Avoid copying of the orignal variable if it is going to be marked as
firstprivate in task regions. For taskloops, still need to copy the
non-trvially copyable variables to correctly construct them upon task
creation.
Summary:
To enable this, two changes are needed:
1) Add an optional attribute `padding` to linalg.conv.
2) Compute if the indices accessing is out of bound in the loops. If so, use the
padding value `0`. Otherwise, use the value derived from load.
In the patch, the padding only works for lowering without other transformations,
e.g., tiling, fusion, etc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75722
Patch based on https://reviews.llvm.org/D75912 by Alexander Shishkin. Thanks
Alexander!
To minimize disruption to existing clients, who may be relying on the fact that
unused references to unresolved symbols do not generate an error, this patch
makes error checking opt-in: Clients can call ExecutionEngine::hasError or
LLVMExecutionEngineGetError to check whether and error has occurred.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75912
Summary:
Add FORCE_ON option to LLVM_ENABLE_ZLIB, which causes a configuration
error if zlib is not found.
Similar to https://reviews.llvm.org/D40050.
Reviewers: hans, thakis, rnk
Subscribers: mgorny, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76110
a tail call
This reapplies the patch in https://reviews.llvm.org/rG1f5b471b8bf4,
which was reverted because it was causing crashes.
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1061289#c2
Check that HasSafePathToCall is true before checking the call is a tail
call.
Original commit message:
Previosly ARC optimizer removed the autoreleaseRV/retainRV pair in the
following code, which caused the object returned by @something to be
placed in the autorelease pool because the call to @something isn't a
tail call:
```
%call = call i8* @something(...)
%2 = call i8* @objc_retainAutoreleasedReturnValue(i8* %call)
%3 = call i8* @objc_autoreleaseReturnValue(i8* %2)
ret i8* %3
```
Fix the bug by checking whether @something is a tail call.
rdar://problem/59275894
Only collapse inner endcf if the outer one belongs to SI_IF.
If it does belong to SI_ELSE then mask being restored in fact
a partial inverse of what we need.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76154
These symbols need to be external (MSVC tools error out if a weak
external points at a symbol that isn't external; this was tried before
but had to be reverted in bc5b7217dc,
and this was originally explicitly fixed in
732eeaf2a9).
If multiple object files have weak symbols with defaults, their
defaults could cause linker errors due to duplicate definitions,
unless the names of the defaults are unique.
GNU binutils handles this by appending the name of another symbol
from the same object file to the name of the default symbol. Try
to implement something similar; before writing the object file,
locate a symbol that should have a unique name and use the name of
that one for making the weak defaults unique.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75989
Summary:
This revision adds lowering of vector.contract to llvm.intr.matrix_multiply.
Note that there is currently a mismatch between the MLIR vector dialect which
expects row-major layout and the LLVM matrix intrinsics which expect column
major layout.
As a consequence, we currently only match a vector.contract with indexing maps
that express column-major matrix multiplication.
Other cases would require additional transposes and it is better to wait for
LLVM intrinsics to provide a per-operation attribute that would specify which
layout is expected.
A separate integration test, not submitted to MLIR core, has independently
verified that correct execution occurs on a 2x2x2 matrix multiplication.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76014
This reapplies the following patch, which was reverted because it caused
neon CodeGen tests to fail:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rGa6150b48cea00ab31e9335cc73770327acc4cb3a
I've added checks to detect half precision neon vectors and avoid
promiting them to vectors of floats.
See the discussion here: https://reviews.llvm.org/rG825235c140e7
Original commit message:
This fixes an assertion in Sema::CreateBuiltinBinOp that fails when one
of the vector operand's element type is a typedef of __fp16.
rdar://problem/55983556
There are some functional regressions and I suspect our
scopes are not as perfectly enclosed as I expected.
Disable it for now.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76148
The SVE ACLE doesn't allow arrays of sizeless types. At the moment
clang accepts the TU:
__SVInt8_t x[2];
but trying to code-generate it triggers the LLVM assertion:
llvm/lib/IR/Type.cpp:588: static llvm::ArrayType* llvm::ArrayType::get(llvm::Type*, uint64_t): Assertion `isValidElementType(ElementType) && "Invalid type for array element!"' failed.
This patch reports an appropriate error instead.
The rules are slightly more restrictive than for general incomplete types.
For example:
struct s;
typedef struct s arr[2];
is valid as far as it goes, whereas arrays of sizeless types are
invalid in all contexts. BuildArrayType therefore needs a specific
check for isSizelessType in addition to the usual handling of
incomplete types.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76082
Since fields can't have sizeless type, it also doesn't make sense
to capture sizeless types by value in lambda expressions. This patch
makes sure that we diagnose that and that we use "sizeless type" rather
"incomplete type" in the associated message. (Both are correct, but
"sizeless type" is more specific and hopefully more user-friendly.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75738
The SVE ACLE doesn't allow fields to have sizeless type. At the moment
clang accepts things like:
struct s { __SVInt8_t x; } y;
but trying to code-generate it leads to LLVM asserts like:
llvm/include/llvm/Support/TypeSize.h:126: uint64_t llvm::TypeSize::getFixedSize() const: Assertion `!IsScalable && "Request for a fixed size on a scalable object"' failed.
This patch adds an associated clang diagnostic.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75737
This reverts commit 5c3117b0a9
This should not be necessary after
7593a480db, and Florian Hahn has confirmed
that the problem no longer reproduces with this patch.
I happened to notice this code because the FIXME talks about
OrderedBasicBlock.
Reviewed By: fhahn, dexonsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76075
If we're extracting the 0'th index of a v16i8 vector we're better off using MOVD than PEXTRB, unless we're storing the value or we require the implicit zero extension of PEXTRB.
The biggest perf diff is on SLM targets where MOVD (uops=1, lat=3 tp=1) is notably faster than PEXTRB (uops=2, lat=5, tp=4).
This matches what we already do for PEXTRW.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76138
Summary:
The direct lowering of vector.broadcast into LLVM has been replaced by
progressive lowering into elementary vector ops. This also required a
small refactoring of a llvm.mlir test that used a direct vector.broadcast
operator (just to define a matmul).
Reviewers: nicolasvasilache, andydavis1, rriddle
Reviewed By: nicolasvasilache
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, rriddle, jpienaar, burmako, shauheen, antiagainst, nicolasvasilache, arpith-jacob, mgester, lucyrfox, liufengdb, Joonsoo, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76143
Summary:
SLPVectorizer try to vectorize list of scalar instructions of the same type,
instructions already vectorized are rejected through isValidElementType().
Without this patch, tryToVectorizeList() will first try to determine vectorization
factor of a list of Instructions before checking whether each instruction has unsupported
type or not. For instructions already vectorized for SVE, it will crash at getVectorElementSize(),
where it try to return a fixed size.
This patch make sure invalid element types are rejected before trying to get vectorization
factor. This make sure we are not trying to vectorize instructions already vectorized.
Reviewers: sdesmalen, efriedma, spatel, RKSimon, ABataev, apazos, rengolin
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: tschuett, hiraditya, rkruppe, psnobl, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76017
This is another intermediate step for PR44213
(https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44213).
This stores the SDK *name* in the debug info, to make it possible to
`-fdebug-prefix-map`-replace the sysroot with a recognizable string
and allowing the debugger to find a fitting SDK relative to itself,
not the machine the executable was compiled on.
rdar://problem/51645582
Back in D42616, we switched our default nop length from 15 to 10 bytes because some platforms have painful decode stalls when encountering multiple instruction prefixes. (10 byte long nops come from the fact that prefixes are used to pad after 8 bytes, and some platforms have issues w/more than two prefixes.)
Based on Agner's guides, it appears to be the case that modern Intel (SandyBridge and later) can decode an arbitrary number of prefixes without issue. Intel's guide only provides up to 9 bytes; I read that as providing a safe default for all their chips. Older chips and Atom series have serious decode stalls. I can't find a conclusive reference beyond those two.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75945
For context, the proposed RISC-V bit manipulation extension has a subset
of instructions which require one of two SubtargetFeatures to be
enabled, 'zbb' or 'zbp', and there is no defined feature which both of
these can imply to use as a constraint either (see comments in D65649).
AssemblerPredicates allow multiple SubtargetFeatures to be declared in
the "AssemblerCondString" field, separated by commas, and this means
that the two features must both be enabled. There is no equivalent to
say that _either_ feature X or feature Y must be enabled, short of
creating a dummy SubtargetFeature for this purpose and having features X
and Y imply the new feature.
To solve the case where X or Y is needed without adding a new feature,
and to better match a typical TableGen style, this replaces the existing
"AssemblerCondString" with a dag "AssemblerCondDag" which represents the
same information. Two operators are defined for use with
AssemblerCondDag, "all_of", which matches the current behaviour, and
"any_of", which adds the new proposed ORing features functionality.
This was originally proposed in the RFC at
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-February/139138.html
Changes to all current backends are mechanical to support the replaced
functionality, and are NFCI.
At this stage, it is illegal to combine features with ands and ors in a
single AssemblerCondDag. I suspect this case is sufficiently rare that
adding more complex changes to support it are unnecessary.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74338
Summary:
This patch will filter attributes to only preserve those that are usefull.
In the case of NoAlias it is filtered out not because it isn't usefull
but because it is incorrect to preserve it as it is only valdi for the
duration of the function.
Reviewers: jdoerfert
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Subscribers: jdoerfert, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75828
Alexey Bataev