The patch is generated using this command:
$ tools/extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py -fix \
-checks=-*,llvm-namespace-comment -header-filter='llvm/.*|clang/.*' \
work/llvm/tools/clang
To reduce churn, not touching namespaces spanning less than 10 lines.
llvm-svn: 240270
Based on previous discussion on the mailing list, clang currently lacks support
for C99 partial re-initialization behavior:
Reference: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-dev/2013-April/029188.html
Reference: http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/dr_253.htm
This patch attempts to fix this problem.
Given the following code snippet,
struct P1 { char x[6]; };
struct LP1 { struct P1 p1; };
struct LP1 l = { .p1 = { "foo" }, .p1.x[2] = 'x' };
// this example is adapted from the example for "struct fred x[]" in DR-253;
// currently clang produces in l: { "\0\0x" },
// whereas gcc 4.8 produces { "fox" };
// with this fix, clang will also produce: { "fox" };
Differential Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5789
llvm-svn: 239446
Currently, the NaN values emitted for MIPS architectures do not cover
non-IEEE754-2008 compliant case. This change fixes the issue.
Patch by Vladimir Radosavljevic.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7882
llvm-svn: 230653
When visiting AssignmentOps, keep evaluating after a failure (when possible) in
order to identify overflow in subexpressions.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D1238
llvm-svn: 228202
Comparing the address of an object with an incomplete type might return
true with a 'distinct' object if the former has a size of zero.
However, such an object should compare unequal with null.
llvm-svn: 224040
OpenCL v2.0 s6.5.5 restricts conversion of pointers to different address spaces:
- the named address spaces (__global, __local, and __private) => __generic - implicitly converted;
- __generic => named - with an explicit cast;
- named <=> named - disallowed;
- __constant <=> any other - disallowed.
llvm-svn: 222834
This is a new form of expression of the form:
(expr op ... op expr)
where one of the exprs is a parameter pack. It expands into
(expr1 op (expr2onwards op ... op expr))
(and likewise if the pack is on the right). The non-pack operand can be
omitted; in that case, an empty pack gives a fallback value or an error,
depending on the operator.
llvm-svn: 221573
complete object to a pointer to the start of another complete object does
not evaluate to the constant 'false'. All other comparisons between the
addresses of subobjects of distinct complete objects still do.
llvm-svn: 220343
and !=) to support mixed complex and real operand types.
This requires removing an assert from SemaChecking, and adding support
both to the constant evaluator and the code generator to synthesize the
imaginary part when needed. This seemed somewhat cleaner than having
just the comparison operators force real-to-complex conversions.
I've added test cases for these operations. I'm really terrified that
there were *no* tests in-tree which exercised this.
This turned up when trying to build R after my change to the complex
type lowering.
llvm-svn: 219570
operators where one type is a C complex type, and to emit both the
efficient and correct implementation for complex arithmetic according to
C11 Annex G using this extra information.
For both multiply and divide the old code was writing a long-hand
reduced version of the math without any of the special handling of inf
and NaN recommended by the standard here. Instead of putting more
complexity here, this change does what GCC does which is to emit
a libcall for the fully general case.
However, the old code also failed to do the proper minimization of the
set of operations when there was a mixed complex and real operation. In
those cases, C provides a spec for much more minimal operations that are
valid. Clang now emits the exact suggested operations. This change isn't
*just* about performance though, without minimizing these operations, we
again lose the correct handling of infinities and NaNs. It is critical
that this happen in the frontend based on assymetric type operands to
complex math operations.
The performance implications of this change aren't trivial either. I've
run a set of benchmarks in Eigen, an open source mathematics library
that makes heavy use of complex. While a few have slowed down due to the
libcall being introduce, most sped up and some by a huge amount: up to
100% and 140%.
In order to make all of this work, also match the algorithm in the
constant evaluator to the one in the runtime library. Currently it is
a broken port of the simplifications from C's Annex G to the long-hand
formulation of the algorithm.
Splitting this patch up is very hard because none of this works without
the AST change to preserve non-complex operands. Sorry for the enormous
change.
Follow-up changes will include support for sinking the libcalls onto
cold paths in common cases and fastmath improvements to allow more
aggressive backend folding.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5698
llvm-svn: 219557
Assertion failed: "Computed __func__ length differs from type!"
Reworked PredefinedExpr representation with internal StringLiteral field for function declaration.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5365
llvm-svn: 219393
Richard noted in the review of r217349 that extra handling of
__builtin_assume_aligned inside of the expression evaluator was needed. He was
right, and this should address the concerns raised, namely:
1. The offset argument to __builtin_assume_aligned can have side effects, and
we need to make sure that all arguments are properly evaluated.
2. If the alignment assumption does not hold, that introduces undefined
behavior, and undefined behavior cannot appear inside a constexpr.
and hopefully the diagnostics produced are detailed enough to explain what is
going on.
llvm-svn: 218992
Adding handling of __builtin_assume_aligned to IntExprEvaluator does not make
sense because __builtin_assume_aligned returns a pointer (not an integer).
Thanks to Richard for figuring out why this was not doing anything.
I'll add this back in a better place (PointerExprEvaluator perhaps).
llvm-svn: 218958
constexpr function. Part of this fix is a tentative fix for an as-yet-unfiled
core issue (we're missing a prohibition against reading mutable members from
unions via a trivial constructor/assignment, since that doesn't perform an
lvalue-to-rvalue conversion on the members).
llvm-svn: 217852
This makes use of the recently-added @llvm.assume intrinsic to implement a
__builtin_assume(bool) intrinsic (to provide additional information to the
optimizer). This hooks up __assume in MS-compatibility mode to mirror
__builtin_assume (the semantics have been intentionally kept compatible), and
implements GCC's __builtin_assume_aligned as assume((p - o) & mask == 0). LLVM
now contains special logic to deal with assumptions of this form.
llvm-svn: 217349
Changes diagnostic options, language standard options, diagnostic identifiers, diagnostic wording to use c++14 instead of c++1y. It also modifies related test cases to use the updated diagnostic wording.
llvm-svn: 215982
or a class derived from T. We already supported this when initializing
_Atomic(T) from T for most (and maybe all) other reasonable values of T.
llvm-svn: 214390
The class seems to have an invariant that Entries is non-empty if
Invalid is false. It appears this method was previously private, and
all internal uses checked Invalid. Now there is an external caller, so
check Invalid to avoid array OOB underflow.
Fixes PR20420.
llvm-svn: 213816
This is a follow-up to an IRC conversation with Richard last night; __assume
does not evaluate its argument, and so the argument should not contribute to
whether (__assume(e), constant) can be used where a constant is required.
llvm-svn: 213267
This is a follow-up to David's r211677. For the following code,
we would end up referring to 'foo' in the initializer for 'arr',
and then fail to link, because 'foo' is dllimport and needs to be
accessed through the __imp_?foo.
__declspec(dllimport) extern const char foo[];
const char* f() {
static const char* const arr[] = { foo };
return arr[0];
}
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4299
llvm-svn: 211736
The C++ language requires that the address of a function be the same
across all translation units. To make __declspec(dllimport) useful,
this means that a dllimported function must also obey this rule. MSVC
implements this by dynamically querying the import address table located
in the linked executable. This means that the address of such a
function in C++ is not constant (which violates other rules).
However, the C language has no notion of ODR nor does it permit dynamic
initialization whatsoever. This requires implementations to _not_
dynamically query the import address table and instead utilize a wrapper
function that will be synthesized by the linker which will eventually
query the import address table. The effect this has is, to say the
least, perplexing.
Consider the following C program:
__declspec(dllimport) void f(void);
typedef void (*fp)(void);
static const fp var = &f;
const fp fun() { return &f; }
int main() { return fun() == var; }
MSVC will statically initialize "var" with the address of the wrapper
function and "fun" returns the address of the actual imported function.
This means that "main" will return false!
Note that LLVM's optimizers are strong enough to figure out that "main"
should return true. However, this result is dependent on having
optimizations enabled!
N.B. This change also permits the usage of dllimport declarators inside
of template arguments; they are sufficiently constant for such a
purpose. Add tests to make sure we don't regress here.
llvm-svn: 211677
The address of dllimport functions can be accessed one of two ways:
- Through the IAT which is symbolically referred to with a symbol
starting with __imp_.
- Via the wrapper-function which ends up calling through the __imp_
symbol.
The problem with using the wrapper-function is that it's address will
not compare as equal in all translation units. Specifically, it will
compare unequally with the translation unit which defines the function.
This fixes PR19955.
llvm-svn: 211570
The address of dllimport variables isn't something that can be
meaningfully used in a constexpr context and isn't suitable for
evaluation at load-time. They require loads from memory to properly
evaluate.
This fixes PR19955.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4250
llvm-svn: 211568
expression of array-of-unknown-bound type, don't try to complete the array
bound, and return the alignment of the element type rather than 1.
llvm-svn: 210608
Summary:
Gracefully fail to evaluate a constant expression if its type is
unknown, rather than failing an assertion trying to access the type.
Reviewers: klimek
Reviewed By: klimek
CC: chandlerc, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D3075
llvm-svn: 203950
Alexander Kornienko