This fixes the https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41355.
Previously with -r we printed relocation section name instead of the target section name.
It was like this: "RELOCATION RECORDS FOR [.rel.text]"
Now it is: "RELOCATION RECORDS FOR [.text]"
Also when relocation target section has more than one relocation section,
we did not combine the output. Now we do.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61312
llvm-svn: 360143
It was previously writing this temporary snippet to file,
then reading it back, but leaving the tmp file in place.
This is both unefficient, and results in huge garbage pileup
in /tmp.
One would have thought it would have been caught during D60317..
llvm-svn: 360138
In some cases it is useful to explicitly set symbol's st_name value.
For example, I am using it in a patch for LLD to remove the broken
binary from a test case and replace it with a YAML test.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61180
llvm-svn: 360137
Summary:
This reverts commit r360106.
The revisioin causes llvm-tblgen to hang while generating info for
RISCV.td. The root cause might be in the RISCV.td definition but I don't
know enough about this to investigate further.
Command that starts hangning after r360106:
`llvm-build/bin/llvm-tblgen -I llvm/include -I llvm/tools/clang/include -I llvm/lib/Target/RISCV -gen-instr-info llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCV.td`
Reviewers: sammccall, yan_luo, craig.topper, gribozavr
Reviewed By: gribozavr
Subscribers: PkmX, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61632
llvm-svn: 360136
Basic "revectorization" combine, we can probably do more opcodes here but it can be a tricky cost-benefit depending on where the subvectors came from - but this case helps shuffle combining.
llvm-svn: 360134
It makes the --plugin-opt=obj-path= and --plugin-opt=thinlto-index-only=
behavior more consistent - the files will be created in the
BitcodeFiles.empty() case, but I assume whether it behaves this way is
not required by anyone.
LTOObj->run() cannot run with empty BitcodeFiles. There would be an error:
ld.lld: error: No available targets are compatible with triple ""
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61635
llvm-svn: 360129
The tests fork.text, fork.sigusr.test and fork-ubsan.test intermittently
fail on the aarch64 buildbots. Input gathered from the fork.sigusr.test
implies that when the builder is under load the timeout value is not
sufficient. The fork-ubsan.test doesn't have a timeout and I think is not
always finding the error after 10000 runs so I've marked it as unsupported
for now.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61449
llvm-svn: 360126
This *APPEARS* to fix a *very* infuriating issue of Yaml's being corrupted,
partially written, truncated. Or at least i'm not seeing the issue
on a new benchmark sweep.
The issue is somewhat rare, happens maybe once in 1000 benchmarks.
Which means there are up to hundreds of broken benchmarks
for a full x86 sweep in a single mode.
llvm-svn: 360124
Summary:
No test case because I don't know of a way to trigger this, but I
accidentally caused this to fail while working on a different change.
Change-Id: I8015aa447fe27163cc4e4902205a203bd44bf7e3
Reviewers: arsenm, rampitec
Subscribers: kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61490
llvm-svn: 360123
Keep looking for decl-specifiers after an unknown identifier. Don't
issue diagnostics about an error type specifier conflicting with later
type specifiers.
llvm-svn: 360117
Accidentally taking the size of a struct-pointer type or a value of this type
is more common than explicitly using the & operator for the value. This patch
extends the check to include these cases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61260
llvm-svn: 360114
This is based on D54720 by Sean Fertile.
When accessing a global symbol which is not defined in the translation unit,
compilers will generate instructions that load the address from the toc entry.
If the symbol is defined, non-preemptable, and addressable with a 32-bit
signed offset from the toc pointer, the address can be computed
directly. e.g.
addis 3, 2, .LC0@toc@ha # R_PPC64_TOC16_HA
ld 3, .LC0@toc@l(3) # R_PPC64_TOC16_LO_DS, load the address from a .toc entry
ld/lwa 3, 0(3) # load the value from the address
.section .toc,"aw",@progbits
.LC0: .tc var[TC],var
can be relaxed to
addis 3,2,var@toc@ha # this may be relaxed to a nop,
addi 3,3,var@toc@l # then this becomes addi 3,2,var@toc
ld/lwa 3, 0(3) # load the value from the address
We can delete the test ppc64-got-indirect.s as its purpose is covered by
newly added ppc64-toc-relax.s and ppc64-toc-relax-constants.s
Reviewed By: ruiu, sfertile
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60958
llvm-svn: 360112
Summary:
If fneg lowering for fsub -0.0, x fails we currently fall back to treating it as an fsub. This has different behavior for nans than the xor with sign bit trick we normally try to do. On X86, the xor trick for double fails fast-isel in 32-bit mode with sse2 due to 64 bit integer types not being available. With -O2 we would always use an xorpd for this case. If we use subsd, this creates an observable behavior difference between -O0 and -O2. So fall back to SelectionDAG if we can't fast-isel it, that way SelectionDAG will use the xorpd.
I believe this patch is restoring the behavior prior to r345295 from last October. This was missed then because our fast isel case in 32-bit mode aborted fast-isel earlier for another reason. But I've added new tests to cover that.
Reviewers: andrew.w.kaylor, cameron.mcinally, spatel, efriedma
Reviewed By: cameron.mcinally
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61622
llvm-svn: 360111
The only known user of this relocation type and symbol type is
the debug info sections, but we were not testing the `--relocatable`
output path.
This change adds a minimal test case to cover relocations against
section symbols includes `--relocatable` output.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61623
llvm-svn: 360110
TypedDINodeRef<T> is a redundant wrapper of Metadata * that is actually a T *.
Accordingly, change DI{Node,Scope,Type}Ref uses to DI{Node,Scope,Type} * or their const variants.
This allows us to delete many resolve() calls that clutter the code.
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61369
llvm-svn: 360108
Fixes the main issue in PR41693
When both modes are used, two functions are created:
`sancov.module_ctor`, `sancov.module_ctor.$LastUnique`, where
$LastUnique is the current LastUnique counter that may be different in
another module.
`sancov.module_ctor.$LastUnique` belongs to the comdat group of the same
name (due to the non-null third field of the ctor in llvm.global_ctors).
COMDAT group section [ 9] `.group' [sancov.module_ctor] contains 6 sections:
[Index] Name
[ 10] .text.sancov.module_ctor
[ 11] .rela.text.sancov.module_ctor
[ 12] .text.sancov.module_ctor.6
[ 13] .rela.text.sancov.module_ctor.6
[ 23] .init_array.2
[ 24] .rela.init_array.2
# 2 problems:
# 1) If sancov.module_ctor in this module is discarded, this group
# has a relocation to a discarded section. ld.bfd and gold will
# error. (Another issue: it is silently accepted by lld)
# 2) The comdat group has an unstable name that may be different in
# another translation unit. Even if the linker allows the dangling relocation
# (with --noinhibit-exec), there will be many undesired .init_array entries
COMDAT group section [ 25] `.group' [sancov.module_ctor.6] contains 2 sections:
[Index] Name
[ 26] .init_array.2
[ 27] .rela.init_array.2
By using different module ctor names, the associated comdat group names
will also be different and thus stable across modules.
Reviewed By: morehouse, phosek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61510
llvm-svn: 360107
The CPlusPlus Language plugin is unused in lldbBreakpoint. We should just remove
it.
A great follow up to this change would be to remove the dependency on the ObjC
language plugin, but that is actually used and requires some refactoring.
llvm-svn: 360105
The UnaryOperator class was originally placed in llvm/IR/Instructions.h, with the other UnaryInstructions. However, I'm now thinking that it makes more sense for it to live in llvm/IR/InstrTypes.h, with BinaryOperator. It is more similar to BinaryOperator than any of the other UnaryInstructions.
NFCI
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61614
llvm-svn: 360103
The FR32/FR64/VR128/VR256 register classes don't contain the upper 16 registers. For most cases we use the default implementation which will find any register class that contains the register in question if the VT is legal for the register class. But if the VT is i32 or i64, we won't find a matching register class and will instead up in the code modified in this patch.
If the requested register is x/y/zmm16-31 we weren't returning a register class that contains those registers and will hit an assertion in the caller.
To fix this, I've changed to use the extended register class instead. I don't believe we need a subtarget check to see if avx512 is enabled. The default implementation just pick whatever register class it finds first. I checked and we currently pick FR32X for XMM0 with an f32 type using the default implementation regardless of whether avx512 is enabled. So I assume its it is ok to do the same for i32.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61457
llvm-svn: 360102
Summary:
When there are multiple instances of a forward decl record type, only the first one is emitted with a type index, because
the type is added to a map with a null type index. Avoid this by reordering so that forward decl types aren't added to the map.
Reviewers: rnk
Subscribers: aprantl, hiraditya, arphaman, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61460
llvm-svn: 360101
This matches the behavior of the old pass manager. There are some
targets that don't have target machine at all (e.g. le32, spir) which
whose tests would never run with new pass manager. Similarly, we would
need to disable tests for targets that are disabled.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58374
llvm-svn: 360100
This generally follows what other targets do. I don't completely
understand why the special case for tail calls existed in the first
place; even when the code was committed in r105413, call lowering didn't
work in the way described in the comments.
Stack protector lowering breaks if the register copies are not glued to
a tail call: we have to insert the stack protector check before the tail
call, and we choose the location based on the assumption that all
physical register dependencies of a tail call are adjacent to the tail
call. (See FindSplitPointForStackProtector.) This is sort of fragile,
but I don't see any reason to break that assumption.
I'm guessing nobody has seen this before just because it's hard to
convince the scheduler to actually schedule the code in a way that
breaks; even without the glue, the only computation that could actually
be scheduled after the register copies is the computation of the call
address, and the scheduler usually prefers to schedule that before the
copies anyway.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41417
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60427
llvm-svn: 360099
George Rimar