Commit Graph

13 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Nikita Popov 9fd02a71a3 Revert "[ValueTracking] Improve isKnowNonZero for Ints"
This reverts commit 3b137a4956.

As reported in https://reviews.llvm.org/D60846, this is causing
miscompiles.

llvm-svn: 360260
2019-05-08 14:50:01 +00:00
Dan Robertson 3b137a4956 [ValueTracking] Improve isKnowNonZero for Ints
Improve isKnownNonZero for integers in order to improve cttz
optimizations.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60846

llvm-svn: 360222
2019-05-08 02:25:08 +00:00
Sanjay Patel d3cfaae243 [LICM] auto-generate complete test checks; NFC
llvm-svn: 359881
2019-05-03 13:25:06 +00:00
Eric Christopher cee313d288 Revert "Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass.""
The reversion apparently deleted the test/Transforms directory.

Will be re-reverting again.

llvm-svn: 358552
2019-04-17 04:52:47 +00:00
Eric Christopher a863435128 Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass."
As it's causing some bot failures (and per request from kbarton).

This reverts commit r358543/ab70da07286e618016e78247e4a24fcb84077fda.

llvm-svn: 358546
2019-04-17 02:12:23 +00:00
Max Kazantsev 69f6dfa0f8 [LICM] Use ICFLoopSafetyInfo in LICM
This patch makes LICM use `ICFLoopSafetyInfo` that is a smarter version
of LoopSafetyInfo that leverages power of Implicit Control Flow Tracking
to keep track of throwing instructions and give less pessimistic answers
to queries related to throws.

The ICFLoopSafetyInfo itself has been introduced in rL344601. This patch
enables it in LICM only.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50377
Reviewed By: apilipenko

llvm-svn: 346201
2018-11-06 02:44:49 +00:00
Max Kazantsev b2724d9af8 [NFC] Add Requires: asserts where needed
llvm-svn: 342108
2018-09-13 04:43:24 +00:00
Max Kazantsev 0e0e19c980 [NFC] Use expensive asserts in relevant LICM tests
llvm-svn: 342107
2018-09-13 04:00:39 +00:00
Max Kazantsev 5a10d127b9 [AliasSetTracker] Do not treat experimental_guard intrinsic as memory writing instruction
The `experimental_guard` intrinsic has memory write semantics to model the thread-exiting
logic, but does not do any actual writes to memory. Currently, `AliasSetTracker` treats it as a
normal memory write. As result, a loop-invariant load cannot be hoisted out of loop because
the guard may possibly alias with it.

This patch makes `AliasSetTracker` so that it doesn't treat guards as memory writes.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50497
Reviewed By: reames

llvm-svn: 339753
2018-08-15 06:21:02 +00:00
Max Kazantsev c9dca6df78 [NFC] Add some tests on mustexec
llvm-svn: 339219
2018-08-08 04:40:47 +00:00
Serguei Katkov 5095883fe9 [LICM] Extend the MustExecute scope
CanProveNotTakenFirstIteration utility does not handle the case when
condition of the branch is a constant. Add its handling.

Reviewers: reames, anna, mkazantsev
Reviewed By: reames
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46996

llvm-svn: 332695
2018-05-18 04:56:28 +00:00
Philip Reames 8a106272e8 [LICM/mustexec] Extend first iteration must execute logic to fcmps
This builds on the work from https://reviews.llvm.org/D44287. It turned out supporting fcmp was much easier than I realized, so let's do that now.

As an aside, our -O3 handling of a floating point IVs leaves a lot to be desired. We do convert the float IV to an integer IV, but do so late enough that many other optimizations are missed (e.g. we don't vectorize).

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44542

llvm-svn: 327722
2018-03-16 16:33:49 +00:00
Philip Reames a21d5f1e18 [LICM] Ignore exits provably not taken on first iteration when computing must execute
It is common to have conditional exits within a loop which are known not to be taken on some iterations, but not necessarily all. This patches extends our reasoning around guaranteed to execute (used when establishing whether it's safe to dereference a location from the preheader) to handle the case where an exit is known not to be taken on the first iteration and the instruction of interest *is* known to be taken on the first iteration.

This case comes up in two major ways:
* If we have a range check which we've been unable to eliminate, we frequently know that it doesn't fail on the first iteration.
* Pass ordering. We may have a check which will be eliminated through some sequence of other passes, but depending on the exact pass sequence we might never actually do so or we might miss other optimizations from passes run before the check is finally eliminated.

The initial version (here) is implemented via InstSimplify. At the moment, it catches a few cases, but misses a lot too. I added test cases for missing cases in InstSimplify which I'll follow up on separately. Longer term, we should probably wire SCEV through to here to get much smarter loop aware simplification of the first iteration predicate.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44287

llvm-svn: 327664
2018-03-15 21:04:28 +00:00