This is repeatably worth 0.3s compile time on MathExtras.cpp. This is a
very popular header, and it basically pulls all Intel intrinsics into
every LLVM TU. Let's not do that.
llvm-svn: 335406
Summary:
This affects what sections are displayed as "DATA" in llvm-objdump.
The other user llvm-size is unaffected.
Before, a "TEXT" section is also "DATA", which seems weird.
The sh_flags condition matches that of bfd's SEC_DATA but the sh_type
condition uses (== SHF_PROGBITS) instead of bfd's (!= SHT_NOBITS).
bfd's SEC_DATA is not appealing as so many sections will be shown as DATA.
Reviewers: jyknight, Bigcheese
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48472
llvm-svn: 335405
Previously, to support (%dx) we left a wide open hole in our 16-bit memory address checking. This let this address value be used with any instruction without error in the parser. It would later fail in the encoder with an assertion failure on debug builds and who knows what on release builds.
This patch passes the mnemonic down to the memory operand parsing function so we can allow the (%dx) form only on specific instructions.
llvm-svn: 335403
Fixes include:
- fix all lint errors
- add code that will automatically register and LLDB command classes by detecting the classes and any classes that have a "register_lldb_command" function
- automatically fill in the correct module name when registering commands
- automatically fill in the class name when registering command
llvm-svn: 335401
This gets rid of a bunch of weird special cases; instead, just use SCEV
rewriting for everything. In addition to being simpler, this fixes a
bug where we would use the wrong stride in certain edge cases.
The one bit I'm not quite sure about is the trip count handling,
specifically the FIXME about overflow. In general, I think we need to
widen the exit condition, but that's probably not profitable if the new
type isn't legal, so we probably need a check somewhere. That said, I
don't think I'm making the existing problem any worse.
As a followup to this, a bunch of IV-related code in root-finding could
be cleaned up; with SCEV-based rewriting, there isn't any reason to
assume a loop will have exactly one or two PHI nodes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45191
llvm-svn: 335400
This allows us to check these:
-16-bit addressing doesn't support scale so we should error if we find one there.
-Multiplying ESP/RSP by a scale even if the scale is 1 should be an error because ESP/RSP can't be an index.
llvm-svn: 335398
By default, the second register gets assigned to the index register slot. But ESP can't be an index register so we need to swap it with the other register.
There's still a slight bug that we allow [EAX+ESP*1]. The existence of the multiply even though its with 1 should force ESP to the index register and trigger an error, but it doesn't currently.
llvm-svn: 335394
Summary:
Pick D42933 back up, and make NSInteger/NSUInteger with %zu/%zi specifiers on Darwin warn only in pedantic mode. The default -Wformat recently started warning for the following code because of the added support for analysis for the '%zi' specifier.
NSInteger i = NSIntegerMax;
NSLog(@"max NSInteger = %zi", i);
The problem is that on armv7 %zi is 'long', and NSInteger is typedefed to 'int' in Foundation. We should avoid this warning as it's inconvenient to our users: it's target specific (happens only on armv7 and not arm64), and breaks their existing code. We should also silence the warning for the '%zu' specifier to ensure consistency. This is acceptable because Darwin guarantees that, despite the unfortunate choice of typedef, sizeof(size_t) == sizeof(NS[U]Integer), the warning is therefore noisy for pedantic reasons. Once this is in I'll update public documentation.
Related discussion on cfe-dev:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2018-May/058050.html
<rdar://36874921&40501559>
Reviewers: ahatanak, vsapsai, alexshap, aaron.ballman, javed.absar, jfb, rjmccall
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, aheejin, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47290
llvm-svn: 335393
The DispatchUnit is no longer a dependency of RCU, so this patch removes a
stale include and forward decl. This patch also cleans up some comments.
llvm-svn: 335392
We likely gave up on folding some select-of-constants patterns in
IR with rL331486, and we need to recover those in the DAG.
The tests without select are based on our current DAGCombiner
optimizations for select-of-constants.
llvm-svn: 335391
We likely gave up on folding some select-of-constants patterns in
IR with rL331486, and we need to recover those in the DAG.
The tests without select are based on our current DAGCombiner
optimizations for select-of-constants.
llvm-svn: 335390
These test cases show that the "(select (and (x , 0x1) == 0), y, (z ^ y) ) -> (-(and (x , 0x1)) & z ) ^ y" doesn't work if the select condition is changed to (and (x, 0x1) != 1)
llvm-svn: 335389
Since we are now producing a summary also for regular LTO builds, we
need to run the NameAnonGlobals pass in those cases as well (the
summary cannot handle anonymous globals).
See https://reviews.llvm.org/D34156 for details on the original change.
This reverts commit 6c9ee4a4a438a8059aacc809b2dd57128fccd6b3.
llvm-svn: 335385
The second register is the index register and should only be %si or %di if used with a base register. And in that case the base register should be %bp or %bx.
This makes us compatible with gas.
We do still need to support both orders with Intel syntax which uses [bp+si] and [si+bp]
llvm-svn: 335384
Speculative fix for the interface definition of __ubsan_on_report for
the Windows bots:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-windows/builds/30528
lib\ubsan\ubsan_interface.inc(55): error C2065: '__ubsan_on_report':
undeclared identifier
INTERCEPT_SANITIZER_WEAK_FUNCTION was the wrong macro to use to begin
with because __ubsan_on_report isn't weak. Reading through that macro,
it's still not clear to me why there is an undefined reference, though,
because it appears to define a dummy __ubsan_on_report shim.
llvm-svn: 335383
members of dependent contexts.
This permits cases where the names before and after the '::' in a
dependent inherited constructor using-declaration do not match, but
where we can nonetheless tell when parsing the template that a
constructor is being named. Under (open) core language DR 2070, such
cases will probably be ill-formed, but r335182 does not quite give
that result and didn't intend to change this, so restore the old
behavior for now.
llvm-svn: 335381
(%bp) can't be encoded without a displacement. The encoding is instead used for displacement alone. So a 1 byte displacement of 0 must be used. But if there is an index register we can encode without a displacement.
llvm-svn: 335379
If the shuffle is required for the reduced structures/big data type,
current code may cause compiler crash because of the loading of the
aggregate values. Patch fixes this problem.
llvm-svn: 335377
Introduce -Wquoted-include-in-framework-header, which should fire a warning
whenever a quote include appears in a framework header and suggest a fix-it.
For instance, for header A.h added in the tests, this is how the warning looks
like:
./A.framework/Headers/A.h:2:10: warning: double-quoted include "A0.h" in framework header, expected angle-bracketed instead [-Wquoted-include-in-framework-header]
#include "A0.h"
^~~~~~
<A/A0.h>
./A.framework/Headers/A.h:3:10: warning: double-quoted include "B.h" in framework header, expected angle-bracketed instead [-Wquoted-include-in-framework-header]
#include "B.h"
^~~~~
<B.h>
This helps users to prevent frameworks from using local headers when in fact
they should be targetting system level ones.
The warning is off by default.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47157
rdar://problem/37077034
llvm-svn: 335375
This if/elseif structure seems to be missing this case.
Previously, this would report a size of 1 pointer too small.
This didn't really change anything besides failing to reclaim
a very small amount of memory.
llvm-svn: 335372
Add support to the ubsan runtime for reporting diagnostics to a monitor
process (e.g a debugger).
The Xcode IDE uses this by setting a breakpoint on __ubsan_on_report and
collecting diagnostic information via __ubsan_get_current_report_data,
which it then surfaces to users in the editor UI.
Testing for this functionality already exists in upstream lldb, here:
lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/functionalities/ubsan
Apart from that, this is `ninja check-{a,ub}san` clean.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48446
llvm-svn: 335371
Summary:
In LoopUnswitch when replacing a branch Parent -> Succ with a conditional
branch Parent -> True & Parent->False, the DomTree updates should insert an edge for
each of True/False if True/False are different than Succ, and delete Parent->Succ edge
if both are different. The comparison with Succ appears to be incorect,
it's comparing with Parent instead.
There is no test failing either before or after this change, but it seems to me this is
the right way to do the update.
Reviewers: chandlerc, kuhar
Subscribers: sanjoy, jlebar, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48457
llvm-svn: 335369
Enable tryToVectorizeList to support InstructionsState alternate opcode patterns at a root (build vector etc.) as well as further down the vectorization tree.
NOTE: This patch reduces some of the debug reporting if there are opcode mismatches - I can try to add it back if it proves a problem. But it could get rather messy trying to provide equivalent verbose debug strings via getSameOpcode etc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48488
llvm-svn: 335364
Summary:
Remove explicit stages and introduce a list of stages.
A pipeline should be composed of an arbitrary list of stages, and not any
predefined list of stages in the Backend. The Backend should not know of any
particular stage, rather it should only be concerned that it has a list of
stages, and that those stages will fulfill the contract of what it means to be
a Stage (namely pre/post/execute a given instruction).
For now, we leave the original set of stages defined in the Backend ctor;
however, I imagine these will be moved out at a later time.
This patch makes an adjustment to the semantics of Stage::isReady.
Specifically, what the Backend really needs to know is if a Stage has
unfinished work. With that said, it is more appropriately renamed
Stage::hasWorkToComplete(). This change will clean up the check in
Backend::run(), allowing us to query each stage to see if there is unfinished
work, regardless of what subclass a stage might be. I feel that this change
simplifies the semantics too, but that's a subjective statement.
Given how RetireStage and ExecuteStage handle data in their preExecute(), I've
had to change the order of Retire and Execute in our stage list. Retire must
complete any of its preExecute actions before ExecuteStage's preExecute can
take control. This is mainly because both stages utilize the RCU. In the
meantime, I want to see if I can adjust that or remove that coupling.
Reviewers: andreadb, RKSimon, courbet
Reviewed By: andreadb
Subscribers: tschuett, gbedwell, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46907
llvm-svn: 335361
Summary:
Previously, the strings matched LSP completion pretty closely.
The completion label was a single string, for instance. This made
implementing completion itself easy but makes it hard to use the names
in other way, e.g. pretty-printed name in synthesized
documentation/hover.
It also limits our introspection into completion items, which can only
be as precise as the indexed symbols. This change is a prerequisite to
improvements to overload bundling which need to inspect e.g. signature
structure.
Reviewers: ioeric
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48475
llvm-svn: 335360
Reid Kleckner