Previously we wrote line information and file checksum
information, but we did not write information about inlinee
lines and functions. This patch adds support for that.
llvm-svn: 301936
Strip on OpenBSD does not correctly handle an empty .eh_frame section
and produces broken binaries in that case. Currently lld creates such
an empty .eh_frame section, despite the fact that the OpenBSD crtend.o
explicitly inserts a terminator. The Linux LSB "standard":
https://refspecs.linuxfoundation.org/LSB_5.0.0/LSB-Core-generic/LSB-Core-generic/ehframechpt.html#EHFRAME
explicitly says that
The .eh_frame section shall contain 1 or more Call Frame Information (CFI) records.
This diff includes a test that specifically tests the issue I'm seeing
on OpenBSD.
Patch by Mark Kettenis!
llvm-svn: 301931
This was originally checked in here:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL301923
And reverted here:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL301924
Because there's a clang test that would fail after this. I fixed/removed the
offending CHECK lines in:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL301928
So let's try this again. Original commit message:
This is the fold that causes the infinite loop in BoringSSL
(https://github.com/google/boringssl/blob/master/crypto/cipher/e_rc2.c)
when we fix instcombine demanded bits to prefer 'not' ops as in https://reviews.llvm.org/D32255.
There are 2 or 3 problems with dyn_castNotVal, and I don't think we can
reinstate https://reviews.llvm.org/D32255 until dyn_castNotVal is completely eliminated.
1. As shown here, it transforms 'not' into random xor. This transform is harmful to SCEV and codegen because 'not' can often be folded while random xor cannot.
2. It does not transform vector constants. This is actually a good thing, but if you don't believe the above argument, then we shouldn't have excluded vectors.
3. It tries to avoid transforming not(not(X)). That's nice, but it doesn't match the greedy nature of instcombine. If we DeMorganize a pattern that has an extra 'not' in it: ~(~(~X) & Y) --> (~X | ~Y)
That's just another case of DeMorgan, so we should trust that we'll fold that pattern too: (~X | ~ Y) --> ~(X & Y)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32665
llvm-svn: 301929
The fast reset for large memory regions is not working
only on windows. So enable it for Go/linux/darwin/freebsd.
See https://github.com/golang/go/issues/20139
for background and motivation.
Based on idea by Josh Bleecher Snyder.
llvm-svn: 301927
Summary:
TSan's Android `__get_tls()` and `TLS_SLOT_TSAN` can be used by other sanitizers as well (see D32649), this change moves them to sanitizer_common.
I picked sanitizer_linux.h as their new home.
In the process, add the 32-bit versions for ARM, i386 & MIPS.
Can the address of `__get_tls()[TLS_SLOT_TSAN]` change in between the calls?
I am not sure if there is a need to repeat the construct as opposed to using a variable. So I left things as they were.
Testing on my side was restricted to a successful cross-compilation.
Reviewers: dvyukov, kubamracek
Reviewed By: dvyukov
Subscribers: aemerson, rengolin, srhines, dberris, arichardson, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32705
llvm-svn: 301926
This is the fold that causes the infinite loop in BoringSSL
(https://github.com/google/boringssl/blob/master/crypto/cipher/e_rc2.c)
when we fix instcombine demanded bits to prefer 'not' ops as in D32255.
There are 2 or 3 problems with dyn_castNotVal, and I don't think we can
reinstate D32255 until dyn_castNotVal is completely eliminated.
1. As shown here, it transforms 'not' into random xor. This transform is
harmful to SCEV and codegen because 'not' can often be folded while
random xor cannot.
2. It does not transform vector constants. This is actually a good thing,
but if you don't believe the above argument, then we shouldn't have
excluded vectors.
3. It tries to avoid transforming not(not(X)). That's nice, but it doesn't
match the greedy nature of instcombine. If we DeMorganize a pattern
that has an extra 'not' in it:
~(~(~X) & Y) --> (~X | ~Y)
That's just another case of DeMorgan, so we should trust that we'll fold
that pattern too:
(~X | ~ Y) --> ~(X & Y)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32665
llvm-svn: 301923
Summary: This is a common pattern that arise when legalizing large integers operations. Only do it when Y + 1 cannot overflow as this would change the carry behavior of uaddo .
Reviewers: jyknight, nemanjai, mkuper, spatel, RKSimon, zvi, bkramer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32687
llvm-svn: 301922
This is motivated by https://reviews.llvm.org/D32488 where I am trying
to add printing of the section type for incompatible sections to LLD
error messages. This patch allows us to use the same code in
llvm-readobj and LLD instead of duplicating the function inside LLD.
Patch by Alexander Richardson!
llvm-svn: 301921
Document the 'code' data type, and that value{15-17} is different to
value{17-15}.
Patch by @chenwj (Wei-Ren Chen).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32117
llvm-svn: 301920
Summary: Common pattern when legalizing large integers operations. Similar to D32687, when the carry isn't used.
Reviewers: jyknight, nemanjai, mkuper, spatel, RKSimon, zvi, bkramer
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32738
llvm-svn: 301919
Summary:
If we have symbol information in a separate file, we need to be very
careful about presenting a unified section view of module to the rest of
the debugger. ObjectFileELF had code to handle that, but it was being
overly cautious -- the section->GetFileSize()!=0 meant that the
unification would fail for sections which do not occupy any space in the
object file (e.g., .bss). In my case, that manifested itself as not
being able to display the values of .bss variables properly as the
section associated with the variable did not have it's load address set
(because it was not present in the unified section list).
I test this by making sure the unified section list and the variables
refer to the same section.
Reviewers: eugene, zturner
Subscribers: tberghammer, lldb-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32434
llvm-svn: 301917
It leads to clang crashing, e.g. on this short code fragment (added to
test/SemaCXX/warn-thread-safety-parsing.cpp):
class SomeClass {
public:
void foo() {
auto l = [this] { auto l = [] EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(mu_) {}; };
}
Mutex mu_;
};
llvm-svn: 301916
PR31088 demonstrated that we were assuming that only integers require promotion from <1 x iX> types, when in fact float types may require it as well - in this case half floats.
This patch adds support for extension/truncation for both integer and float types.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32391
llvm-svn: 301910
Summary:
UniqueCStringMap "sorts" the entries for fast lookup, but really it only cares about uniqueness. ConstString can be compared by pointer alone, rather than with strcmp, resulting in much faster comparisons. Change the interface to take ConstString instead, and propagate use of the type to the callers where appropriate.
Reviewers: #lldb, clayborg
Reviewed By: clayborg
Subscribers: labath, jasonmolenda, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32316
Patch by Scott Smith <scott.smith@purestorage.com>.
llvm-svn: 301908
The existing code only looks at half of the tree when matching bswap + rol patterns ending in an OR tree (as opposed to a cascade).
Patch originally introduced by Jim Lewis.
Submitted on the behalf of Dinar Temirbulatov.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32039
llvm-svn: 301907
Emit and use the TableGen instruction selector for ARM. At the moment,
this allows us to remove the hand-written code for selecting G_SDIV and
G_UDIV.
Future commits will focus on increasing the code coverage for it and
removing more dead code from the current instruction selector.
llvm-svn: 301905
Summary: It is simply unused, and the header for it is private, so there should be no external dependencies.
Reviewers: #lldb, zturner
Reviewed By: zturner
Subscribers: zturner, tberghammer, jingham, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32503
Patch by Scott Smith <scott.smith@purestorage.com>.
llvm-svn: 301903
If there is a bug in the LTO implementation that causes it to fail to provide
an expected symbol definition, the linker should report an undefined symbol
error. Unfortunately, we were failing to do so if the symbol definition
was weak, as the undefine() function was turning the definition into a weak
undefined symbol, which resolves to zero if the symbol remains undefined. This
patch causes us to set the binding to STB_GLOBAL when we undefine a symbol.
I can't see a good way to test this. The behaviour should only be observable
if there is a bug in the LTO implementation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32731
llvm-svn: 301897
Fixes PR30730.
This is a re-commit of a pulled commit. The commit was pulled because some
software projects contained uses of Altivec vectors that violated alignment
requirements. Known issues have now been fixed.
Committing on behalf of Lei Huang.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26861
llvm-svn: 301892
The fix is that ExprEvaluatorBase::VisitInitListExpr should handle transparent exprs instead of exprs with one element. Fixing that uncovers one testcase failure because the AST for "constexpr _Complex float test2 = {1};" is wrong (the _Complex prvalue should not be const-qualified), and a number of test failures in test/OpenMP where the captured stmt contains an InitListExpr that is in syntactic form.
llvm-svn: 301891
r288279 mistakenly added it to all arches, but it's only available
from v8.1 onwards.
The testcase is awkward, because (I suspect) of PR32873.
Spotted by inspection.
llvm-svn: 301890
Because it was a callee-saved register, we automatically generated code
to spill and unspill its original value so that it is restored after the
function returns.
The problem is that this code was being generated before the epilogue.
The epilogue itself uses the Y register, which could be prematurely
restored by the CSR restoration process.
This removes R29R28 from the CSR list and changes the prologue/epilogue
code to handle it explicitly.
llvm-svn: 301887
This change caused buildbot failures, apparently because we're not
passing around types that InstSimplify is used to seeing. I'm not overly
familiar with InstSimplify, so I'm reverting this until I can figure out
what exactly is wrong.
llvm-svn: 301885
Zachary Turner