Define an option -riscv-vector-bits-max to specify the maximum vector
bits for vectorizer. Loop vectorizer will use the value to check if it
is safe to use the whole vector registers to vectorize the loop.
It is not the optimum solution for loop vectorizing for scalable vector.
It assumed the whole vector registers will be used to vectorize the code.
If it is possible, we should configure vl to do vectorize instead of
using whole vector registers.
We only consider LMUL = 1 in this patch.
This patch just an initial work for loop vectorizer for RISC-V Vector.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95659
This patch adds support for both the fadd reduction intrinsic, in both
the ordered and unordered modes.
The fmin and fmax intrinsics are not currently supported due to a
discrepancy between the LLVM semantics and the RVV ISA behaviour with
regards to signaling NaNs. This behaviour is likely fixed in version 2.3
of the RISC-V F/D/Q extension, but until then the intrinsics can be left
unsupported.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95870
This patch adds support for the integer reduction intrinsics supported
by RVV. This excludes "mul" which has no corresponding instruction.
The reduction instructions in RVV have slightly complicated type
constraints given they always produce a single "M1" vector register.
They are lowered to custom nodes including the second "scalar" reduction
operand to simplify the patterns and in the hope that they can be useful
for future DAG combines.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95620
MCTargetDesc includes headers from Utils and Utils includes headers
from MCTargetDesc. So from a library layering perspective it makes sense
for them to be in the same library. I guess the other option might be to
move the tablegen includes from RISCVMCTargetDesc.h to RISCVBaseInfo.h
so that RISCVBaseInfo.h didn't need to include RISCVMCTargetDesc.h.
Everything else that depends on Utils also depends on MCTargetDesc so
having one library seemed simpler.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93168
Changes TTI function getIntImmCostInst to take an additional Instruction parameter,
which enables us to be able to check it is part of a min(max())/max(min()) pattern that will match SSAT.
We can then mark the constant used as free to prevent it being hoisted so SSAT can still be generated.
Required minor changes in some non-ARM backends to allow for the optional parameter to be included.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87457
Make the kind of cost explicit throughout the cost model which,
apart from making the cost clear, will allow the generic parts to
calculate better costs. It will also allow some backends to
approximate and correlate the different costs if they wish. Another
benefit is that it will also help simplify the cost model around
immediate and intrinsic costs, where we currently have multiple APIs.
RFC thread:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-April/141263.html
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79002
Soon Intrinsic::ID will be a plain integer, so this overload will not be
possible.
Rename both overloads to ensure that downstream targets observe this as
a build failure instead of a runtime failure.
Split off from D71320
Reviewers: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71381
APInt::getSExtValue will assert if getMinSignedBits() > 64. This can happen,
for instance, if examining an i128. Avoid this assertion by checking
Imm.getMinSignedBits() <= 64 before doing
getTLI()->isLegalAddImmediate(Imm.getSExtValue()). We could directly check
getMinSignedBits() <= 12 but it seems better to reuse the isLegalAddImmediate
helper for this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64390
llvm-svn: 365462
Summary:
LLVM Allows Targets to provide information that guides optimisations
made to LLVM IR. This is done with callbacks on a TargetTransformInfo object.
This patch adds a TargetTransformInfo class for RISC-V. This will allow us to
implement RISC-V specific callbacks as they become necessary.
This commit also adds the getIntImmCost callbacks, and tests them with a simple
constant hoisting test. Our immediate costs are on the conservative side, for
the moment, but we prevent hoisting in most circumstances anyway.
Previous review was on D63007
Reviewers: asb, luismarques
Reviewed By: asb
Subscribers: ributzka, MaskRay, llvm-commits, Jim, benna, psnobl, jocewei, PkmX, rkruppe, the_o, brucehoult, MartinMosbeck, rogfer01, edward-jones, zzheng, jrtc27, shiva0217, kito-cheng, niosHD, sabuasal, apazos, simoncook, johnrusso, rbar, hiraditya, mgorny
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63433
llvm-svn: 364046
Craig Topper