params. Don't insert addrof operations when matching against a pointer;
array/function conversions should take care of this for us, assuming the
argument type-checked in the first place. Add a fixme where we seem to be
using a less-restrictive reference type than we should.
Fixes PR 6249.
llvm-svn: 95495
over to VarDecl::isThisDeclarationADefinition(), which handles
variables declared with linkage specifications better (among other
things). CMake 2.9 (from CVS) now builds with clang++ and is somewhat
functional.
llvm-svn: 95486
type-checking within a template definition. In this case, the
"instantiated" declaration is just the declaration itself, found
within the current instantiation. Fixes PR6239.
llvm-svn: 95442
follows (as conservatively as possible) gcc's current behavior: attributes
written on return types that don't apply there are applied to the function
instead, etc. Only parse CC attributes as type attributes, not as decl attributes;
don't accepet noreturn as a decl attribute on ValueDecls, either (it still
needs to apply to other decls, like blocks). Consistently consume CC/noreturn
information throughout codegen; enforce this by removing their default values
in CodeGenTypes::getFunctionInfo().
llvm-svn: 95436
when instantiating the declaration of a member template:
- Only check if the have a template template argument at a specific position
when we already know that we have template arguments at that level;
otherwise, we're substituting for a level-reduced template template
parameter.
- When trying to find an instantiated declaration for a template
template parameter, look into the instantiated scope. This was a
typo, where we had two checks for TemplateTypeParmDecl, one of
which should have been a TemplateTemplateParmDecl.
With these changes, tramp3d-v4 passes -fsyntax-only.
llvm-svn: 95421
declaration, we can end up with template-id annotation tokens for
types that have not been converted into type annotation tokens. When
this is the case, translate the template-id into a type and parse as
an expression.
llvm-svn: 95404
context. This happens fairly rarely (which is why we got away with
this bug). Fixes PR6184, where we skipped over the template parameter
scope while tentatively parsing.
llvm-svn: 95376
With this fix, and the other fixes committed today a make check-all with a clang-built LLVM now gives:
Expected Passes : 6933
Expected Failures : 46
Unsupported Tests : 40
Unexpected Failures: 27
which means that we pass 99.96% of all tests :) The resulting 27 tests are all LLVMC tests and seem to be because of differences in the clang and gcc drivers.
llvm-svn: 95313
template parameter, perform array/function decay (if needed), take the
address of the argument (if needed), perform qualification conversions
(if needed), and remove any top-level cv-qualifiers from the resulting
expression. Fixes PR6226.
llvm-svn: 95309
a different return type. While we don't emit any errors (yet), at
least we avoid cases where we might crash because of an assertion
failure later on (when the return type differs from what is expected).
llvm-svn: 95268
void f(int a = 10) {
return a;
}
would always return 10, regardless of the passed in argument.
This fixes another 600 test failures. We're now down to only 137 failures!
llvm-svn: 95262
prevent a crash on templates when looking for an existing declaration of the
predefined global operators. This fixes PR5918.
Added an easy test case for the overload handling, but testing the crash is
a bit trickier. Created a new test that can use multiple runs with a define to
trigger which test case is used so we can test this type of issue.
llvm-svn: 95220
that is in an anonymous namespace, give that function or variable
internal linkage.
This change models an oddity of the C++ standard, where names declared
in an anonymous namespace have external linkage but, because anonymous
namespace are really "uniquely-named" namespaces, the names cannot be
referenced from other translation units. That means that they have
external linkage for semantic analysis, but the only sensible
implementation for code generation is to give them internal
linkage. We now model this notion via the UniqueExternalLinkage
linkage type. There are several changes here:
- Extended NamedDecl::getLinkage() to produce UniqueExternalLinkage
when the declaration is in an anonymous namespace.
- Added Type::getLinkage() to determine the linkage of a type, which
is defined as the minimum linkage of the types (when we're dealing
with a compound type that is not a struct/class/union).
- Extended NamedDecl::getLinkage() to consider the linkage of the
template arguments and template parameters of function template
specializations and class template specializations.
- Taught code generation to rely on NamedDecl::getLinkage() when
determining the linkage of variables and functions, also
considering the linkage of the types of those variables and
functions (C++ only). Map UniqueExternalLinkage to internal
linkage, taking out the explicit checks for
isInAnonymousNamespace().
This fixes much of PR5792, which, as discovered by Anders Carlsson, is
actually the reason behind the pass-manager assertion that causes the
majority of clang-on-clang regression test failures. With this fix,
Clang-built-Clang+LLVM passes 88% of its regression tests (up from
67%). The specific numbers are:
LLVM:
Expected Passes : 4006
Expected Failures : 32
Unsupported Tests : 40
Unexpected Failures: 736
Clang:
Expected Passes : 1903
Expected Failures : 14
Unexpected Failures: 75
Overall:
Expected Passes : 5909
Expected Failures : 46
Unsupported Tests : 40
Unexpected Failures: 811
Still to do:
- Improve testing
- Check whether we should allow the presence of types with
InternalLinkage (in addition to UniqueExternalLinkage) given
variables/functions internal linkage in C++, as mentioned in
PR5792.
- Determine how expensive the getLinkage() calls are in practice;
consider caching the result in NamedDecl.
- Assess the feasibility of Chris's idea in comment #1 of PR5792.
llvm-svn: 95216
RegionStoreManager::InvalidateRegions() by adjusting the worklist to
iterate over BindingKeys instead of MemRegions. We also only need to
do the actual invalidation work on base regions, and for non-base
regions just blow away their bindings.
llvm-svn: 95200
lvalue-to-rvalue conversion adjusts lvalues of qualified, non-class
type to rvalue expressions of the unqualified variant of that
type. For example, given:
const int i;
(void)(i + 17);
the lvalue-to-rvalue conversion for the subexpression "i" will turn it
from an lvalue expression (a DeclRefExpr) with type 'const int' into
an rvalue expression with type 'int'. Both C and C++ mandate this
conversion, and somehow we've slid through without implementing it.
We now have both DefaultFunctionArrayConversion and
DefaultFunctionArrayLvalueConversion, and which gets used depends on
whether we do the lvalue-to-rvalue conversion or not. Generally, we do
the lvalue-to-rvalue conversion, but there are a few notable
exceptions:
- the left-hand side of a '.' operator
- the left-hand side of an assignment
- a C++ throw expression
- a subscript expression that's subscripting a vector
Making this change exposed two issues with blocks:
- we were deducing const-qualified return types of non-class type
from a block return, which doesn't fit well
- we weren't always setting the known return type of a block when it
was provided with the ^return-type syntax
Fixes the current Clang-on-Clang compile failure and PR6076.
llvm-svn: 95167
WHAT!?!
It turns out that Type::isPromotableIntegerType() was not considering
enumeration types to be promotable, so we would never do the
promotion despite having properly computed the promotion type when the
enum was defined. Various operations on values of enum type just
"worked" because we could still compute the integer rank of an enum
type; the oddity, however, is that operations such as "add an enum and
an unsigned" would often have an enum result type (!). The bug
actually showed up as a spurious -Wformat diagnostic
(<rdar://problem/7595366>), but in theory it could cause miscompiles.
In this commit:
- Enum types with a promotion type of "int" or "unsigned int" are
promotable.
- Tweaked the computation of promotable types for enums
- For all of the ABIs, treat enum types the same way as their
underlying types (*not* their promotion types) for argument passing
and return values
- Extend the ABI tester with support for enumeration types
llvm-svn: 95117
dyncast is just due to \r\n newline interaction w/ regexps. The remap-load.c
failure is a bit stranger (the end of the extent is on the next line), but I
don't care to investigate.
llvm-svn: 95071
arguments. Fix a bug where incomplete explicit specializations were being
passed through as legitimate. Fix a bug where the absence of an explicit
specialization in an overload set was causing overall deduction to fail.
Fixes PR6191.
llvm-svn: 95052
forgetting a ';' at the end of a struct. For something like:
class c {
}
void foo() {}
we now produce:
t.cc:3:2: error: expected ';' after class
}
^
;
instead of:
t.cc:4:1: error: cannot combine with previous 'class' declaration specifier
void foo() {}
^
t.cc:2:7: error: 'class c' can not be defined in the result type of a function
class c {
^
GCC produces:
t.cc:4: error: new types may not be defined in a return type
t.cc:4: note: (perhaps a semicolon is missing after the definition of ‘c’)
t.cc:4: error: two or more data types in declaration of ‘foo’
I *think* I got the follow set right, but if I forgot anything, we'll start
getting spurious "expected ';' after class" errors, let me know if you see
any.
llvm-svn: 95042
t.cc:4:3: error: expected ';' at end of declaration list
int y;
^
t.cc:6:1: error: expected ';' at end of declaration list
};
^
After:
t.cc:3:8: error: expected ';' at end of declaration list
int x
^
;
t.cc:5:8: error: expected ';' at end of declaration list
int z
^
;
llvm-svn: 95039
t.c:4:3: error: expected ';' at end of declaration list
int y;
^
t.c:4:8: warning: extra ';' inside a struct or union
int y;
^
t.c:6:1: warning: expected ';' at end of declaration list
};
^
After:
t.c:3:8: error: expected ';' at end of declaration list
int x // expected-error {{expected ';' at end of declaration list}}
^
;
t.c:5:8: warning: expected ';' at end of declaration list
int z
^
;
llvm-svn: 95038
Anders Carlsson