https://commondatastorage.googleapis.com/chromium-browser-clang/llvm-include-analysis.html
Excessive use of the <string> header has a massive impact on compile time; its most commonly included via the ErrorHandling.h header, which has to be included in many key headers, impacting many source files that have no need for std::string.
As an initial step toward removing the <string> include from ErrorHandling.h, this patch proposes to update the fatal_error_handler_t handler to just take a raw const char* instead.
The next step will be to remove the report_fatal_error std::string variant, which will involve a lot of cleanup and better use of Twine/StringRef.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111049
LLVMLineEditor library is part of the LLVM dylib. Move it into
LLVM_LINK_COMPONENTS to avoid duplicate linking when dylib is being
used. This fixes building standalone clang against installed LLVM
without static libraries.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107558
Use `clang_target_link_libraries` to avoid duplicate libraries when
the same symbol is provided both by a static library and a larger
dylib, fixing linking with win32 dylibs. This fixes errors like
these:
ld.lld: error: duplicate symbol: llvm::createStringError(std::__1::error_code, char const*)
>>> defined at libLLVMSupport.a(Error.cpp.obj)
>>> defined at libLLVM-14git.dll
This matches how other clang tools declare their dependencies.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107231
We have the basic infrastructure in place. We can recover from simple errors
(recovering from errors in template instantiations is not yet supported). It
looks like we are in a reasonably functional state for llvm13.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106813
This reverts commit 3ec88ca60b which reverted e386871e1d due to a asan build
failure.
This patch removes the new lines in the test case which seem to introduce the
failure.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104898
Original commit message:
In http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-July/143257.html we have
mentioned our plans to make some of the incremental compilation facilities
available in llvm mainline.
This patch proposes a minimal version of a repl, clang-repl, which enables
interpreter-like interaction for C++. For instance:
./bin/clang-repl
clang-repl> int i = 42;
clang-repl> extern "C" int printf(const char*,...);
clang-repl> auto r1 = printf("i=%d\n", i);
i=42
clang-repl> quit
The patch allows very limited functionality, for example, it crashes on invalid
C++. The design of the proposed patch follows closely the design of cling. The
idea is to gather feedback and gradually evolve both clang-repl and cling to
what the community agrees upon.
The IncrementalParser class is responsible for driving the clang parser and
codegen and allows the compiler infrastructure to process more than one input.
Every input adds to the “ever-growing” translation unit. That model is enabled
by an IncrementalAction which prevents teardown when HandleTranslationUnit.
The IncrementalExecutor class hides some of the underlying implementation
details of the concrete JIT infrastructure. It exposes the minimal set of
functionality required by our incremental compiler/interpreter.
The Transaction class keeps track of the AST and the LLVM IR for each
incremental input. That tracking information will be later used to implement
error recovery.
The Interpreter class orchestrates the IncrementalParser and the
IncrementalExecutor to model interpreter-like behavior. It provides the public
API which can be used (in future) when using the interpreter library.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96033
This reverts commit 44a4000181.
We are seeing build failures due to missing dependency to libSupport and
CMake Error at tools/clang/tools/clang-repl/cmake_install.cmake
file INSTALL cannot find
In http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-July/143257.html we have
mentioned our plans to make some of the incremental compilation facilities
available in llvm mainline.
This patch proposes a minimal version of a repl, clang-repl, which enables
interpreter-like interaction for C++. For instance:
./bin/clang-repl
clang-repl> int i = 42;
clang-repl> extern "C" int printf(const char*,...);
clang-repl> auto r1 = printf("i=%d\n", i);
i=42
clang-repl> quit
The patch allows very limited functionality, for example, it crashes on invalid
C++. The design of the proposed patch follows closely the design of cling. The
idea is to gather feedback and gradually evolve both clang-repl and cling to
what the community agrees upon.
The IncrementalParser class is responsible for driving the clang parser and
codegen and allows the compiler infrastructure to process more than one input.
Every input adds to the “ever-growing” translation unit. That model is enabled
by an IncrementalAction which prevents teardown when HandleTranslationUnit.
The IncrementalExecutor class hides some of the underlying implementation
details of the concrete JIT infrastructure. It exposes the minimal set of
functionality required by our incremental compiler/interpreter.
The Transaction class keeps track of the AST and the LLVM IR for each
incremental input. That tracking information will be later used to implement
error recovery.
The Interpreter class orchestrates the IncrementalParser and the
IncrementalExecutor to model interpreter-like behavior. It provides the public
API which can be used (in future) when using the interpreter library.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96033
Vassil Vassilev