Summary:
This test is allowed to run on non-x86 hosts and thus must use
llvm-nm rather than nm.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25473
llvm-svn: 283901
The non-obvious motivation for adding this fold (which already happens in InstCombine)
is that we want to canonicalize IR towards select instructions and canonicalize DAG
nodes towards boolean math. So we need to recreate some folds in the DAG to handle that
change in direction.
An interesting implementation difference for cases like this is that InstCombine
generally works top-down while the DAG goes bottom-up. That means we need to detect
different patterns. In this case, the SimplifyDemandedBits fold prevents us from
performing a zext to sext fold that would then be recognized as a negation of a sext.
llvm-svn: 283900
The high registers are not allocatable in Thumb1 functions, but they
could still be used by inline assembly, so we need to save and restore
the callee-saved high registers (r8-r11) in the prologue and epilogue.
This is complicated by the fact that the Thumb1 push and pop
instructions cannot access these registers. Therefore, we have to move
them down into low registers before pushing, and move them back after
popping into low registers.
In most functions, we will have low registers that are also being
pushed/popped, which we can use as the temporary registers for
saving/restoring the high registers. However, this is not guaranteed, so
we may need to push some extra low registers to ensure that the high
registers can be saved/restored. For correctness, it would be sufficient
to use just one low register, but if we have enough low registers
available then we only need one push/pop instruction, rather than one
per high register.
We can also use the argument/return registers when they are not live,
and the link register when saving (but not restoring), reducing the
number of extra registers we need to push.
There are still a few extreme edge cases where we need two push/pop
instructions, because not enough low registers can be made live in the
prologue or epilogue.
In addition to the regression tests included here, I've also tested this
using a script to generate functions which clobber different
combinations of registers, have different numbers of argument and return
registers (including variadic arguments), allocate different fixed sized
objects on the stack, and do or don't use variable sized allocas and the
__builtin_return_address intrinsic (all of which affect the available
registers in the prologue and epilogue). I ran these functions in a test
harness which verifies that all of the callee-saved registers are
correctly preserved.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24228
llvm-svn: 283867
Currently, the Int_eh_sjlj_dispatchsetup intrinsic is marked as
clobbering all registers, including floating-point registers that may
not be present on the target. This is technically true, as we could get
linked against code that does use the FP registers, but that will not
actually work, as the soft-float code cannot save and restore the FP
registers. SjLj exception handling can only work correctly if either all
or none of the code is built for a target with FP registers. Therefore,
we can assume that, when Int_eh_sjlj_dispatchsetup is compiled for a
soft-float target, it is only going to be linked against other
soft-float code, and so only clobbers the general-purpose registers.
This allows us to check that no non-savable registers are clobbered when
generating the prologue/epilogue.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25180
llvm-svn: 283866
Allow instructions such as 'cmp w0, #(end - start)' by folding the
expression into a constant. For ELF, we fold only if the symbols are in
the same section. For MachO, we fold if the expression contains only
symbols that are not linker visible.
Fixes https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=18920
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23834
llvm-svn: 283862
Bot does not like it: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/builds/17075
/mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot3/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/test/Object/invalid.test:70:32: error: expected string not found in input
INVALID-SEC-ADDRESS-ALIGNMENT: Invalid address alignment of section headers
^
<stdin>:1:1: note: scanning from here
/mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot3/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/include/llvm/Object/ELF.h:412:7: runtime error: upcast of misaligned address 0x000002d8b899 for type 'llvm::object::Elf_Shdr_Impl<llvm::object::ELFType<llvm::support::endianness::little, true> >', which requires 2 byte alignment
^
<stdin>:1:125: note: possible intended match here
/mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot3/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/include/llvm/Object/ELF.h:412:7: runtime error: upcast of misaligned address 0x000002d8b899 for type 'llvm::object::Elf_Shdr_Impl<llvm::object::ELFType<llvm::support::endianness::little, true> >', which requires 2 byte alignment
llvm-svn: 283858
This reverts commit r283842.
test/CodeGen/X86/tail-dup-repeat.ll causes and llc crash with our
internal testing. I'll share a link with you.
llvm-svn: 283857
This changes MachineRegisterInfo to be initializes after parsing all
instructions. This is in preparation for upcoming commits that allow the
register class specification on the operand or deduce them from the
MCInstrDesc.
This commit removes the unused feature of having nonsequential register
numbers. This was confusing anyway as the vreg numbers would be
different after parsing when you had "holes" in your numbering.
This patch also introduces the concept of an incomplete virtual
register. An incomplete virtual register may be used during .mir parsing
to construct MachineOperands without knowing the exact register class
(or register bank) yet.
NFC except for some error messages.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22397
llvm-svn: 283848
The tail duplication pass uses an assumed layout when making duplication
decisions. This is fine, but passes up duplication opportunities that
may arise when blocks are outlined. Because we want the updated CFG to
affect subsequent placement decisions, this change must occur during
placement.
In order to achieve this goal, TailDuplicationPass is split into a
utility class, TailDuplicator, and the pass itself. The pass delegates
nearly everything to the TailDuplicator object, except for looping over
the blocks in a function. This allows the same code to be used for tail
duplication in both places.
This change, in concert with outlining optional branches, allows
triangle shaped code to perform much better, esepecially when the
taken/untaken branches are correlated, as it creates a second spine when
the tests are small enough.
Issue from previous rollback fixed, and a new test was added for that
case as well. Issue was worklist/scheduling/taildup issue in layout.
Issue from 2nd rollback fixed, with 2 additional tests. Issue was
tail merging/loop info/tail-duplication causing issue with loops that share
a header block.
Issue with early tail-duplication of blocks that branch to a fallthrough
predecessor fixed with test case: tail-dup-branch-to-fallthrough.ll
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D18226
llvm-svn: 283842
Summary:
Previously, when allocating unspillable live ranges, we would never
attempt to split. We would always bail out and try last ditch graph
recoloring.
This patch changes this by attempting to split all live intervals before
performing recoloring.
This fixes LLVM bug PR14879.
I can't add test cases for any backends other than AVR because none of
them have small enough register classes to trigger the bug.
Reviewers: qcolombet
Subscribers: MatzeB
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25070
llvm-svn: 283838
When combining an integer load with !range metadata that does not include 0 to a pointer load, make sure emit !nonnull metadata on the newly-created pointer load. This prevents the !nonnull metadata from being dropped during a ptrtoint/inttoptr pair.
This fixes PR30597.
Patch by Ariel Ben-Yehuda!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25215
llvm-svn: 283836
This only adds the support for 64-bit vector OR. Adding more sizes is
not difficult, but it requires a bigger refactoring because ORs work on
any size, not necessarly the ones that match the width of the register
width. Right now, this is not expressed in the legalization, so don't
bother pushing the refactoring yet.
llvm-svn: 283831
Add integer expansion for FLT_ROUNDS_ for targets where i32 is not a legal
type.
Patch by Edward Jones, thanks!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24459
llvm-svn: 283797
The instructions VLDM/VSTM can only access word-aligned memory
locations and produce alignment fault if the condition is not met.
The compiler currently generates VLDM/VSTM for v2f64 load/store
regardless the alignment of the memory access. Instead, if a v2f64
load/store is not word-aligned, the compiler should generate
VLD1/VST1. For each non double-word-aligned VLD1/VST1, a VREV
instruction should be generated when targeting Big Endian.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25281
llvm-svn: 283763
Summary:
Rotate by 1 is translated to 1 micro-op, while rotate with imm8 is translated to 2 micro-ops.
Fixes pr30644.
Reviewers: delena, igorb, craig.topper, spatel, RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25399
llvm-svn: 283758
Fixed copy+paste vector alignment to correct for per-element scalar loads
Increased to 512-bit data sizes in preparation of avx512 tests
llvm-svn: 283748
sections_begin() may return unalignment pointer when Header->e_shoff isinvalid.
That may result in a crash in clients, for example we have one in LLD:
assert((PtrWord & ~PointerBitMask) == 0 &&
"Pointer is not sufficiently aligned");
fails when trying to push_back Elf_Shdr* (unaligned) into TinyPtrVector.
Patch forces check for alignment of Header->e_shoff.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25368
llvm-svn: 283740
Commit in the name of:Coby Tayree
1.'v' constraint for (x86) non-avx arch imitates the already implemented 'x' constraint, i.e. allows XMM{0-15} & YMM{0-15} depending on the apparent arch & mode (32/64).
2.for the avx512 arch it allows [X,Y,Z]MM{0-31} (mode dependent)
This patch applies the needed changes to clang
clang patch: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25004
Differential Revision: D25005
llvm-svn: 283717
Masked-expand-load node represents load operation that loads a variable amount of elements from memory according to amount of "true" bits in the mask and expands the loaded elements according to their position in the mask vector.
Right now, the node is used in intrinsics for VEXPAND* instructions.
The work is done towards implementation of masked.expandload and masked.compressstore intrinsics.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25322
llvm-svn: 283694
Sanjay Patel