like .cfi_restore"
Insert .cfi_offset/.cfi_register when IncomingCSRSaved of current block
is larger than OutgoingCSRSaved of its previous block.
Original commit message:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D42848 only handled CFA related cfi directives but
didn't handle CSR related cfi. The patch adds the CSR part. Basically it reuses
the framework created in D42848. For each basicblock, the patch tracks which
CSR set have been saved at its CFG predecessors's exits, and compare the CSR
set with the set at its previous basicblock's exit (The previous block is the
block laid before the current block). If the saved CSR set at its previous
basicblock's exit is larger, .cfi_restore will be inserted.
The patch also generates proper .cfi_restore in epilogue to make sure the
saved CSR set is consistent for the incoming edges of each block.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74303
https://reviews.llvm.org/D42848 only handled CFA related cfi directives but
didn't handle CSR related cfi. The patch adds the CSR part. Basically it reuses
the framework created in D42848. For each basicblock, the patch tracks which
CSR set have been saved at its CFG predecessors's exits, and compare the CSR
set with the set at its previous basicblock's exit (The previous block is the
block laid before the current block). If the saved CSR set at its previous
basicblock's exit is larger, .cfi_restore will be inserted.
The patch also generates proper .cfi_restore in epilogue to make sure the
saved CSR set is consistent for the incoming edges of each block.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74303
This file lists every pass in LLVM, and is included by Pass.h, which is
very popular. Every time we add, remove, or rename a pass in LLVM, it
caused lots of recompilation.
I found this fact by looking at this table, which is sorted by the
number of times a file was changed over the last 100,000 git commits
multiplied by the number of object files that depend on it in the
current checkout:
recompiles touches affected_files header
342380 95 3604 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h
314730 234 1345 llvm/include/llvm/InitializePasses.h
307036 118 2602 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/APInt.h
213049 59 3611 llvm/include/llvm/Support/MathExtras.h
170422 47 3626 llvm/include/llvm/Support/Compiler.h
162225 45 3605 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/Optional.h
158319 63 2513 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/Triple.h
140322 39 3598 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/StringRef.h
137647 59 2333 llvm/include/llvm/Support/Error.h
131619 73 1803 llvm/include/llvm/Support/FileSystem.h
Before this change, touching InitializePasses.h would cause 1345 files
to recompile. After this change, touching it only causes 550 compiles in
an incremental rebuild.
Reviewers: bkramer, asbirlea, bollu, jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70211
This adds a flag to LLVM and clang to always generate a .debug_frame
section, even if other debug information is not being generated. In
situations where .eh_frame would normally be emitted, both .debug_frame
and .eh_frame will be used.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67216
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
- Reapply changes intially introduced in r343089
- The archtecture info is no longer loaded whenever a DWARFContext is created
- The runtimes libraries (santiziers) make use of the dwarf context classes but
do not intialise the target info
- The architecture of the object can be obtained without loading the target info
- Adding a method to the dwarf context to get this information and multiplex the
string printing later on
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55774
llvm-svn: 349472
- Add fix so that all code paths that create DWARFContext
with an ObjectFile initialise the target architecture in the context
- Add an assert that the Arch is known in the Dwarf CallFrameString method
llvm-svn: 343317
This caused the DebugInfo/Sparc/gnu-window-save.ll test to fail.
> Functions that have signed return addresses need additional dwarf support:
> - After signing the LR, and before authenticating it, the LR register is in a
> state the is unusable by a debugger or unwinder
> - To account for this a new directive, .cfi_negate_ra_state, is added
> - This directive says the signed state of the LR register has now changed,
> i.e. unsigned -> signed or signed -> unsigned
> - This directive has the same CFA code as the SPARC directive GNU_window_save
> (0x2d), adding a macro to account for multiply defined codes
> - This patch matches the gcc implementation of this support:
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/800271/
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50136
llvm-svn: 343103
Functions that have signed return addresses need additional dwarf support:
- After signing the LR, and before authenticating it, the LR register is in a
state the is unusable by a debugger or unwinder
- To account for this a new directive, .cfi_negate_ra_state, is added
- This directive says the signed state of the LR register has now changed,
i.e. unsigned -> signed or signed -> unsigned
- This directive has the same CFA code as the SPARC directive GNU_window_save
(0x2d), adding a macro to account for multiply defined codes
- This patch matches the gcc implementation of this support:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/800271/
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50136
llvm-svn: 343089
With r295105, some 'noreturn' blocks (those that don't return and have no
successors) may be merged.
If such blocks' predecessors have different outgoing offset or register, don't
report an error in CFIInstrInserter verify().
Thanks to Vlad Tsyrklevich for reporting the issue.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51161
llvm-svn: 341087
Instead of enabling it for non NDEBUG builds, use -verify-cfiinstrs to
run verifier in CFIInstrInserter. It defaults to false.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46444
llvm-svn: 331635
This patch aims to provide correct dwarf unwind information in function
epilogue for X86.
It consists of two parts. The first part inserts CFI instructions that set
appropriate cfa offset and cfa register in emitEpilogue() in
X86FrameLowering. This part is X86 specific.
The second part is platform independent and ensures that:
* CFI instructions do not affect code generation (they are not counted as
instructions when tail duplicating or tail merging)
* Unwind information remains correct when a function is modified by
different passes. This is done in a late pass by analyzing information
about cfa offset and cfa register in BBs and inserting additional CFI
directives where necessary.
Added CFIInstrInserter pass:
* analyzes each basic block to determine cfa offset and register are valid
at its entry and exit
* verifies that outgoing cfa offset and register of predecessor blocks match
incoming values of their successors
* inserts additional CFI directives at basic block beginning to correct the
rule for calculating CFA
Having CFI instructions in function epilogue can cause incorrect CFA
calculation rule for some basic blocks. This can happen if, due to basic
block reordering, or the existence of multiple epilogue blocks, some of the
blocks have wrong cfa offset and register values set by the epilogue block
above them.
CFIInstrInserter is currently run only on X86, but can be used by any target
that implements support for adding CFI instructions in epilogue.
Patch by Violeta Vukobrat.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42848
llvm-svn: 330706
This reverts r317579, originally committed as r317100.
There is a design issue with marking CFI instructions duplicatable. Not
all targets support the CFIInstrInserter pass, and targets like Darwin
can't cope with duplicated prologue setup CFI instructions. The compact
unwind info emission fails.
When the following code is compiled for arm64 on Mac at -O3, the CFI
instructions end up getting tail duplicated, which causes compact unwind
info emission to fail:
int a, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m;
void n(int o, int *b) {
if (g)
f = 0;
for (; f < o; f++) {
m = a;
if (l > j * k > i)
j = i = k = d;
h = b[c] - e;
}
}
We get assembly that looks like this:
; BB#1: ; %if.then
Lloh3:
adrp x9, _f@GOTPAGE
Lloh4:
ldr x9, [x9, _f@GOTPAGEOFF]
mov w8, wzr
Lloh5:
str wzr, [x9]
stp x20, x19, [sp, #-16]! ; 8-byte Folded Spill
.cfi_def_cfa_offset 16
.cfi_offset w19, -8
.cfi_offset w20, -16
cmp w8, w0
b.lt LBB0_3
b LBB0_7
LBB0_2: ; %entry.if.end_crit_edge
Lloh6:
adrp x8, _f@GOTPAGE
Lloh7:
ldr x8, [x8, _f@GOTPAGEOFF]
Lloh8:
ldr w8, [x8]
stp x20, x19, [sp, #-16]! ; 8-byte Folded Spill
.cfi_def_cfa_offset 16
.cfi_offset w19, -8
.cfi_offset w20, -16
cmp w8, w0
b.ge LBB0_7
LBB0_3: ; %for.body.lr.ph
Note the multiple .cfi_def* directives. Compact unwind info emission
can't handle that.
llvm-svn: 317726
This header includes CodeGen headers, and is not, itself, included by
any Target headers, so move it into CodeGen to match the layering of its
implementation.
llvm-svn: 317647
Reland r317100 with minor fix regarding ComputeCommonTailLength function in
BranchFolding.cpp. Skipping top CFI instructions block needs to executed on
several more return points in ComputeCommonTailLength().
Original r317100 message:
"Correct dwarf unwind information in function epilogue for X86"
This patch aims to provide correct dwarf unwind information in function
epilogue for X86.
It consists of two parts. The first part inserts CFI instructions that set
appropriate cfa offset and cfa register in emitEpilogue() in
X86FrameLowering. This part is X86 specific.
The second part is platform independent and ensures that:
- CFI instructions do not affect code generation
- Unwind information remains correct when a function is modified by
different passes. This is done in a late pass by analyzing information
about cfa offset and cfa register in BBs and inserting additional CFI
directives where necessary.
Changed CFI instructions so that they:
- are duplicable
- are not counted as instructions when tail duplicating or tail merging
- can be compared as equal
Added CFIInstrInserter pass:
- analyzes each basic block to determine cfa offset and register valid at
its entry and exit
- verifies that outgoing cfa offset and register of predecessor blocks match
incoming values of their successors
- inserts additional CFI directives at basic block beginning to correct the
rule for calculating CFA
Having CFI instructions in function epilogue can cause incorrect CFA
calculation rule for some basic blocks. This can happen if, due to basic
block reordering, or the existence of multiple epilogue blocks, some of the
blocks have wrong cfa offset and register values set by the epilogue block
above them.
CFIInstrInserter is currently run only on X86, but can be used by any target
that implements support for adding CFI instructions in epilogue.
Patch by Violeta Vukobrat.
llvm-svn: 317579
This patch aims to provide correct dwarf unwind information in function
epilogue for X86.
It consists of two parts. The first part inserts CFI instructions that set
appropriate cfa offset and cfa register in emitEpilogue() in
X86FrameLowering. This part is X86 specific.
The second part is platform independent and ensures that:
- CFI instructions do not affect code generation
- Unwind information remains correct when a function is modified by
different passes. This is done in a late pass by analyzing information
about cfa offset and cfa register in BBs and inserting additional CFI
directives where necessary.
Changed CFI instructions so that they:
- are duplicable
- are not counted as instructions when tail duplicating or tail merging
- can be compared as equal
Added CFIInstrInserter pass:
- analyzes each basic block to determine cfa offset and register valid at
its entry and exit
- verifies that outgoing cfa offset and register of predecessor blocks match
incoming values of their successors
- inserts additional CFI directives at basic block beginning to correct the
rule for calculating CFA
Having CFI instructions in function epilogue can cause incorrect CFA
calculation rule for some basic blocks. This can happen if, due to basic
block reordering, or the existence of multiple epilogue blocks, some of the
blocks have wrong cfa offset and register values set by the epilogue block
above them.
CFIInstrInserter is currently run only on X86, but can be used by any target
that implements support for adding CFI instructions in epilogue.
Patch by Violeta Vukobrat.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35844
llvm-svn: 317100
CFI instructions that set appropriate cfa offset and cfa register are now
inserted in emitEpilogue() in X86FrameLowering.
Majority of the changes in this patch:
1. Ensure that CFI instructions do not affect code generation.
2. Enable maintaining correct information about cfa offset and cfa register
in a function when basic blocks are reordered, merged, split, duplicated.
These changes are target independent and described below.
Changed CFI instructions so that they:
1. are duplicable
2. are not counted as instructions when tail duplicating or tail merging
3. can be compared as equal
Add information to each MachineBasicBlock about cfa offset and cfa register
that are valid at its entry and exit (incoming and outgoing CFI info). Add
support for updating this information when basic blocks are merged, split,
duplicated, created. Add a verification pass (CFIInfoVerifier) that checks
that outgoing cfa offset and register of predecessor blocks match incoming
values of their successors.
Incoming and outgoing CFI information is used by a late pass
(CFIInstrInserter) that corrects CFA calculation rule for a basic block if
needed. That means that additional CFI instructions get inserted at basic
block beginning to correct the rule for calculating CFA. Having CFI
instructions in function epilogue can cause incorrect CFA calculation rule
for some basic blocks. This can happen if, due to basic block reordering,
or the existence of multiple epilogue blocks, some of the blocks have wrong
cfa offset and register values set by the epilogue block above them.
Patch by Violeta Vukobrat.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D18046
llvm-svn: 306529
Fangrui Song