Address post follow up comment in D108016. Avoid creating isec for
LLVM segments since we are skipping over it.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, int3
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108167
There was an instance of a third-party archive containing multiple
_llvm symbols from different files that clashed with each other
producing duplicate symbols. Symbols under the LLVM segment
don't seem to be producing any meaningful value, so just ignore them.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, int3
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108016
Now that D95204 switched default to new Darwin backend, rename some CMake
targets to match.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, smeenai, int3
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107516
ld64 seems to handle common symbols in bitcode rather
bizarrely. They follow entirely different precedence rules from their
non-bitcode counterparts. I initially tried to emulate ld64 in D106597,
but I'm not sure the extra complexity is worth it, especially given that
common symbols are not, well, very common.
This diff accords common bitcode symbols the same precedence as regular
common symbols, just as we treat all other pairs of bitcode and
non-bitcode symbol types. The tests document ld64's behavior in detail,
just in case we want to revisit this.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, thakis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107027
This matches ld64's behavior, and makes it easier to fit LLD
into existing build systems.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, smeenai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107011
These symbols are somewhat interesting in that they create non-existing
segments, which as far as I know is the only way to create segments
that don't contain any sections.
Final part of part of PR50760. Like D106629, but for segments instead
of sections. I'm not aware of anything that needs this in practice.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106767
Fixes the output segment name if both -rename_section and
-rename_segment are used and the post-section-rename segment
name is the same as the pre-segment-rename segment name to
match ld64's behavior.
The motivation is that segment$start$ can create section-less segments,
and this makes a corner case in the interaction between segment$start and
-rename_segment in the upcoming segment$start patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106766
With this, libclang_rt.profile_osx.a can be linked, that is coverage
and PGO-instrumented builds should now work with lld.
section$start and section$end symbols can create non-existing sections.
They're also undefined symbols that are only magic if there isn't a
regular symbol with their name, which means the need to be handled
in treatUndefined() instead of just looping over all existing
sections and adding start and end symbols like the ELF port does.
To represent the actual symbols, this uses absolute symbols that
get their value updated once an output section is layed out.
segment$start and segment$end are still missing for now, but they produce a
nicer error message after this patch.
Main part of PR50760.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106629
In particular, relocations to absolute symbols or literal sections can
be handled in equalsConstant(), since their output addresses will not
change across each iteration of ICF. Offsets and addends can also be
dealt with entirely in equalsConstant(), making the code somewhat easier
to reason about. Only ConcatInputSections need to be handled in
equalsVariable().
LLD-ELF's implementation takes a similar approach.
Although this should make ICF do less work, in practice it seems like
there is no stat sig difference in time taken when linking
chromium_framework.
This refactor is motivated by an upcoming diff which improves ICF's handling of
addends.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, gkm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106212
segment$start$/segment$end$ symbols allow creating segments without
sections, so getting the segment address off the first section
won't work there. Storing the address on the segment is arguably a
bit simpler too.
No behavior change, part of PR50760.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106665
Absolute symbols have a nullptr isec. buildInputSectionPriorities()
would defer isec, causing crashes. Ordering absolute symbols doesn't
make sense, so just ignore them. This seems to match ld64.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106628
Ported from COFF/ELF; test is adapted from
test/COFF/thinlto-archivecollision.ll
LTO expects every bitcode file to have a unique name. If given multiple bitcode
files with the same name, it errors with "Expected at most one ThinLTO module
per bitcode file".
This change incorporates the archive name, to disambiguate members with the
same name in different archives and the offset in archive to disambiguate
members with the same name in the same archive.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106179
In ld64, `-U section$start$FOO$bar` handles `section$start$FOO$bar`
as a regular `section$start` symbol, that is section$start processing
happens before -U processing.
Likely, nobody uses that in practice so it doesn't seem very important
to be compatible with this, but it also moves the -U handling code next
to the `-undefined dynamic_lookup` handling code, which is nice because
they do the same thing. And, in fact, this did identify a bug in a corner
case in the intersection of `-undefined dynamic_lookup` and dead-stripping
(fix for that in D106565).
Vaguely related to PR50760.
No interesting behavior change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106566
We lost the `used` bit on the Undefined when we replaced it with a DylibSymbol
in treatUndefined().
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106565
treatUndefinedSymbol() was previously called before gatherInputSections()
and markLive() for these special symbols, but after them for normal
undefineds.
For PR50760, treatUndefinedSymbol() will have to potentially create
sections, so it's good to move treatUndefinedSymbol() for special
undefineds later, so that it can assume that gatherInputSections()
and markLive() has already been called always.
No intended behavior change, but part of PR50760 (and covered in
tests in the patch for the full feature).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106552
Implement pass 3 of bind opcodes from ld64 (which supports both 32-bit and 64-bit).
Pass 3 implementation condenses BIND_OPCODE_DO_BIND_ADD_ADDR_ULEB opcode
to BIND_OPCODE_DO_BIND_ADD_ADDR_IMM_SCALED. This change is already behind an
O2 flag so it shouldn't impact current performance. I verified ld64's output with x86_64 LLD
and they were both emitting the same optimized bind opcodes (although in a slightly different
order). Tested with arm64_32 LLD and compared that with x86 LLD that the order of the bind
opcodes are the same (offset values are different which should be expected).
Reviewed By: int3, #lld-macho, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106128
This reverts commit 321b2bef09.
`for (BindIR *p = &opcodes[0]; p->opcode != BIND_OPCODE_DONE; ++p) {` has a heap-buffer-overflow with test/MachO/bind-opcodes.
Implement pass 3 of bind opcodes from ld64 (which supports both 32-bit and 64-bit).
Pass 3 implementation condenses BIND_OPCODE_DO_BIND_ADD_ADDR_ULEB opcode
to BIND_OPCODE_DO_BIND_ADD_ADDR_IMM_SCALED. This change is already behind an
O2 flag so it shouldn't impact current performance. I verified ld64's output with x86_64 LLD
and they were both emitting the same optimized bind opcodes (although in a slightly different
order). Tested with arm64_32 LLD and compared that with x86 LLD that the order of the bind
opcodes are the same (offset values are different which should be expected).
Reviewed By: int3, #lld-macho
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106128
ICF previously operated only within a given OutputSection. We would
merge all CFStrings first, then merge all regular code sections in a
second phase. This worked fine since CFStrings would never reference
regular `__text` sections. However, I would like to expand ICF to merge
functions that reference unwind info. Unwind info references the LSDA
section, which can in turn reference the `__text` section, so we cannot
perform ICF in phases.
In order to have ICF operate on InputSections spanning multiple
OutputSections, we need a way to distinguish InputSections that are
destined for different OutputSections, so that we don't fold across
section boundaries. We achieve this by creating OutputSections early,
and setting `InputSection::parent` to point to them. This is what
LLD-ELF does. (This change should also make it easier to implement the
`section$start$` symbols.)
This diff also folds InputSections w/o checking their flags, which I
think is the right behavior -- if they are destined for the same
OutputSection, they will have the same flags in the output (even if
their input flags differ). I.e. the `parent` pointer check subsumes the
`flags` check. In practice this has nearly no effect (ICF did not become
any more effective on chromium_framework).
I've also updated ICF.cpp's block comment to better reflect its current
status.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, smeenai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105641
In D105866, we used an intermediate container to store a list of opcodes. Here,
we use that data structure to help us perform optimization passes that would allow
a more efficient encoding of bind opcodes. Currently, the functionality mirrors the
optimization pass {1,2} done in ld64 for bind opcodes under optimization gate
to prevent slight regressions.
Reviewed By: int3, #lld-macho
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105867
We want to incorporate some of the optimization passes in bind opcodes from ld64.
This revision makes no functional changes but to start storing opcodes in intermediate
containers in preparation for implementing the optimization passes in a follow-up revision.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105866
This adds support for the lld-only `--thinlto-cache-policy` option, as well as
implementations for ld64's `-cache_path_lto`, `-prune_interval_lto`,
`-prune_after_lto`, and `-max_relative_cache_size_lto`.
Test is adapted from lld/test/ELF/lto/cache.ll
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105922
The mappings we were using had a small number of keys, so a vector is
probably better. This allows us to remove the last usage of std::map in
our codebase.
I also used `removeSimulator` to simplify the code a bit further.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, thakis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105786
lld currently only references dyld_stub_binder when it's needed.
ld64 always references it when libSystem is linked.
Match ld64.
The (somewhat lame) motivation is that `nm` on a binary without any
export writes a "no symbols" warning to stderr, and this change makes
it so that every binary in practice has at least a reference to
dyld_stub_binder, which suppresses that.
Every "real" output file will reference dyld_stub_binder, so most
of the time this shouldn't make much of a difference. And if you
really don't want to have this reference for whatever reason, you
can stop passing -lSystem, like you have to for ld64 anyways.
(After linking any dylib, we dump the exported list of symbols to
a txt file with `nm` and only relink downstream deps if that txt
file changes. A nicer fix is to make lld optionally write .tbd files
with the public interface of a linked dylib and use that instead,
but for now the txt files are what we do.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105782
This is for aesthetic reasons, I'm not aware of anything that needs
this in practice. It does have a few effects:
- `-undefined dynamic_lookup` now has an effect for dyld_stub_binder.
This matches ld64.
- `-U dyld_stub_binder` now works like you'd expect (it doesn't work in ld64).
- The error message for a missing dyld_stub_binder symbol now looks like
other undefined reference symbols, it changes from
symbol dyld_stub_binder not found (normally in libSystem.dylib). Needed to perform lazy binding.
to
error: undefined symbol: dyld_stub_binder
>>> referenced by lazy binding (normally in libSystem.dylib)
Also add test coverage for that error message.
But in practice, this should have no interesting effects since everything links
in dyld_stub_binder via libSystem anyways.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105781
Two changess:
- Drop assertions that all symbols are in GOT
- Set allEntriesAreOmitted correctly
Related bug: 50812
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105364
Change "dyn_cast" to "isa" to get rid of the unused
variable "bitcodeFile".
gcc warned with
lld/MachO/Driver.cpp:531:17: warning: unused variable 'bitcodeFile' [-Wunused-variable]
531 | if (auto *bitcodeFile = dyn_cast<BitcodeFile>(file)) {
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
If the input has compact unwind info but all of it is removed
after dead stripping, we would crash. Now we don't write any
__unwind_info section at all, like ld64.
This is a bit awkward to implement because we only know the final
state of unwind info after UnwindInfoSectionImpl<Ptr>::finalize(),
which is called after sections are added. So add a small amount of
bookkeeping to relocateCompactUnwind() instead (which runs earlier)
so that we can predict what finalize() will do before it runs.
Fixes PR51010.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105557
This implements the part of -export_dynamic that adds external
symbols as dead strip roots even for executables.
It does not yet implement the effect -export_dynamic has for LTO.
I tried just replacing `config->outputType != MH_EXECUTE` with
`(config->outputType != MH_EXECUTE || config->exportDynamic)` in
LTO.cpp, but then local symbols make it into the symbol table too,
which is too much (and also doesn't match ld64). So punt on this
for now until I understand it better.
(D91583 may or may not be related too).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105482
This is the other flag clang passes when calling clang with two -arch
flags (which means with this, `clang -arch x86_64 -arch arm64 -fuse-ld=lld ...`
now no longer prints any warnings \o/). Since clang calls the linker several
times in that setup, it's not clear to the user from which invocation the
errors are. The flag's help text is
Specifies that the linker should augment error and warning messages
with the architecture name.
In ld64, the only effect of the flag is that undefined symbols are prefaced
with
Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64:
instead of the usual "Undefined symbols:". So for now, let's add this
only to undefined symbol errors too. That's probably the most common
linker diagnostic.
Another idea would be to prefix errors and warnings with "ld64.lld(x86_64):"
instead of the usual "ld64.lld:", but I'm not sure if people would
misunderstand that as a comment about the arch of ld itself.
But open to suggestions on what effect this flag should have :) And we
don't have to get it perfect now, we can iterate on it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105450
This is one of two flags clang passes to the linker when giving calling
clang with multiple -arch flags.
I think it'd make sense to also use finalOutput instead of outputFile
in CodeSignatureSection() and when replacing @executable_path, but
ld64 doesn't do that, so I'll at least put those in separate commits.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105449
I think this is an old way for doing what is done with
-reexport_library these days, but it's e.g. still used in libunwind's
build (the opensource.apple.com one, not the llvm one).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105448
Size-wise, BIND_OPCODE_SET_SYMBOL_TRAILING_FLAGS_IMM is the most
expensive opcode, since it comes with an associated symbol string. We
were previously emitting it once per binding, instead of once per
symbol. This diff groups all bindings for a given symbol together and
ensures we only emit one such opcode per symbol. This matches ld64's
behavior.
While this is a relatively small win on chromium_framework (-72KiB), for
programs that have more dynamic bindings, the difference can be quite
large.
This change is perf-neutral when linking chromium_framework.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, thakis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105075
clang and gcc both seem to emit relocations in reverse order of
address. That means we can match relocations to their containing
subsections in `O(relocs + subsections)` rather than the `O(relocs *
log(subsections))` that our previous binary search implementation
required.
Unfortunately, `ld -r` can still emit unsorted relocations, so we have a
fallback code path for that (less common) case.
Numbers for linking chromium_framework on my 3.2 GHz 16-Core Intel Xeon W:
N Min Max Median Avg Stddev
x 20 4.04 4.11 4.075 4.0775 0.018027756
+ 20 3.95 4.02 3.98 3.985 0.020900768
Difference at 95.0% confidence
-0.0925 +/- 0.0124919
-2.26855% +/- 0.306361%
(Student's t, pooled s = 0.0195172)
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, thakis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105410
Two bugs:
1. This tries to take the address of the last symbol plus the length
of the last symbol. However, the sorted vector is cuPtrVector,
not cuVector. Also, cuPtrVector has tombstone values removed
and cuVector doesn't. If there was a stripped value at the end,
the "last" element's value was UINT64_MAX, which meant the
sentinel value was one less than the length of that "last"
dead symbol.
2. We have to subtract in.header->addr. For 64-bit binaries that's
(1 << 32) and functionAddress is 32-bit so this is a no-op, but
for 32-bit binaries the sentinel's value was too large.
I believe this has no effect in practice since the first-level
binary search code in libunwind (in UnwindCursor.hpp) does:
uint32_t low = 0;
uint32_t high = sectionHeader.indexCount();
uint32_t last = high - 1;
while (low < high) {
uint32_t mid = (low + high) / 2;
if ((mid == last) ||
(topIndex.functionOffset(mid + 1) > targetFunctionOffset)) {
low = mid;
break;
} else {
low = mid + 1;
}
So the address of the last entry in the first-level table isn't really
checked -- except for the very end, but the check against `last` means
we just run the loop once more than necessary. But it makes `unwinddump` output
look less confusing, and it's what it looks was the intention here.
(No test since I can't think of a way to make FileCheck check that one
number is larger than another.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105404
We have been creating many ConcatInputSections with identical values due
to .subsections_via_symbols. This diff factors out the identical values
into a Shared struct, to reduce memory consumption and make copying
cheaper.
I also changed `callSiteCount` from a uint32_t to a 31-bit field to save an
extra word.
All in all, this takes InputSection from 120 to 72 bytes (and
ConcatInputSection from 160 to 112 bytes), i.e. 30% size reduction in
ConcatInputSection.
Numbers for linking chromium_framework on my 3.2 GHz 16-Core Intel Xeon W:
N Min Max Median Avg Stddev
x 20 4.14 4.24 4.18 4.183 0.027548999
+ 20 4.04 4.11 4.075 4.0775 0.018027756
Difference at 95.0% confidence
-0.1055 +/- 0.0149005
-2.52211% +/- 0.356215%
(Student's t, pooled s = 0.0232803)
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, thakis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105305
Vincent Lee