When multiple regions start on the same line, llvm-cov was just
showing the count of the last one as the line count. This can be
confusing and misleading for things like one-liner loops, where the
count at the end isn't very interesting, or even "if" statements with
an opening brace at the end of the line.
Instead, use the maximum of all of the region start counts.
llvm-svn: 230263
This splits the logic for actually looking up coverage information
from the logic that displays it. These were tangled rather thoroughly
so this change is a bit large, but it mostly consists of moving things
around. The coverage lookup logic itself now lives in the library,
rather than being spread between the library and the tool.
llvm-svn: 218184
This encapsulates how we handle the coverage regions of a file or
function. In the old model, the user had to deal with nested regions,
so they needed to maintain their own auxiliary data structures to get
any useful information out of this. The new API provides a sequence of
non-overlapping coverage segments, which makes it possible to render
coverage information in a single pass and avoids a fair amount of
extra work.
llvm-svn: 217975
SourceCoverageView currently has "Kind" and a list of child views, all
of which must have either an expansion or an instantiation Kind. In
addition to being an error-prone design, this makes it awkward to
differentiate between the two child types and adds a number of
optionally used members to the type.
Split the subview types into their own separate objects, and maintain
lists of each rather than one combined "Children" list.
llvm-svn: 217940
In r217746, though it was supposed to be NFC, I broke llvm-cov's
handling of showing regions without showing counts. This should've
shown up in the existing tests, except they were checking debug output
that was displayed regardless of what was actually output. I've moved
the relevant debug output to a more appropriate place so that the
tests catch this kind of thing.
llvm-svn: 217835
This commit expands llvm-cov's functionality by adding support for a new code coverage
tool that uses LLVM's coverage mapping format and clang's instrumentation based profiling.
The gcov compatible tool can be invoked by supplying the 'gcov' command as the first argument,
or by modifying the tool's name to end with 'gcov'.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4445
llvm-svn: 216300
Easwaran Raman