This mostly affects pure virtual methods, but would also affect parent
methods defined inline in the header when analyzing the child's source file.
llvm-svn: 161709
This check is also accessible through the debug.ExprInspection checker.
Like clang_analyzer_eval, you can use it to test the analyzer engine's
current state; the argument should be true or false to indicate whether or
not you expect the function to be inlined.
When used in the positive case (clang_analyzer_checkInlined(true)), the
analyzer prints the message "TRUE" if the function is ever inlined. However,
clang_analyzer_checkInlined(false) should never print a message; this asserts
that there should be no paths on which the current function is inlined, but
then there are no paths on which to print a message! (If the assertion is
violated, the message "FALSE" will be printed.)
This asymmetry comes from the fact that the only other chance to print a
message is when the function is analyzed as a top-level function. However,
when we do that, we can't be sure it isn't also inlined elsewhere (such as
in a recursive function, or if we want to analyze in both general or
specialized cases). Rather than have all checkInlined calls have an appended,
meaningless "FALSE" or "TOP-LEVEL" case, there is just no message printed.
void clang_analyzer_checkInlined(int);
For debugging purposes only!
llvm-svn: 161708
While -Wpedantic was reasonable, -Wno-pedantic would turn off a bunch of warnings that
are on by default. This counters the intention of this warning flag.
To fix this, -Wpedantic now includes extentions that are not on by default. The
remaining warnings will manifest anyway, and won't accidentally get turned off
by -Wno-pedantic.
Fixes <rdar://problem/12076105>
llvm-svn: 161695
When a trace ends with a back-edge, include PHIs in the loop header in
the height computations. This makes the critical path through a loop
more accurate by including the latencies of the last instructions in the
loop.
llvm-svn: 161688
- if a boolean test (X86ISD::CMP or X86ISD:SUB) checks a boolean value
generated from X86ISD::SETCC, try to simplify the boolean value
generation and checking by reusing the original EFLAGS with proper
condition code
- add hooks to X86 specific SETCC/BRCOND/CMOV, the major 3 places
consuming EFLAGS
part of patches fixing PR12312
llvm-svn: 161687
Instead of adding it to each individual subclass in
Targets.cpp, simply check the appropriate target
values.
Where before it was only on x86_64 and ppc64, it's now
also defined on mips64 and nvptx64.
Also add a bunch of negative tests to ensure it is *not*
defined on any other architectures while we're here.
llvm-svn: 161685
TODO:
- Handle @syncronized properties.
- Always inline properties declared publicly (do not split the path).
This is tricky since there is no mapping from a Decl to the property in
the AST as far as I can tell.
llvm-svn: 161683
when we don't need to split.
In some cases we know that a method cannot have a different
implementation in a subclass:
- the class is declared in the main file (private)
- all the method declarations (including the ones coming from super
classes) are in the main file.
This can be improved further, but might be enough for the heuristic.
(When we are too aggressive splitting the state, efficiency suffers.
When we fail to split the state coverage might suffer.)
llvm-svn: 161681
when trying to free memory that actually belongs to the system purgeable zone, use malloc_zone_free(malloc_default_purgeable_zone(), ptr) instead of asan_free().
llvm-svn: 161661
When replacing Old with New, it can happen that New is already a
successor. Add the old and new edge weights instead of creating a
duplicate edge.
llvm-svn: 161653
Jordan Rose