macOS paths usually start with /Users, which clang-cl interprets as a
macro undefine, leading to pretty much everything failing to compile.
CMake should be taught to put a -- in its compilation rules for clang-cl
(and I've been meaning to submit that upstream for a while). In the
meantime, however, and to support older CMake versions, we can just
create a custom make rules override to fix the compilation rules.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41219
llvm-svn: 320785
This makes it work better with some build_vector and concat_vectors creations.
Adjust the NewSDValueDbgMsg in getConstant to avoid duplicating the print when it calls getSplatBuildVector since getSplatBuildVector didn't trigger a print before.
llvm-svn: 320783
We have several instructions that were introduced in AVX512F that are only available in 512-bit form on KNL. We still make use of them for 128/256 by artificially widening and extracting during isel.
This commit separates these operations from the true 512-bit operations. This way we can qualify the normal 512-bit operations with needing 512-bit register support. And these special operations will get qualified with needing 512-bit registers OR VLX.
The 512-bit register qualification will be introduced in a future patch this just gets everything grouped to minimize deltas on that patch.
llvm-svn: 320782
Previously they were sort of interleaved in with XMM/YMM/ZMM action related code.
Trying to separate things so its easier to split 512-bit vectors later.
llvm-svn: 320781
Move it into the separate hasVLX block later in the constructor.
I'm trying to separate 128/256 and 512-bit related code so we can eventually qualify the hasAVX512 block with support for 512-bit vectors required by the prefer-vector-width feature support being talked about in D41096.
llvm-svn: 320779
Clang recently switched to C++14 (with GNU extensions) as the default
dialect, but LLDB didn't catch up. This causes failures as LLDB still
evaluates ObjectiveC expressions as Objective C++ using C++98 as standard.
There are things not available in C++98, including, e.g. nullptr.
In some cases Objective-C `nil` is defined as `nullptr` so this causes
an evaluation failure. Switch the default to overcome this issue
(actually, currently lldb evaluates both C++11 and C++14 as C++11,
but that seems a larger change and definitely could be re-evaluated
in the future).
No test as this is currently failing on the LLDB bots after the clang
switch (so, de facto, there's a test already for it).
This is a recommit, with a thinko fixed (the code was previously
placed incorrectly).
<rdar://problem/36011995>
llvm-svn: 320778
Add support for properly handling PIC code with no-PLT. This equates to
`-fpic -fno-plt -O0` with the clang frontend. External functions are
marked with nonlazybind, which must then be indirected through the GOT.
This allows code to be built without optimizations in PIC mode without
going through the PLT. Addresses PR35653!
llvm-svn: 320776
This is a special code that indicates that it's a function id.
While I'm still not certain how to interpret these, we definitely
should *not* be using these values as indices into an array directly.
For now, when we encounter one of these, just print the numeric value.
llvm-svn: 320775
Summary:
- lowers @llvm.global_dtors by adding @llvm.global_ctors
functions which register the destructors with `__cxa_atexit`.
- impements @llvm.global_ctors with wasm start functions and linker metadata
See [here](https://github.com/WebAssembly/tool-conventions/issues/25) for more background.
Subscribers: jfb, dschuff, mgorny, jgravelle-google, aheejin, sunfish
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41211
llvm-svn: 320774
Summary:
Now that r320495, "[debuginfo-tests] Support moving
debuginfo-tests to llvm/projects," has landed, which includes a local
copy of test_debuginfo.pl, remove the obsolete copy.
Reviewers: zturner, aprantl
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: llvm-commits, JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41260
llvm-svn: 320771
Specifically, libwidevinecdm.so in Chrome has such bad symbol.
It seems the BFD linker handles them as local symbols, so instead
of inserting them to the symbol table, we should skip them too.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41257
llvm-svn: 320770
The initializeLocal function of UnaryTransformTypeLoc missed
the UnderlyingTInfo member. This caused a null-dereference
issue, as reported in PR23421. This patch correctly initializss
the UnderlyingTInfo.
llvm-svn: 320765
This change swaps FunctionSamples to a std::map. This saves us around
17% of the memory required to parse sample profiles. To put hard numbers
on this, clang now eats around 1.3GB of RAM instead of 1.6GB while
parsing a 50MB profile.
The CPU time taken by a large profile merge (3.1GB of data across 226
files) is also reduced by ~11% by this patch (1:09.08 vs 1:01.11).
This was split out at the request of reviewers in D41152.
llvm-svn: 320764
Clang recently switched to C++14 (with GNU extensions) as the default
dialect, but LLDB didn't catch up. This causes failures as LLDB still
evaluates ObjectiveC expressions as Objective C++ using C++98 as standard.
There are things not available in C++98, including, e.g. nullptr.
In some cases Objective-C `nil` is defined as `nullptr` so this causes
an evaluation failure. Switch the default to overcome this issue
(actually, currently lldb evaluates both C++11 and C++14 as C++11,
but that seems a larger change and definitely could be re-evaluated
in the future).
No test as this is currently failing on the LLDB bots after the clang
switch (so, de facto, there's a test already for it).
<rdar://problem/36011995>
llvm-svn: 320761
While investigating LLVM PR22316 (http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=22316)
I started wondering if it were not always preferable to emit the
initial DBG_VALUEs for stack arguments as FI locations instead of
describing the first register they get copied into. The advantage of
doing this is that the arguments will be available as soon as the
stack is setup. As illustrated by the testcase in the PR, the first
copy of the FI into a register may be sunk by MachineSink.cpp into a
later basic block. By describing the argument on the stack, we nicely
circumvent this problem.
<rdar://problem/19583723>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41135
llvm-svn: 320758
Summary:
In D41064, I proposed adding `#pragma clang diagnostic ignored
"-Wuser-defined-literals"` to some of libc++'s headers, since these
warnings are now triggered by clang's new `-std=gnu++14` default:
```
$ cat test.cpp
#include <string>
$ clang -std=c++14 -Wsystem-headers -Wall -Wextra -c test.cpp
In file included from test.cpp:1:
In file included from /usr/include/c++/v1/string:470:
/usr/include/c++/v1/string_view:763:29: warning: user-defined literal suffixes not starting with '_' are reserved [-Wuser-defined-literals]
basic_string_view<char> operator "" sv(const char *__str, size_t __len)
^
/usr/include/c++/v1/string_view:769:32: warning: user-defined literal suffixes not starting with '_' are reserved [-Wuser-defined-literals]
basic_string_view<wchar_t> operator "" sv(const wchar_t *__str, size_t __len)
^
/usr/include/c++/v1/string_view:775:33: warning: user-defined literal suffixes not starting with '_' are reserved [-Wuser-defined-literals]
basic_string_view<char16_t> operator "" sv(const char16_t *__str, size_t __len)
^
/usr/include/c++/v1/string_view:781:33: warning: user-defined literal suffixes not starting with '_' are reserved [-Wuser-defined-literals]
basic_string_view<char32_t> operator "" sv(const char32_t *__str, size_t __len)
^
In file included from test.cpp:1:
/usr/include/c++/v1/string:4012:24: warning: user-defined literal suffixes not starting with '_' are reserved [-Wuser-defined-literals]
basic_string<char> operator "" s( const char *__str, size_t __len )
^
/usr/include/c++/v1/string:4018:27: warning: user-defined literal suffixes not starting with '_' are reserved [-Wuser-defined-literals]
basic_string<wchar_t> operator "" s( const wchar_t *__str, size_t __len )
^
/usr/include/c++/v1/string:4024:28: warning: user-defined literal suffixes not starting with '_' are reserved [-Wuser-defined-literals]
basic_string<char16_t> operator "" s( const char16_t *__str, size_t __len )
^
/usr/include/c++/v1/string:4030:28: warning: user-defined literal suffixes not starting with '_' are reserved [-Wuser-defined-literals]
basic_string<char32_t> operator "" s( const char32_t *__str, size_t __len )
^
8 warnings generated.
```
Both @aaron.ballman and @mclow.lists felt that adding this workaround to
the libc++ headers was the wrong way, and it should be fixed in clang
instead.
Here is a proposal to do just that. I verified that this suppresses the
warning, even when -Wsystem-headers is used, and that the warning is
still emitted for a declaration outside of system headers.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, mclow.lists, rsmith
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: mclow.lists, aaron.ballman, andrew, emaste, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41080
llvm-svn: 320755
There are many more expr types that can be a capability expr, like
CXXThisExpr, CallExpr, MemberExpr. Instead of enumerating all of them,
just check typeHasCapability for any type given.
Also add & and * operators to allowed unary operators.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41224
llvm-svn: 320753
Most attributes will now use the Clang<"name"> construct to provide both __attribute__((name)) and [[clang::name]] syntaxes for the attribute. Attributes deviating from this should be marked with a comment explaining why they are not supported under both spellings. Common reasons are: the attribute is provided by some other specification that controls the syntax or the attribute cannot be exposed under a particular spelling for some given reason.
Because this is a mechanical change that only introduces new spellings, there are no test cases for the commit.
llvm-svn: 320752
Summary:
Now that r320495, "[debuginfo-tests] Support moving
debuginfo-tests to llvm/projects," has landed, remove temporary FIXME
that supported the old mechanism.
Reviewers: zturner, aprantl
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41259
llvm-svn: 320751
Most of the -Wsign-compare warnings are due to the fact that
enums are signed by default in the MS ABI, while the
tautological comparison warnings trigger on x86 builds where
sizeof(size_t) is 4 bytes, so N > numeric_limits<unsigned>::max()
is always false.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41256
llvm-svn: 320750
This should solve:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34603
...by preventing SimplifyCFG from altering redundant instructions before early-cse has a chance to run.
It changes the default (canonical-forming) behavior of SimplifyCFG, so we're only doing the
sinking transform later in the optimization pipeline.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38566
llvm-svn: 320749
This patch allows checking whether a C++ record declaration is abstract through
libclang and clang.cindex (Python).
Patch by Johann Klähn!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36952
llvm-svn: 320748
This reverts commit 37e69667f748e1458b46483b7c1b8f9ba33eec44.
We're going to discuss its ramifications further before making a
conclusion.
llvm-svn: 320747
Rather than adding more bits to express every
MMO flag you could want, just directly use the
MMO flags. Also fixes using a bunch of bool arguments to
getMemIntrinsicNode.
On AMDGPU, buffer and image intrinsics should always
have MODereferencable set, but currently there is no
way to do that directly during the initial intrinsic
lowering.
llvm-svn: 320746
Summary:
The initial implementation used an ASan like Chunk class that was deriving from
a Header class. Due to potential races, we ended up working with local copies
of the Header and never using the parent class fields. ScudoChunk was never
constructed but cast, and we were using `this` as the pointer needed for our
computations. This was meh.
So we refactored ScudoChunk to be now a series of static functions within the
namespace `__scudo::Chunk` that take a "user" pointer as first parameter (former
`this`). A compiled binary doesn't really change, but the code is more sensible.
Clang tends to inline all those small function (in -O2), but GCC left a few not
inlined, so we add the `INLINE` keyword to all.
Since we don't have `ScudoChunk` pointers anymore, a few variables were renamed
here and there to introduce a clearer distinction between a user pointer
(usually `Ptr`) and a backend pointer (`BackendPtr`).
Reviewers: alekseyshl, flowerhack
Reviewed By: alekseyshl
Subscribers: #sanitizers, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41200
llvm-svn: 320745
Summary:
This is the first mostly working version of the Sanitizer port to 32-bit Solaris/x86.
It is currently based on Solaris 11.4 Beta.
This part was initially developed inside libsanitizer in the GCC tree and should apply to
both. Subsequent parts will address changes to clang, the compiler-rt build system
and testsuite.
I'm not yet sure what the right patch granularity is: if it's profitable to split the patch
up, I'd like to get guidance on how to do so.
Most of the changes are probably straightforward with a few exceptions:
* The Solaris syscall interface isn't stable, undocumented and can change within an
OS release. The stable interface is the libc interface, which I'm using here, if possible
using the internal _-prefixed names.
* While the patch primarily target 32-bit x86, I've left a few sparc changes in. They
cannot currently be used with clang due to a backend limitation, but have worked
fine inside the gcc tree.
* Some functions (e.g. largefile versions of functions like open64) only exist in 32-bit
Solaris, so I've introduced a separate SANITIZER_SOLARIS32 to check for that.
The patch (with the subsequent ones to be submitted shortly) was tested
on i386-pc-solaris2.11. Only a few failures remain, some of them analyzed, some
still TBD:
AddressSanitizer-i386-sunos :: TestCases/Posix/concurrent_overflow.cc
AddressSanitizer-i386-sunos :: TestCases/init-order-atexit.cc
AddressSanitizer-i386-sunos :: TestCases/log-path_test.cc
AddressSanitizer-i386-sunos :: TestCases/malloc-no-intercept.c
AddressSanitizer-i386-sunos-dynamic :: TestCases/Posix/concurrent_overflow.cc
AddressSanitizer-i386-sunos-dynamic :: TestCases/Posix/start-deactivated.cc
AddressSanitizer-i386-sunos-dynamic :: TestCases/default_options.cc
AddressSanitizer-i386-sunos-dynamic :: TestCases/init-order-atexit.cc
AddressSanitizer-i386-sunos-dynamic :: TestCases/log-path_test.cc
AddressSanitizer-i386-sunos-dynamic :: TestCases/malloc-no-intercept.c
SanitizerCommon-Unit :: ./Sanitizer-i386-Test/MemoryMappingLayout.DumpListOfModules
SanitizerCommon-Unit :: ./Sanitizer-i386-Test/SanitizerCommon.PthreadDestructorIterations
Maybe this is good enough the get the ball rolling.
Reviewers: kcc, alekseyshl
Reviewed By: alekseyshl
Subscribers: srhines, jyknight, kubamracek, krytarowski, fedor.sergeev, llvm-commits, #sanitizers
Tags: #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40898
llvm-svn: 320740
This reverts commit ac5edc198eb612f82293850c3488042708b1c5fa.
Apparently this doesn't cover all the bases, so some compilers
and standard libraries still think this is not trivially copyable
even though it is. Reverting this back to an MSVC-only check for
now so that at least we have some coverage.
llvm-svn: 320739
In SLPVectorizer, the vector build instructions (insertvalue for aggregate type) is passed to BoUpSLP.buildTree, it is treated as UserIgnoreList, so later in cost estimation, the cost of these instructions are not counted.
For aggregate value, later usage are more likely to be done in scalar registers, either used as individual scalars or used as a whole for function call or return value. Ignore scalar extraction instructions may cause too aggressive vectorization for aggregate values, and slow down performance. So for vectorization of aggregate value, the scalar extraction instructions are required in cost estimation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41139
llvm-svn: 320736
Shoaib Meenai