Currently, a load from an alloca that is used in as single block and is not preceded
by a store is replaced by undef. This is not always correct if the single block is
inside a loop.
Fix the logic so that:
1) If there are no stores in the block, replace the load with an undef, as before.
2) If there is a store (regardless of where it is in the block w.r.t the load), bail
out, and let the rest of mem2reg handle this alloca.
Patch by: gil.rapaport@intel.com
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11355
llvm-svn: 242884
Summary: The current code in LoopUnswtich::processCurrentLoop() mixes trivial loop unswitch and non-trivial loop unswitch together. It goes over all basic blocks in the loop and checks if a condition is trivial or non-trivial unswitch condition. However, trivial unswitch condition can only occur in the loop header basic block (where it controls whether or not the loop does something at all). This refactoring separate trivial loop unswitch and non-trivial loop unswitch. Before going over all basic blocks in the loop, it checks if the loop header contains a trivial unswitch condition. If so, unswitch it. Otherwise, go over all blocks like before but don't check trivial condition any more since they are not possible to be in the other blocks. This code has no functionality change.
Reviewers: meheff, reames, broune
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11276
llvm-svn: 242873
types and loads, loads or stores widened past the size of an alloca,
etc.
This started off with a bug report about big-endian behavior with
bitfields and loads and stores to a { i32, i24 } struct. An initial
attempt to fix this was sent for review in D10357, but that didn't
really get to the root of the problem.
The core issue was that canConvertValue and convertValue in SROA were
handling different bitwidth integers by doing a zext of the integer. It
wouldn't do a trunc though, only a zext! This would in turn lead SROA to
form an i24 load from an i24 alloca, zext it to i32, and then use it.
This would at least produce the wrong value for big-endian systems.
One of my many false starts here was to correct the computation for
big-endian systems by shifting. But this doesn't actually work because
the original code has a 64-bit store to the entire 8 bytes, and a 32-bit
load of the last 4 bytes, and because the alloc size is 8 bytes, we
can't lose that last (least significant if bigendian) byte! The real
problem here is that we're forming an i24 load in SROA which is actually
not sufficiently wide to load all of the necessary bits here. The source
has an i32 load, and SROA needs to form that as well.
The straightforward way to do this is to disable the zext logic in
canConvertValue and convertValue, forcing us to actually load all
32-bits. This seems like a really good change, but it in turn breaks
several other parts of SROA.
First in the chain of knock-on failures, we had places where we were
doing integer-widening promotion even though some of the integer loads
or stores extended *past the end* of the alloca's memory! There was even
a comment about preventing this, but it only prevented the case where
the type had a different bit size from its store size. So I added checks
to handle the cases where we actually have a widened load or store and
to avoid trying to special integer widening promotion in those cases.
Second, we actually rely on the ability to promote in the face of loads
past the end of an alloca! This is important so that we can (for
example) speculate loads around PHI nodes to do more promotion. The bits
loaded are garbage, but as long as they aren't used and the alignment is
suitable high (which it wasn't in the test case!) this is "fine". And we
can't stop promoting here, lots of things stop working well if we do. So
we need to add specific logic to handle the extension (and truncation)
case, but *only* where that extension or truncation are over bytes that
*are outside the alloca's allocated storage* and thus totally bogus to
load or store.
And of course, once we add back this correct handling of extension or
truncation, we need to correctly handle bigendian systems to avoid
re-introducing the exact bug that started us off on this chain of misery
in the first place, but this time even more subtle as it only happens
along speculated loads atop a PHI node.
I've ported an existing test for PHI speculation to the big-endian test
file and checked that we get that part correct, and I've added several
more interesting big-endian test cases that should help check that we're
getting this correct.
Fun times.
llvm-svn: 242869
We insert a bitcast which obfuscates the getCalledFunction for the utility
function which looks up attributes from the called function. Loosing ABI
changing parameter attributes is a bad thing.
rdar://21516488
llvm-svn: 242807
A patch by Chakshu Grover!
This patch allows constfolding of trunc,rint,nearbyint,ceil and floor intrinsics using APFloat class.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11144
llvm-svn: 242763
Summary:
SpeculativeExecution enables a series straight line optimizations (such
as SLSR and NaryReassociate) on conditional code. For example,
if (...)
... b * s ...
if (...)
... (b + 1) * s ...
speculative execution can hoist b * s and (b + 1) * s from then-blocks,
so that we have
... b * s ...
if (...)
...
... (b + 1) * s ...
if (...)
...
Then, SLSR can rewrite (b + 1) * s to (b * s + s) because after
speculative execution b * s dominates (b + 1) * s.
The performance impact of this change is significant. It speeds up the
benchmarks running EigenFloatContractionKernelInternal16x16
(ba68f42fa6/unsupported/Eigen/CXX11/src/Tensor/TensorContractionCuda.h?at=default#cl-526)
by roughly 2%. Some internal benchmarks that have the above code pattern
are improved by up to 40%. No significant slowdowns are observed on
Eigen CUDA microbenchmarks.
Reviewers: jholewinski, broune, eliben
Subscribers: llvm-commits, jholewinski
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11201
llvm-svn: 242437
Internalizing an individual comdat group member without also internalizing
the other members of the comdat can break comdat semantics. For example,
if a module contains a reference to an internalized comdat member, and the
linker chooses a comdat group from a different object file, this will break
the reference to the internalized member.
This change causes the internalizer to only internalize comdat members if all
other members of the comdat are not externally visible. Once a comdat group
has been fully internalized, there is no need to apply comdat rules to its
members; later optimization passes (e.g. globaldce) can legally drop individual
members of the comdat. So we drop the comdat attribute from all comdat members.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10679
llvm-svn: 242423
Self-referential constants containing references to a merged function
no longer cause the MergeFunctions pass to infinite loop. Also adds a
reproduction IR which would otherwise fail, which was isolated from a similar
issue in Chromium.
Author: jrkoenig
Reviewers: nlewycky, jfb
Subscribers: llvm-commits, nlewycky, jfb
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11208
llvm-svn: 242337
During estimation of unrolling effect we should be able to propagate
constants through casts.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10207
llvm-svn: 242257
Sometimes an incidentally created instruction can duplicate a Value used
elsewhere. It then often doesn't end up in the leader table. If it's later
removed, we attempt to remove it from the leader table and segfault.
Instead we should just ignore the removal request, which won't cause any
problems. The reverse situation, where the original instruction is replaced by
the new one (which you might think could leave the leader table empty) cannot
occur, because the incidental instruction will never be found in the first
place.
llvm-svn: 242199
Volatile loads and stores are made visible in global state regardless of
what memory is involved. It is not correct to disregard the ordering
and synchronization scope because it is possible to synchronize with
memory operations performed by hardware.
This partially addresses PR23737.
llvm-svn: 242126
Previously we would refrain from attempting to increase the linkage of
available_externally globals because they were considered weak for the
linker. Now they are treated more like a declaration instead of a weak
definition.
This was causing SSE alignment faults in Chromuim, when some code
assumed it could increase the alignment of a dllimported global that it
didn't control. http://crbug.com/509256
llvm-svn: 242091
This test case was breaking the hexagon elf bot. The failing lines
were actually unnecessary as checking that the store still reads the
correct value demonstrates that everything is working fine now.
llvm-svn: 242073
When spotting that a loop can use ctpop, we were incorrectly replacing all uses of a value with a value derived from ctpop.
The bug here was exposed because we were replacing a use prior to the ctpop with the ctpop value and so we have a use before def, i.e., we changed
%tobool.5 = icmp ne i32 %num, 0
store i1 %tobool.5, i1* %ptr
br i1 %tobool.5, label %for.body.lr.ph, label %for.end
to
store i1 %1, i1* %ptr
%0 = call i32 @llvm.ctpop.i32(i32 %num)
%1 = icmp ne i32 %0, 0
br i1 %1, label %for.body.lr.ph, label %for.end
Even if we inserted the ctpop so that it dominates the store here, that would still be incorrect. The store doesn’t want the result of ctpop.
The fix is very simple, and involves replacing only the branch condition with the ctpop instead of all uses.
Reviewed by Hal Finkel.
llvm-svn: 242068
Enable runtime unrolling for loops with unroll count metadata ("#pragma unroll N")
and a runtime trip count. Also, do not unroll loops with unroll full metadata if the
loop has a runtime loop count. Previously, such loops would be unrolled with a
very large threshold (pragma-unroll-threshold) if runtime unrolled happened to be
enabled resulting in a very large (and likely unwise) unroll factor.
llvm-svn: 242047
Summary:
This at least saves compile time. I also encountered a case where
ephemeral values affect whether other variables are promoted, causing
performance issues. It may be a bug in LSR, but I didn't manage to
reduce it yet. Anyhow, I believe it's in general not worth considering
ephemeral values in LSR.
Reviewers: atrick, hfinkel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11115
llvm-svn: 242011
There is no suitable basic block to sink instructions in loops without
exits. The only way an instruction in a loop without exits can be used
is as an incoming value to a PHI. In such cases, the incoming block for
the corresponding value is unreachable.
This fixes PR24013.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10903
llvm-svn: 241987
After changes in rL231820 loop re-rotation is performed even in -Oz mode. Since loop rotation is disabled for -Oz, it seems loop re-rotation should be disabled too.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10961
llvm-svn: 241897
Not doing this can lead to misoptimizations down the line, e.g. because
of range metadata on the replacing load excluding values that are valid
for the load that is being replaced.
llvm-svn: 241886
Summary:
In RewriteLoopExitValues, before expanding out an SCEV expression using
SCEVExpander, try to see if an existing LLVM IR expression already
computes the value we're interested in. If so use that existing
expression.
Apart from reducing IndVars' reliance on the rest of the compilation
pipeline, this also prevents IndVars from concluding some expressions as
"high cost" when they're not. For instance,
`InductiveRangeCheckElimination` often emits code of the following form:
```
len = umin(len_A, len_B)
loop:
...
if (i++ < len)
goto loop
outside_loop:
use(i)
```
`SCEVExpander` refuses to rewrite the use of `i` in `outside_loop`,
since it thinks the value of `i` on loop exit, `len`, is a high cost
expansion since it contains an `umax` in it. With this change,
`IndVars` can see that it can re-use `len` instead of creating a new
expression to compute `umin(len_A, len_B)`.
I considered putting this cleverness in `SCEVExpander`, but I was
worried that it may then have a deterimental effect on other passes
that use it. So I decided it was better to just do this in the one
place where it seems like an obviously good idea, with the intent of
generalizing later if needed.
Reviewers: atrick, reames
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10782
llvm-svn: 241838
Summary:
Often filter-like loops will do memory accesses that are
separated by constant offsets. In these cases it is
common that we will exceed the threshold for the
allowable number of checks.
However, it should be possible to merge such checks,
sice a check of any interval againt two other intervals separated
by a constant offset (a,b), (a+c, b+c) will be equivalent with
a check againt (a, b+c), as long as (a,b) and (a+c, b+c) overlap.
Assuming the loop will be executed for a sufficient number of
iterations, this will be true. If not true, checking against
(a, b+c) is still safe (although not equivalent).
As long as there are no dependencies between two accesses,
we can merge their checks into a single one. We use this
technique to construct groups of accesses, and then check
the intervals associated with the groups instead of
checking the accesses directly.
Reviewers: anemet
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10386
llvm-svn: 241673
Summary:
Initially, these intrinsics seemed like part of a family of "frame"
related intrinsics, but now I think that's more confusing than helpful.
Initially, the LangRef specified that this would create a new kind of
allocation that would be allocated at a fixed offset from the frame
pointer (EBP/RBP). We ended up dropping that design, and leaving the
stack frame layout alone.
These intrinsics are really about sharing local stack allocations, not
frame pointers. I intend to go further and add an `llvm.localaddress()`
intrinsic that returns whatever register (EBP, ESI, ESP, RBX) is being
used to address locals, which should not be confused with the frame
pointer.
Naming suggestions at this point are welcome, I'm happy to re-run sed.
Reviewers: majnemer, nicholas
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11011
llvm-svn: 241633
This checks subtarget feature compatibility for inlining by verifying
that the callee is a strict subset of the caller's features. This includes
the cpu as part of the subtarget we can get via the incoming functions as
the backend takes CPUs as feature sets.
This allows us to inline things like:
int foo() { return baz(); }
int __attribute__((target("sse4.2"))) bar() {
return foo();
}
so that generic code can be inlined into specialized functions.
llvm-svn: 241221
TwoAddressInstructionPass stops after a successful commuting but 3 Addr
conversion might be good for some cases.
Consider:
int foo(int a, int b) {
return a + b;
}
Before this commit, we emit:
addl %esi, %edi
movl %edi, %eax
ret
After this commit, we try 3 Addr conversion:
leal (%rsi,%rdi), %eax
ret
Patch by Volkan Keles <vkeles@apple.com>!
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10851
llvm-svn: 241206
This is mostly an NFC, which increases code readability (instead of
saving old terminator, generating new one in front of old, and deleting
old, we just call a function). However, it would additionaly copy
the debug location from old instruction to replacement, which
would help PR23837.
llvm-svn: 241197
We would create a phi node with a zero initialized operand instead of
undef in the case where no value was originally available. This was
problematic for x86_mmx which has no null value.
llvm-svn: 241143
Surprisingly, this is a correctness issue: the mmx type exists for
calling convention purposes, LLVM doesn't have a zero representation for
them.
This partially fixes PR23999.
llvm-svn: 241142
Summary:
nsw are flaky and can often be removed by optimizations. This patch enhances
nsw by leveraging @llvm.assume in the IR. Specifically, NaryReassociate now
understands that
assume(a + b >= 0) && assume(a >= 0) ==> a +nsw b
As a result, it can split more sext(a + b) into sext(a) + sext(b) for CSE.
Test Plan: nary-gep.ll
Reviewers: broune, meheff
Subscribers: jholewinski, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10822
llvm-svn: 241139
Set debug location for terminator instruction in loop backedge block
(which is an unconditional jump to loop header). We can't copy debug
location from original backedges, as there can be several of them,
with different debug info locations. So, we follow the approach of
SplitBlockPredecessors, and copy the debug info from first non-PHI
instruction in the header (i.e. destination block).
This is yet another change for PR23837.
llvm-svn: 240999
If we are dealing with a pointer induction variable, isInductionPHI
gives back a step value of Stride / size of pointer. However, we might
be indexing with a legal type wider than the pointer width.
Handle this by inserting casts where appropriate instead of crashing.
This fixes PR23954.
llvm-svn: 240877
The PruneEH pass tries to annotate functions as 'noreturn' if it doesn't
see a ReturnInst. However, a naked function containing inline assembly
can contain control flow leaving the function.
This fixes PR23971.
llvm-svn: 240876
Michael Kuperstein