For example, on:
#include <emmintrin.h>
int foo(int N) {
__m128i white2;
white2 = _mm_slli_si128(white2, N);
return 0;
}
we used to get:
fatal error: error in backend: Cannot yet select: intrinsic %llvm.x86.sse2.psll.dq
now we get:
/Users/sabre/t.c:4:11: error: argument to '__builtin_ia32_pslldqi128' must be a
constant integer
white2 = _mm_slli_si128(white2, N);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from /Users/sabre/t.c:1:
/Volumes/Projects/cvs/llvm/Debug+Asserts/lib/clang/2.9/include/emmintrin.h:781:13: note: instantiated from:
((__m128i)__builtin_ia32_pslldqi128((__m128i)(VEC), (IMM)*8))
^ ~~~~~~~
1 error generated.
llvm-svn: 115374
are expanded from macros (and if so, omit the warning). Previously we were just looking at the
location of the binary expression.
Fixes <rdar://problem/8435950>.
llvm-svn: 114044
the function processing the format string can decided whether or not to accept a null format string (e.g., asl_log). Fixes <rdar://problem/8269537>.
llvm-svn: 113469
The rationale behind this is that it is normal for callback functions to have a non-void return type
and it should still be possible to mark them noreturn. (JavaScriptCore is a good example of this).
llvm-svn: 112918
vectors that are the same size. Fix up testcases accordingly and add a new one
to make sure we still error if lax vector conversions are disabled.
Fixes rdar://8328190
llvm-svn: 112122
for incomplete enum types. An incomplete enum can't really be treated as
an "integral or enumeration" type, and the incorrect treatment leads to
bad behavior for many callers.
This makes isIntegralOrEnumerationType equivalent to isIntegerType; I think
we should globally replace the latter with the former; thoughts?
llvm-svn: 111512
than GCC 4.2 here when building 32-bit (where GCC will allow
allocation of an array for which we can't get a valid past-the-end
pointer), and emulate its odd behavior in 64-bit where it only allows
63 bits worth of storage in the array. The former is a correctness
issue; the latter is harmless in practice (you wouldn't be able to use
such an array anyway) and helps us pass a GCC DejaGNU test.
Fixes <rdar://problem/8212293>.
llvm-svn: 111338
Unused warnings for functions:
-static functions
-functions in anonymous namespace
-class methods in anonymous namespace
-class method specializations in anonymous namespace
-function specializations in anonymous namespace
Unused warnings for variables:
-static variables
-variables in anonymous namespace
-static data members in anonymous namespace
-static data members specializations in anonymous namespace
Reveals lots of opportunities for dead code removal in llvm codebase that will
interest my esteemed colleagues.
llvm-svn: 111086
-static function declarations
-functions in anonymous namespace
-class methods in anonymous namespace
-class method specializations in anonymous namespace
-function specializations in anonymous namespace
llvm-svn: 111026
from GCC's in that we warn on *any* increase in alignment requirements, not
just those that are enforced by hardware. Please let us know if this causes
major problems for you (which it shouldn't, since it's an optional warning).
llvm-svn: 110959
Chandler Carruth