The IntelPrinter and the ATTPrinter produce the same strings for the same input. We already use the ATTPrinter explicitly in several other places.
llvm-svn: 328762
X86 Supports Indirect Branch Tracking (IBT) as part of Control-Flow Enforcement Technology (CET).
IBT instruments ENDBR instructions used to specify valid targets of indirect call / jmp.
The `nocf_check` attribute has two roles in the context of X86 IBT technology:
1. Appertains to a function - do not add ENDBR instruction at the beginning of the function.
2. Appertains to a function pointer - do not track the target function of this pointer by adding nocf_check prefix to the indirect-call instruction.
This patch implements `nocf_check` context for Indirect Branch Tracking.
It also auto generates `nocf_check` prefixes before indirect branchs to jump tables that are guarded by range checks.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41879
llvm-svn: 327767
I did this a long time ago with a janky python script, but now
clang-format has built-in support for this. I fed clang-format every
line with a #include and let it re-sort things according to the precise
LLVM rules for include ordering baked into clang-format these days.
I've reverted a number of files where the results of sorting includes
isn't healthy. Either places where we have legacy code relying on
particular include ordering (where possible, I'll fix these separately)
or where we have particular formatting around #include lines that
I didn't want to disturb in this patch.
This patch is *entirely* mechanical. If you get merge conflicts or
anything, just ignore the changes in this patch and run clang-format
over your #include lines in the files.
Sorry for any noise here, but it is important to keep these things
stable. I was seeing an increasing number of patches with irrelevant
re-ordering of #include lines because clang-format was used. This patch
at least isolates that churn, makes it easy to skip when resolving
conflicts, and gets us to a clean baseline (again).
llvm-svn: 304787
This patch fixes bugzilla 31576 (https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=31576).
"data32" instruction prefix was not defined in the llvm.
An exception had to be added to the X86 tablegen and AsmPrinter because both "data16" and "data32" are encoded to 0x66 (but in different modes).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28468
llvm-svn: 292352
It would be better to check the valid/expected size of the immediate operand, but this is
generally better than what we print right now.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20385
llvm-svn: 271114
Removed some unused headers, replaced some headers with forward class declarations.
Found using simple scripts like this one:
clear && ack --cpp -l '#include "llvm/ADT/IndexedMap.h"' | xargs grep -L 'IndexedMap[<]' | xargs grep -n --color=auto 'IndexedMap'
Patch by Eugene Kosov <claprix@yandex.ru>
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19219
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 266595
This gets gas and llc -filetype=obj to agree on the order of prefixes.
For llvm-mc we need to fix the asm parser to know that it makes a difference
on which line the "lock" is in.
Part of pr23594.
llvm-svn: 238232
Previously, subtarget features were a bitfield with the underlying type being uint64_t.
Since several targets (X86 and ARM, in particular) have hit or were very close to hitting this bound, switching the features to use a bitset.
No functional change.
The first several times this was committed (e.g. r229831, r233055), it caused several buildbot failures.
Apparently the reason for most failures was both clang and gcc's inability to deal with large numbers (> 10K) of bitset constructor calls in tablegen-generated initializers of instruction info tables.
This should now be fixed.
llvm-svn: 238192
Previously, subtarget features were a bitfield with the underlying type being uint64_t.
Since several targets (X86 and ARM, in particular) have hit or were very close to hitting this bound, switching the features to use a bitset.
No functional change.
The first two times this was committed (r229831, r233055), it caused several buildbot failures.
At least some of the ARM and MIPS ones were due to gcc/binutils issues, and should now be fixed.
llvm-svn: 237234
per-function subtarget.
Currently, code-gen passes the default or generic subtarget to the constructors
of MCInstPrinter subclasses (see LLVMTargetMachine::addPassesToEmitFile), which
enables some targets (AArch64, ARM, and X86) to change their instprinter's
behavior based on the subtarget feature bits. Since the backend can now use
different subtargets for each function, instprinter has to be changed to use the
per-function subtarget rather than the default subtarget.
This patch takes the first step towards enabling instprinter to change its
behavior based on the per-function subtarget. It adds a bit "PassSubtarget" to
AsmWriter which tells table-gen to pass a reference to MCSubtargetInfo to the
various print methods table-gen auto-generates.
I will follow up with changes to instprinters of AArch64, ARM, and X86.
llvm-svn: 233411
This reverts commit r233055.
It still causes buildbot failures (gcc running out of memory on several platforms, and a self-host failure on arm), although less than the previous time.
llvm-svn: 233068
Previously, subtarget features were a bitfield with the underlying type being uint64_t.
Since several targets (X86 and ARM, in particular) have hit or were very close to hitting this bound, switching the features to use a bitset.
No functional change.
The first time this was committed (r229831), it caused several buildbot failures.
At least some of the ARM ones were due to gcc/binutils issues, and should now be fixed.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8542
llvm-svn: 233055
Previously, subtarget features were a bitfield with the underlying type being uint64_t.
Since several targets (X86 and ARM, in particular) have hit or were very close to hitting this bound, switching the features to use a bitset.
No functional change.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7065
llvm-svn: 229831
Summary:
In AT&T annotation for both x86_64 and x32 calls should be printed as
callq in assembly. It's only a matter of correct mnemonic, object output
is ok.
Test Plan: trivial test added
Reviewers: nadav, dschuff, craig.topper
Subscribers: llvm-commits, zinovy.nis
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5213
llvm-svn: 217435
an immediate operand when we don't have instruction-specific comments.
This ensures that instruction-specific comments are attached to the same
line as the instruction which is important for using them to write
readable and maintainable tests. My next commit will just such a test.
llvm-svn: 217099
Summary:
X86BaseInfo.h defines an enum for the offset of each operand in a memory operand
sequence. Some code uses it and some does not. This patch replaces (hopefully)
all remaining locations where an integer literal was used instead of this enum.
No functionality change intended.
Reviewers: nadav
CC: llvm-commits, t.p.northover
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D3108
llvm-svn: 204158
-Assembly parser now properly check the size of the memory operation specified in intel syntax. So 'mov word ptr [5], al' is no longer accepted.
-x86-32 disassembly of these instructions no longer sign extends the 32-bit address immediate based on size.
-Intel syntax printing prints the ptr size and places brackets around the address immediate.
Known remaining issues with these instructions:
-Segment override prefix is not supported. PR16962 and PR16961.
-Immediate size should be changed by address size prefix.
llvm-svn: 189201
This is for the lldb team so most of but not all of the values are
to be printed as hex with this option. Some small values like the
scale in an X86 address were requested to printed in decimal
without the leading 0x.
There may be some tweaks need to places that may still be in
decimal that they want in hex. Specially for arm. I made my best
guess. Any tweaks from here should be simple.
I also did the best I know now with help from the C++ gurus
creating the cleanest formatImm() utility function and containing
the changes. But if someone has a better idea to make something
cleaner I'm all ears and game for changing the implementation.
rdar://8109283
llvm-svn: 169393
Sooooo many of these had incorrect or strange main module includes.
I have manually inspected all of these, and fixed the main module
include to be the nearest plausible thing I could find. If you own or
care about any of these source files, I encourage you to take some time
and check that these edits were sensible. I can't have broken anything
(I strictly added headers, and reordered them, never removed), but they
may not be the headers you'd really like to identify as containing the
API being implemented.
Many forward declarations and missing includes were added to a header
files to allow them to parse cleanly when included first. The main
module rule does in fact have its merits. =]
llvm-svn: 169131
Craig Topper