When a macro expansion does not result in any tokens, and the macro name
is preceded by whitespace, the whitespace should be passed to the first
token that follows the macro expansion. Similarly when a macro expansion
ends with a placemarker token, and that placemarker token is preceded by
whitespace. This worked already for top-level macro expansions, but is
now extended to also work for nested macro expansions.
Patch by Harald van Dijk!
llvm-svn: 200787
When a function-like macro definition ends with one of the macro's
parameters, and the argument is empty, any whitespace before the
parameter name in the macro definition needs to be preserved. Promoting
the existing NextTokGetsSpace to a preserved bit-field and checking it
at the end of the macro expansion allows it to be moved to the first
token following the macro expansion result.
Patch by Harald van Dijk!
llvm-svn: 200786
In x ## y, where x and y are regular tokens, whitespace between x and ##
is ignored, and whitespace between ## and y is also ignored. When either
x or y is a function argument, whitespace was preserved, but it should
not be. This patch removes the checks for whitespace before ## and
before y, and in the special case where x is an empty macro argument and
y is a regular token, actively removes whitespace before y.
One existing test is affected by that change, but as clang's output now
matches the standard's requirements and that of GCC, I've tweaked the
testcase.
Patch by Harald van Dijk!
llvm-svn: 200785
redeclaration, not just when looking them up for a use -- we need the implicit
declaration to appropriately check various properties of them (notably, whether
they're deleted).
llvm-svn: 200729
Some lines intended to be used for testing x86_64 ABI compatibility were
not firing because lines were annotated with the wrong FileCheck prefix:
X64 vs x64
N.B. Changes beyond just changing x64 to X64 were made, presumably
because other parts of the layout engine have changed. I've verified
the changes to make sure that MSVC creates a compatible layout.
llvm-svn: 200670
Ranges before:
void test(void (*)(int), int, float);
~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~ ~~~~~~
Ranges after:
void test(void (*)(int), int, float);
~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~ ~~~~~
This does not change the actual location of the ParmVarDecl, it still
points to the location where the name would be. PR17970.
llvm-svn: 200640
When building for i386 or x86_64 with IPHONEOS_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET set in the
environment, the toolchain correctly recognizes that the target platform is
the iOS simulator. The code in Darwin::addMinVersionArgs was not updated for
svn 197148, where isTargetIPhoneOS() was widely replaced by isTargetIOSBased().
This is kind of a strange case, though, because we probably ought to be
passing -ios_simulator_version_min to the linker, but according to the FIXME
in the code, we intentionally avoid that unless the -mios-simulator-version-min
option was used. I don't know whether it is safe to change that yet, so
for now, I am just fixing the assertion failure.
llvm-svn: 200618
When a non-trivial parameter is present, clang now gathers up all the
parameters that lack inreg and puts them into a packed struct. MSVC
always aligns each parameter to 4 bytes and no more, so this is a pretty
simple struct to lay out.
On win64, non-trivial records are passed indirectly. Prior to this
change, clang was incorrectly using byval on win64.
I'm able to self-host a working clang with this change and additional
LLVM patches.
Reviewers: rsmith
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2636
llvm-svn: 200597
This fixes PR15768, where the sret parameter and the 'this' parameter
are in the wrong order.
Instance methods compiled by MSVC never return records in registers,
they always return indirectly through an sret pointer. That sret
pointer always comes after the 'this' parameter, for both __cdecl and
__thiscall methods.
Unfortunately, the same is true for other calling conventions, so we'll
have to change the overall approach here relatively soon.
Reviewers: rsmith
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2664
llvm-svn: 200587
With this change, we give different results for __alignof than MSVC, but
our record layout is compatible.
Some data member pointers also now have a size that is not a multiple of
their alignment.
Fixes PR18618.
Reviewers: majnemer
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2669
llvm-svn: 200585
Add the ImportDecl to the set of interesting delcarations that are
deserialized eagerly when an AST file is loaded (rather than lazily like
most decls). This is required to get auto linking to work when there is
no explicit import in the main file. Also resolve a FIXME to rename
'ExternalDefinitions', since that is only one of the things that need eager
deserialization. The new name is 'EagerlyDeserializedDecls'. The corresponding
AST bitcode is also renamed.
llvm-svn: 200505
This is causing a failure in the msan buildbot that I am having trouble
reproducing. Reverting until I can figure out what went wrong.
llvm-svn: 200492
a previously-computed linkage as an unsupportable error condition.
Per discussion on cfe-commits, this appears to be a
difficult-to-resolve flaw in our implementation approach;
we may pursue this as a language defect, but for now it's
better to diagnose it as unsupported than to produce
inconsistent results (or assertions). Anything that we can
do to limit how often this diagnostic fires, such as the
changes in r200380, is probably for the best, though.
llvm-svn: 200438
We would previously allow inappropriate inheritance keywords to appear
on class declarations. We would also allow inheritance keywords on
templates which were not fully specialized; this was divergent from
MSVC.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2585
llvm-svn: 200423
the linkage cache) when type-checking static local
variables.
There's a very deep problem here where the linkage of
a declaration can suddenly massively change as soon as
it's given a typedef name; these fixes, while optimizations
in their own right, are really just targeted workarounds.
rdar://15928125
llvm-svn: 200380
Arguments and return values must always be marshalled as for the base
AAPCS when the callee is a variadic function.
Patch by Oliver Stannard!
llvm-svn: 200307
case when correcting for too many arguments (r191450 had only fixed the
problem for when there were too few arguments). Also fix the underlining
for both cases.
llvm-svn: 200268
PR18322. This test will be reenabled when the SDK gets fixed. In the meantime,
it is pretty disruptive to have this test keep failing.
llvm-svn: 200256
This reverts commit r200233.
The test required a registered ARM target, it was testing LLVM's
generated assembly, and it should have been an IRGen test.
llvm-svn: 200242
parimary class and in mrr mode, assume property's default
memory attribute (assign) and to prevent a bogus warning.
// rdar://15859862
llvm-svn: 200238
e.g. thumbv7m-apple-ios3.0.0-eabi, then it should mean it's an iOS target. For
embedded targets, the OS should be unknown, e.g. thumbv7m-apple-unknown-macho.
Since Tim has recently fixed the triple, r195149 is no longer needed.
rdar://15911035
llvm-svn: 200164
This starts to switch ARCMT to use proper diagnostic messages. The old use was
based on incorrect example code from the documentation.
The logic of the previous report() functions has been retained to support any
external consumers that might be intercepting diagnostic messages through the
old interface.
Note that the change in test/Misc/warning-flags.c isn't a new warning without a
flag, rather one that was previously invisible to the test. Adding a flag might
be a good idea though.
llvm-svn: 200124
initialized from a constant expression in C++98, it can be used in
constant expressions, even if it was brace-initialized. Patch by
Rahul Jain!
llvm-svn: 200098
Previously, string literals were ignored in all logical expressions. This
reduces it to only ignore in logical and expressions.
assert(0 && "error"); // No warning
assert(0 || "error"); // Warn
Fixes PR17565
llvm-svn: 200056
allow this, and we should warn on it, but it turns out that people were already
relying on this.
We should introduce a -Wgcc-compat warning for this if the attributes are known
to GCC, but we don't currently track enough information about attributes to do
so reliably.
llvm-svn: 200045
might have a smaller size as compared to the stand-alone type of the base class.
This is possible when the derived class is packed and hence might have smaller
alignment requirement than the base class.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2599
llvm-svn: 200031
override for the type of 'this', also clear it out (unless we're entering the
context of a lambda-expression, where it should be inherited).
llvm-svn: 199962
member-declaration. In the process, fix a couple of bugs that had crept in
where we would parse the first and subsequent member-declarators differently
(in particular, we didn't accept an asm-label on a member function definition
within a class, and we would accept virt-specifiers and attributes in the wrong
order on the first declarator but not on subsequent ones).
llvm-svn: 199957
Due to statement expressions supported as GCC extension, it is possible
to put 'break' or 'continue' into a loop/switch statement but outside
its body, for example:
for ( ; ({ if (first) { first = 0; continue; } 0; }); )
This code is rejected by GCC if compiled in C mode but is accepted in C++
code. GCC bug 44715 tracks this discrepancy. Clang used code generation
that differs from GCC in both modes: only statement of the third
expression of 'for' behaves as if it was inside loop body.
This change makes code generation more close to GCC, considering 'break'
or 'continue' statement in condition and increment expressions of a
loop as it was inside the loop body. It also adds error for the cases
when 'break'/'continue' appear outside loop due to this syntax. If
code generation differ from GCC, warning is issued.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2518
llvm-svn: 199897
This is a simpler rule, broadly in line with previous Darwin (which chose
between "soft" and "softfp") but probably safer. In practice the only real
reason for "softfp" is ABI compatibility, not usually an issue on limited chips
like these, so anyone who wanted hard-float should already be saying so.
That's my story and I'm sticking to it.
rdar://problem/15887493
llvm-svn: 199896
Some ABIs have different return types for constructors and
destructors, and we're just looking for the end of the function
here. Loosen up the regex.
llvm-svn: 199870
If there are non-trivially-copyable types /other/ than C++ records, we
won't have a synthesized copy expression, but we can't just use a simple
load/return.
Also, add comments and shore up tests, making sure to test in both ARC
and non-ARC.
llvm-svn: 199869
Adrian Prantl