Summary:
This patch introduces the skeleton of the constexpr interpreter,
capable of evaluating a simple constexpr functions consisting of
if statements. The interpreter is described in more detail in the
RFC. Further patches will add more features.
Reviewers: Bigcheese, jfb, rsmith
Subscribers: bruno, uenoku, ldionne, Tyker, thegameg, tschuett, dexonsmith, mgorny, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64146
llvm-svn: 370584
containing designators. The C++20 wording doesn't actually say what
happens in this case, but treating this as a non-deduced context seems
like the most natural behavior.
(We might want to consider deducing through array designators as an
extension in the future, but will need to be careful to deduce the array
bound properly if we do so. That's not permitted herein.)
llvm-svn: 370555
initializers.
This has some interesting interactions with our existing extensions to
support C99 designated initializers as an extension in C++. Those are
resolved as follows:
* We continue to permit the full breadth of C99 designated initializers
in C++, with the exception that we disallow a partial overwrite of an
initializer with a non-trivially-destructible type. (Full overwrite
is OK, because we won't run the first initializer at all.)
* The C99 extensions are disallowed in SFINAE contexts and during
overload resolution, where they could change the meaning of valid
programs.
* C++20 disallows reordering of initializers. We only check for that for
the simple cases that the C++20 rules permit (designators of the form
'.field_name =' and continue to allow reordering in other cases).
It would be nice to improve this behavior in future.
* All C99 designated initializer extensions produce a warning by
default in C++20 mode. People are going to learn the C++ rules based
on what Clang diagnoses, so it's important we diagnose these properly
by default.
* In C++ <= 17, we apply the C++20 rules rather than the C99 rules, and
so still diagnose C99 extensions as described above. We continue to
accept designated C++20-compatible initializers in C++ <= 17 silently
by default (but naturally still reject under -pedantic-errors).
This is not a complete implementation of P0329R4. In particular, that
paper introduces new non-C99-compatible syntax { .field { init } }, and
we do not support that yet.
This is based on a previous patch by Don Hinton, though I've made
substantial changes when addressing the above interactions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59754
llvm-svn: 370544
Summary:
This patch introduces the skeleton of the constexpr interpreter,
capable of evaluating a simple constexpr functions consisting of
if statements. The interpreter is described in more detail in the
RFC. Further patches will add more features.
Reviewers: Bigcheese, jfb, rsmith
Subscribers: bruno, uenoku, ldionne, Tyker, thegameg, tschuett, dexonsmith, mgorny, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64146
llvm-svn: 370531
Summary:
This patch introduces the skeleton of the constexpr interpreter,
capable of evaluating a simple constexpr functions consisting of
if statements. The interpreter is described in more detail in the
RFC. Further patches will add more features.
Reviewers: Bigcheese, jfb, rsmith
Subscribers: bruno, uenoku, ldionne, Tyker, thegameg, tschuett, dexonsmith, mgorny, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64146
llvm-svn: 370476
We failed to correctly handle the 'holes' left behind by designated
initializers in VerifyOnly mode. This would result in us thinking that a
designated initialization would be valid, only to find that it is not
actually valid when we come to build it. In a +Asserts build, that would
assert, and in a -Asserts build, that would silently lose some part of
the initialization or crash.
With this change, when an InitListExpr contains any designators, we now
always build a structured list so that we can track the locations of the
'holes' that we need to go back and fill in.
We could in principle do better: we only need the structured form if
there is a designator that jumps backwards (and can otherwise check for
the holes as we progress through the initializer list), but dealing with
that turns out to be rather complicated, so it's not done as part of
this patch.
llvm-svn: 370419
-fms-extensions is intended to enable conforming language extensions and
-fms-compatibility is intended to language rule relaxations, so a user
could plausibly compile with -fno-ms-compatibility on Windows while
still using dllexport, for example. This exception specification
validation behavior has been handled as a warning since before
-fms-compatibility was added in 2011. I think it's just an oversight
that it hasn't been moved yet.
This will help users find conformance issues in their code such as those
found in _com_ptr_t as described in https://llvm.org/PR42842.
Reviewers: hans
Subscribers: STL_MSFT, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66770
llvm-svn: 370087
lambda from within the lambda-declarator.
Instead of trying to reconstruct whether a parameter pack was declared
inside a lambda (which we can't do correctly in general because we might
not have attached parameters to their declaration contexts yet), track
the set of parameter packs introduced in each live lambda scope, and
require only those parameters to be immediately expanded when they
appear inside that lambda.
In passing, fix incorrect disambiguation of a lambda-expression starting
with an init-capture pack in a braced-init-list. We previously
incorrectly parsed that as a designated initializer.
llvm-svn: 369985
default template argument expression.
We already did this for type template parameters and template template
parameters, but apparently forgot to do so for non-type template
parameters. This causes the substituted default argument expression to
be substituted in the proper context, and in particular to properly mark
its subexpressions as odr-used.
llvm-svn: 369834
This reverts commit r369591, because it causes the formerly-reliable
-Wreturn-stack-address warning to start issuing false positives.
Testcase provided on the commit thread.
llvm-svn: 369677
Summary:
This fixes inference of gsl::Pointer on std::set::iterator with libstdc++ (the typedef for iterator
on the template is a DependentNameType - we can only put the gsl::Pointer attribute
on the underlaying record after instantiation)
inference of gsl::Pointer on std::vector::iterator with libc++ (the class was forward-declared,
we added the gsl::Pointer on the canonical decl (the forward decl), and later when the
template was instantiated, there was no attribute on the definition so it was not instantiated).
and a duplicate gsl::Pointer on some class with libstdc++ (we first added an attribute to
a incomplete instantiation, and then another was copied from the template definition
when the instantiation was completed).
We now add the attributes to all redeclarations to fix thos issues and make their usage easier.
Reviewers: gribozavr
Subscribers: Szelethus, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66179
llvm-svn: 369591
This gives library implementers a way to use standards-based attributes that do not conflict with user-defined macros of the same name. Attributes in C2x require this behavior normatively (C2x 6.7.11p4), but there's no reason to not have the same behavior in C++, especially given that such attributes may be used by a C library consumed by a C++ compilation.
llvm-svn: 369033
When handling a member access into a non-class, non-ObjC-object type, we
would perform a lookup into the surrounding scope as if for an
unqualified lookup. If the member access was followed by a '<' and this
lookup (or the typo-correction for it) found a template name, we'd treat
the member access as naming that template.
Now we treat such accesses as never naming a template if the type of the
object expression is of vector type, so that vector component accesses
are never misinterpreted as naming something else. This is not entirely
correct, since it is in fact valid to name a template from the enclosing
scope in this context, when invoking a pseudo-destructor for the vector
type via an alias template, but that's very much a corner case, and this
change leaves that case only as broken as the corresponding case for
Objective-C types is.
This incidentally adds support for dr2292, which permits a 'template'
keyword at the start of a member access naming a pseudo-destructor.
llvm-svn: 368940
The default behavior of Clang's indirect function call checker will replace
the address of each CFI-checked function in the output file's symbol table
with the address of a jump table entry which will pass CFI checks. We refer
to this as making the jump table `canonical`. This property allows code that
was not compiled with ``-fsanitize=cfi-icall`` to take a CFI-valid address
of a function, but it comes with a couple of caveats that are especially
relevant for users of cross-DSO CFI:
- There is a performance and code size overhead associated with each
exported function, because each such function must have an associated
jump table entry, which must be emitted even in the common case where the
function is never address-taken anywhere in the program, and must be used
even for direct calls between DSOs, in addition to the PLT overhead.
- There is no good way to take a CFI-valid address of a function written in
assembly or a language not supported by Clang. The reason is that the code
generator would need to insert a jump table in order to form a CFI-valid
address for assembly functions, but there is no way in general for the
code generator to determine the language of the function. This may be
possible with LTO in the intra-DSO case, but in the cross-DSO case the only
information available is the function declaration. One possible solution
is to add a C wrapper for each assembly function, but these wrappers can
present a significant maintenance burden for heavy users of assembly in
addition to adding runtime overhead.
For these reasons, we provide the option of making the jump table non-canonical
with the flag ``-fno-sanitize-cfi-canonical-jump-tables``. When the jump
table is made non-canonical, symbol table entries point directly to the
function body. Any instances of a function's address being taken in C will
be replaced with a jump table address.
This scheme does have its own caveats, however. It does end up breaking
function address equality more aggressively than the default behavior,
especially in cross-DSO mode which normally preserves function address
equality entirely.
Furthermore, it is occasionally necessary for code not compiled with
``-fsanitize=cfi-icall`` to take a function address that is valid
for CFI. For example, this is necessary when a function's address
is taken by assembly code and then called by CFI-checking C code. The
``__attribute__((cfi_jump_table_canonical))`` attribute may be used to make
the jump table entry of a specific function canonical so that the external
code will end up taking a address for the function that will pass CFI checks.
Fixes PR41972.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65629
llvm-svn: 368495
Summary:
The maximum alignment used by ARM arch
is 64bits, not 128.
This could cause overaligned memory
access for 128 bit neon vector that
have unpredictable behaviour.
This fixes: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42668
Reviewers: ostannard, dmgreen, srhines, danalbert, pirama, peter.smith
Reviewed By: pirama, peter.smith
Subscribers: phosek, thegameg, thakis, llvm-commits, carwil, peter.smith, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65000
llvm-svn: 368288
Fix -Wpessimizing-move and -Wredundant-move when warning on initializer lists.
The new fix-it hints for removing the std::move call will now also suggest
removing the braces for the initializer list so that the resulting code will
still be compilable.
This fixes PR42832
llvm-svn: 368237
Summary:
Hard code gsl::Owner/gsl::Pointer for std types. The paper mentions
some types explicitly. Generally, all containers and their iterators are
covered. For iterators, we cover both the case that they are defined
as an nested class or as an typedef/using. I have started to test this
implementation against some real standard library implementations, namely
libc++ 7.1.0, libc++ 8.0.1rc2, libstdc++ 4.6.4, libstdc++ 4.8.5,
libstdc++ 4.9.4, libstdc++ 5.4.0, libstdc++ 6.5.0, libstdc++ 7.3.0,
libstdc++ 8.3.0 and libstdc++ 9.1.0.
The tests are currently here
https://github.com/mgehre/llvm-project/blob/lifetime-ci/lifetime-attr-test.shhttps://github.com/mgehre/llvm-project/blob/lifetime-ci/lifetime-attr-test.cpp
I think due to their dependency on a standard library, they are not a good fit
for clang/test/. Where else could I put them?
Reviewers: gribozavr, xazax.hun
Subscribers: rnkovacs, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64448
llvm-svn: 368147
Summary:
The -Wparentheses warnings are enabled by default in clang but they are under
-Wall in gcc (gcc/c-family/c.opt). Some of the operator precedence warnings are
oftentimes criticized as noise (clang: default; gcc: -Wall). If a warning is
very controversial, it is probably not a good idea to enable it by default.
This patch disables the rather annoying ones:
-Wbitwise-op-parentheses, e.g. i & i | i
-Wlogical-op-parentheses, e.g. i && i || i
After this change:
```
* = enabled by default
-Wall
-Wparentheses
-Wlogical-op-parentheses
-Wlogical-not-parentheses*
-Wbitwise-op-parentheses
-Wshift-op-parentheses*
-Woverloaded-shift-op-parentheses*
-Wparentheses-equality*
-Wdangling-else*
```
-Woverloaded-shift-op-parentheses is typically followed by overload
resolution failure. We can instead improve the error message, and
probably delete -Woverloaded-shift-op-parentheses in the future. Keep it
for now because it gives some diagnostics.
Reviewers: akyrtzi, jyknight, rtrieu, rsmith, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: dexonsmith, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65192
llvm-svn: 367690
We were previously just using a specialization in the class template instead of
creating a new specialization in the class instantiation.
Fixes llvm.org/PR42779.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65359
llvm-svn: 367367
check the formal rules rather than seeing if the normal checks produce a
diagnostic.
This fixes the handling of C++2a extensions in lambdas in C++17 mode,
as well as some corner cases in earlier language modes where we issue
diagnostics for things other than not satisfying the formal constexpr
requirements.
llvm-svn: 367254
The maximum alignment used by ARM arch
is 64bits, not 128.
This could cause overaligned memory
access for 128 bit neon vector that
have unpredictable behaviour.
This fixes: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42668
Patch by: Diogo Sampaio(diogo.sampaio@arm.com)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65000
Change-Id: I5a62b766491f15dd51e4cfe6625929db897f67e3
llvm-svn: 367119
Summary:
This is the first part of work announced in
"[RFC] Adding lifetime analysis to clang" [0],
i.e. the addition of the [[gsl::Owner(T)]] and
[[gsl::Pointer(T)]] attributes, which
will enable user-defined types to participate in
the lifetime analysis (which will be part of the
next PR).
The type `T` here is called "DerefType" in the paper,
and denotes the type that an Owner owns and a Pointer
points to. E.g. `std::vector<int>` should be annotated
with `[[gsl::Owner(int)]]` and
a `std::vector<int>::iterator` with `[[gsl::Pointer(int)]]`.
[0] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2018-November/060355.html
Reviewers: gribozavr
Subscribers: xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63954
llvm-svn: 367040
As discussed in D64780 the wording of this warning message is being
changed to say 'is not supported' instead of 'ignored', and the
diag ID itself is being changed to warn_cconv_not_supported.
llvm-svn: 366368
Add "memtag" sanitizer that detects and mitigates stack memory issues
using armv8.5 Memory Tagging Extension.
It is similar in principle to HWASan, which is a software implementation
of the same idea, but there are enough differencies to warrant a new
sanitizer type IMHO. It is also expected to have very different
performance properties.
The new sanitizer does not have a runtime library (it may grow one
later, along with a "debugging" mode). Similar to SafeStack and
StackProtector, the instrumentation pass (in a follow up change) will be
inserted in all cases, but will only affect functions marked with the
new sanitize_memtag attribute.
Reviewers: pcc, hctim, vitalybuka, ostannard
Subscribers: srhines, mehdi_amini, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, cryptoad, steven_wu, dexonsmith, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64169
llvm-svn: 366123
Ignore trailing NullStmts in compound expressions when determining the result type and value. This is to match the GCC behavior which ignores semicolons at the end of compound expressions.
Patch by Dominic Ferreira.
llvm-svn: 365498
This is a fix for rG864949 which only disabled default construction and
assignment for lambdas with capture-defaults, where the C++2a draft
disables them for lambdas with any lambda-capture at all.
Patch by Logan Smith!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64058
llvm-svn: 365406
Summary:
Prior to r329065, we used [-max, max] as the range of representable
values because LLVM's `fptrunc` did not guarantee defined behavior when
truncating from a larger floating-point type to a smaller one. Now that
has been fixed, we can make clang follow normal IEEE 754 semantics in this
regard and take the larger range [-inf, +inf] as the range of representable
values.
In practice, this affects two parts of the frontend:
* the constant evaluator no longer treats floating-point evaluations
that result in +-inf as being undefined (because they no longer leave
the range of representable values of the type)
* UBSan no longer treats conversions to floating-point type that are
outside the [-max, +max] range as being undefined
In passing, also remove the float-divide-by-zero sanitizer from
-fsanitize=undefined, on the basis that while it's undefined per C++
rules (and we disallow it in constant expressions for that reason), it
is defined by Clang / LLVM / IEEE 754.
Reviewers: rnk, BillyONeal
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63793
llvm-svn: 365272
This commit adds a new builtin, __builtin_bit_cast(T, v), which performs a
bit_cast from a value v to a type T. This expression can be evaluated at
compile time under specific circumstances.
The compile time evaluation currently doesn't support bit-fields, but I'm
planning on fixing this in a follow up (some of the logic for figuring this out
is in CodeGen). I'm also planning follow-ups for supporting some more esoteric
types that the constexpr evaluator supports, as well as extending
__builtin_memcpy constexpr evaluation to use the same infrastructure.
rdar://44987528
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62825
llvm-svn: 364954
Summary:
Add support for the C++2a [[no_unique_address]] attribute for targets using the Itanium C++ ABI.
This depends on D63371.
Reviewers: rjmccall, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: dschuff, aheejin, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63451
llvm-svn: 363976
If we construct an object in some arbitrary non-default addr space
it should fail unless either:
- There is an implicit conversion from the address space to default
/generic address space.
- There is a matching ctor qualified with an address space that is
either exactly matching or convertible to the address space of an
object.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62156
llvm-svn: 363944
Summary:
I've found that most often the proper way to fix this warning is to add
`static`, because if the code otherwise compiles and links, the function
or variable is apparently not needed outside of the TU.
We can't provide a fix-it hint for variable declarations, because
multiple VarDecls can share the same type, and if we put static in front
of that, we affect all declared variables, some of which might have
previous declarations.
We also provide no fix-it hint for the rare case of an `extern` function
definition, because that would require removing `extern` and I have no
idea how to get the source location of the storage class specifier from
a FunctionDecl. I believe this information is only available earlier in
the AST construction from DeclSpec::getStorageClassSpecLoc(), but we
don't have that here.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59402
llvm-svn: 363749
Summary:
Since the addition of __builtin_is_constant_evaluated the result of an expression can change based on whether it is evaluated in constant context. a lot of semantic checking performs evaluations with out specifying context. which can lead to wrong diagnostics.
for example:
```
constexpr int i0 = (long long)__builtin_is_constant_evaluated() * (1ll << 33); //#1
constexpr int i1 = (long long)!__builtin_is_constant_evaluated() * (1ll << 33); //#2
```
before the patch, #2 was diagnosed incorrectly and #1 wasn't diagnosed.
after the patch #1 is diagnosed as it should and #2 isn't.
Changes:
- add a flag to Sema to passe in constant context mode.
- in SemaChecking.cpp calls to Expr::Evaluate* are now done in constant context when they should.
- in SemaChecking.cpp diagnostics for UB are not checked for in constant context because an error will be emitted by the constant evaluator.
- in SemaChecking.cpp diagnostics for construct that cannot appear in constant context are not checked for in constant context.
- in SemaChecking.cpp diagnostics on constant expression are always emitted because constant expression are always evaluated.
- semantic checking for initialization of constexpr variables is now done in constant context.
- adapt test that were depending on warning changes.
- add test.
Reviewers: rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62009
llvm-svn: 363488
Summary:
this revision adds Lexing, Parsing and Basic Semantic for the consteval specifier as specified by http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2018/p1073r3.html
with this patch, the consteval specifier is treated as constexpr but can only be applied to function declaration.
Changes:
- add the consteval keyword.
- add parsing of consteval specifier for normal declarations and lambdas expressions.
- add the whether a declaration is constexpr is now represented by and enum everywhere except for variable because they can't be consteval.
- adapt diagnostic about constexpr to print constexpr or consteval depending on the case.
- add tests for basic semantic.
Reviewers: rsmith, martong, shafik
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: eraman, efriedma, rnkovacs, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61790
llvm-svn: 363362
Summary:
[[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41549 | bug report ]]
Before this patch, implicit deduction guides were generated from the first declaration found by lookup.
With this patch implicit deduction guides are generated from the definition of the class template.
Also added test that was previously failing.
Reviewers: rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits, Quuxplusone
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63072
llvm-svn: 363361
Summary:
this is a bugfixe for [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41400 | PR41400 ]]
added nullptr check at the relevent place and test
Reviewers: rsmith, riccibruno
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: jkooker, jkorous, riccibruno, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60523
llvm-svn: 363360
packs.
Two changes:
* Track odr-use via FunctionParmPackExprs to properly handle dependent
odr-uses of packs in generic lambdas.
* Do not instantiate implicit captures; instead, regenerate them by
instantiating the body of the lambda. This is necessary to
distinguish between cases where only one element of a pack is
captured and cases where the entire pack is captured.
This reinstates r362358 (reverted in r362375) with a fix for an
uninitialized variable use in UpdateMarkingForLValueToRValue.
llvm-svn: 362531
prettyprint
__declspec(nothrow) should work on function pointers as well as function
references, so this changes it to FunctionLike. Additionally,
FunctionLike needed to be modified to permit function references.
Finally, the TypePrinter didn't properly print the NoThrow exception
specifier, so make sure we get that right as well.
llvm-svn: 362435
As reported here: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42100
This fairly common pattern ends up being an error in MinGW, so relax it
in all cases to a warning.
llvm-svn: 362434
Two changes:
* Track odr-use via FunctionParmPackExprs to properly handle dependent
odr-uses of packs in generic lambdas.
* Do not instantiate implicit captures; instead, regenerate them by
instantiating the body of the lambda. This is necessary to
distinguish between cases where only one element of a pack is
captured and cases where the entire pack is captured.
........
Fixes http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/llvm-clang-x86_64-expensive-checks-win buildbot failures
llvm-svn: 362375
packs.
Two changes:
* Track odr-use via FunctionParmPackExprs to properly handle dependent
odr-uses of packs in generic lambdas.
* Do not instantiate implicit captures; instead, regenerate them by
instantiating the body of the lambda. This is necessary to
distinguish between cases where only one element of a pack is
captured and cases where the entire pack is captured.
llvm-svn: 362358
Summary:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41909 describes an issue in which
a generic lambda that takes a dependent argument `auto set` causes the
template instantiation machinery for coroutine body statements to crash
with an ICE. The issue is two-fold:
1. The paths taken by the template instantiator contain several asserts
that the coroutine promise must not have a dependent type.
2. The template instantiator unconditionally builds corotuine statements
that depend on the promise type, which cannot be dependent.
To work around the issue, prevent the template instantiator from building
dependent coroutine statements if the coroutine promise type is dependent.
Since we only expect this to occur in the case of a generic lambda, limit
the workaround behavior to just that case.
Reviewers: GorNishanov, EricWF, lewissbaker, tks2103
Reviewed By: GorNishanov
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62550
llvm-svn: 362348
The previously added warning ended up causing false positives when
nothrow was used on member functions, where the exception specification
wasn't yet parsed. So, throw() and noexcept(true) both were incorrectly
warning. There doesn't seem to be a good way to force these to be parsed
to identify which they are (and likely should not be), so suppress the warning.
For now, unevaluated/uninstantiated are left as warnings as I am not
creative enough to find a reproducer that causes a false positive for
either.
llvm-svn: 362236
The implementation of the NoThrow ExceptionSpecificationType missed a
switch statement for forming the diagnostic when an out-of-line member
redeclaration misses the exception specification. This patch adds the
correct case statement.
llvm-svn: 362225
We need to know whether the destructor is trivial in order to tell
whether other parts of the class are valid (in particular, this affects
whether the type is a literal type, which affects whether defaulted
special members can be declared constexpr or are implicitly constexpr).
llvm-svn: 362184
and returned to the context in which 'this' should be captured.
This means we now always mark 'this' referenced from the context in
which it's actually referenced, rather than potentially from some
context nested within that.
llvm-svn: 362182
As reported here https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42000, it was
possible to get the constexpr version of __builtin_*_overflow to give
the wrong answer.
This was because when extending the operands to fit the largest type (so
that the math could be done), the decision on whether to sign/zero
extend the operands was based on the result signedness, not on the
operands signedness.
In the reported case, (unsigned char)255 - (int)100 needed
to have each extended to the int in order to do the math. However, when
extending the first operand to 'int', we incorrectly sign extended it
instead of zero extending. Thus, the result didnt fit back into the
unsigned char.
The fix for this was simply to choose zero/sign extension based on the
sign of the operand itself.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62665
llvm-svn: 362157
In response to https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33235, it became
clear that the current mechanism of hacking through checks for the
exception specification of a function gets confused really quickly when
there are alternate exception specifiers.
This patch introcues EST_NoThrow, which is the equivilent of
EST_noexcept when caused by EST_noThrow. The existing implementation is
left in place to cover functions with no FunctionProtoType.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62435
llvm-svn: 362119
We need to eagerly instantiate constexpr functions used in them even if
the default argument is never actually used, because we might evaluate
portions of it when performing semantic checks.
llvm-svn: 361670
HandleUnionActiveMemberChange forgot to walk over a nop implicit
conversion node and got stuck in the process.
As a cleanup I changed the declaration of `E` so it can't
be accidentally accessed after the loop.
llvm-svn: 361571
Summary:
This adds a new error for missing parentheses around lambdas in delete operators.
```
int main() {
delete []() { return new int(); }();
}
```
This will result in:
```
test.cpp:2:3: error: '[]' after delete interpreted as 'delete[]'
delete []() { return new int(); }();
^~~~~~~~~
test.cpp:2:9: note: add parentheses around the lambda
delete []() { return new int(); }();
^
( )
```
Reviewers: rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: riccibruno, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36357
llvm-svn: 361119
class type in constant evaluation.
This reinstates r360977, reverted in r360987, now that its rerequisite
patch is reinstated and fixed.
llvm-svn: 361067
object rather than tracking the originating expression.
This is groundwork for supporting polymorphic typeid expressions. (Note
that this somewhat regresses our support for DR1968, but it turns out
that that never actually worked anyway, at least in non-trivial cases.)
This reinstates r360974, reverted in r360988, with a fix for a
static_assert failure on 32-bit builds: force Type base class to have
8-byte alignment like the rest of Clang's AST nodes.
llvm-svn: 360995
object rather than tracking the originating expression.
This is groundwork for supporting polymorphic typeid expressions. (Note
that this somewhat regresses our support for DR1968, but it turns out
that that never actually worked anyway, at least in non-trivial cases.)
llvm-svn: 360974
Summary:
This patch implements the source location builtins `__builtin_LINE(), `__builtin_FUNCTION()`, `__builtin_FILE()` and `__builtin_COLUMN()`. These builtins are needed to implement [`std::experimental::source_location`](https://rawgit.com/cplusplus/fundamentals-ts/v2/main.html#reflection.src_loc.creation).
With the exception of `__builtin_COLUMN`, GCC also implements these builtins, and Clangs behavior is intended to match as closely as possible.
Reviewers: rsmith, joerg, aaron.ballman, bogner, majnemer, shafik, martong
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: rnkovacs, loskutov, riccibruno, mgorny, kunitoki, alexr, majnemer, hfinkel, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37035
llvm-svn: 360937
evaluation.
This reinstates r360559, reverted in r360580, with a fix to avoid
crashing if evaluation-for-overflow mode encounters a virtual call on an
object of a class with a virtual base class, and to generally not try to
resolve virtual function calls to objects whose (notional) vptrs are not
readable. (The standard rules are unclear here, but this seems like a
reasonable approach.)
llvm-svn: 360635
their lifetime in constant expressions.
This is undefined behavior per [class.cdtor]p2.
We continue to allow this for objects whose values are not visible
within the constant evaluation, because there's no way we can tell
whether the access is defined or not, existing code relies on the
ability to make such calls, and every other compiler allows such
calls.
This reinstates r360499, reverted in r360531.
llvm-svn: 360538
evaluation.
It's not enough to just track the LValueBase that we're evaluating, we
need to also track the path to the objects whose constructors are
running.
This reinstates r360464 (reverted in r360531) with a workaround for an
MSVC bug that previously caused the Windows bots to fail.
llvm-svn: 360537
Reject attempts to call non-static member functions on objects outside
their lifetime in constant expressions.
This is undefined behavior per [class.cdtor]p2.
We continue to allow this for objects whose values are not visible
within the constant evaluation, because there's no way we can tell
whether the access is defined or not, existing code relies on the
ability to make such calls, and every other compiler allows such
calls.
........
Fix handling of objects under construction during constant expression
evaluation.
It's not enough to just track the LValueBase that we're evaluating, we
need to also track the path to the objects whose constructors are
running.
........
Fixes windows buildbots
llvm-svn: 360531
their lifetime in constant expressions.
This is undefined behavior per [class.cdtor]p2.
We continue to allow this for objects whose values are not visible
within the constant evaluation, because there's no way we can tell
whether the access is defined or not, existing code relies on the
ability to make such calls, and every other compiler allows such
calls.
llvm-svn: 360499
evaluation.
It's not enough to just track the LValueBase that we're evaluating, we
need to also track the path to the objects whose constructors are
running.
llvm-svn: 360464
This fixes a crash where we would neglect to mark a destructor referenced for an
__attribute__((no_destory)) array. The destructor is needed though, since if an
exception is thrown we need to cleanup the elements.
rdar://48462498
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61165
llvm-svn: 360446
Darwin if the version of libc++abi isn't new enough to include the fix
in r319123
This patch resurrects r264998, which was committed to work around a bug
in libc++abi that was causing _cxa_allocate_exception to return a memory
that wasn't double-word aligned.
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20160328/154332.html
In addition, this patch makes clang issue a warning if the type of the
thrown object requires an alignment that is larger than the minimum
guaranteed by the target C++ runtime.
rdar://problem/49864414
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61667
llvm-svn: 360404
template name is not visible to unqualified lookup.
In order to support this without a severe degradation in our ability to
diagnose typos in template names, this change significantly restructures
the way we handle template-id-shaped syntax for which lookup of the
template name finds nothing.
Instead of eagerly diagnosing an undeclared template name, we now form a
placeholder template-name representing a name that is known to not find
any templates. When the parser sees such a name, it attempts to
disambiguate whether we have a less-than comparison or a template-id.
Any diagnostics or typo-correction for the name are delayed until its
point of use.
The upshot should be a small improvement of our diagostic quality
overall: we now take more syntactic context into account when trying to
resolve an undeclared identifier on the left hand side of a '<'. In
fact, this works well enough that the backwards-compatible portion (for
an undeclared identifier rather than a lookup that finds functions but
no function templates) is enabled in all language modes.
llvm-svn: 360308
Summary:
e.g.
auto foo() {
return no_such_thing; // Return value is a TypoExpr
}
using T = decltype(foo()); // Uh-oh, undeduced auto.
Reviewers: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61649
llvm-svn: 360224
This caused Clang to start erroring on the following:
struct S {
template <typename = int> explicit S();
};
struct T : S {};
struct U : T {
U();
};
U::U() {}
$ clang -c /tmp/x.cc
/tmp/x.cc:10:4: error: call to implicitly-deleted default constructor of 'T'
U::U() {}
^
/tmp/x.cc:5:12: note: default constructor of 'T' is implicitly deleted
because base class 'S' has no default constructor
struct T : S {};
^
1 error generated.
See discussion on the cfe-commits email thread.
This also reverts the follow-ups r359966 and r359968.
> this patch adds support for the explicit bool specifier.
>
> Changes:
> - The parsing for the explicit(bool) specifier was added in ParseDecl.cpp.
> - The storage of the explicit specifier was changed. the explicit specifier was stored as a boolean value in the FunctionDeclBitfields and in the DeclSpec class. now it is stored as a PointerIntPair<Expr*, 2> with a flag and a potential expression in CXXConstructorDecl, CXXDeductionGuideDecl, CXXConversionDecl and in the DeclSpec class.
> - Following the AST change, Serialization, ASTMatchers, ASTComparator and ASTPrinter were adapted.
> - Template instantiation was adapted to instantiate the potential expressions of the explicit(bool) specifier When instantiating their associated declaration.
> - The Add*Candidate functions were adapted, they now take a Boolean indicating if the context allowing explicit constructor or conversion function and this boolean is used to remove invalid overloads that required template instantiation to be detected.
> - Test for Semantic and Serialization were added.
>
> This patch is not yet complete. I still need to check that interaction with CTAD and deduction guides is correct. and add more tests for AST operations. But I wanted first feedback.
> Perhaps this patch should be spited in smaller patches, but making each patch testable as a standalone may be tricky.
>
> Patch by Tyker
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60934
llvm-svn: 360024
where either the modification or the other access is unreachable.
This reverts r359984 (which reverted r359962). The bug in clang-tidy's
test suite exposed by the original commit was fixed in r360009.
llvm-svn: 360010
new expression.
This was voted into C++20 as a defect report resolution, so we
retroactively apply it to all prior language modes (though it can never
actually be used before C++11 mode).
llvm-svn: 360006
state when it's encountered while evaluating a constexpr function.
We attempt to follow GCC trunk's behavior here, but it is somewhat
inscrutible, so our behavior is only approximately the same for now.
Specifically, we only permit modification of objects whose lifetime
began within the operand of the __builtin_constant_p. GCC appears to
have effectively the same restriction, but also some unknown restriction
based on where and how the local state of the constexpr function is
mentioned within the operand (see added testcases).
llvm-svn: 359958
this patch adds support for the explicit bool specifier.
Changes:
- The parsing for the explicit(bool) specifier was added in ParseDecl.cpp.
- The storage of the explicit specifier was changed. the explicit specifier was stored as a boolean value in the FunctionDeclBitfields and in the DeclSpec class. now it is stored as a PointerIntPair<Expr*, 2> with a flag and a potential expression in CXXConstructorDecl, CXXDeductionGuideDecl, CXXConversionDecl and in the DeclSpec class.
- Following the AST change, Serialization, ASTMatchers, ASTComparator and ASTPrinter were adapted.
- Template instantiation was adapted to instantiate the potential expressions of the explicit(bool) specifier When instantiating their associated declaration.
- The Add*Candidate functions were adapted, they now take a Boolean indicating if the context allowing explicit constructor or conversion function and this boolean is used to remove invalid overloads that required template instantiation to be detected.
- Test for Semantic and Serialization were added.
This patch is not yet complete. I still need to check that interaction with CTAD and deduction guides is correct. and add more tests for AST operations. But I wanted first feedback.
Perhaps this patch should be spited in smaller patches, but making each patch testable as a standalone may be tricky.
Patch by Tyker
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60934
llvm-svn: 359949
Because diagnostics and their notes are not connected at the API level,
if the error message for an overload is emitted, then the overload
candidates are completed - if a diagnostic is emitted during that work,
the notes related to overload candidates would be attached to the latter
diagnostic, not the original error. Sort of worse, if the latter
diagnostic was disabled, the notes are disabled.
Reviewers: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61357
llvm-svn: 359854
We correct some typos in `ActOnArraySubscriptExpr` and
`ActOnOMPArraySectionExpr`, so when their result is `ExprError`, we can
end up correcting delayed typos in the same expressions again. In
general it is OK but when `NumTypos` is incorrect, we can hit the
assertion
> Assertion failed: (Entry != DelayedTypos.end() && "Failed to get the state for a TypoExpr!"), function getTypoExprState, file clang/lib/Sema/SemaLookup.cpp, line 5219.
Fix by replacing some subscript `ExprResult` with typo-corrected expressions
instead of keeping the original expressions. Thus if original expressions
contained `TypoExpr`, we'll use corrected expressions instead of trying to
correct them again.
rdar://problem/47403222
Reviewers: rsmith, erik.pilkington, majnemer
Reviewed By: erik.pilkington
Subscribers: jkorous, dexonsmith, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60848
llvm-svn: 359713
Summary:
GCC's -Wtype-limits (part of -Wextra):
Warn if a comparison is always true or always false due to the limited range of the data type
Reviewers: rsmith, aaron.ballman, lebedev.ri, thakis
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: lebedev.ri, jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58841
llvm-svn: 359516
us emitting the operand of __builtin_constant_p if it has side-effects.
Original commit message:
Fix interactions between __builtin_constant_p and constexpr to match
current trunk GCC.
GCC permits information from outside the operand of
__builtin_constant_p (but in the same constant evaluation context) to be
used within that operand; clang now does so too. A few other minor
deviations from GCC's behavior showed up in my testing and are also
fixed (matching GCC):
* Clang now supports nullptr_t as the argument type for
__builtin_constant_p
* Clang now returns true from __builtin_constant_p if called with a
null pointer
* Clang now returns true from __builtin_constant_p if called with an
integer cast to pointer type
llvm-svn: 359367
Contrary to MSVC, GCC/MinGW needs to have the dllexport attribute
on the template instantiation declaration, not on the definition.
Previously clang never marked explicit template instantiations as
dllexport in MinGW mode, if the instantiation had a previous
declaration, regardless of where the attribute was placed. This
makes Clang behave like GCC in this regard, and allows using the
same attribute form for both MinGW compilers.
This fixes PR40256.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61118
llvm-svn: 359285
const-qualified type is not implicitly given internal linkage. But a
variable template declared 'static' is.
This reinstates part of r359048, reverted in r359076.
llvm-svn: 359260
internal linkage entities.
Such constructs are ill-formed by [temp.explicit]p13. We make a special
exception to permit an invalid construct used by libc++ in some build
modes: its <valarray> header declares some functions with the
internal_linkage attribute and then (meaninglessly) provides explicit
instantiation declarations for them. Luckily, Clang happens to
effectively ignore the explicit instantiation declaration when
generating code in this case, and this change codifies that behavior.
This reinstates part of r359048, reverted in r359076. (The libc++ issue
triggering the rollback has been addressed.)
llvm-svn: 359259
The change breaks libc++ with the follwing error:
In file included from valarray:4:
.../include/c++/v1/valarray:1062:60: error: explicit instantiation declaration of 'valarray<_Tp>' with internal linkage
_LIBCPP_EXTERN_TEMPLATE(_LIBCPP_FUNC_VIS valarray<size_t>::valarray(size_t))
^
.../include/c++/v1/valarray:1063:60: error: explicit instantiation declaration of '~valarray<_Tp>' with internal linkage
_LIBCPP_EXTERN_TEMPLATE(_LIBCPP_FUNC_VIS valarray<size_t>::~valarray())
llvm-svn: 359076
Summary:
This patch implements `__builtin_is_constant_evaluated` as specifier by [P0595R2](https://wg21.link/p0595r2). It is built on the back of Bill Wendling's work for `__builtin_constant_p()`.
More tests to come, but early feedback is appreciated.
I plan to implement warnings for common mis-usages like those belowe in a following patch:
```
void foo(int x) {
if constexpr (std::is_constant_evaluated())) { // condition is always `true`. Should use plain `if` instead.
foo_constexpr(x);
} else {
foo_runtime(x);
}
}
```
Reviewers: rsmith, MaskRay, bruno, void
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: dexonsmith, zoecarver, fdeazeve, kristina, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55500
llvm-svn: 359067
of an auto"
This commit changed the initializer expression passed into
initialization (stripping off an enclosing pair of parentheses or
braces) and subtly changing the meaning of programs, typically by
inserting bogus calls to copy constructors.
See the added testcase in test/SemaCXX/cxx1y-init-captures.cpp for an
example of the breakage.
llvm-svn: 359066
current trunk GCC.
GCC permits information from outside the operand of
__builtin_constant_p (but in the same constant evaluation context) to be
used within that operand; clang now does so too. A few other minor
deviations from GCC's behavior showed up in my testing and are also
fixed (matching GCC):
* Clang now supports nullptr_t as the argument type for
__builtin_constant_p
* Clang now returns true from __builtin_constant_p if called with a
null pointer
* Clang now returns true from __builtin_constant_p if called with an
integer cast to pointer type
llvm-svn: 359059
Without this patch, APSInt inherits APInt::isNegative, which merely
checks the sign bit without regard to whether the type is actually
signed. isNonNegative and isStrictlyPositive call isNegative and so
are also affected.
This patch adjusts APSInt to override isNegative, isNonNegative, and
isStrictlyPositive with implementations that consider whether the type
is signed.
A large set of Clang OpenMP tests are affected. Without this patch,
these tests assume that `true` is not a valid argument for clauses
like `collapse`. Indeed, `true` fails APInt::isStrictlyPositive but
not APSInt::isStrictlyPositive. This patch adjusts those tests to
assume `true` should be accepted.
This patch also adds tests revealing various other similar fixes due
to APSInt::isNegative calls in Clang's ExprConstant.cpp and
SemaExpr.cpp: `++` and `--` overflow in `constexpr`, evaluated object
size based on `alloc_size`, `<<` and `>>` shift count validation, and
OpenMP array section validation.
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri, ABataev, hfinkel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59712
llvm-svn: 359012
This reverts r358409, which I think broke the bots in compiler-rt.
Since I'm having trouble reproducing the failure, I'm reverting this
until I can investigate locally.
llvm-svn: 358437
Summary:
In r350649, I changed aligned allocation from being available starting
in macosx10.13 to macosx10.14. However, aligned allocation is indeed
available starting with macosx10.13, my investigation had been based
on the wrong libc++abi dylib.
This means that Clang before the fix will be more stringent when it
comes to aligned allocation -- it will not allow it when back-deploying
to macosx 10.13, when it would actually be safe to do so.
Note that a companion change will be coming to fix the libc++ tests.
Reviewers: ahatanak
Subscribers: jkorous, dexonsmith, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60626
llvm-svn: 358409
Summary:
As was already stated in a previous comment, the parameter isn't
necessarily referring to one of the DeclContext's parameter. We
should check the index is within the range to avoid out-of-boundary
access.
Reviewers: gribozavr, rsmith, lebedev.ri
Reviewed By: gribozavr, rsmith
Subscribers: lebedev.ri, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60055
Patch by Violet.
llvm-svn: 358134
Fixes the assertion
> no Attr* for AttributedType*
> UNREACHABLE executed at llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaType.cpp:298!
In `TypeProcessingState::getAttributedType` we put into `AttrsForTypes`
types with `auto` but later in
`TypeProcessingState::takeAttrForAttributedType` we use transformed
types and that's why cannot find `Attr` corresponding to
`AttributedType`.
Fix by keeping `AttrsForTypes` up to date after replacing `AutoType`.
rdar://problem/47689465
Reviewers: rsmith, arphaman, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: jkorous, dexonsmith, jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58659
llvm-svn: 357298
Summary:
- If a parameter is used, nonnull checking needs function prototype to
retrieve the corresponding parameter's attributes. However, at the
prototype substitution phase when a template is being instantiated,
expression may be created and checked without a fully specialized
prototype. Under such a scenario, skip nonnull checking on that
argument.
Reviewers: rjmccall, tra, yaxunl
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59900
llvm-svn: 357236
MarkVarDeclODRUsed indirectly calls captureInBlock, which creates a copy
expression. The copy expression is insulated in it's own
ExpressionEvaluationContext, so it saves, mutates, and restores MaybeODRUseExprs
as CleanupVarDeclMarking is iterating through it, leading to a crash. Fix this
by iterating through a local copy of MaybeODRUseExprs.
rdar://47493525
https://reviews.llvm.org/D59670
llvm-svn: 357040
The intention is to add metadata to direct call sites of functions
marked with __declspec(allocator), which will ultimately result in some
S_HEAPALLOCSITE debug info records when emitting codeview.
This is a piece of PR38491
llvm-svn: 356964
Bail-out of CheckArrayAccess when the types of the base expression before
and after eventual casts are dependent. We will get another chance to check
for array bounds during instantiation. Fixes PR41087.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59776
Reviewed By: efriedma
llvm-svn: 356957
Summary:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D59076 added a new coroutine error that
prevented users from using 'co_await' or 'co_yield' within a exception
handler. However, it was reverted in https://reviews.llvm.org/rC356774
because it caused a regression in nested scopes in C++ catch statements,
as documented by https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41171.
The issue was due to an incorrect use of a `clang::ParseScope`. To fix:
1. Add a regression test for catch statement parsing that mimics the bug
report from https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41171.
2. Re-apply the coroutines error patch from
https://reviews.llvm.org/D59076, but this time with the correct
ParseScope behavior.
Reviewers: GorNishanov, tks2103, rsmith, riccibruno, jbulow
Reviewed By: riccibruno
Subscribers: EricWF, jdoerfert, lewissbaker, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59752
llvm-svn: 356865
After https://reviews.llvm.org/rL355317 we noticed that quite a decent
amount of code redeclares builtins (memcpy in particular, I believe
reduced from an MSVC header) with a calling convention specified.
This gets particularly troublesome when the user specifies a new
'default' calling convention on the command line.
When looking to add a diagnostic for this case, it was noticed that we
had 3 other diagnostics that differed only slightly. This patch ALSO
unifies those under a 'select'. Unfortunately, the order of words in
ONE of these diagnostics was reversed ("'thiscall' calling convention"
vs "calling convention 'thiscall'"), so this patch also standardizes on
the former.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59560
Change-Id: I79f99fe7c2301640755ffdd774b46eb44526bb22
llvm-svn: 356663
Before this commit, we emit unavailable errors for calls to functions during
overload resolution, and for references to all other declarations in
DiagnoseUseOfDecl. The early checks during overload resolution aren't as good as
the DiagnoseAvailabilityOfDecl based checks, as they error on the code from
PR40991. This commit fixes this by removing the early checking.
llvm.org/PR40991
rdar://48564179
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59394
llvm-svn: 356599
Summary:
Similar to D56967, we add the existing diag::note_locked_here to tell
the user where we saw the locking that isn't matched correctly.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, delesley
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59455
llvm-svn: 356427
Nandor Licker