of a darwin platform was in the list of `UBSAN_SUPPORTED_ARCH`.
This is a follow up to r341306.
The typo meant that if an architecture was a prefix to another
architecture in the list (e.g. `armv7` is a prefix of `armv7k`) then
this would trigger a match which is not the intended behaviour.
rdar://problem/41126835
llvm-svn: 342553
Summary:
In order for this test to work the log file needs to be removed from both
from the host and device. To fix this the `rm` `RUN` lines have been
replaced with `RUN: rm` followed by `RUN: %device_rm`.
Initially I tried having it so that `RUN: %run rm` implicitly runs `rm`
on the host as well so that only one `RUN` line is needed. This
simplified writing the test however that had two large drawbacks.
* It's potentially very confusing (e.g. for use of the device scripts outside
of the lit tests) if asking for `rm` to run on device also causes files
on the host to be deleted.
* This doesn't work well with the glob patterns used in the test.
The host shell expands the `%t.log.*` glob pattern and not on the
device so we could easily miss deleting old log files from previous
test runs if the corresponding file doesn't exist on the host.
So instead deletion of files on the device and host are explicitly
separate commands.
The command to delete files from a device is provided by a new
substitution `%device_rm` as suggested by Filipe Cabecinhas.
The semantics of `%device_rm` are that:
* It provides a way remove files from a target device when
the host is not the same as the target. In the case that the
host and target are the same it is a no-op.
* It interprets shell glob patterns in the context of the device
file system instead of the host file system.
This solves the globbing problem provided the argument is quoted so
that lit's underlying shell doesn't try to expand the glob pattern.
* It supports the `-r` and `-f` flags of the `rm` command,
with the same semantics.
Right now an implementation of `%device_rm` is provided only for
ios devices. For all other devices a lit warning is emitted and
the `%device_rm` is treated as a no-op. This done to avoid changing
the behaviour for other device types but leaves room for others
to implement `%device_rm`.
The ios device implementation uses the `%run` wrapper to do the work
of removing files on a device.
The `iossim_run.py` script has been fixed so that it just runs `rm`
on the host operating system because the device and host file system
are the same.
rdar://problem/41126835
Reviewers: vsk, kubamracek, george.karpenkov, eugenis
Subscribers: #sanitizers, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51648
llvm-svn: 342391
tests for ios, watchos, tvos, and their simulator counterparts.
This commit does not make the tests actually pass. This will be handled
in later commits.
rdar://problem/41126835
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51270
llvm-svn: 341306
Changes the default Windows target triple returned by
GetHostTriple.cmake from the old environment names (which we wanted to
move away from) to newer, normalized ones. This also requires updating
all tests to use the new systems names in constraints.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47381
llvm-svn: 339307
Just to be consistent with the rest.
I should have done that in the commit itself, but the filepaths
is one thing i forgot to verify :S
llvm-svn: 338307
The Builder sanitizer-x86_64-linux-android is failing
starting with rL338287 / D48959.
It runs the tests via android_compile.py, so i'm not sure this
is actually *this* issue:
https://code.google.com/p/address-sanitizer/issues/detail?id=316
but this seems oddly similar to the other XFAIL'ed cases...
Right now that seems to be the only failing builder,
so i *think* it makes sense to try to just blacklist it for now.
llvm-svn: 338296
This test fails with libc++ when built with MemorySanitizer. This
is because we link to an uninstrumented version of the library
so msan detects a nested error when calling std::cout << "...".
This can be easily avoided by using good old printf.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49867
llvm-svn: 338053
Summary:
That flag has been introduced in https://reviews.llvm.org/D48660 for
suppressing UIO error messages in an efficient way. The main motivation is to
be able to use UIO checks in builds used for fuzzing as it might provide an
interesting signal to a fuzzing engine such as libFuzzer.
See https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz/issues/910 for more information.
Reviewers: morehouse, kcc
Reviewed By: morehouse
Subscribers: kubamracek, delcypher, #sanitizers, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49324
llvm-svn: 337068
Summary:
Original patch by Kuba Mracek
The %T lit expansion expands to a common directory shared between all
the tests in the same directory, which is unexpected and unintuitive,
and more importantly, it's been a source of subtle race conditions and
flaky tests. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D35396, it was agreed that it
would be best to simply ban %T and only keep %t, which is unique to each
test. When a test needs a temporary directory, it can just create one
using mkdir %t.
This patch removes %T in compiler-rt.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48618
llvm-svn: 336661
Summary:
Setting UBSAN_OPTIONS=silence_unsigned_overflow=1 will silence all UIO
reports. This feature, combined with
-fsanitize-recover=unsigned-integer-overflow, is useful for providing
fuzzing signal without the excessive log output.
Helps with https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz/issues/910.
Reviewers: kcc, vsk
Reviewed By: vsk
Subscribers: vsk, kubamracek, Dor1s, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48660
llvm-svn: 335762
__ubsan_on_report isn't defined as weak, and redefining it in a test is
not supported on Windows.
See the error message here: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48446
llvm-svn: 335523
Add support to the ubsan runtime for reporting diagnostics to a monitor
process (e.g a debugger).
The Xcode IDE uses this by setting a breakpoint on __ubsan_on_report and
collecting diagnostic information via __ubsan_get_current_report_data,
which it then surfaces to users in the editor UI.
Testing for this functionality already exists in upstream lldb, here:
lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/functionalities/ubsan
Apart from that, this is `ninja check-{a,ub}san` clean.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48446
llvm-svn: 335371
Summary:
This patch (on top of the previous two (https://reviews.llvm.org/D40898 and
https://reviews.llvm.org/D40899) complete the compiler-rt side of the the Solaris
sanitizer port.
It contains the following sets of changes:
* For the time being, the port is for 32-bit x86 only, so reject the various tests on
x86_64.
* When compiling as C++, <setjmp.h> resp. <iso/setjmp_iso.h> only declares
_setjmp and _longjmp inside namespace std.
* MAP_FILE is a Windows feature. While e.g. Linux <sys/mman.h> provides a
no-op compat define, Solaris does not.
* test/asan/TestCases/Posix/coverage.cc was initially failing like this:
/vol/gcc/src/llvm/llvm/local/projects/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/scripts/sancov.py: 4 files merged; 2 PCs total
rm: cannot remove '/var/gcc/llvm/local/projects/compiler-rt/test/asan/I386SunOSConfig/TestCases/Posix/Output/coverage': Invalid argument
Further digging revealed that the rm was trying to remove the running test's working
directory which failed as observed. cd'ing out of the dir before let the test pass.
* Two tests needed a declaration of alloca. I've now copied the existing code from
test/asan/TestCases/alloca_constant_size.cc, but it may be more profitable and
maintainable to have a common testsuite header where such code is collected.
* Similarly, Solaris' printf %p format doesn't include the leading 0x.
* In test/asan/TestCases/malloc-no-intercept.c, I had to undef __EXTENSIONS__
(predefined by clang for no apparent reason) to avoid conflicting declarations
for memalign.
* test/ubsan/TestCases/Float/cast-overflow.cpp has different platform dependent
ways to define BYTE_ORDER and friends. Why not just use __BYTE_ORDER__ and
friends as predefined by clang and gcc?
Patch by Rainer Orth.
Reviewers: kcc, alekseyshl
Reviewed By: alekseyshl
Subscribers: srhines, kubamracek, mgorny, krytarowski, fedor.sergeev, JDevlieghere, llvm-commits, #sanitizers
Tags: #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40900
llvm-svn: 322635
As discussed in the mail thread <https://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/forum/
#!topic/std-discussion/T64_dW3WKUk> "Calling noexcept function throug non-
noexcept pointer is undefined behavior?", such a call should not be UB.
However, Clang currently warns about it.
This change removes exception specifications from the function types recorded
for -fsanitize=function, both in the functions themselves and at the call sites.
That means that calling a non-noexcept function through a noexcept pointer will
also not be flagged as UB. In the review of this change, that was deemed
acceptable, at least for now. (See the "TODO" in compiler-rt
test/ubsan/TestCases/TypeCheck/Function/function.cpp.)
This is the compiler-rt part of a patch covering both cfe and compiler-rt.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40720
llvm-svn: 321860
...when such an operation is done on an object during con-/destruction.
(This adds a test case to compiler-rt/test/ubsan/TestCases/TypeCheck/vptr.cpp
that, unlike the existing test cases there, wants to detect multiple UBSan
warnings in one go. Therefore, that file had to be changed from globally using
-fno-sanitize-recover to individually using halt_on_error only where
appropriate.)
This is the compiler-rt part of a patch covering both cfe and compiler-rt.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40295
llvm-svn: 321518
At least <http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-android/
builds/6013/steps/annotate/logs/stdio> complains about
__ubsan::__ubsan_handle_function_type_mismatch_abort (compiler-rt
lib/ubsan/ubsan_handlers.cc) returning now despite being declared 'noreturn', so
looks like a different approach is needed for the function_type_mismatch check
to be called also in cases that may ultimately succeed.
llvm-svn: 320981
As discussed in the mail thread <https://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/forum/
#!topic/std-discussion/T64_dW3WKUk> "Calling noexcept function throug non-
noexcept pointer is undefined behavior?", such a call should not be UB.
However, Clang currently warns about it.
There is no cheap check whether two function type_infos only differ in noexcept,so pass those two type_infos as additional data to the function_type_mismatch
handler (with the optimization of passing a null "static callee type" info when that is already noexcept, so the additional check can be avoided anyway). For
the Itanium ABI (which appears to be the only one that happens to be used on
platforms that support -fsanitize=function, and which appears to only record
noexcept information for pointer-to-function type_infos, not for function
type_infos themselves), we then need to check the mangled names for occurrence
of "Do" representing "noexcept".
This is the compiler-rt part of a patch covering both cfe and compiler-rt.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40720
llvm-svn: 320977
Summary:
As discussed in https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz/issues/933,
it would be really awesome to be able to use ThinLTO for fuzzing.
However, as @kcc has pointed out, it is currently undefined (untested)
whether the sanitizers actually function properly with LLD and/or LTO.
This patch is inspired by the cfi test, which already do test with LTO
(and/or LLD), since LTO is required for CFI to function.
I started with UBSan, because it's cmakelists / lit.* files appeared
to be the cleanest. This patch adds the infrastructure to easily add
LLD and/or LTO sub-variants of the existing lit test configurations.
Also, this patch adds the LLD flavor, that explicitly does use LLD to link.
The check-ubsan does pass on my machine. And to minimize the [initial]
potential buildbot breakage i have put some restrictions on this flavour.
Please review carefully, i have not worked with lit/sanitizer tests before.
The original attempt, r319525 was reverted in r319526 due
to the failures in compiler-rt standalone builds.
Reviewers: eugenis, vitalybuka
Reviewed By: eugenis
Subscribers: #sanitizers, pcc, kubamracek, mgorny, llvm-commits, mehdi_amini, inglorion, kcc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39508
llvm-svn: 319575
This reverts commit r319525.
This change has introduced a problem with the Lit tests build for compiler-rt using Gold: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux/builds/6047/steps/test%20standalone%20compiler-rt/logs/stdio
llvm-lit: /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux/build/llvm/utils/lit/lit/TestingConfig.py:101: fatal: unable to parse config file '/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux/build/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/test/profile/Linux/lit.local.cfg', traceback: Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux/build/llvm/utils/lit/lit/TestingConfig.py", line 88, in load_from_path
exec(compile(data, path, 'exec'), cfg_globals, None)
File "/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux/build/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/test/profile/Linux/lit.local.cfg", line 37, in <module>
if root.host_os not in ['Linux'] or not is_gold_linker_available():
File "/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux/build/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/test/profile/Linux/lit.local.cfg", line 27, in is_gold_linker_available
stderr = subprocess.PIPE)
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/subprocess.py", line 390, in __init__
errread, errwrite)
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/subprocess.py", line 1024, in _execute_child
raise child_exception
OSError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory
llvm-svn: 319529
Summary:
As discussed in https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz/issues/933,
it would be really awesome to be able to use ThinLTO for fuzzing.
However, as @kcc has pointed out, it is currently undefined (untested)
whether the sanitizers actually function properly with LLD and/or LTO.
This patch is inspired by the cfi test, which already do test with LTO
(and/or LLD), since LTO is required for CFI to function.
I started with UBSan, because it's cmakelists / lit.* files appeared
to be the cleanest. This patch adds the infrastructure to easily add
LLD and/or LTO sub-variants of the existing lit test configurations.
Also, this patch adds the LLD flavor, that explicitly does use LLD to link.
The check-ubsan does pass on my machine. And to minimize the [initial]
potential buildbot breakage i have put some restrictions on this flavour.
Please review carefully, i have not worked with lit/sanitizer tests before.
Reviewers: eugenis, vitalybuka
Reviewed By: eugenis
Subscribers: #sanitizers, pcc, kubamracek, mgorny, llvm-commits, mehdi_amini, inglorion, kcc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39508
llvm-svn: 319525
If the lookup using RTLD_NEXT failed, the sanitizer runtime library
is later in the library search order than the DSO that we are trying
to intercept, which means that we cannot intercept this function. We
still want the address of the real definition, though, so look it up
using RTLD_DEFAULT.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39779
llvm-svn: 317930
This is a very poorly named feature. I think originally it meant to cover linux only, but the use of it in msan
seems to be about any aarch64 platform. Anyway, this change should be NFC on everything except Android.
llvm-svn: 315389
As a follow-up to r315142, this makes it possible to use ubsan with a
static runtime on Darwin. I've also added a new StandaloneStatic testing
configuration so the new setup can be tested.
llvm-svn: 315143
Summary:
Enable check-cfi and check-ubsan on Android.
Check-ubsan includes standalone and ubsan+asan, but not tsan or msan.
Cross-dso cfi tests are disabled for now.
Reviewers: vitalybuka, pcc
Subscribers: srhines, kubamracek, llvm-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38608
llvm-svn: 315105
This was originally broken by r258744 which introduced a weak reference
from ubsan to ubsan_cxx. This reference does not work directly on
Windows because COFF has no direct concept of weak symbols. The fix is
to use /alternatename to create a weak external reference to ubsan_cxx.
Also fix the definition (and the name, so that we drop cached values)
of the cmake flag that controls whether to build ubsan_cxx. Now the
user-controllable flag is always on, and we turn it off internally
depending on whether we support building it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37882
llvm-svn: 313391
Summary:
Part of the code inspired by the original work on libsanitizer in GCC 5.4 by Christos Zoulas.
Sponsored by <The NetBSD Foundation>
Reviewers: joerg, vitalybuka, kcc, filcab, fjricci
Reviewed By: fjricci
Subscribers: srhines, kubamracek, mgorny, llvm-commits, #sanitizers
Tags: #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36483
llvm-svn: 310412
This reverts commit r309042, thereby adding a test for -fsanitize=vptr
functionality without -fsanitize=null. It also removes -fsanitize=null
from another -fsanitize=vptr test.
llvm-svn: 309847
The dynamic type check needs to inspect vtables, but could crash if it
encounters a vtable pointer to inaccessible memory. In the first attempt
to fix the issue (r304437), we performed a memory accessibility check on
the wrong range of memory. This should *really* fix the problem.
Patch by Max Moroz!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34215
llvm-svn: 305489
Roman Lebedev