This would be ambigious with itself when C++20 tries to lookup the
reversed form. I didn't find a use in LLVM, but MLIR does a lot of
comparisons of ranges of different types.
The error messages in tests are far better when a test fails if the test
is written using ASSERT_/EXPECT_<operator>(A, B) rather than
ASSERT_/EXPECT_TRUE(A <operator> B).
This commit updates all of llvm/unittests/Support to use these macros
where possible.
This change has not been possible in:
- llvm/unittests/Support/FSUniqueIDTest.cpp - due to not overloading
operators beyond ==, != and <.
- llvm/unittests/Support/BranchProbabilityTest.cpp - where the unchanged
tests are of the operator overloads themselves.
There are other possibilities of this conversion not being valid, which
have not applied in these tests, as they do not use NULL (they use
nullptr), and they do not use const char* (they use std::string or
StringRef).
Reviewed By: mubashar_
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117319
This revision moves the various range utilities present in MLIR to LLVM to enable greater reuse. This revision moves the following utilities:
* indexed_accessor_*
This is set of utility iterator/range base classes that allow for building a range class where the iterators are represented by an object+index pair.
* make_second_range
Given a range of pairs, returns a range iterating over the `second` elements.
* hasSingleElement
Returns if the given range has 1 element. size() == 1 checks end up being very common, but size() is not always O(1) (e.g., ilist). This method provides O(1) checks for those cases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78064
Benjamin Kramer