LWG 3013 points out that the constructors and increment members
of the directory iterators need to allocate, and therefore cannot
be marked noexcept.
It also points out that `is_empty` and `copy` likely need to allocate
as well, and as such can also not be noexcept.
This patch speculatively implements the resolution removing noexcept,
because libc++ does indeed have the possibility of throwing on allocation
failure.
llvm-svn: 316941
The guts of the increment method for recursive_directory_iterator
was failing to pass an error code object to calls to status/symlink_status,
which can throw under certain conditions.
This patch fixes the issues by correctly propagating the error codes.
However the noexcept still needs to be removed from the signature, as
mentioned in LWG 3014, but that change will be made in a separate commit.
llvm-svn: 316939
The logic to allocate a node within std::list was repeated
in a bunch of places. This is unneeded. This patch refactors
the shared logic into a single function to reduce duplication.
This patch is part of a set to clean up node construction in
general, but refactoring construction requires some more work
to make it work cleanly in C++03
llvm-svn: 316021
Previously this macro used 0/1 to indicate if it was set.
This is unlike all other libc++ configuration macros which
use ifdef/ifndef.
This patch makes this macro consistent with everything else.
llvm-svn: 315995
Summary:
The constructors `vector(Iter, Iter, Alloc = Alloc{})` and `assign(Iter, Iter)` don't correctly perform EmplaceConstruction from the result of dereferencing the iterator. This results in them performing an additional and unneeded copy.
This patch addresses the issue by correctly using `emplace_back` in C++11 and newer.
There are also some bugs in our `insert` implementation, but those will be handled separately.
@mclow.lists We should probably merge this into 5.1, agreed?
Reviewers: mclow.lists, dlj, EricWF
Reviewed By: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: cfe-commits, mclow.lists
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38757
llvm-svn: 315994
The vcruntime headers are hairy and clash with both libc++ headers
themselves and other libraries. libc++ normally deals with the clashes
by deferring to the vcruntime headers and silencing its own definitions,
but for clients which don't want to depend on vcruntime headers, it's
desirable to support the opposite, i.e. have libc++ provide its own
definitions.
Certain operator new/delete replacement scenarios are not currently
supported in this mode, which requires some tests to be marked XFAIL.
The added documentation has more details.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38522
llvm-svn: 315234
Make it clear that these are intended only to force a specific ABI when
the autodetection would give the wrong result by renaming the cmake
options and adding separate forcing macros, as suggested by EricWF in
the post-commit review of r314949 and further discussed on IRC.
llvm-svn: 314965
libc++'s current heuristic for detecting Itanium vs. Microsoft ABI falls
short in some cases. For example, it will detect windows-itanium targets
as using the Microsoft ABI, since they set `_MSC_VER` (for compatibility
with Microsoft headers). Leave the current heuristic in place by default
but also allow users to explicitly specify the ABI if need be.
llvm-svn: 314949
Some ABI macros affect headers, so it's nice to have a site config
option for them. Add a LIBCXX_ABI_DEFINES cmake macro to allow
specifying a list of ABI macros to define in the site config.
The primary design constraint (as discussed with Eric on IRC a while
back) was to not have to repeat the ABI macro names in cmake, which only
leaves a free-form cmake list as an option. A somewhat unfortunate
consequence is that we can't verify that the ABI macros being defined
actually exist, though we can at least perform some basic sanity
checking, since all the ABI macros begin with _LIBCPP_ABI_.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36719
llvm-svn: 314946
Previously LIT would often fail while attempting to set up/configure
the test compiler; normally when attempting to dump the builtin macros.
This sort of failure provided no useful information about what went
wrong with the compiler, making the actual issues hard --- if not
impossible --- to debug easily.
This patch changes the LIT configuration to report the failure explicitly,
including the failed compile command and the stdout/stderr output.
llvm-svn: 314735
This warning "structure was padded due to alignment specifier" says
that the compiler is going to do exactly what you asked it to do.
It's triggered by the tests for over-aligned dynamic memory allocation.
llvm-svn: 314257
Despite a strong CMake warning that this is an unsupported
libcxx build configuration, some bots still rely on being
able to check out lit and libcxx independently with no
LLVM sources, and then run lit against libcxx.
A previous patch broke that workflow, so this is making it work
again. Unfortunately, it breaks generation of the llvm-lit
script for libcxx, but we will just have to live with that until
a solution is found that allows libcxx to make more use of
llvm build pieces. libcxx can still run tests by using the
ninja check target, or by running lit.py directly against the
build tree or source tree.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38057
llvm-svn: 313763
Summary:
This patch replaces __sync_* with __libcpp_atomic_* and adds a wrapper
function for __atomic_exchange to support _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_THREADS.
Reviewers: EricWF, jroelofs, mclow.lists, compnerd
Reviewed By: EricWF, compnerd
Subscribers: compnerd, efriedma, cfe-commits, joerg, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35235
llvm-svn: 313694
After speaking with the libcxx owners, they agreed that this is
a bug in the bot that needs to be fixed by the bot owners, and
the CMake changes are correct.
llvm-svn: 313643
This reverts commit 4ad71811d45268d81b60f27e3b8b2bcbc23bd7b9.
There is a bot that is checking out libcxx and lit with nothing
else and then running lit.py against the test tree. Since there's
no LLVM source tree, there's no LLVM CMake. CMake actually
reports this as a warning saying unsupported libcxx configuration,
but I guess someone is depending on it anyway.
llvm-svn: 313607
Marshall Clow