If the DAGCombiner's rotate matching was working as expected,
I don't think we'd see any test diffs here.
This sidesteps the issue of custom lowering for rotates raised in PR38243:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38243
...by only dealing with legal operations.
llvm-svn: 337966
In some cases LSV sees (load/store _ (select _ <pointer expression>
<pointer expression>)) patterns in input IR, often due to sinking and
other forms of CFG simplification, sometimes interspersed with
bitcasts and all-constant-indices GEPs. With this
patch`areConsecutivePointers` method would attempt to handle select
instructions. This leads to an increased number of successful
vectorizations.
Technically, select instructions could appear in index arithmetic as
well, however, we don't see those in our test suites / benchmarks.
Also, there is a lot more freedom in IR shapes computing integral
indices in general than in what's common in pointer computations, and
it appears that it's quite unreliable to do anything short of making
select instructions first class citizens of Scalar Evolution, which
for the purposes of this patch is most definitely an overkill.
Reviewed By: rampitec
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49428
llvm-svn: 337965
Instead of depending on implicit padding from the structure layout code,
use a packed struct and emit the padding explicitly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49710
llvm-svn: 337961
GNU binutils tools have no problems with this kind of shared constants,
provided that we actually hook it up completely in AsmPrinter and
produce a global symbol.
This effectively reverts SVN r335918 by hooking the rest of it up
properly.
This feature was implemented originally in SVN r213006, with no reason
for why it can't be used for MinGW other than the fact that GCC doesn't
do it while MSVC does.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49646
llvm-svn: 337951
In SVN r334523, the first half of comdat constant pool handling was
hoisted from X86WindowsTargetObjectFile (which despite the name only
was used for msvc targets) into the arch independent
TargetLoweringObjectFileCOFF, but the other half of the handling was
left behind in X86AsmPrinter::GetCPISymbol.
With only half of the handling in place, inconsistent comdat
sections/symbols are created, causing issues with both GNU binutils
(avoided for X86 in SVN r335918) and with the MS linker, which
would complain like this:
fatal error LNK1143: invalid or corrupt file: no symbol for COMDAT section 0x4
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49644
llvm-svn: 337950
Violating the invariants specified by attributes is undefined behavior.
Maybe we could use poison instead for some of the parameter attributes,
but I don't think it's worthwhile.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49041
llvm-svn: 337947
Saves materializing the immediate for the "ands".
Corresponding patterns exist for lsrs+lsls, but that seems less common
in practice.
Now implemented as a DAGCombine.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49585
llvm-svn: 337945
as well as sext(C + x + ...) -> (D + sext(C-D + x + ...))<nuw><nsw>
similar to the equivalent transformation for zext's
if the top level addition in (D + (C-D + x * n)) could be proven to
not wrap, where the choice of D also maximizes the number of trailing
zeroes of (C-D + x * n), ensuring homogeneous behaviour of the
transformation and better canonicalization of such AddRec's
(indeed, there are 2^(2w) different expressions in `B1 + ext(B2 + Y)` form for
the same Y, but only 2^(2w - k) different expressions in the resulting `B3 +
ext((B4 * 2^k) + Y)` form, where w is the bit width of the integral type)
This patch generalizes sext(C1 + C2*X) --> sext(C1) + sext(C2*X) and
sext{C1,+,C2} --> sext(C1) + sext{0,+,C2} transformations added in
r209568 relaxing the requirements the following way:
1. C2 doesn't have to be a power of 2, it's enough if it's divisible by 2
a sufficient number of times;
2. C1 doesn't have to be less than C2, instead of extracting the entire
C1 we can split it into 2 terms: (00...0XXX + YY...Y000), keep the
second one that may cause wrapping within the extension operator, and
move the first one that doesn't affect wrapping out of the extension
operator, enabling further simplifications;
3. C1 and C2 don't have to be positive, splitting C1 like shown above
produces a sum that is guaranteed to not wrap, signed or unsigned;
4. in AddExpr case there could be more than 2 terms, and in case of
AddExpr the 2nd and following terms and in case of AddRecExpr the
Step component don't have to be in the C2*X form or constant
(respectively), they just need to have enough trailing zeros,
which in turn could be guaranteed by means other than arithmetics,
e.g. by a pointer alignment;
5. the extension operator doesn't have to be a sext, the same
transformation works and profitable for zext's as well.
Apparently, optimizations like SLPVectorizer currently fail to
vectorize even rather trivial cases like the following:
double bar(double *a, unsigned n) {
double x = 0.0;
double y = 0.0;
for (unsigned i = 0; i < n; i += 2) {
x += a[i];
y += a[i + 1];
}
return x * y;
}
If compiled with `clang -std=c11 -Wpedantic -Wall -O3 main.c -S -o - -emit-llvm`
(!{!"clang version 7.0.0 (trunk 337339) (llvm/trunk 337344)"})
it produces scalar code with the loop not unrolled with the unsigned `n` and
`i` (like shown above), but vectorized and unrolled loop with signed `n` and
`i`. With the changes made in this commit the unsigned version will be
vectorized (though not unrolled for unclear reasons).
How it all works:
Let say we have an AddExpr that looks like (C + x + y + ...), where C
is a constant and x, y, ... are arbitrary SCEVs. Let's compute the
minimum number of trailing zeroes guaranteed of that sum w/o the
constant term: (x + y + ...). If, for example, those terms look like
follows:
i
XXXX...X000
YYYY...YY00
...
ZZZZ...0000
then the rightmost non-guaranteed-zero bit (a potential one at i-th
position above) can change the bits of the sum to the left (and at
i-th position itself), but it can not possibly change the bits to the
right. So we can compute the number of trailing zeroes by taking a
minimum between the numbers of trailing zeroes of the terms.
Now let's say that our original sum with the constant is effectively
just C + X, where X = x + y + .... Let's also say that we've got 2
guaranteed trailing zeros for X:
j
CCCC...CCCC
XXXX...XX00 // this is X = (x + y + ...)
Any bit of C to the left of j may in the end cause the C + X sum to
wrap, but the rightmost 2 bits of C (at positions j and j - 1) do not
affect wrapping in any way. If the upper bits cause a wrap, it will be
a wrap regardless of the values of the 2 least significant bits of C.
If the upper bits do not cause a wrap, it won't be a wrap regardless
of the values of the 2 bits on the right (again).
So let's split C to 2 constants like follows:
0000...00CC = D
CCCC...CC00 = (C - D)
and represent the whole sum as D + (C - D + X). The second term of
this new sum looks like this:
CCCC...CC00
XXXX...XX00
----------- // let's add them up
YYYY...YY00
The sum above (let's call it Y)) may or may not wrap, we don't know,
so we need to keep it under a sext/zext. Adding D to that sum though
will never wrap, signed or unsigned, if performed on the original bit
width or the extended one, because all that that final add does is
setting the 2 least significant bits of Y to the bits of D:
YYYY...YY00 = Y
0000...00CC = D
----------- <nuw><nsw>
YYYY...YYCC
Which means we can safely move that D out of the sext or zext and
claim that the top-level sum neither sign wraps nor unsigned wraps.
Let's run an example, let's say we're working in i8's and the original
expression (zext's or sext's operand) is 21 + 12x + 8y. So it goes
like this:
0001 0101 // 21
XXXX XX00 // 12x
YYYY Y000 // 8y
0001 0101 // 21
ZZZZ ZZ00 // 12x + 8y
0000 0001 // D
0001 0100 // 21 - D = 20
ZZZZ ZZ00 // 12x + 8y
0000 0001 // D
WWWW WW00 // 21 - D + 12x + 8y = 20 + 12x + 8y
therefore zext(21 + 12x + 8y) = (1 + zext(20 + 12x + 8y))<nuw><nsw>
This approach could be improved if we move away from using trailing
zeroes and use KnownBits instead. For instance, with KnownBits we could
have the following picture:
i
10 1110...0011 // this is C
XX X1XX...XX00 // this is X = (x + y + ...)
Notice that some of the bits of X are known ones, also notice that
known bits of X are interspersed with unknown bits and not grouped on
the rigth or left.
We can see at the position i that C(i) and X(i) are both known ones,
therefore the (i + 1)th carry bit is guaranteed to be 1 regardless of
the bits of C to the right of i. For instance, the C(i - 1) bit only
affects the bits of the sum at positions i - 1 and i, and does not
influence if the sum is going to wrap or not. Therefore we could split
the constant C the following way:
i
00 0010...0011 = D
10 1100...0000 = (C - D)
Let's compute the KnownBits of (C - D) + X:
XX1 1 = carry bit, blanks stand for known zeroes
10 1100...0000 = (C - D)
XX X1XX...XX00 = X
--- -----------
XX X0XX...XX00
Will this add wrap or not essentially depends on bits of X. Adding D
to this sum, however, is guaranteed to not to wrap:
0 X
00 0010...0011 = D
sX X0XX...XX00 = (C - D) + X
--- -----------
sX XXXX XX11
As could be seen above, adding D preserves the sign bit of (C - D) +
X, if any, and has a guaranteed 0 carry out, as expected.
The more bits of (C - D) we constrain, the better the transformations
introduced here canonicalize expressions as it leaves less freedom to
what values the constant part of ((C - D) + x + y + ...) can take.
Reviewed By: mzolotukhin, efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48853
llvm-svn: 337943
Summary:
The VS compiler (on Windows) has a bug which results in fieldFromInstruction being optimized out in some circumstances. This only happens in *release no debug info* builds that have assertions *turned off* - in all other situations the function is not inlined, so the functionality is correct. All of the bots have assertions turned on, so this path is not regularly tested. The workaround is to not inline the function on Windows - if the bug is fixed in a later release of the VS compiler, the noinline specification can be removed.
The test that consistently reproduces this is Lanai v11.txt test.
Reviewers: asmith, labath, zturner
Subscribers: dblaikie, stella.stamenova, aprantl, JDevlieghere, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49753
llvm-svn: 337942
When VectorLegalizer::LegalizeOp creates a new SDValue after iterating
over its arguments, we need to refer to the same result number of the
new node that the original value used.
Reviewed by: cameron.mcinally
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49805
llvm-svn: 337939
Currently ComputeNumSignBits does early exit while processing some
of the operations (add, sub, mul, and select). This prevents the
function from using AssumptionCacheTracker if passed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49759
llvm-svn: 337936
For example v = <2 x i1> is represented as bbbbaaaa in a predicate register,
where b = v[1], a = v[0]. Extracting v[1] is equivalent to extracting bit 4
from the predicate register.
llvm-svn: 337934
This recommits r337910 after fixing an "ambiguous call to addAttribute"
error with some compilers (gcc circa 4.9 and MSVC). It seems that these
compilers will consider a "false -> pointer" conversion during overload
resolution. This creates ambiguity because one I added an overload which
takes a MCExpr * as an argument.
I fix this by making the new overload take MCExpr&, which avoids the
conversion. It also documents the fact that we expect a valid MCExpr
object.
Original commit message follows:
The motivation for this is D49493, where we'd like to test details of
debug_str_offsets behavior which is difficult to trigger from a
traditional test.
This adds the plubming necessary for dwarfgen to generate this section.
The more interesting changes are:
- I've moved emitStringOffsetsTableHeader function from DwarfFile to
DwarfStringPool, so I can generate the section header more easily from
the unit test.
- added a new addAttribute overload taking an MCExpr*. This is used to
generate the DW_AT_str_offsets_base, which links a compile unit to the
offset table.
I've also added a basic test for reading and writing DW_form_strx forms.
Reviewers: dblaikie, JDevlieghere, probinson
Subscribers: llvm-commits, aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49670
llvm-svn: 337933
Initially, in https://reviews.llvm.org/D44890, I had these defined as
empty functions inside the header when the respective event listener
was not built in. As done in that commit, that wasn't correct, because
it was a ODR violation. Krasimir hot-fixed that in r333265, but that
wasn't quite right either, because it'd lead to the symbol not being
available.
Instead just move the fallbacksto ExecutionEngineBindings.cpp. Could
define them as static inlines in the header too, but I don't think it
matters.
Reviewers: whitequark
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49654
llvm-svn: 337930
This reverts commit r337910 as it's generating "ambiguous call to
addAttribute" errors on some bots.
Will resubmit once I get a chance to look into the problem.
llvm-svn: 337924
Add support for lowering pointer arguments.
Changing type from pointer to integer is already done in
MipsTargetLowering::getRegisterTypeForCallingConv.
Patch by Petar Avramovic.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49419
llvm-svn: 337912
Summary:
The motivation for this is D49493, where we'd like to test details of
debug_str_offsets behavior which is difficult to trigger from a
traditional test.
This adds the plubming necessary for dwarfgen to generate this section.
The more interesting changes are:
- I've moved emitStringOffsetsTableHeader function from DwarfFile to
DwarfStringPool, so I can generate the section header more easily from
the unit test.
- added a new addAttribute overload taking an MCExpr*. This is used to
generate the DW_AT_str_offsets_base, which links a compile unit to the
offset table.
I've also added a basic test for reading and writing DW_form_strx forms.
Reviewers: dblaikie, JDevlieghere, probinson
Subscribers: llvm-commits, aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49670
llvm-svn: 337910
NFC changes to make scheduler TableGen files more readable, by using loops
instead of a lot of similar defs with just e.g. a latency value that changes.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D49598
Review: Ulrich Weigand, Javed Abshar
llvm-svn: 337909
r337828 resolves a PredicateInfo issue with unnamed types.
Original message:
This patch updates IPSCCP to use PredicateInfo to propagate
facts to true branches predicated by EQ and to false branches
predicated by NE.
As a follow up, we should be able to extend it to also propagate additional
facts about nonnull.
Reviewers: davide, mssimpso, dberlin, efriedma
Reviewed By: davide, dberlin
llvm-svn: 337904
Add support for inline assembly with output operand that do not
naturally go in the register class it is constrained to (eg. double in a
32-bit GPR as in the PR).
llvm-svn: 337903
Helpers are available to make this option file format independant. This
patch adds the feature for Wasm file format. It doesn't change the
behavior of the other file format handling.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49545
llvm-svn: 337896
code.
This consolidates all our hardening calls, and simplifies the code
a bit. It seems much more clear to handle all of these together.
No functionality changed here.
llvm-svn: 337895
This function actually does two things: it traces the predicate state
through each of the basic blocks in the function (as that isn't directly
handled by the SSA updater) *and* it hardens everything necessary in the
block as it goes. These need to be done together so that we have the
currently active predicate state to use at each point of the hardening.
However, this also made obvious that the flag to disable actual
hardening of loads was flawed -- it also disabled tracing the predicate
state across function calls within the body of each block. So this patch
sinks this debugging flag test to correctly guard just the hardening of
loads.
Unless load hardening was disabled, no functionality should change with
tis patch.
llvm-svn: 337894
The target independent AsmParser doesn't recognise .hword, .word, .dword
which are required for Mips. Currently MipsAsmParser recognises these
through dispatch to MipsAsmParser::parseDataDirective. This contains
equivalent logic to AsmParser::parseDirectiveValue. This patch allows
reuse of AsmParser::parseDirectiveValue by making use of
addAliasForDirective to support .hword, .word and .dword.
Original patch provided by Alex Bradbury at D47001 was modified to fix
handling of microMIPS symbols. The `AsmParser::parseDirectiveValue`
calls either `EmitIntValue` or `EmitValue`. In this patch we override
`EmitIntValue` in the `MipsELFStreamer` to clear a pending set of
microMIPS symbols.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49539
llvm-svn: 337893
Summary:
Previously, passes use
```
DomTreeUpdater DTU(DT, DomTreeUpdater::UpdateStrategy::Lazy);
DTU.deleteBB(DelBB);
```
to delete a BasicBlock.
But passes which don't have the ability to update DomTree (e.g. tailcallelim, simplifyCFG) cannot recognize a DelBB awaiting deletion and will continue to process this DelBB.
This is a simple approach to notify devs of passes which may use DTU in the future to deal with deleted BasicBlocks under Lazy Strategy correctly.
Reviewers: kuhar, brzycki, dmgreen
Reviewed By: kuhar
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49731
llvm-svn: 337891
Summary:
This is a follow-up to r303043. In computeMapping(), we need to disqualify an
InstrMapping if it would be impossible to repair one of the registers in the
instruction to match the mapping.
This change is needed in order to be able to define an instruction
mapping for G_SELECT for the AMDGPU target and will be tested
by test/CodeGen/AMDGPU/GlobalISel/regbankselect-select.mir
Reviewers: ab, qcolombet, t.p.northover, dsanders
Reviewed By: qcolombet
Subscribers: tpr, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49735
llvm-svn: 337882
This ports the profiling runtime on Fuchsia and enables the
instrumentation. Unlike on other platforms, Fuchsia doesn't use
files to dump the instrumentation data since on Fuchsia, filesystem
may not be accessible to the instrumented process. We instead use
the data sink to pass the profiling data to the system the same
sanitizer runtimes do.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47208
llvm-svn: 337881
against v1.2 BCBS attacks directly.
Attacks using spectre v1.2 (a subset of BCBS) are described in the paper
here:
https://people.csail.mit.edu/vlk/spectre11.pdf
The core idea is to speculatively store over the address in a vtable,
jumptable, or other target of indirect control flow that will be
subsequently loaded. Speculative execution after such a store can
forward the stored value to subsequent loads, and if called or jumped
to, the speculative execution will be steered to this potentially
attacker controlled address.
Up until now, this could be mitigated by enableing retpolines. However,
that is a relatively expensive technique to mitigate this particular
flavor. Especially because in most cases SLH will have already mitigated
this. To fully mitigate this with SLH, we need to do two core things:
1) Unfold loads from calls and jumps, allowing the loads to be post-load
hardened.
2) Force hardening of incoming registers even if we didn't end up
needing to harden the load itself.
The reason we need to do these two things is because hardening calls and
jumps from this particular variant is importantly different from
hardening against leak of secret data. Because the "bad" data here isn't
a secret, but in fact speculatively stored by the attacker, it may be
loaded from any address, regardless of whether it is read-only memory,
mapped memory, or a "hardened" address. The only 100% effective way to
harden these instructions is to harden the their operand itself. But to
the extent possible, we'd like to take advantage of all the other
hardening going on, we just need a fallback in case none of that
happened to cover the particular input to the control transfer
instruction.
For users of SLH, currently they are paing 2% to 6% performance overhead
for retpolines, but this mechanism is expected to be substantially
cheaper. However, it is worth reminding folks that this does not
mitigate all of the things retpolines do -- most notably, variant #2 is
not in *any way* mitigated by this technique. So users of SLH may still
want to enable retpolines, and the implementation is carefuly designed to
gracefully leverage retpolines to avoid the need for further hardening
here when they are enabled.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49663
llvm-svn: 337878
Summary: truncateToMinimalBitWidths() doesn't handle all Instructions and the worst case is compiler crash via llvm_unreachable(). Fix is to add a case to handle PHINode and changed the worst case to NO-OP (from compiler crash).
Reviewers: sbaranga, mssimpso, hsaito
Reviewed By: hsaito
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49461
llvm-svn: 337861
if the top level addition in (D + (C-D + x + ...)) could be proven to
not wrap, where the choice of D also maximizes the number of trailing
zeroes of (C-D + x + ...), ensuring homogeneous behaviour of the
transformation and better canonicalization of such expressions.
This enables better canonicalization of expressions like
1 + zext(5 + 20 * %x + 24 * %y) and
zext(6 + 20 * %x + 24 * %y)
which get both transformed to
2 + zext(4 + 20 * %x + 24 * %y)
This pattern is common in address arithmetics and the transformation
makes it easier for passes like LoadStoreVectorizer to prove that 2 or
more memory accesses are consecutive and optimize (vectorize) them.
Reviewed By: mzolotukhin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48853
llvm-svn: 337859
We generated a subtract for the power of 2 minus one then negated the result. The negate can be optimized away by swapping the subtract operands, but DAG combine doesn't know how to do that and we don't add any of the new nodes to the worklist anyway.
This patch makes use explicitly emit the swapped subtract.
llvm-svn: 337858
Use a left shift and 2 subtracts like we do for 30. Move this out from behind the slow lea check since it doesn't even use an LEA.
Use this for multiply by 14 as well.
llvm-svn: 337856
Summary:
Currently all wasm atomic memory access instructions are sequentially
consistent, so even if LLVM IR specifies weaker orderings than that, we
should upgrade them to sequential ordering and treat them in the same
way.
Reviewers: dschuff
Subscribers: sbc100, jgravelle-google, sunfish, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49194
llvm-svn: 337854
Just some gardening here.
Similar to how we moved call information into Candidates, this moves outlined
frame information into OutlinedFunction. This allows us to remove
TargetCostInfo entirely.
Anywhere where we returned a TargetCostInfo struct, we now return an
OutlinedFunction. This establishes OutlinedFunctions as more of a general
repeated sequence, and Candidates as occurrences of those repeated sequences.
llvm-svn: 337848
Sanjay Patel