In r246338, code was added to check for this, but it failed to take into
account implicit destructor invocations because those are not reflected
in the AST. This adds a separate check for them.
llvm-svn: 281395
The class PTHWriter is in lib/Frontend/CacheTokens.cpp
inside the anonymous namespace.
This diff changes the order of fields an removes excessive padding.
Test plan: make -j8 check-clang
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23902
llvm-svn: 281385
Fix a crash-on-invalid.
When parsing type arguments and protocols,
parseObjCTypeArgsOrProtocolQualifiers() calls ParseTypeName(), which tries to
find matching tokens for '[', '(', etc whenever they appear among potential
type names. If unmatched, ParseTypeName() yields a tok::eof token stream. This
leads to crashes since the parsing at this point is not expected to go beyond
the param list closing '>'.
Fix that by properly handling tok::eof in
parseObjCTypeArgsOrProtocolQualifiers() callers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23852
rdar://problem/25063557
llvm-svn: 281383
AST may contain intermediate ParenExpr nodes
between MemberExpr and ArrayToPointerDecay.
This diff adjusts the check in ExprEngine::VisitMemberExpr accordingly.
Test plan: make -j8 check-clang-analysis
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24484
llvm-svn: 281373
This mostly behaves cl.exe's behavior, even though clang-cl is stricter in some
corner cases and more lenient in others (see the included test).
To make the uuid declared previously here diagnostic work correctly, tweak
stripTypeAttributesOffDeclSpec() to keep attributes in the right order.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D24469
llvm-svn: 281367
implicit declarations of move operations, GCC 4.7 would find that SelectPiece
has neither a move constructor nor a copy constructor. The copy constructor was
(correctly) deleted because the class has a member of move-only type, and the
move constructor was (incorrectly, per current C++ rules) not provided because
the class has a copy-only base class (in turn because it explicitly declares a
destructor).
llvm-svn: 281363
For ObjC type parameter, we used to have TypedefType that is canonicalized to
id or the bound type. We can't represent "T <protocol>" and thus will lose
the type information in the following example:
@interface MyMutableDictionary<KeyType, ObjectType> : NSObject
- (void)setObject:(ObjectType)obj forKeyedSubscript:(KeyType <NSCopying>)key;
@end
MyMutableDictionary<NSString *, NSString *> *stringsByString;
NSNumber *n1, *n2;
stringsByString[n1] = n2;
--> no warning on type mismatch of the key.
To fix the problem, we introduce a new type ObjCTypeParamType that supports
a list of protocol qualifiers.
We create ObjCTypeParamType for ObjCTypeParamDecl when we create
ObjCTypeParamDecl. We also substitute ObjCTypeParamType instead of TypedefType
on an ObjCTypeParamDecl.
rdar://24619481
rdar://25060179
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D23080
llvm-svn: 281358
Fix target options for fp32/64-denormals so that
+fp64-denormals is set if fp64 is supported
-fp32-denormals if fp32 denormals is not supported, or -cl-denorms-are-zero is set
+fp32-denormals if fp32 denormals is supported and -cl-denorms-are-zero is not set
If target feature fp32/64-denormals is explicitly set, they will override default options and options deduced from -cl-denorms-are-zero.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24512
llvm-svn: 281357
We also need to add ObjCTypeParamTypeLoc. ObjCTypeParamType supports the
representation of "T <protocol>" where T is a type parameter. Before this,
we use TypedefType to represent the type parameter for ObjC.
ObjCTypeParamType has "ObjCTypeParamDecl *OTPDecl" and it extends from
ObjCProtocolQualifiers. It is a non-canonical type and is canonicalized
to the underlying type with the protocol qualifiers.
rdar://24619481
rdar://25060179
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D23079
llvm-svn: 281355
To construct the canonical type of ObjCTypeParamType, we need to apply
qualifiers on ObjCObjectPointerType. The updated applyObjCProtocolQualifiers
handles this case by merging the protocol lists, constructing a new
ObjCObjectType, then a new ObjCObjectPointerType.
rdar://24619481
rdar://25060179
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D24059
llvm-svn: 281353
Now ObjCObjectType extends from ObjCProtocolQualifiers. We save number of
protocols in ObjCProtocolQualifiers.
This is in preparation of adding a new type class ObjCTypeParamType that
can take protocol qualifiers.
rdar://24619481
rdar://25060179
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D23078
llvm-svn: 281351
The unit tests in this patch demonstrate the need to traverse template
parameter lists of DeclaratorDecls (e.g. VarDecls, CXXMethodDecls) and
TagDecls (e.g. EnumDecls, RecordDecls).
Fixes PR29042.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D24268
Patch from Lukasz
Łukasz Anforowicz <lukasza@chromium.org>!
llvm-svn: 281345
Summary: This change adds "java" to the list of known extensions that clang-format supports.
Patch by Luis Hector Chavez
Reviewers: djasper
Subscribers: srhines, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24401
llvm-svn: 281294
Original commit message:
Add -fdiagnostics-show-hotness
Summary:
I've recently added the ability for optimization remarks to include the
hotness of the corresponding code region. This uses PGO and allows
filtering of the optimization remarks by relevance. The idea was first
discussed here:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.compilers.llvm.devel/98334
The general goal is to produce a YAML file with the remarks. Then, an
external tool could dynamically filter these by hotness and perhaps by
other things.
That said it makes sense to also expose this at the more basic level
where we just include the hotness info with each optimization remark.
For example, in D22694, the clang flag was pretty useful to measure the
overhead of the additional analyses required to include hotness.
(Without the flag we don't even run the analyses.)
For the record, Hal has already expressed support for the idea of this
patch on IRC.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23284
llvm-svn: 281293
In c++1z, static_assert is not required to have a StringLiteral message, where
previously it was required. Update the AST Reader to be able to handle a
null StringLiteral.
llvm-svn: 281286
We should be doing the same checks when a type is completed as we do
when a complete type is used during emission. Previously, we duplicated
the logic, and it got out of sync. This could be observed with
dllimported classes.
Also reduce a test case for this slightly.
Implementing review feedback from David Blaikie on r281057.
llvm-svn: 281278
This patch makes us act more conservatively when trying to determine
the objectsize for an array at the end of an object. This is in
response to code like the following:
```
struct sockaddr {
/* snip */
char sa_data[14];
};
void foo(const char *s) {
size_t slen = strlen(s) + 1;
size_t added_len = slen <= 14 ? 0 : slen - 14;
struct sockaddr *sa = malloc(sizeof(struct sockaddr) + added_len);
strcpy(sa->sa_data, s);
// ...
}
```
`__builtin_object_size(sa->sa_data, 1)` would return 14, when there
could be more than 14 bytes at `sa->sa_data`.
Code like this is apparently not uncommon. FreeBSD's manual even
explicitly mentions this pattern:
https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/developers-handbook/sockets-essential-functions.html
(section 7.5.1.1.2).
In light of this, we now just give up on any array at the end of an
object if we can't find the object's initial allocation.
I lack numbers for how much more conservative we actually become as a
result of this change, so I chose the fix that would make us as
compatible with GCC as possible. If we want to be more aggressive, I'm
happy to consider some kind of whitelist or something instead.
llvm-svn: 281277
Summary:
I've recently added the ability for optimization remarks to include the
hotness of the corresponding code region. This uses PGO and allows
filtering of the optimization remarks by relevance. The idea was first
discussed here:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.compilers.llvm.devel/98334
The general goal is to produce a YAML file with the remarks. Then, an
external tool could dynamically filter these by hotness and perhaps by
other things.
That said it makes sense to also expose this at the more basic level
where we just include the hotness info with each optimization remark.
For example, in D22694, the clang flag was pretty useful to measure the
overhead of the additional analyses required to include hotness.
(Without the flag we don't even run the analyses.)
For the record, Hal has already expressed support for the idea of this
patch on IRC.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23284
llvm-svn: 281276
Fixed incorrect docs that referred to:
objc_arc_weak_unavailable
when it should be:
objc_arc_weak_reference_unavailable
Patch by: Sean McBride!
llvm-svn: 281227
Use (call-process region nil ...) instead of (point-min) so that the
call works in narrowed buffers.
Patch by Philipp Stephani, thank you!
llvm-svn: 281203
remark flags. For now I'm checking in a copy of the built documentation, but we
can replace this with a placeholder (as we do for the attributes reference
documentation) once we enable building this server-side.
llvm-svn: 281192
MSVC emits /include directives in the .drective section for the
__dyn_tls_init function (decorated as ___dyn_tls_init@12 for 32-bit).
This fixes PR30347.
llvm-svn: 281189
provided before trying to print it.
This fixes a segfault that occurs when function printPretty generated by
tablegen tries to print an optional argument of attribute
objc_bridge_related.
rdar://problem/28155469
llvm-svn: 281132
When deserializing ObjCInterfaceDecl with definition data, if we already have
a definition, try to keep the definition invariant; also pull in the
categories even if it is not what getDefinition returns (this effectively
combines categories).
rdar://27926200
rdar://26708823
llvm-svn: 281119
Summary:
This fixes a bug where we were unable to compile the following CUDA
file with libstdc++ (didn't try libc++):
#include <future>
void foo() { std::shared_future<int> x; }
The problem is that <future> only defines std::shared_future if
__GCC_ATOMIC_INT_LOCK_FREE > 1. When we compiled this file for device,
the macro was set to 1, and then the class didn't exist at all.
Reviewers: tra
Subscribers: cfe-commits, jhen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24407
llvm-svn: 281089
Albert Gutowski