The original commit had a memory leak in the test has a leak as it doesn't
dispose of the evaluated cursor result.
This also contains the follow-up NFC refactoring commit r336591.
rdar://45893054
Original commit message:
[libclang] evalute compound statement cursors before trying to evaluate
the cursor like a declaration
This change fixes a bug in libclang in which it tries to evaluate a statement
cursor as a declaration cursor, because that statement still has a pointer to
the declaration parent.
rdar://38888477
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49051
llvm-svn: 350666
Summary:
`buildASTFromCodeWithArgs()` was creating a memory buffer referencing a
stack-allocated string. This diff changes the implementation to copy the code
string into the memory buffer so that said buffer owns the memory.
Patch by Yitzhak Mandelbaum.
Reviewers: alexfh
Reviewed By: alexfh
Subscribers: cfe-commits, EricWF
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55765
llvm-svn: 350638
Summary: The LocationE parameter of evalStore is documented as "The location expression that is stored to". When storing from an increment / decrement operator this was not satisfied. In user code this causes an inconsistency between the SVal and Stmt parameters of checkLocation.
Reviewers: NoQ, dcoughlin, george.karpenkov
Reviewed By: NoQ
Subscribers: xazax.hun, baloghadamsoftware, szepet, a.sidorin, mikhail.ramalho, Szelethus, donat.nagy, dkrupp, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55701
llvm-svn: 350528
Summary:
Much like hasArg for various call expressions, this allows LibTooling users to
match against a member of an initializer list.
This is currently being used as part of the abseil-duration-scale clang-tidy
check.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56090
llvm-svn: 350523
Summary:
It's a new primitive for importing symbols, and should be treated like
the (previously handled) `goog.require` and `goog.forwardDeclare`.
Reviewers: krasimir
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56385
llvm-svn: 350516
Add support for distinguishing plain Gentoo distribution, and a unit
test for it. This is going to be used to introduce distro-specific
customizations in the driver code; most notably, it is going to be used
to disable -faddrsig.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56024
llvm-svn: 350027
removed
Stat cache chaining was implemented for a StatListener in the PTH writer so that
it could write out the stat information to PTH. r348266 removed support for PTH,
and it doesn't seem like there are other uses of stat cache chaining. We can
remove the chaining support.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55455
llvm-svn: 349942
Summary:
There are certain cases when normal C/C++ lookup (localUncachedLookup)
does not find AST nodes. E.g.:
Example 1:
template <class T>
struct X {
friend void foo(); // this is never found in the DC of the TU.
};
Example 2:
// The fwd decl to Foo is not found in the lookupPtr of the DC of the
// translation unit decl.
struct A { struct Foo *p; };
In these cases we create a new node instead of returning with the old one.
To fix it we create a new lookup table which holds every node and we are
not interested in any C++ specific visibility considerations.
Simply, we must know if there is an existing Decl in a given DC.
Reviewers: a_sidorin, a.sidorin
Subscribers: mgorny, rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53708
llvm-svn: 349351
Summary:
The crux of the issue that is being fixed is that lookup could not find
previous decls of a friend class. The solution involves making the
friend declarations visible in their decl context (i.e. adding them to
the lookup table).
Also, we simplify `VisitRecordDecl` greatly.
This fix involves two other repairs (without these the unittests fail):
(1) We could not handle the addition of injected class types properly
when a redecl chain was involved, now this is fixed.
(2) DeclContext::removeDecl failed if the lookup table in Vector form
did not contain the to be removed element. This caused troubles in
ASTImporter::ImportDeclContext. This is also fixed.
Reviewers: a_sidorin, balazske, a.sidorin
Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53655
llvm-svn: 349349
ClangCheckerRegistry is a very non-obvious, poorly documented, weird concept.
It derives from CheckerRegistry, and is placed in lib/StaticAnalyzer/Frontend,
whereas it's base is located in lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core. It was, from what I can
imagine, used to circumvent the problem that the registry functions of the
checkers are located in the clangStaticAnalyzerCheckers library, but that
library depends on clangStaticAnalyzerCore. However, clangStaticAnalyzerFrontend
depends on both of those libraries.
One can make the observation however, that CheckerRegistry has no place in Core,
it isn't used there at all! The only place where it is used is Frontend, which
is where it ultimately belongs.
This move implies that since
include/clang/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/ClangCheckers.h only contained a single function:
class CheckerRegistry;
void registerBuiltinCheckers(CheckerRegistry ®istry);
it had to re purposed, as CheckerRegistry is no longer available to
clangStaticAnalyzerCheckers. It was renamed to BuiltinCheckerRegistration.h,
which actually describes it a lot better -- it does not contain the registration
functions for checkers, but only those generated by the tblgen files.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54436
llvm-svn: 349275
Some versions of gcc, especially when invoked through ccache (-E), can have
trouble with raw string literals inside macros. This moves the string out of
the macro.
llvm-svn: 349059
Summary:
This change adds a new AST matcher for block expressions.
Test Notes:
Ran the clang unit tests.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55546
llvm-svn: 349004
Summary:
Currently the Clang AST doesn't store information about how the callee of a CallExpr was found. Specifically if it was found using ADL.
However, this information is invaluable to tooling. Consider a tool which renames usages of a function. If the originally CallExpr was formed using ADL, then the tooling may need to additionally qualify the replacement.
Without information about how the callee was found, the tooling is left scratching it's head. Additionally, we want to be able to match ADL calls as quickly as possible, which means avoiding computing the answer on the fly.
This patch changes `CallExpr` to store whether it's callee was found using ADL. It does not change the size of any AST nodes.
Reviewers: fowles, rsmith, klimek, shafik
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: aaron.ballman, riccibruno, calabrese, titus, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55534
llvm-svn: 348977
This is a more thorough fix of rC348911.
The story about -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS=on build after rC348907 (Move PCHContainerOperations from Frontend to Serialization) is:
1. libclangSerialization.so defines PCHContainerReader dtor, ...
2. clangFrontend and clangTooling define classes inheriting from PCHContainerReader, thus their DSOs have undefined references on PCHContainerReader dtor
3. Components depending on either clangFrontend or clangTooling cannot be linked unless they have explicit dependency on clangSerialization due to the default linker option -z defs. The explicit dependency could be avoided if libclang{Frontend,Tooling}.so had these undefined references.
This patch adds the explicit dependency on clangSerialization to make them build.
llvm-svn: 348915
Summary: The test passes on Windows only when it is executed on the C: drive. If the build and tests run on a different drive, the test is currently failing.
Reviewers: kadircet, asmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55451
llvm-svn: 348665
Summary:
Absolute path information for virtual files were missing even if we
have already stat'd the files. This patch puts that information for virtual
files that can succesffully be stat'd.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55054
llvm-svn: 348006
Summary:
When we already have an incomplete underlying type of a typedef in the
"To" context, and the "From" context has the same typedef, but the
underlying type is complete, then the imported type should be complete.
Fixes an assertion in CTU analysis of Xerces:
Assertion `DD && "queried property of class with no definition"' failed.
This assert is happening in the analyzer engine, because that attempts
to query an underlying type of a typedef, which happens to be
incomplete.
Reviewers: a_sidorin, a.sidorin
Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53693
llvm-svn: 347648
Summary:
If one definition is currently being defined, we do not compare for
equality and we assume that the decls are equal.
Reviewers: a_sidorin, a.sidorin, shafik
Reviewed By: a_sidorin
Subscribers: gamesh411, shafik, rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53697
llvm-svn: 347564
Summary:
r346756 refined clang-format to not treat the `[` in `asm (...: [] ..)` as an
ObjCExpr. However that's not enough, as we might have a comma-separated list of
such clobbers as in the newly added test.
This updates the detection to instead look at the Line's first token being `asm`
and not mark `[`-s as ObjCExprs in this case.
Reviewers: djasper, benhamilton
Reviewed By: djasper, benhamilton
Subscribers: benhamilton, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54795
llvm-svn: 347465
Summary:
Clang-format is treating all occurences of `is` in js as type matchers. In some
cases this is wrong, as it might be a dict key.
Reviewers: mprobst
Reviewed By: mprobst
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54753
llvm-svn: 347307
Summary:
Old behavior is to just return the cached entry regardless of opened-ness.
That feels buggy (though I guess nobody ever actually needed this).
This came up in the context of clangd+clang-tidy integration: we're
going to getFile(open=false) to replay preprocessor actions obscured by
the preamble, but the compilation may subsequently getFile(open=true)
for non-preamble includes.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: ioeric, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54691
llvm-svn: 347205
Add support for "polymorphic" types to YAMLIO.
PolymorphicTraits can dynamically switch between other traits (Scalar, Map, or
Sequence). When inputting, the PolymorphicTraits type is told which type to
become, and when outputting the PolymorphicTraits type is asked which type it
currently is.
Also add support for TaggedScalarTraits to allow dynamically differentiating
between multiple scalar types using YAML tags.
Serialize empty maps as "{}" and empty sequences as "[]", so that types
are preserved when round-tripping PolymorphicTraits. This change has
equivalent semantics, but may break e.g. tests which compare output
verbatim.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48144
llvm-svn: 346884
Summary:
The goal is to allow analyses such as clang-tidy checks to run on a
subset of the AST, e.g. "only on main-file decls" for interactive tools.
Today, these become "problematically global" by running RecursiveASTVisitors
rooted at the TUDecl, or by navigating up via ASTContext::getParent().
The scope is restricted using a set of top-level-decls that RecursiveASTVisitors
should be rooted at. This also applies to the visitor that populates the
parent map, and so the top-level-decls are considered to have no parents.
This patch makes the traversal scope a mutable property of ASTContext.
The more obvious way to do this is to pass the top-level decls to
relevant functions directly, but this has some problems:
- it's error-prone: accidentally mixing restricted and unrestricted
scopes is a performance trap. Interleaving multiple analyses is
common (many clang-tidy checks run matchers or RAVs from matcher callbacks)
- it doesn't map well to the actual use cases, where we really do want
*all* traversals to be restricted.
- it involves a lot of plumbing in parts of the code that don't care
about traversals.
This approach was tried out in D54259 and D54261, I wanted to like it
but it feels pretty awful in practice.
Caveats: to get scope-limiting behavior of RecursiveASTVisitors, callers
have to call the new TraverseAST(Ctx) function instead of TraverseDecl(TU).
I think this is an improvement to the API regardless.
Reviewers: klimek, ioeric
Subscribers: mgorny, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54309
llvm-svn: 346847
Summary:
The opening square of an inline asm clobber was being annotated as an ObjCExpr.
This caused, amongst other things, the ObjCGuesser to guess header files
containing that pattern as ObjC files.
Reviewers: benhamilton
Reviewed By: benhamilton
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54111
llvm-svn: 346756
Summary:
clang-format can get confused by string literals in TableGen: it knows that strings can be broken up, but doesn't seem to understand how that can be indented across line breaks, and arranges them in a weird triangular pattern. Take this output example from `clang-format tools/llvm-objcopy/ObjcopyOpts.td` (which has now been formatted in rL345896 with this patch applied):
```
defm keep_global_symbols
: Eq<
"keep-global-symbols", "Reads a list of symbols from <filename> and "
"runs as if " "--keep-global-symbol=<symbol> "
"is set for each one. "
"<filename> " "contains one "
"symbol per line "
"and may contain "
"comments "
"beginning " "with"
" '#'"
". "
"Lead"
"ing "
```
Reviewers: alexshap, MaskRay, djasper
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Subscribers: krasimir, mgorny, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53952
llvm-svn: 346687
Summary:
The issue is that for array subscript like:
```
arr[[Foo() bar]];
```
ClangFormat will recognize it as C++11 attribute syntax and put a space between 'arr' and first '[', like:
```
arr [[Foo() bar]];
```
Now it is fixed. Tested with:
```
ninja FormatTests
```
Reviewers: benhamilton
Reviewed By: benhamilton
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54288
llvm-svn: 346566
Summary:
Compound literals, enums, file-scoped arrays, etc. require their
initializers and size specifiers to be constant. Wrap the initializer
expressions in a ConstantExpr so that we can easily check for this later
on.
Reviewers: rsmith, shafik
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits, jyknight, nickdesaulniers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53921
llvm-svn: 346455
Summary: We can run the tools on a subset files of compilation database.
Reviewers: ioeric
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54092
llvm-svn: 346131
One of the reasons why AnalyzerOptions is so chaotic is that options can be
retrieved from the command line whenever and wherever. This allowed for some
options to be forgotten for a looooooong time. Have you ever heard of
"region-store-small-struct-limit"? In order to prevent this in the future, I'm
proposing to restrict AnalyzerOptions' interface so that only checker options
can be retrieved without special getters. I would like to make every option be
accessible only through a getter, but checkers from plugins are a thing, so I'll
have to figure something out for that.
This also forces developers who'd like to add a new option to register it
properly in the .def file.
This is done by
* making the third checker pointer parameter non-optional, and checked by an
assert to be non-null.
* I added new, but private non-checkers option initializers, meant only for
internal use,
* Renamed these methods accordingly (mind the consistent name for once with
getBooleanOption!):
- getOptionAsString -> getCheckerStringOption,
- getOptionAsInteger -> getCheckerIntegerOption
* The 3 functions meant for initializing data members (with the not very
descriptive getBooleanOption, getOptionAsString and getOptionAsUInt names)
were renamed to be overloads of the getAndInitOption function name.
* All options were in some way retrieved via getCheckerOption. I removed it, and
moved the logic to getStringOption and getCheckerStringOption. This did cause
some code duplication, but that's the only way I could do it, now that checker
and non-checker options are separated. Note that the non-checker version
inserts the new option to the ConfigTable with the default value, but the
checker version only attempts to find already existing entries. This is how
it always worked, but this is clunky and I might end reworking that too, so we
can eventually get a ConfigTable that contains the entire configuration of the
analyzer.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53483
llvm-svn: 346113
Summary:
If one definition is currently being defined, we do not compare for
equality and we assume that the decls are equal.
Reviewers: a_sidorin
Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53697
llvm-svn: 345760
Summary:
This is done in order to improve cases where the lambda's body is moved too far to the right. Consider the following snippet with column limit set to 79:
```
void f() {
leader::MakeThisCallHere(&leader_service_,
cq_.get(),
[this, liveness](const leader::ReadRecordReq& req,
std::function<void()> done) {
logger_->HandleReadRecord(
req, resp, std::move(done));
});
leader::MakeAnother(&leader_service_,
cq_.get(),
[this, liveness](const leader::ReadRecordReq& req,
std::function<void()> done) {
logger_->HandleReadRecord(
req, resp, std::move(done), a);
});
}
```
The tool favors extra indentation for the lambda body and so the code incurs extra wrapping and adjacent calls are indented to a different level. I find this behavior annoying and I'd like the tool to favor new lines and, thus, use the extra width.
The fix, reduced, brings the following formatting.
Before:
function(1,
[] {
DoStuff();
//
},
1);
After:
function(
1,
[] {
DoStuff();
//
},
1);
Refer to the new tests in FormatTest.cpp
Contributed by oleg.smolsky!
Reviewers: djasper, klimek, krasimir
Subscribers: cfe-commits, owenpan
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52676
llvm-svn: 345753
There are multiple reasons why field structures can be imported
in wrong order. The simplest is the ability of field initializers
and method bodies to refer fields not in order they are listed in.
Unfortunately, there is no clean solution for that currently
so I'm leaving a FIXME.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44100
llvm-svn: 345545
Alex Lorenz