When both constants are positive or both constants are negative,
InstCombine already simplifies comparisons like this, but when
it's exactly zero and -1, the operand sorting ends up reversed
and the pattern fails to match. Handle that special case.
Follow up for rdar://14689217
llvm-svn: 188512
Summary:
When the -dfsan-debug-nonzero-labels parameter is supplied, the code
is instrumented such that when a call parameter, return value or load
produces a nonzero label, the function __dfsan_nonzero_label is called.
The idea is that a debugger breakpoint can be set on this function
in a nominally label-free program to help identify any bugs in the
instrumentation pass causing labels to be introduced.
Reviewers: eugenis
CC: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1405
llvm-svn: 188472
This replaces the old incomplete greylist functionality with an ABI
list, which can provide more detailed information about the ABI and
semantics of specific functions. The pass treats every function in
the "uninstrumented" category in the ABI list file as conforming to
the "native" (i.e. unsanitized) ABI. Unless the ABI list contains
additional categories for those functions, a call to one of those
functions will produce a warning message, as the labelling behaviour
of the function is unknown. The other supported categories are
"functional", "discard" and "custom".
- "discard" -- This function does not write to (user-accessible) memory,
and its return value is unlabelled.
- "functional" -- This function does not write to (user-accessible)
memory, and the label of its return value is the union of the label of
its arguments.
- "custom" -- Instead of calling the function, a custom wrapper __dfsw_F
is called, where F is the name of the function. This function may wrap
the original function or provide its own implementation.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1345
llvm-svn: 188402
extremely subtle miscompilations (such as a load getting replaced with
the value stored *below* the load within a basic block) related to
promoting an alloca to an SSA value, there is the dim possibility that
you hit this. Please let me know if you won this unfortunate lottery.
The first half of mem2reg's core logic (as it is used both in the
standalone mem2reg pass and in SROA) builds up a mapping from
'Instruction *' to the index of that instruction within its basic block.
This allows quickly establishing which store dominate a particular load
even for large basic blocks. We cache this information throughout the
run of mem2reg over a function in order to amortize the cost of
computing it.
This is not in and of itself a strange pattern in LLVM. However, it
introduces a very important constraint: absolutely no instruction can be
deleted from the program without updating the mapping. Otherwise a newly
allocated instruction might get the same pointer address, and then end
up with a wrong index. Yes, LLVM routinely suffers from a *single
threaded* variant of the ABA problem. Most places in LLVM don't find
avoiding this an imposition because they don't both delete and create
new instructions iteratively, but mem2reg *loves* to do this... All the
time. Fortunately, the mem2reg code was really careful about updating
this cache to handle this eventuallity... except when it comes to the
debug declare intrinsic. Oops. The fix is to invalidate that pointer in
the cache when we delete it, the same as we do when deleting alloca
instructions and other instructions.
I've also caused the same bug in new code while working on a fix to
PR16867, so this seems to be a really unfortunate pattern. Hopefully in
subsequent patches the deletion of dead instructions can be consolidated
sufficiently to make it less likely that we'll see future occurences of
this bug.
Sorry for not having a test case, but I have literally no idea how to
reliably trigger this kind of thing. It may be single-threaded, but it
remains an ABA problem. It would require a really amazing number of
stars to align.
llvm-svn: 188367
Use the pointer size if datalayout is available.
Use i64 if it's not, which is consistent with what other
places do when the pointer size is unknown.
The test doesn't really test this in a useful way
since it will be transformed to that later anyway,
but this now tests it for non-zero arrays and when
datalayout isn't available. The cases in
visitGetElementPtrInst should save an extra re-visit to
the newly created GEP since it won't need to cleanup after
itself.
llvm-svn: 188339
When computing the use set of a store, we need to add the store to the write
set prior to iterating over later instructions. Otherwise, if there is a later
aliasing load of that store, that load will not be tagged as a use, and bad
things will happen.
trackUsesOfI still adds later dependent stores of an instruction to that
instruction's write set, but it never sees the original instruction, and so
when tracking uses of a store, the store must be added to the write set by the
caller.
Fixes PR16834.
llvm-svn: 188329
However, opt -O2 doesn't run mem2reg directly so nobody noticed until r188146
when SROA started sending more things directly down the PromoteMemToReg path.
In order to revert r187191, I also revert dependent revisions r187296, r187322
and r188146. Fixes PR16867. Does not add the testcases from that PR, but both
of them should get added for both mem2reg and sroa when this revert gets
unreverted.
llvm-svn: 188327
Do not generate new vector values for the same entries because we know that the incoming values
from the same block must be identical.
llvm-svn: 188185
Summary:
Doing work in constructors is bad: this change suggests to
call SpecialCaseList::create(Path, Error) instead of
"new SpecialCaseList(Path)". Currently the latter may crash with
report_fatal_error, which is undesirable - sometimes we want to report
the error to user gracefully - for example, if he provides an incorrect
file as an argument of Clang's -fsanitize-blacklist flag.
Reviewers: pcc
Reviewed By: pcc
CC: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1327
llvm-svn: 188156
These functions used to assume that the lsb of an integer corresponds
to vector element 0, whereas for big-endian it's the other way around:
the msb is in the first element and the lsb is in the last element.
Fixes MultiSource/Benchmarks/mediabench/gsm/toast for z.
llvm-svn: 188155
SROA-based analysis has enough information. This should work now that
both mem2reg *and* the SSAUpdater-based AllocaPromoter have been updated
to be able to promote the types of allocas that the SROA analysis
detects.
I've included tests for the AllocaPromoter that were only possible to
write once we fast-tracked promotable allocas without rewriting them.
This includes a test both for r187347 and r188145.
Original commit log for r187323:
"""
Now that mem2reg understands how to cope with a slightly wider set of uses of
an alloca, we can pre-compute promotability while analyzing an alloca for
splitting in SROA. That lets us short-circuit the common case of a bunch of
trivially promotable allocas. This cuts 20% to 30% off the run time of SROA for
typical frontend-generated IR sequneces I'm seeing. It gets the new SROA to
within 20% of ScalarRepl for such code. My current benchmark for these numbers
is PR15412, but it fits the general pattern of IR emitted by Clang so it should
be widely applicable.
"""
llvm-svn: 188146
the more general set of patterns that are now handled by mem2reg and that we
can detect quickly while doing SROA's initial analysis. Notably, this allows it
to promote through no-op bitcast and GEP sequences. A core part of the
SSAUpdater approach is the ability to test whether a particular instruction is
part of the set being promoted. Testing this becomes significantly more complex
in the world where the operand to every load and store isn't the alloca itself.
I ended up using the approach of walking up the def-chain until we find the
alloca. I benchmarked this against keeping a set of pointer operands and
keeping a set of the loads and stores we care about, and this one seemed faster
although the difference was very small.
No test case yet because currently the rewriting always "fixes" the inputs to
not require this. The next patch which re-enables early promotion of easy cases
in SROA will include a test case that specifically exercises this aspect of the
alloca promoter.
llvm-svn: 188145
our visiting datastructures in the AllocaPromoter/SSAUpdater path of
SROA. Also shift the order if clears around to be more consistent.
No functionality changed here, this is just a cleanup.
llvm-svn: 188144
It is breaking builbots with libgmalloc enabled on Mac OS X.
$ cd llvm ; mkdir release ; cd release
$ ../configure --enable-optimized —prefix=$PWD/install
$ make
$ make check
$ Release+Asserts/bin/llvm-lit -v --param use_gmalloc=1 --param \
gmalloc_path=/usr/lib/libgmalloc.dylib \
../test/Instrumentation/DataFlowSanitizer/args-unreachable-bb.ll
llvm-svn: 188142
I fixed the aforementioned problems that came up on some of the linux boxes.
Major thanks to Nick Lewycky for his help debugging!
rdar://14590914
llvm-svn: 188122
This moves removeUnreachableBlocksFromFn from SimplifyCFGPass.cpp
to Utils/Local.cpp and uses it to replace the implementation of
llvm::removeUnreachableBlocks, which appears to do a strict subset
of what removeUnreachableBlocksFromFn does.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1334
llvm-svn: 188119
This reverts commit r187941.
The commit was passing on my os x box, but it is failing on some non-osx
platforms. I do not have time to look into it now, so I am reverting and will
recommit after I figure this out.
llvm-svn: 187946
All libm floating-point rounding functions, except for round(), had their own
ISD nodes. Recent PowerPC cores have an instruction for round(), and so here I'm
adding ISD::FROUND so that round() can be custom lowered as well.
For the most part, this is straightforward. I've added an intrinsic
and a matching ISD node just like those for nearbyint() and friends. The
SelectionDAG pattern I've named frnd (because ISD::FP_ROUND has already claimed
fround).
This will be used by the PowerPC backend in a follow-up commit.
llvm-svn: 187926
DataFlowSanitizer is a generalised dynamic data flow analysis.
Unlike other Sanitizer tools, this tool is not designed to detect a
specific class of bugs on its own. Instead, it provides a generic
dynamic data flow analysis framework to be used by clients to help
detect application-specific issues within their own code.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D965
llvm-svn: 187923
The globals being generated here were given the 'private' linkage type. However,
this caused them to end up in different sections with the wrong prefix. E.g.,
they would be in the __TEXT,__const section with an 'L' prefix instead of an 'l'
(lowercase ell) prefix.
The problem is that the linker will eat a literal label with 'L'. If a weak
symbol is then placed into the __TEXT,__const section near that literal, then it
cannot distinguish between the literal and the weak symbol.
Part of the problems here was introduced because the address sanitizer converted
some C strings into constant initializers with trailing nuls. (Thus putting them
in the __const section with the wrong prefix.) The others were variables that
the address sanitizer created but simply had the wrong linkage type.
llvm-svn: 187827
Our internal regex implementation does not cope with large numbers
of anchors very efficiently. Given a ~3600-entry special case list,
regex compilation can take on the order of seconds. This patch solves
the problem for the special case of patterns matching literal global
names (i.e. patterns with no regex metacharacters). Rather than
forming regexes from literal global name patterns, add them to
a StringSet which is checked before matching against the regex.
This reduces regex compilation time by an order of roughly thousands
when reading the aforementioned special case list, according to a
completely unscientific study.
No test cases. I figure that any new tests for this code should
check that regex metacharacters are properly recognised. However,
I could not find any documentation which documents the fact that the
syntax of global names in special case lists is based on regexes.
The extent to which regex syntax is supported in special case lists
should probably be decided on/documented before writing tests.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1150
llvm-svn: 187732
It will now only convert the arguments / return value and call
the underlying function if the types are able to be bitcasted.
This avoids using fp<->int conversions that would occur before.
llvm-svn: 187444
infrastructure to do promotion without a domtree the same smarts about
looking through GEPs, bitcasts, etc., that I just taught mem2reg about.
This way, if SROA chooses to promote an alloca which still has some
noisy instructions this code can cope with them.
I've not used as principled of an approach here for two reasons:
1) This code doesn't really need it as we were already set up to zip
through the instructions used by the alloca.
2) I view the code here as more of a hack, and hopefully a temporary one.
The SSAUpdater path in SROA is a real sore point for me. It doesn't make
a lot of architectural sense for many reasons:
- We're likely to end up needing the domtree anyways in a subsequent
pass, so why not compute it earlier and use it.
- In the future we'll likely end up needing the domtree for parts of the
inliner itself.
- If we need to we could teach the inliner to preserve the domtree. Part
of the re-work of the pass manager will allow this to be very powerful
even in large SCCs with many functions.
- Ultimately, computing a domtree has gotten significantly faster since
the original SSAUpdater-using code went into ScalarRepl. We no longer
use domfrontiers, and much of domtree is lazily done based on queries
rather than eagerly.
- At this point keeping the SSAUpdater-based promotion saves a total of
0.7% on a build of the 'opt' tool for me. That's not a lot of
performance given the complexity!
So I'm leaving this a bit ugly in the hope that eventually we just
remove all of this nonsense.
I can't even readily test this because this code isn't reachable except
through SROA. When I re-instate the patch that fast-tracks allocas
already suitable for promotion, I'll add a testcase there that failed
before this change. Before that, SROA will fix any test case I give it.
llvm-svn: 187347
standards for LLVM. Remove duplicated comments on the interface from the
implementation file (implementation comments are left there of course).
Also clean up, re-word, and fix a few typos and errors in the commenst
spotted along the way.
This is in preparation for changes to these files and to keep the
uninteresting tidying in a separate commit.
llvm-svn: 187335
uses of an alloca, we can pre-compute promotability while analyzing an
alloca for splitting in SROA. That lets us short-circuit the common case
of a bunch of trivially promotable allocas. This cuts 20% to 30% off the
run time of SROA for typical frontend-generated IR sequneces I'm seeing.
It gets the new SROA to within 20% of ScalarRepl for such code. My
current benchmark for these numbers is PR15412, but it fits the general
pattern of IR emitted by Clang so it should be widely applicable.
llvm-svn: 187323
their being optimized out in debug mode. Realistically, this just isn't
going to be the slow part anyways. This also fixes unused variable
warnings that are breaking LLD build bots. =/ I didn't see these at
first, and kept losing track of the fact that they were broken.
llvm-svn: 187297
analysis of the alloca. We don't need to visit all the users twice for
this. We build up a kill list during the analysis and then just process
it afterward. This recovers the tiny bit of performance lost by moving
to the visitor based analysis system as it removes one entire use-list
walk from mem2reg. In some cases, this is now faster than mem2reg was
previously.
llvm-svn: 187296
Adds unit tests for it too.
Split BasicBlockUtils into an analysis-half and a transforms-half, and put the
analysis bits into a new Analysis/CFG.{h,cpp}. Promote isPotentiallyReachable
into llvm::isPotentiallyReachable and move it into Analysis/CFG.
llvm-svn: 187283
Merge consecutive if-regions if they contain identical statements.
Both transformations reduce number of branches. The transformation
is guarded by a target-hook, and is currently enabled only for +R600,
but the correctness has been tested on X86 target using a variety of
CPU benchmarks.
Patch by: Mei Ye
llvm-svn: 187278
robust. It now uses an InstVisitor and worklist to actually walk the
uses of the Alloca transitively and detect the pattern which we can
directly promote: loads & stores of the whole alloca and instructions we
can completely ignore.
Also, with this new implementation teach both the predicate for testing
whether we can promote and the promotion engine itself to use the same
code so we no longer have strange divergence between the two code paths.
I've added some silly test cases to demonstrate that we can handle
slightly more degenerate code patterns now. See the below for why this
is even interesting.
Performance impact: roughly 1% regression in the performance of SROA or
ScalarRepl on a large C++-ish test case where most of the allocas are
basically ready for promotion. The reason is because of silly redundant
work that I've left FIXMEs for and which I'll address in the next
commit. I wanted to separate this commit as it changes the behavior.
Once the redundant work in removing the dead uses of the alloca is
fixed, this code appears to be faster than the old version. =]
So why is this useful? Because the previous requirement for promotion
required a *specific* visit pattern of the uses of the alloca to verify:
we *had* to look for no more than 1 intervening use. The end goal is to
have SROA automatically detect when an alloca is already promotable and
directly hand it to the mem2reg machinery rather than trying to
partition and rewrite it. This is a 25% or more performance improvement
for SROA, and a significant chunk of the delta between it and
ScalarRepl. To get there, we need to make mem2reg actually capable of
promoting allocas which *look* promotable to SROA without have SROA do
tons of work to massage the code into just the right form.
This is actually the tip of the iceberg. There are tremendous potential
savings we can realize here by de-duplicating work between mem2reg and
SROA.
llvm-svn: 187191
This patch provides basic support for powerpc64le as an LLVM target.
However, use of this target will not actually generate little-endian
code. Instead, use of the target will cause the correct little-endian
built-in defines to be generated, so that code that tests for
__LITTLE_ENDIAN__, for example, will be correctly parsed for
syntax-only testing. Code generation will otherwise be the same as
powerpc64 (big-endian), for now.
The patch leaves open the possibility of creating a little-endian
PowerPC64 back end, but there is no immediate intent to create such a
thing.
The LLVM portions of this patch simply add ppc64le coverage everywhere
that ppc64 coverage currently exists. There is nothing of any import
worth testing until such time as little-endian code generation is
implemented. In the corresponding Clang patch, there is a new test
case variant to ensure that correct built-in defines for little-endian
code are generated.
llvm-svn: 187179
The language reference says that:
"If a symbol appears in the @llvm.used list, then the compiler,
assembler, and linker are required to treat the symbol as if there is
a reference to the symbol that it cannot see"
Since even the linker cannot see the reference, we must assume that
the reference can be using the symbol table. For example, a user can add
__attribute__((used)) to a debug helper function like dump and use it from
a debugger.
llvm-svn: 187103
schedule an alloca for another iteration in SROA. This only showed up
with a mixture of promotable and unpromotable selects and phis. Added
a test case for this.
llvm-svn: 187031
pending speculation for a phi node. The problem here is that we were
using growth of the specluation set as an indicator of whether
speculation would occur, and if the phi node is already in the set we
don't see it grow. This is a symptom of the fact that this signal is
a total hack.
Unfortunately, I couldn't really come up with a non-hacky way of
signaling that promotion remains valid *after* speculation occurs, such
that we only speculate when all else looks good for promotion. In the
end, I went with at least a much more explicit approach of doing the
work of queuing inside the phi and select processing and setting
a preposterously named flag to convey that we're in the special state of
requiring speculating before promotion.
Thanks to Richard Trieu and Nick Lewycky for the excellent work reducing
a testcase for this from a pretty giant, nasty assert in a big
application. =] The testcase was excellent.
llvm-svn: 187029
We don't have tests for the effect of if-conversion loops because it requires a big test (that includes if-converted loops) and it is difficult to find and balance a loop to do the right thing.
llvm-svn: 186845
helper function. This leaves both trivial cases handled entirely in
helper functions and merely manages the list of allocas to process in
the run method.
The next step will be to handle all of the trivial promotion work prior
to even creating the core class and the subsequent simplifications that
enables.
llvm-svn: 186784
a single block into the helper routine. This takes advantage of the fact
that we can directly replace uses prior to any store with undef to
simplify matters and unconditionally promote allocas only used within
one block.
I've removed the special handling for the case of no stores existing.
This has no semantic effect but might slow things down. I'll fix that in
a later patch when I refactor this entire thing to be easier to manage
the different cases.
llvm-svn: 186783
handles the general cases.
The hope is to refactor this so that we don't end up building the entire
class for the trivial cases. I also want to lift a lot of the early
pre-processing in the initial segment of run() into a separate routine,
and really none of it needs to happen inside the primary promotion
class.
These routines in particular used none of the actual state in the
promotion class, so they don't really make sense as members.
llvm-svn: 186781
This struct is nicely independent of everything else, and we already
needed a foward declaration here. It's simpler to just define it
immediately.
llvm-svn: 186780
Jim Grosbach