Breaks the MSVC build.
DataStream.cpp(44): error C2552: 'llvm::Statistic::Value' : non-aggregates cannot be initialized with initializer list
llvm-svn: 202731
With C++11 we finally have a standardized way to specify atomic operations. Use
them to replace the existing custom implemention. Sadly the translation is not
entirely trivial as std::atomic allows more fine-grained control over the
atomicity. I tried to preserve the old semantics as well as possible.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2915
llvm-svn: 202730
The inalloca attribute is designed to support passing C++ objects by
value in the Microsoft C++ ABI. It behaves the same as byval, except
that it always implies that the argument is in memory and that the bytes
are never copied. This attribute allows the caller to take the address
of an outgoing argument's memory and execute arbitrary code to store
into it.
This patch adds basic IR support, docs, and verification. It does not
attempt to implement any lowering or fix any possibly broken transforms.
When this patch lands, a complete description of this feature should
appear at http://llvm.org/docs/InAlloca.html .
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2173
llvm-svn: 197645
This patch removes most of the trivial cases of weak vtables by pinning them to
a single object file. The memory leaks in this version have been fixed. Thanks
Alexey for pointing them out.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2068
Reviewed by Andy
llvm-svn: 195064
This change is incorrect. If you delete virtual destructor of both a base class
and a subclass, then the following code:
Base *foo = new Child();
delete foo;
will not cause the destructor for members of Child class. As a result, I observe
plently of memory leaks. Notable examples I investigated are:
ObjectBuffer and ObjectBufferStream, AttributeImpl and StringSAttributeImpl.
llvm-svn: 194997
This patch removes most of the trivial cases of weak vtables by pinning them to
a single object file.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2068
Reviewed by Andy
llvm-svn: 194865
This function attribute indicates that the function is not optimized
by any optimization or code generator passes with the
exception of interprocedural optimization passes.
llvm-svn: 189101
There's no need to specify a flag to omit frame pointer elimination on non-leaf
nodes...(Honestly, I can't parse that option out.) Use the function attribute
stuff instead.
llvm-svn: 187093
- Coallocate entires for AttributeSetImpls and Nodes after the class itself.
- Remove mutable iterators from immutable classes.
- Remove unused context field from AttributeImpl.
- Derive Enum/Align/String attribute implementations from AttributeImpl instead
of having a whole new inheritance tree for them.
- Derive AlignAttributeImpl from EnumAttributeImpl.
llvm-svn: 186075
The Builtin attribute is an attribute that can be placed on function call site that signal that even though a function is declared as being a builtin,
rdar://problem/13727199
llvm-svn: 185049
Other than recognizing the attribute, the patch does little else.
It changes the branch probability analyzer so that edges into
blocks postdominated by a cold function are given low weight.
Added analysis and code generation tests. Added documentation for the
new attribute.
llvm-svn: 182638
The cause of the windows failures was fixed by r180791. Revert to the state
after Sabre's original revert.
Original message:
revert r179735, it has no testcases, and doesn't really make sense.
llvm-svn: 180844
The actual storage was already using unsigned, but the interface was using
uint64_t. This is wasteful on 32 bits and looks to be the root causes of
a miscompilation on Windows where a value was being sign extended to 64bits
to compare with the result of getSlotIndex.
Patch by Pasi Parviainen!
llvm-svn: 180791
This un-reverts r179735 and reverts commit r180574.
This fixes assertion failures for me locally and should fix the failures
on Windows reported widely on llvm-dev. We should check if the bots
caught this and if so why not.
llvm-svn: 180722
Semantics of parameters named Index and Idx were inconsistent between
"include/llvm/IR/Attributes.h", "lib/IR/AttributeImpl.h" and
"lib/IR/Attributes.cpp": sometimes these were fixed 1-based indexes of IR
parameters (or AttributeSet::ReturnIndex for IR return values or
AttributeSet::FunctionIndex for IR functions), other times they were the
internal slot for storage in the underlying AttributeSetImpl. I renamed usage of
the former to "Index" and usage of the latter to "Slot" ("Slot" was already
being used consistently for the latter in a subset of cases)
Patch by Stephen Lin!
llvm-svn: 179791
1. Verify::VerifyParameterAttrs in "lib/IR/Verifier.cpp" and
AttrBuilder::removeFunctionOnlyAttrs in "lib/IR/Attributes.cpp" (only called
by Verify::VerifyFunctionAttrs) separately maintained a list of function-only
attribute types. I've consolidated the logic into a new function used for
both cases in "lib/IR/Verifier.cpp", so this logic is in one place (other
than the AsmParser front-end)
2. Various functions in "lib/IR/Verifier.cpp" passed AttributeSet around by
reference needlessly, as it's just a handle to an immutable pimpl body.
Patch by Stephen Lin!
llvm-svn: 179790
These are two related changes (one in llvm, one in clang).
LLVM:
- rename address_safety => sanitize_address (the enum value is the same, so we preserve binary compatibility with old bitcode)
- rename thread_safety => sanitize_thread
- rename no_uninitialized_checks -> sanitize_memory
CLANG:
- add __attribute__((no_sanitize_address)) as a synonym for __attribute__((no_address_safety_analysis))
- add __attribute__((no_sanitize_thread))
- add __attribute__((no_sanitize_memory))
for S in address thread memory
If -fsanitize=S is present and __attribute__((no_sanitize_S)) is not
set llvm attribute sanitize_S
llvm-svn: 176075
The 'nobuiltin' attribute is applied to call sites to indicate that LLVM should
not treat the callee function as a built-in function. I.e., it shouldn't try to
replace that function with different code.
llvm-svn: 175835
Avoids malloc and is a lot denser. We lose iteration over target independent
attributes, but that's a strange interface anyways and didn't have any users
outside of AttrBuilder.
llvm-svn: 175370
This emits the attribute groups that are used by the functions. (It currently
doesn't print out return type or parameter attributes within attribute groups.)
Note: The functions still retrieve their attributes from the "old" bitcode
format (using the deprecated 'Raw()' method). This means that string attributes
within an attribute group will not show up during a disassembly. This will be
addressed in a future commit.
llvm-svn: 174867
This is useful when parsing an object that references multiple attribute groups.
N.B. If both builders have alignments specified, then they should match!
llvm-svn: 174480
The stuff we're handing are all enums (Attribute::AttrKind), integers and
strings. Don't convert them to Constants, which is an unnecessary step here. The
rest of the changes are mostly mechanical.
llvm-svn: 174456
Rename the PARAMATTR_CODE_ENTRY to PARAMATTR_CODE_ENTRY_OLD. It will be replaced
by another encoding. Keep around the current LLVM attribute encoder/decoder
code, but move it to the bitcode directories so that no one's tempted to use
them.
llvm-svn: 174335
Use the AttributeSet's iterators in AttrBuilder::hasAttributes() when
determining of the intersection of the AttrBuilder and AttributeSet is non-null.
llvm-svn: 174250
The AttrBuilder is for building a collection of attributes. The Attribute object
holds only one attribute. So it's not really useful for the Attribute object to
have a creator which takes an AttrBuilder.
This has two fallouts:
1. The AttrBuilder no longer holds its internal attributes in a bit-mask form.
2. The attributes are now ordered alphabetically (hence why the tests have changed).
llvm-svn: 174110
The Attribute::hasAttributes() is kind of meaningless since an Attribute can
have only one attribute. And we would rather people use the 'operator=='
instead of Attribute::hasAttribute().
llvm-svn: 174026
The AttrBuilder is there to build up multiple attributes. The Attribute class
represents only one attribute at a time. So remove this unnecessary builder
creator method.
llvm-svn: 174010
Several places were still treating the Attribute object as respresenting
multiple attributes. Those places now use the AttributeSet to represent
multiple attributes.
llvm-svn: 174003
The AttributeSetNode contains all of the attributes. This removes one (hopefully
last) use of the Attribute class as a container of multiple attributes.
llvm-svn: 173761
We no longer accept an encoded integer as representing all of the
attributes. Convert this via the AttrBuilder class into an AttributeSet with the
correct representation (an AttributeSetImpl that holds a list of Attribute
objects).
llvm-svn: 173750
The AttributeWithIndex class exposed the interior structure of the AttributeSet
class. That was gross. Remove it and all of the code that relied upon it.
llvm-svn: 173722
This now uses the AttributeSet object instead of the Attribute /
AttributeWithIndex objects. It's fairly simple now. It goes through all of the
subsets before the one we're modifying, adds them to the new set. It then adds
the modified subset (with the requested attributes removed). And then adds the
rest of the subsets.
llvm-svn: 173660
This now uses the AttributeSet object instead of the Attribute /
AttributeWithIndex objects. It's fairly simple now. It goes through all of the
subsets before the one we're modifying, adds them to the new set. It then adds
the modified subset. And then adds the rest of the subsets.
llvm-svn: 173659
We want to remove AttributeWithIndex because it provides a non-encapsulated view
of the AttributeSetImpl object. Instead, use accessor methods and iterators.
Eventually, this code can be simplified because the Attribute object will hold
only one attribute instead of multiple attributes.
llvm-svn: 173641
Nick Lewycky