extractor has extracted hundreds of loops from the SPEC benchmarks without crashing
and without misoptimizing the programs.
This testcase could be reduced substantially more by hand, but I don't have time
to work on it right now.
llvm-svn: 12495
folding load instructions into other instructions across free instruction
boundaries. Perhaps this will also fix the other strange failures?
llvm-svn: 12494
1. Names were not put on the new arguments created (ok, this just helps sanity :)
2. Fix outgoing pointer values
3. Do not insert stores for values that had not been computed
4. Fix some wierd problems with the outset calculation
This fixes CodeExtractor/2004-03-14-DominanceProblem.ll, making the extractor
work on at least one simple case!
llvm-svn: 12484
addRequiredTransitive member that Misha added, and explains the whole
concept a lot better. Also, the document used incorrect "subsubsection"
tags instead of "doc_subsubsection" which this fixes.
llvm-svn: 12474
in the QMTest Testrunner tests.
Please note that putting output files in the Output directory no longer
works, as QMTest does not build Output directories anymore (nor does the
test run in a separate subdirectory, anyway).
llvm-svn: 12466
as it is making effectively arbitrary modifications to the CFG and we don't
have a domset/domfrontier implementations that can handle the dynamic updates.
Instead of having a bunch of code that doesn't actually work in practice,
just demote any potentially tricky values to the stack (causing the problem
to go away entirely). Later invocations of mem2reg will rebuild SSA for us.
This fixes all of the major performance regressions with tail duplication
from LLVM 1.1. For example, this loop:
---
int popcount(int x) {
int result = 0;
while (x != 0) {
result = result + (x & 0x1);
x = x >> 1;
}
return result;
}
---
Used to be compiled into:
int %popcount(int %X) {
entry:
br label %loopentry
loopentry: ; preds = %entry, %no_exit
%x.0 = phi int [ %X, %entry ], [ %tmp.9, %no_exit ] ; <int> [#uses=3]
%result.1.0 = phi int [ 0, %entry ], [ %tmp.6, %no_exit ] ; <int> [#uses=2]
%tmp.1 = seteq int %x.0, 0 ; <bool> [#uses=1]
br bool %tmp.1, label %loopexit, label %no_exit
no_exit: ; preds = %loopentry
%tmp.4 = and int %x.0, 1 ; <int> [#uses=1]
%tmp.6 = add int %tmp.4, %result.1.0 ; <int> [#uses=1]
%tmp.9 = shr int %x.0, ubyte 1 ; <int> [#uses=1]
br label %loopentry
loopexit: ; preds = %loopentry
ret int %result.1.0
}
And is now compiled into:
int %popcount(int %X) {
entry:
br label %no_exit
no_exit: ; preds = %entry, %no_exit
%x.0.0 = phi int [ %X, %entry ], [ %tmp.9, %no_exit ] ; <int> [#uses=2]
%result.1.0.0 = phi int [ 0, %entry ], [ %tmp.6, %no_exit ] ; <int> [#uses=1]
%tmp.4 = and int %x.0.0, 1 ; <int> [#uses=1]
%tmp.6 = add int %tmp.4, %result.1.0.0 ; <int> [#uses=2]
%tmp.9 = shr int %x.0.0, ubyte 1 ; <int> [#uses=2]
%tmp.1 = seteq int %tmp.9, 0 ; <bool> [#uses=1]
br bool %tmp.1, label %loopexit, label %no_exit
loopexit: ; preds = %no_exit
ret int %tmp.6
}
llvm-svn: 12457
time from 615s to 1.49s on a large testcase that has a gigantic switch statement
that all of the blocks in the function go to (an intepreter).
llvm-svn: 12442
Chris Lattner