While ignoring read-only scalar dependences it was not necessary to consider
store instructins, but as store instructions can be the target of a scalar
read-only dependency we need to consider them for the construction of scalar
read-only dependences.
llvm-svn: 246429
If a region does not have more than one loop, we do not identify it as
a Scop in ScopDetection. The main optimizations Polly is currently performing
(tiling, preparation for outer-loop vectorization and loop fusion) are unlikely
to have a positive impact on individual loops. In some cases, Polly's run-time
alias checks or conditional hoisting may still have a positive impact, but those
are mostly enabling transformations which LLVM already performs for individual
loops. As we do not focus on individual loops, we leave them untouched to not
introduce compile time regressions and execution time noise. This results in
good compile time reduction (oourafft: -73.99%, smg2000: -56.25%).
Contributed-by: Pratik Bhatu <cs12b1010@iith.ac.in>
Reviewers: grosser
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12268
llvm-svn: 246161
Even though read-only accesses to scalars outside of a scop do not need to be
modeled to derive valid transformations or to generate valid sequential code,
but information about them is useful when we considering memory footprint
analysis and/or kernel offloading.
llvm-svn: 243981
Tobias Grosser