This commit fixes several things in the MLIR vim syntax file:
- Spell checking is now on by default only in comments.
- '#' now starts an identifier instead of starting an outline attribute
declaration, which fixes coloring the rest of the line as a
preprocessor directive when there is a '#' in the middle.
- '!' and '^' -prefixed identifiers are now colored as types
and labels.
Reviewed By: bondhugula
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122626
The last remaining operations in the standard dialect all revolve around
FuncOp/function related constructs. This patch simply handles the initial
renaming (which by itself is already huge), but there are a large number
of cleanups unlocked/necessary afterwards:
* Removing a bunch of unnecessary dependencies on Func
* Cleaning up the From/ToStandard conversion passes
* Preparing for the move of FuncOp to the Func dialect
See the discussion at https://discourse.llvm.org/t/standard-dialect-the-final-chapter/6061
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120624
Introduce the execute_region op that is able to hold a region which it
executes exactly once. The op encapsulates a CFG within itself while
isolating it from the surrounding control flow. Proposal discussed here:
https://llvm.discourse.group/t/introduce-std-inlined-call-op-proposal/282
execute_region enables one to inline a function without lowering out all
other higher level control flow constructs (affine.for/if, scf.for/if)
to the flat list of blocks / CFG form. It thus allows the benefit of
transforms on higher level control flow ops available in the presence of
the inlined calls. The inlined calls continue to benefit from
propagation of SSA values across their top boundary. Functions won’t
have to remain outlined until later than desired. Abstractions like
affine execute_regions, lambdas with implicit captures could be lowered
to this without first lowering out structured loops/ifs or outlining.
But two potential early use cases are of: (1) an early inliner (which
can inline functions by introducing execute_region ops), (2) lowering of
an affine.execute_region, which cleanly maps to an scf.execute_region
when going from the affine dialect to the scf dialect.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75837
This reverts commit 0d48d265db.
This reapplies the following commit, with a fix for CAPI/ir.c:
[mlir] Start splitting the `tensor` dialect out of `std`.
This starts by moving `std.extract_element` to `tensor.extract` (this
mirrors the naming of `vector.extract`).
Curiously, `std.extract_element` supposedly works on vectors as well,
and this patch removes that functionality. I would tend to do that in
separate patch, but I couldn't find any downstream users relying on
this, and the fact that we have `vector.extract` made it seem safe
enough to lump in here.
This also sets up the `tensor` dialect as a dependency of the `std`
dialect, as some ops that currently live in `std` depend on
`tensor.extract` via their canonicalization patterns.
Part of RFC: https://llvm.discourse.group/t/rfc-split-the-tensor-dialect-from-std/2347/2
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92991
This starts by moving `std.extract_element` to `tensor.extract` (this
mirrors the naming of `vector.extract`).
Curiously, `std.extract_element` supposedly works on vectors as well,
and this patch removes that functionality. I would tend to do that in
separate patch, but I couldn't find any downstream users relying on
this, and the fact that we have `vector.extract` made it seem safe
enough to lump in here.
This also sets up the `tensor` dialect as a dependency of the `std`
dialect, as some ops that currently live in `std` depend on
`tensor.extract` via their canonicalization patterns.
Part of RFC: https://llvm.discourse.group/t/rfc-split-the-tensor-dialect-from-std/2347/2
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92991
Introduce affine.prefetch: op to prefetch using a multi-dimensional
subscript on a memref; similar to affine.load but has no effect on
semantics, but only on performance.
Provide lowering through std.prefetch, llvm.prefetch and map to llvm's
prefetch instrinsic. All attributes reflected through the lowering -
locality hint, rw, and instr/data cache.
affine.prefetch %0[%i, %j + 5], false, 3, true : memref<400x400xi32>
Signed-off-by: Uday Bondhugula <uday@polymagelabs.com>
Closestensorflow/mlir#225
COPYBARA_INTEGRATE_REVIEW=https://github.com/tensorflow/mlir/pull/225 from bondhugula:prefetch 4c3b4e93bc64d9a5719504e6d6e1657818a2ead0
PiperOrigin-RevId: 286212997
- for the symbol rules, the code was updated but the doc wasn't.
Signed-off-by: Uday Bondhugula <uday@polymagelabs.com>
Closestensorflow/mlir#284
COPYBARA_INTEGRATE_REVIEW=https://github.com/tensorflow/mlir/pull/284 from bondhugula:doc 9aad8b8a715559f7ce61265f3da3f8a3c11b45ea
PiperOrigin-RevId: 284283712
- introduce splat op in standard dialect (currently for int/float/index input
type, output type can be vector or statically shaped tensor)
- implement LLVM lowering (when result type is 1-d vector)
- add constant folding hook for it
- while on Ops.cpp, fix some stale names
Signed-off-by: Uday Bondhugula <uday@polymagelabs.com>
Closestensorflow/mlir#141
COPYBARA_INTEGRATE_REVIEW=https://github.com/tensorflow/mlir/pull/141 from bondhugula:splat 48976a6aa0a75be6d91187db6418de989e03eb51
PiperOrigin-RevId: 270965304
- some of it has been adapted from LLVM's vim utils
Signed-off-by: Uday Bondhugula <uday@polymagelabs.com>
Closestensorflow/mlir#90
COPYBARA_INTEGRATE_REVIEW=https://github.com/tensorflow/mlir/pull/90 from bondhugula:vim 22b1c958818c4b09de0ec8e1d7a4893171a03dbf
PiperOrigin-RevId: 266071752
consistent and moving the using declarations over. Hopefully this is the last
truly massive patch in this refactoring.
This is step 21/n towards merging instructions and statements, NFC.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 227178245
1) affineint (as it is named) is not a type suitable for general computation (e.g. the multiply/adds in an integer matmul). It has undefined width and is undefined on overflow. They are used as the indices for forstmt because they are intended to be used as indexes inside the loop.
2) It can be used in both cfg and ml functions, and in cfg functions. As you mention, “symbols” are not affine, and we use affineint values for symbols.
3) Integers aren’t affine, the algorithms applied to them can be. :)
4) The only suitable use for affineint in MLIR is for indexes and dimension sizes (i.e. the bounds of those indexes).
PiperOrigin-RevId: 216057974
Sergei Grechanik