If an analysis is actually invalidated, there's already a log statement
for that: 'Invalidating analysis: FooAnalysis'.
Otherwise the statement is not very useful.
Reviewed By: asbirlea, ychen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84981
To match NewPM pass name, and also for readability.
Also rename rpo-functionattrs -> rpo-function-attrs while we're here.
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84694
Summary:
This is the InlineAdvisor used in 'development' mode. It enables two
scenarios:
- loading models via a command-line parameter, thus allowing for rapid
training iteration, where models can be used for the next exploration
phase without requiring recompiling the compiler. This trades off some
compilation speed for the added flexibility.
- collecting training logs, in the form of tensorflow.SequenceExample
protobufs. We generate these as textual protobufs, which simplifies
generation and testing. The protobufs may then be readily consumed by a
tensorflow-based training algorithm.
To speed up training, training logs may also be collected from the
'default' training policy. In that case, this InlineAdvisor does not
use a model.
RFC: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-April/140763.html
Reviewers: jdoerfert, davidxl
Subscribers: mgorny, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83733
This allows tracking the in-memory type of a pointer argument to a
function for ABI purposes. This is essentially a stripped down version
of byval to remove some of the stack-copy implications in its
definition.
This includes the base IR changes, and some tests for places where it
should be treated similarly to byval. Codegen support will be in a
future patch.
My original attempt at solving some of these problems was to repurpose
byval with a different address space from the stack. However, it is
technically permitted for the callee to introduce a write to the
argument, although nothing does this in reality. There is also talk of
removing and replacing the byval attribute, so a new attribute would
need to take its place anyway.
This is intended avoid some optimization issues with the current
handling of aggregate arguments, as well as fixes inflexibilty in how
frontends can specify the kernel ABI. The most honest representation
of the amdgpu_kernel convention is to expose all kernel arguments as
loads from constant memory. Today, these are raw, SSA Argument values
and codegen is responsible for turning these into loads.
Background:
There currently isn't a satisfactory way to represent how arguments
for the amdgpu_kernel calling convention are passed. In reality,
arguments are passed in a single, flat, constant memory buffer
implicitly passed to the function. It is also illegal to call this
function in the IR, and this is only ever invoked by a driver of some
kind.
It does not make sense to have a stack passed parameter in this
context as is implied by byval. It is never valid to write to the
kernel arguments, as this would corrupt the inputs seen by other
dispatches of the kernel. These argumets are also not in the same
address space as the stack, so a copy is needed to an alloca. From a
source C-like language, the kernel parameters are invisible.
Semantically, a copy is always required from the constant argument
memory to a mutable variable.
The current clang calling convention lowering emits raw values,
including aggregates into the function argument list, since using
byval would not make sense. This has some unfortunate consequences for
the optimizer. In the aggregate case, we end up with an aggregate
store to alloca, which both SROA and instcombine turn into a store of
each aggregate field. The optimizer never pieces this back together to
see that this is really just a copy from constant memory, so we end up
stuck with expensive stack usage.
This also means the backend dictates the alignment of arguments, and
arbitrarily picks the LLVM IR ABI type alignment. By allowing an
explicit alignment, frontends can make better decisions. For example,
there's real no advantage to an aligment higher than 4, so a frontend
could choose to compact the argument layout. Similarly, there is a
high penalty to using an alignment lower than 4, so a frontend could
opt into more padding for small arguments.
Another design consideration is when it is appropriate to expose the
fact that these arguments are all really passed in adjacent
memory. Currently we have a late IR optimization pass in codegen to
rewrite the kernel argument values into explicit loads to enable
vectorization. In most programs, unrelated argument loads can be
merged together. However, exposing this property directly from the
frontend has some disadvantages. We still need a way to track the
original argument sizes and alignments to report to the driver. I find
using some side-channel, metadata mechanism to track this
unappealing. If the kernel arguments were exposed as a single buffer
to begin with, alias analysis would be unaware that the padding bits
betewen arguments are meaningless. Another family of problems is there
are still some gaps in replacing all of the available parameter
attributes with metadata equivalents once lowered to loads.
The immediate plan is to start using this new attribute to handle all
aggregate argumets for kernels. Long term, it makes sense to migrate
all kernel arguments, including scalars, to be passed indirectly in
the same manner.
Additional context is in D79744.
Summary:
NOTE: There is a mailing list discussion on this: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-December/137632.html
Complemantary to the assumption outliner prototype in D71692, this patch
shows how we could simplify the code emitted for an alignemnt
assumption. The generated code is smaller, less fragile, and it makes it
easier to recognize the additional use as a "assumption use".
As mentioned in D71692 and on the mailing list, we could adopt this
scheme, and similar schemes for other patterns, without adopting the
assumption outlining.
Reviewers: hfinkel, xbolva00, lebedev.ri, nikic, rjmccall, spatel, jdoerfert, sstefan1
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Subscribers: thopre, yamauchi, kuter, fhahn, merge_guards_bot, hiraditya, bollu, rkruppe, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71739
Previously the NPM inliner would skip all potential inlines in an
optnone function, but alwaysinline callees should be inlined regardless
of optnone.
Fixes inline-optnone.ll under NPM.
Reviewed By: kazu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83021
Assume bundle can have more than one entry with the same name,
but at least AlignmentFromAssumptionsPass::extractAlignmentInfo() uses
getOperandBundle("align"), which internally assumes that it isn't the
case, and happily crashes otherwise.
Minimal reduced reproducer: run `opt -alignment-from-assumptions` on
target datalayout = "e-m:e-p270:32:32-p271:32:32-p272:64:64-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128"
target triple = "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu"
%0 = type { i64, %1*, i8*, i64, %2, i32, %3*, i8* }
%1 = type opaque
%2 = type { i8, i8, i16 }
%3 = type { i32, i32, i32, i32 }
; Function Attrs: nounwind
define i32 @f(%0* noalias nocapture readonly %arg, %0* noalias %arg1) local_unnamed_addr #0 {
bb:
call void @llvm.assume(i1 true) [ "align"(%0* %arg, i64 8), "align"(%0* %arg1, i64 8) ]
ret i32 0
}
; Function Attrs: nounwind willreturn
declare void @llvm.assume(i1) #1
attributes #0 = { nounwind "reciprocal-estimates"="none" }
attributes #1 = { nounwind willreturn }
This is what we'd have with -mllvm -enable-knowledge-retention
This reverts commit c95ffadb24.
The legacy pass is called "loop-unroll", but in the new PM it's called "unroll".
Also applied to unroll-and-jam and unroll-full.
Fixes various check-llvm tests when NPM is turned on.
Reviewed By: Whitney, dmgreen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82590
If the GEP instruction contanins only constants as its arguments,
then it should be recognized as a constant. For now, there was
also added a flag to turn off this simplification if it causes
any regressions ("disable-gep-const-evaluation") which is off
by default. Once I gather needed data of the effectiveness of
this simplification, the flag will be deleted.
Reviewers: apilipenko, davidxl, mtrofin
Reviewed By: mtrofin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81026
Summary:
NOTE: There is a mailing list discussion on this: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-December/137632.html
Complemantary to the assumption outliner prototype in D71692, this patch
shows how we could simplify the code emitted for an alignemnt
assumption. The generated code is smaller, less fragile, and it makes it
easier to recognize the additional use as a "assumption use".
As mentioned in D71692 and on the mailing list, we could adopt this
scheme, and similar schemes for other patterns, without adopting the
assumption outlining.
Reviewers: hfinkel, xbolva00, lebedev.ri, nikic, rjmccall, spatel, jdoerfert, sstefan1
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Subscribers: yamauchi, kuter, fhahn, merge_guards_bot, hiraditya, bollu, rkruppe, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71739
All other floating point math optimization related attribute are merged
in a conservative way during function inlining. This commit adds the
merge rule for the 'no-signed-zeros-fp-math' attribute.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81714
Some sequences of optimizations can generate call sites which may never be
executed during runtime, and through constant propagation result in dynamic
allocas being converted to static allocas with very large allocation amounts.
The inliner tries to move these to the caller's entry block, resulting in the
stack limits being reached/bypassed. Avoid inlining functions if this would
result.
The threshold of 64k currently doesn't get triggered on the test suite with an
-Os LTO build on arm64, care should be taken in changing this in future to avoid
needlessly pessimising inlining behaviour.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81765
This patch enables printing of constants to see which instructions were
constant-folded. Needed for tests and better visiual analysis of
inliner's work.
Reviewers: apilipenko, mtrofin, davidxl, fedor.sergeev
Reviewed By: mtrofin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81024
This class allows to see the inliner's decisions for better
optimization verifications and tests. To use, use flag
"-passes="print<inline-cost>"".
This is the second attempt to integrate the patch.
The problem from the first try has been discussed and
fixed in D82205.
Reviewers: apilipenko, mtrofin, davidxl, fedor.sergeev
Reviewed By: mtrofin
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81743
Summary:
Add call site location info into inline remarks so we can differentiate inline sites.
This can be useful for inliner tuning. We can also reconstruct full hierarchical inline
tree from parsing such remarks. The messege of inline remark is also tweaked so we can
differentiate SampleProfileLoader inline from CGSCC inline.
Reviewers: wmi, davidxl, hoy
Subscribers: hiraditya, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82213
Summary:
this reduces significantly the number of assumes generated without aftecting too much
the information that is preserved. this improves the compile-time cost
of enable-knowledge-retention significantly.
Reviewers: jdoerfert, sstefan1
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Subscribers: hiraditya, asbirlea, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79650
If the GEP instruction contanins only constants as its arguments,
then it should be recognized as a constant. For now, there was
also added a flag to turn off this simplification if it causes
any regressions ("disable-gep-const-evaluation") which is off
by default. Once I gather needed data of the effectiveness of
this simplification, the flag will be deleted.
Reviewers: apilipenko, davidxl, mtrofin
Reviewed By: mtrofin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81026
This patch enables printing of constants to see which instructions were
constant-folded. Needed for tests and better visiual analysis of
inliner's work.
Reviewers: apilipenko, mtrofin, davidxl, fedor.sergeev
Reviewed By: mtrofin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81024
This class allows to see the inliner's decisions for better
optimization verifications and tests. To use, use flag
"-passes="print<inline-cost>"".
Reviewers: apilipenko, mtrofin, davidxl, fedor.sergeev
Reviewed By: mtrofin
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81743
Summary:
this reduces significantly the number of assumes generated without aftecting too much
the information that is preserved. this improves the compile-time cost
of enable-knowledge-retention significantly.
Reviewers: jdoerfert, sstefan1
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Subscribers: hiraditya, asbirlea, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79650
Summary:
When an SCC got split due to inlining, we have two mechanisms for reprocessing the updated SCC, first is UR.UpdatedC
that repeatedly rerun the new, current SCC; second is a worklist for all newly split SCCs. We can avoid rerun of
the same SCC when the SCC is set to be processed by both mechanisms *back to back*. In pathological cases, such redundant
rerun could cause exponential size growth due to inlining along cycles, even when there's no SCC mutation and hence
convergence is not a problem.
Note that it's ok to have SCC updated and rerun immediately, and also in the work list if we have actually moved an SCC
to be topologically "below" the current one due to merging. In that case, we will need to revisit the current SCC after
those moved SCCs. For that reason, the redundant avoidance here only targets back to back rerun of the same SCC - the
case described by the now removed FIXME comment.
Reviewers: chandlerc, wmi
Subscribers: llvm-commits, hoy
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80589
- Renaming the printer class, flag
- Refactoring
- Changing some tests
This patch is a preparational stage for introducing a new printing pass and new
functionality to the existing Annotation Writer. I plan to extend
this functionality for this tool to be more useful when looking at the inline
process.
Allow InvokeInst to have the second optional prof branch weight for
its unwind branch. InvokeInst is a terminator with two successors.
It might have its unwind branch taken many times. If so
the BranchProbabilityInfo unwind branch heuristic can be inaccurate.
This patch allows a higher accuracy calculated with both branch
weights set.
Changes:
- A new section about InvokeInst is added to
the BranchWeightMetadata page. It states the old information that
missed in the doc and adds new about the second branch weight.
- Verifier is changed to allow either 1 or 2 branch weights
for InvokeInst.
- A new test is written for BranchProbabilityInfo to demonstrate
the main improvement of the simple fix in calcMetadataWeights().
- Several new testcases are created for Inliner. Those check that
both weights are accounted for invoke instruction weight
calculation.
- PGOUseFunc::setBranchWeights() is fixed to be applicable to
InvokeInst.
Reviewers: davidxl, reames, xur, yamauchi
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80618
When sampleFDO is enabled, people may expect they can use
-fno-profile-sample-use to opt-out using sample profile for a certain file.
That could be either for debugging purpose or for performance tuning purpose.
However, when thinlto is enabled, if a function in file A compiled with
-fno-profile-sample-use is imported to another file B compiled with
-fprofile-sample-use, the inlined copy of the function in file B may still
get its profile annotated.
The inconsistency may even introduce profile unused warning because if the
target is not compiled with explicit debug information flag, the function
in file A won't have its debug information enabled (debug information will
be enabled implicitly only when -fprofile-sample-use is used). After it is
imported into file B which is compiled with -fprofile-sample-use, profile
annotation for the outline copy of the function will fail because the
function has no debug information, and that will trigger profile unused
warning.
We add a new attribute use-sample-profile to control whether a function
will use its sample profile no matter for its outline or inline copies.
That will make the behavior of -fno-profile-sample-use consistent.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79959
The "null-pointer-is-valid" attribute needs to be checked by many
pointer-related combines. To make the check more efficient, convert
it from a string into an enum attribute.
In the future, this attribute may be replaced with data layout
properties.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78862
Summary:
This change introduces InliningAdvisor (and related APIs), the interface
that abstracts decision making away from the inlining pass. We will use
this interface to delegate decision making to a trained ML model,
subsequently (see referenced RFC).
RFC: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-April/140763.html
Reviewers: davidxl, eraman, dblaikie
Subscribers: mgorny, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79042
The assert checks that every instruction must be annotated by this point while it is not
necessary. If the inlining process was interrupted because the threshold was reached, the rest
of the instructions would not be annotated which triggers the assert.
The added test shows the situation in which it can happen.
This is a recommit as the original commit fail due to the absence of REQUIRES: assert in the test.
Reviewed By: mtrofin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79107
The assert checks that every instruction must be annotated by this point while it is not
necessary. If the inlining process was interrupted because the threshold was reached, the rest
of the instructions would not be annotated which triggers the assert.
The added test shows the situation in which it can happen.
Reviewed-By: mtrofin
Diff: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79107
Summary:
This simplifies testing in scenarios where we want to set up module-wide
analyses for inlining. The patch enables treating inlining and its
function cleanups, as a module pass. The alternative would be for tests
to describe the pipeline, which is tedious and adds maintenance
overhead.
Reviewers: davidxl, dblaikie, jdoerfert, sstefan1
Subscribers: hiraditya, steven_wu, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78512
This was backwards from intended and missing a test. We perhaps should
just ignored the FP mode here, since it shouldn't be legal to mix code
with different default modes in the absence of strictfp.
This reverts commit 60c642e74b.
This patch is making the TLI "closed" for a predefined set of VecLib
while at the moment it is extensible for anyone to customize when using
LLVM as a library.
Reverting while we figure out a way to re-land it without losing the
generality of the current API.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77925
Summary:
Encode `-fveclib` setting as per-function attribute so it can threaded through to LTO backends. Accordingly per-function TLI now reads
the attributes and select available vector function list based on that. Now we also populate function list for all supported vector
libraries for the shared per-module `TargetLibraryInfoImpl`, so each function can select its available vector list independently but without
duplicating the vector function lists. Inlining between incompatbile vectlib attributed is also prohibited now.
Subscribers: hiraditya, dexonsmith, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77632
This patch builds upon D76140 by updating metadata on pointer typed
loads in inlined functions, when the load is the return value, and the
callsite contains return attributes which can be updated as metadata on
the load.
Added test cases show this for nonnull, dereferenceable,
dereferenceable_or_null
Reviewed-By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76792
Summary:
A recent change in the instruction simplifier enables a call to a function that just returns one of its parameter to be simplified as simply loading the parameter. This exposes a bug in the inliner where double inlining may be involved which in turn may cause compiler ICE when an already-inlined callsite is reused for further inlining.
To put it simply, in the following-like C program, when the function call second(t) is inlined, its code t = third(t) will be reduced to just loading the return value of the callsite first(). This causes the inliner internal data structure to register the first() callsite for the call edge representing the third() call, therefore incurs a double inlining when both call edges are considered an inline candidate. I'm making a fix to break the inliner from reusing a callsite for new call edges.
```
void top()
{
int t = first();
second(t);
}
void second(int t)
{
t = third(t);
fourth(t);
}
void third(int t)
{
return t;
}
```
The actual failing case is much trickier than the example here and is only reproducible with the legacy inliner. The way the legacy inliner works is to process each SCC in a bottom-up order. That means in reality function first may be already inlined into top, or function third is either inlined to second or is folded into nothing. To repro the failure seen from building a large application, we need to figure out a way to confuse the inliner so that the bottom-up inlining is not fulfilled. I'm doing this by making the second call indirect so that the alias analyzer fails to figure out the right call graph edge from top to second and top can be processed before second during the bottom-up. We also need to tweak the test code so that when the inlining of top happens, the function body of second is not that optimized, by delaying the pass of function attribute deducer (i.e, which tells function third has no side effect and just returns its parameter). Since the CGSCC pass is iterative, additional calls are added to top to postpone the inlining of second to the second round right after the first function attribute deducing pass is done. I haven't been able to repro the failure with the new pass manager since the processing order of ininlined callsites is a bit different, but in theory the issue could happen there too.
Note that this fix could introduce a side effect that blocks the simplification of inlined code, specifically for a call site that can be folded to another call site. I hope this can probably be complemented by subsequent inlining or folding, as shown in the attached unit test. The ideal fix should be to separate the use of VMap. However, in reality this failing pattern shouldn't happen often. And even if it happens, there should be a good chance that the non-folded call site will be refolded by iterative inlining or subsequent simplification.
Reviewers: wenlei, davidxl, tejohnson
Reviewed By: wenlei, davidxl
Subscribers: eraman, nikic, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76248
Arthur Eubanks