This change adds a CMake rule to produce shared object versions of
libFuzzer (no-main). Like the static library versions, these shared
libraries have a copy of libc++ statically linked in. For i386 we don't
link with libc++ since i386 does not support mixing position-
independent and non-position-independent code in the same library.
Patch By: IanPudney
Reviewed By: morehouse
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84947
This came up during the review for D67656. It's nice but also subtle, so documenting it as an idiom will make tests easier to understand.
Reviewed By: probinson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68061
for the advantage outlined by D83639 ([OptTable] Support grouped short options)
Some behavior changes:
* -i={0,false} is removed. Use --no-inlines instead.
* --demangle={0,false} is removed. Use --no-demangle instead
* -untag-addresses={0,false} is removed. Use --no-untag-addresses instead
Added a higher level API OptTable::parseArgs which handles optional
initial options populated from an environment variable, expands response
files recursively, and parses options.
Reviewed By: jhenderson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83530
See https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-July/143373.html
"[llvm-dev] Multiple documents in one test file" for some discussions.
This patch has explored several alternatives. The current semantics are similar to
what @dblaikie proposed.
`split-file filename output` splits the input file into multiple parts separated by
regex `^(.|//)--- filename` and write each part to the file `output/filename`
(`filename` can include path separators).
Use case A (organizing input of different formats (e.g. linker
script+assembly) in one file).
```
# RUN: split-file %s %t
# RUN: llvm-mc %t/asm -o %t.o
# RUN: ld.lld -T %t/lds %t.o -o %t
This is sometimes better than the %S/Inputs/ approach because the user
can see the auxiliary files immediately and don't have to open another file.
# asm
...
# lds
...
```
Use case B (for utilities which don't have built-in input splitting
feature):
```
// RUN: split-file %s %t
// RUN: llc < %t/1.ll | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CASE1
// RUN: llc < %t/2.ll | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CASE2
Combing tests prudently can improve readability.
For example, when testing parsing errors if the recovery mechanism isn't possible,
grouping the tests in one file can more readily see test coverage/strategy.
//--- 1.ll
...
//--- 2.ll
...
```
Since this is a new utility, there is no git history concerns for
UpperCase variable names. I use lowerCase variable names like mlir/lld.
Reviewed By: jhenderson, lattner
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83834
As far as I know, ipconstprop has not been used in years and ipsccp has
been used instead. This has the potential for confusion and sometimes
leads people to spend time finding & reporting bugs as well as
updating it to work with the latest API changes.
This patch moves the tests over to SCCP. There's one functional difference
I am aware of: ipconstprop propagates for each call-site individually, so
for functions that are called with different constant arguments it can sometimes
produce better results than ipsccp (at much higher compile-time cost).But
IPSCCP can be thought to do so as well for internal functions and as mentioned
earlier, the pass seems unused in practice (and there are no plans on working
towards enabling it anytime).
Also discussed on llvm-dev:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-July/143773.html
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84447
- Clarify that these are extensions to DWARF 5 and not as yet a
proposal.
Reviewed By: scott.linder
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70523
- Clarify what context is used in DWARF expression evaluation.
- Define location descriptions to fully resolve the context and so
include the context in their result.
- As a consequence of location descriptions being fully resoved,
change address spaces so only a swizzled and unswizzled private
address space is defined. The lane is now part of the location
description context.
- Clarify how call frame information is used to fully resolve
expressions that specify registers.
Reviewed By: scott.linder
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70523
To match NewPM pass name, and also for readability.
Also rename rpo-functionattrs -> rpo-function-attrs while we're here.
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84694
PGO profile is usually more precise than sample profile. However, PGO profile
needs to be collected from loadtest and loadtest may not be representative
enough to the production workload. Sample profile collected from production
can be used as a supplement -- for functions cold in loadtest but warm/hot
in production, we can scale up the related function in PGO profile if the
function is warm or hot in sample profile.
The implementation contains changes in compiler side and llvm-profdata side.
Given an instr profile and a sample profile, for a function cold in PGO
profile but warm/hot in sample profile, llvm-profdata will either mark
all the counters in the profile to be -1 or scale up the max count in the
function to be above hot threshold, depending on the zero counter ratio in
the profile. The assumption is if there are too many counters being zero
in the function profile, the profile is more likely to cause harm than good,
then llvm-profdata will mark all the counters to be -1 indicating the
function is hot but the profile is unaccountable. In compiler side, if a
function profile with all -1 counters is seen, the function entry count will
be set to be above hot threshold but its internal profile will be dropped.
In the long run, it may be useful to let compiler support using PGO profile
and sample profile at the same time, but that requires more careful design
and more substantial changes to make two profiles work seamlessly. The patch
here serves as a simple intermediate solution.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81981
This adds a new extern "C" function that serves the same purpose. This removes the need for external users to depend on internal headers in order to use this feature. It also standardizes the interface in a way that other fuzzing engines will be able to match.
Patch By: IanPudney
Reviewed By: kcc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84561
Starting with Skylake, the LBR contains the precise number of cycles between the two
consecutive branches.
Making use of this will hopefully make the measurements more precise than the
existing methods of using RDTSC.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77422
New change: check for existence of field `cycles` in perf_branch_entry before enabling this mode.
This should prevent compilation errors when building for older kernel whose headers don't support it.
See https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-July/143373.html
"[llvm-dev] Multiple documents in one test file" for some discussions.
`extract part filename` splits the input file into multiple parts separated by
regex `^(.|//)--- ` and extract the specified part to stdout or the
output file (if specified).
Use case A (organizing input of different formats (e.g. linker
script+assembly) in one file).
```
// RUN: extract lds %s -o %t.lds
// RUN: extract asm %s -o %t.s
// RUN: llvm-mc %t.s -o %t.o
// RUN: ld.lld -T %t.lds %t.o -o %t
This is sometimes better than the %S/Inputs/ approach because the user
can see the auxiliary files immediately and don't have to open another file.
```
Use case B (for utilities which don't have built-in input splitting
feature):
```
// RUN: extract case1 %s | llc | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CASE1
// RUN: extract case2 %s | llc | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CASE2
Combing tests prudently can improve readability.
This is sometimes better than having multiple test files.
```
Since this is a new utility, there is no git history concerns for
UpperCase variable names. I use lowerCase variable names like mlir/lld.
Reviewed By: jhenderson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83834
Add support for creating static libraries when the input includes only
Mach-O binaries (and not libraries/archives themselves).
Reviewed by alexshap, Ktwu, smeenai, jhenderson, MaskRay, mtrent
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83002
Its effect could be achieved by
`-stop-after`,`-print-after`,`-print-after-all`. But a few tests need to
print MIR after ISel which could not be done with
`-print-after`/`-stop-after` since isel pass does not have commandline name.
That's the reason `--print-machineinstrs` is downgraded to
`--print-after-isel` in this patch. `--print-after-isel` could be
removed after we switch to new pass manager since isel pass would have a
commandline text name to use `print-after` or equivalent switches.
The motivation of this patch is to reduce tests dependency on
would-be-deprecated feature.
Reviewed By: arsenm, dsanders
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83275
Summary:
This support is needed for the Fortran array variables with pointer/allocatable
attribute. This support enables debugger to identify the status of variable
whether that is currently allocated/associated.
for pointer array (before allocation/association)
without DW_AT_associated
(gdb) pt ptr
type = integer (140737345375288:140737354129776)
(gdb) p ptr
value requires 35017956 bytes, which is more than max-value-size
with DW_AT_associated
(gdb) pt ptr
type = integer (:)
(gdb) p ptr
$1 = <not associated>
for allocatable array (before allocation)
without DW_AT_allocated
(gdb) pt arr
type = integer (140737345375288:140737354129776)
(gdb) p arr
value requires 35017956 bytes, which is more than max-value-size
with DW_AT_allocated
(gdb) pt arr
type = integer, allocatable (:)
(gdb) p arr
$1 = <not allocated>
Testing
- unit test cases added
- check-llvm
- check-debuginfo
Reviewed By: aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83544
This allows tracking the in-memory type of a pointer argument to a
function for ABI purposes. This is essentially a stripped down version
of byval to remove some of the stack-copy implications in its
definition.
This includes the base IR changes, and some tests for places where it
should be treated similarly to byval. Codegen support will be in a
future patch.
My original attempt at solving some of these problems was to repurpose
byval with a different address space from the stack. However, it is
technically permitted for the callee to introduce a write to the
argument, although nothing does this in reality. There is also talk of
removing and replacing the byval attribute, so a new attribute would
need to take its place anyway.
This is intended avoid some optimization issues with the current
handling of aggregate arguments, as well as fixes inflexibilty in how
frontends can specify the kernel ABI. The most honest representation
of the amdgpu_kernel convention is to expose all kernel arguments as
loads from constant memory. Today, these are raw, SSA Argument values
and codegen is responsible for turning these into loads.
Background:
There currently isn't a satisfactory way to represent how arguments
for the amdgpu_kernel calling convention are passed. In reality,
arguments are passed in a single, flat, constant memory buffer
implicitly passed to the function. It is also illegal to call this
function in the IR, and this is only ever invoked by a driver of some
kind.
It does not make sense to have a stack passed parameter in this
context as is implied by byval. It is never valid to write to the
kernel arguments, as this would corrupt the inputs seen by other
dispatches of the kernel. These argumets are also not in the same
address space as the stack, so a copy is needed to an alloca. From a
source C-like language, the kernel parameters are invisible.
Semantically, a copy is always required from the constant argument
memory to a mutable variable.
The current clang calling convention lowering emits raw values,
including aggregates into the function argument list, since using
byval would not make sense. This has some unfortunate consequences for
the optimizer. In the aggregate case, we end up with an aggregate
store to alloca, which both SROA and instcombine turn into a store of
each aggregate field. The optimizer never pieces this back together to
see that this is really just a copy from constant memory, so we end up
stuck with expensive stack usage.
This also means the backend dictates the alignment of arguments, and
arbitrarily picks the LLVM IR ABI type alignment. By allowing an
explicit alignment, frontends can make better decisions. For example,
there's real no advantage to an aligment higher than 4, so a frontend
could choose to compact the argument layout. Similarly, there is a
high penalty to using an alignment lower than 4, so a frontend could
opt into more padding for small arguments.
Another design consideration is when it is appropriate to expose the
fact that these arguments are all really passed in adjacent
memory. Currently we have a late IR optimization pass in codegen to
rewrite the kernel argument values into explicit loads to enable
vectorization. In most programs, unrelated argument loads can be
merged together. However, exposing this property directly from the
frontend has some disadvantages. We still need a way to track the
original argument sizes and alignments to report to the driver. I find
using some side-channel, metadata mechanism to track this
unappealing. If the kernel arguments were exposed as a single buffer
to begin with, alias analysis would be unaware that the padding bits
betewen arguments are meaningless. Another family of problems is there
are still some gaps in replacing all of the available parameter
attributes with metadata equivalents once lowered to loads.
The immediate plan is to start using this new attribute to handle all
aggregate argumets for kernels. Long term, it makes sense to migrate
all kernel arguments, including scalars, to be passed indirectly in
the same manner.
Additional context is in D79744.
This patch changes llvm-readelf (and llvm-readobj for consistency)
behavior to print an error when executed with no input files.
Reading from stdin can be achieved via a '-' for the input
object.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46400
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83704
Reviewed by: jhenderson, MaskRay, sbc, jyknight
This diff starts the implementation of llvm-libtool-darwin
(an llvm based replacement of cctool's libtool).
Libtool is used for creating static and dynamic libraries
from a bunch of object files given as input.
Reviewed by alexshap, smeenai, jhenderson, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82923
From @erichkeane:
```
This patch doesn't seem to build for me:
/iusers/ekeane1/workspaces/llvm-project/llvm/tools/llvm-exegesis/lib/X86/X86Counter.cpp: In function ‘llvm::Error llvm::exegesis::parseDataBuffer(const char*, size_t, const void*, const void*, llvm::SmallVector<long int, 4>*)’:
/iusers/ekeane1/workspaces/llvm-project/llvm/tools/llvm-exegesis/lib/X86/X86Counter.cpp:99:37: error: ‘struct perf_branch_entry’ has no member named ‘cycles’
CycleArray->push_back(Entry.cycles);
I'm on RHEL7, so I have kernel 3.10, so it doesn't have 'cycles'.
According ot this: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v4.3/source/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h#L963 kernel 4.3 is the first time that 'cycles' appeared in this structure.
```
Make explicit that freeze does not touch paddings of an aggregate.
(Relevant comment: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83752#2152550)
This implies that `v = freeze(load p); store v, q` may still leave undef bits
or poison in memory if `v` is an aggregate, but it still happens for
non-byte integers such as i1.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83927
Starting with Skylake, the LBR contains the precise number of cycles between the two
consecutive branches.
Making use of this will hopefully make the measurements more precise than the
existing methods of using RDTSC.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77422
This came up in a recent review, someone was wondering were was
this all documented and I couldn't find a reference to provide.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83816
Like most readability rules, it isn't absolute and there is a matter of taste
to it. I think more recent part of the project may be more consistent in the
current application of the guideline. I suspect sources like
mlir/lib/Dialect/StandardOps/IR/Ops.cpp may be examples of this at the moment.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82594
Stanislav Mekhanoshin