Three tests fail when building and testing LLVM from the Visual C++ environment
since they use the repo version of lit.py that do not have local customization
builtin_parameters = { 'build_mode' : 'Release' }
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51072
Reviewed By: dyung
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108085
Reading modules first reads each control block in the chain and then all
AST blocks.
The first phase is intended to find recoverable errors, eg. an out of
date or missing module. If any error occurs during this phase, it is
safe to remove all modules in the chain as no references to them will
exist.
While reading the AST blocks, however, various fields in ASTReader are
updated with references to the module. Removing modules at this point
can cause dangling pointers which can be accessed later. These would be
otherwise harmless, eg. a binary search over `GlobalSLocEntryMap` may
access a failed module that could error, but shouldn't crash. Do not
remove modules in this phase, regardless of failures.
Since this is the case, it also doesn't make sense to return OutOfDate
during this phase, so remove the two cases where this happens.
When they were originally added these checks would return a failure when
the serialized and current path didn't match up. That was updated to an
OutOfDate as it was found to be hit when using VFS and overriding the
umbrella. Later on the path was changed to instead be the name as
written in the module file, resolved using the serialized base
directory. At this point the check is really only comparing the name of
the umbrella and only works for frameworks since those don't include
`Headers/` in the name (which means the resolved path will never exist)
Given all that, it seems safe to ignore this case entirely for now.
This makes the handling of an umbrella header/directory the same as
regular headers, which also don't check for differences in the path
caused by VFS.
Resolves rdar://79329355
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107690
It fails on ubuntu bionic otherwise with:
```
scan-build-py-14: Run 'scan-view /tmp/scan-build-2021-08-09-09-14-36-765350-nx9s888s' to examine bug reports.
scan-build-py-14: Internal error.
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/llvm-14/lib/libscanbuild/__init__.py", line 125, in wrapper
return function(*args, **kwargs)
File "/usr/lib/llvm-14/lib/libscanbuild/analyze.py", line 72, in scan_build
number_of_bugs = document(args)
File "/usr/lib/llvm-14/lib/libscanbuild/report.py", line 35, in document
for bug in read_bugs(args.output, html_reports_available):
File "/usr/lib/llvm-14/lib/libscanbuild/report.py", line 282, in read_bugs
for bug in parser(bug_file):
File "/usr/lib/llvm-14/lib/libscanbuild/report.py", line 421, in parse_bug_html
for line in handler.readlines():
File "/usr/lib/python3.6/encodings/ascii.py", line 26, in decode
return codecs.ascii_decode(input, self.errors)[0]
UnicodeDecodeError: 'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0xc3 in position 3360: ordinal not in range(128)
scan-build-py-14: Please run this command again and turn on verbose mode (add '-vvvv' as argument).
```
I guess it is caused by a problem in Python 3.6
Reviewed By: phosek, isthismyaccount
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107887
Summary: Change and replace some functions which IE does not support. This patch is made as a continuation of D92928 revision. Also improve hot keys behavior.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107366
Removed AArch64 usage of the getMaxVScale interface, replacing it with
the vscale_range(min, max) IR Attribute.
Reviewed By: paulwalker-arm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106277
This patch adds the flag `extra-checkers` to the sub-command `build` for
passing a comma separated list of additional checkers to include.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106739
Search avr-libc path according to avr-gcc installation at first,
then other possible installed pathes.
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107682
The Linux kernel has a macro called IS_ENABLED(), which evaluates to a
constant 1 or 0 based on Kconfig selections, allowing C code to be
unconditionally enabled or disabled at build time. For example:
int foo(struct *a, int b) {
switch (b) {
case 1:
if (a->flag || !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_64BIT))
return 1;
__attribute__((fallthrough));
case 2:
return 2;
default:
return 3;
}
}
There is an unreachable warning about the fallthrough annotation in the
first case because !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_64BIT) can be evaluated to 1,
which looks like
return 1;
__attribute__((fallthrough));
to clang.
This type of warning is pointless for the Linux kernel because it does
this trick all over the place due to the sheer number of configuration
options that it has.
Add -Wunreachable-code-fallthrough, enabled under -Wunreachable-code, so
that projects that want to warn on unreachable code get this warning but
projects that do not care about unreachable code can still use
-Wimplicit-fallthrough without having to make changes to their code
base.
Fixes PR51094.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, nickdesaulniers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107933
@arichardson pointed out in post-commit review for
https://reviews.llvm.org/D95583 (b714f73def) that `-verify` has an
optional argument that works a lot like `FileCheck`'s `-check-prefix`.
Use it to simplify the test for `-fno-implicit-modules-use-lock`!
The patch adds ELF notes into SHT_NOTE sections of ELF offload images
passed to clang-offload-wrapper.
The new notes use a null-terminated "LLVMOMPOFFLOAD" note name.
There are currently three types of notes:
VERSION: a string (not null-terminated) representing the ELF offload
image structure. The current version '1.0' does not put any restrictions
on the structure of the image. If we ever need to come up with a common
structure for ELF offload images (e.g. to be able to analyze the images
in libomptarget in some standard way), then we will introduce new versions.
PRODUCER: a vendor specific name of the producing toolchain.
Upstream LLVM uses "LLVM" (not null-terminated).
PRODUCER_VERSION: a vendor specific version of the producing toolchain.
Upstream LLVM uses LLVM_VERSION_STRING with optional <space> LLVM_REVISION.
All three notes are not mandatory currently.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99551
LoopLoadElimination, LoopVersioning and LoopVectorize currently
fetch MemorySSA when construction LoopAccessAnalysis. However,
LoopAccessAnalysis does not actually use MemorySSA and we can pass
nullptr instead.
This saves one MemorySSA calculation in the default pipeline, and
thus improves compile-time.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108074
Two standalone LoopRotate passes scheduled using
createFunctionToLoopPassAdaptor() currently enable MemorySSA.
However, while LoopRotate can preserve MemorySSA, it does not use
it, so requiring MemorySSA is unnecessary.
This change doesn't have a practical compile-time impact by itself,
because subsequent passes still request MemorySSA.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108073
This is a rather common feedback we get from out leak checkers: bug reports are
really short, and are contain barely any usable information on what the analyzer
did to conclude that a leak actually happened.
This happens because of our bug report minimizing effort. We construct bug
reports by inspecting the ExplodedNodes that lead to the error from the bottom
up (from the error node all the way to the root of the exploded graph), and mark
entities that were the cause of a bug, or have interacted with it as
interesting. In order to make the bug report a bit less verbose, whenever we
find an entire function call (from CallEnter to CallExitEnd) that didn't talk
about any interesting entity, we prune it (click here for more info on bug
report generation). Even if the event to highlight is exactly this lack of
interaction with interesting entities.
D105553 generalized the visitor that creates notes for these cases. This patch
adds a new kind of NoStateChangeVisitor that leaves notes in functions that
took a piece of dynamically allocated memory that later leaked as parameter,
and didn't change its ownership status.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105553
Preceding discussion on cfe-dev: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2021-June/068450.html
NoStoreFuncVisitor is a rather unique visitor. As VisitNode is invoked on most
other visitors, they are looking for the point where something changed -- change
on a value, some checker-specific GDM trait, a new constraint.
NoStoreFuncVisitor, however, looks specifically for functions that *didn't*
write to a MemRegion of interesting. Quoting from its comments:
/// Put a diagnostic on return statement of all inlined functions
/// for which the region of interest \p RegionOfInterest was passed into,
/// but not written inside, and it has caused an undefined read or a null
/// pointer dereference outside.
It so happens that there are a number of other similar properties that are
worth checking. For instance, if some memory leaks, it might be interesting why
a function didn't take ownership of said memory:
void sink(int *P) {} // no notes
void f() {
sink(new int(5)); // note: Memory is allocated
// Well hold on, sink() was supposed to deal with
// that, this must be a false positive...
} // warning: Potential memory leak [cplusplus.NewDeleteLeaks]
In here, the entity of interest isn't a MemRegion, but a symbol. The property
that changed here isn't a change of value, but rather liveness and GDM traits
managed by MalloChecker.
This patch moves some of the logic of NoStoreFuncVisitor to a new abstract
class, NoStateChangeFuncVisitor. This is mostly calculating and caching the
stack frames in which the entity of interest wasn't changed.
Descendants of this interface have to define 3 things:
* What constitutes as a change to an entity (this is done by overriding
wasModifiedBeforeCallExit)
* What the diagnostic message should be (this is done by overriding
maybeEmitNoteFor.*)
* What constitutes as the entity of interest being passed into the function (this
is also done by overriding maybeEmitNoteFor.*)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105553
Previously we just used {}, but that doesn't work in situations
like this.
if (1)
_MM_EXTRACT_FLOAT(d, x, n);
else
...
The semicolon would terminate the if.
clang/docs/tool/dump_format_style.py was not run as part of {D99840}
Bring ClangFormatStyleOptions.rst back in line.
Reviewed By: HazardyKnusperkeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107958
This covers the SSE and AVX/AVX2 headers. AVX512 has a lot more macros
due to rounding mode.
Fixes part of PR51324.
Reviewed By: pengfei
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107843
Yaron Keren