compiler-specific issues. Instead, repeat an 'operator delete' definition in
each derived class that is actually deleted, and give up on the static type
safety of an error when sized delete is accidentally used on a type derived
from TrailingObjects.
llvm-svn: 260190
This fixes undefined behavior in C++14 due to the size of the object being
deleted being different from sizeof(dynamic type) when it is allocated with
trailing objects.
MSVC seems to have several bugs around using-declarations changing the access
of a member inherited from a base class, so use forwarding functions instead of
using-declarations to make TrailingObjects::operator delete accessible where
desired.
llvm-svn: 260180
The Windows bots have been failing for the last two days, with:
FAILED: C:\PROGRA~2\MICROS~1.0\VC\bin\amd64\cl.exe -c LLVMContextImpl.cpp
D:\buildslave\clang-x64-ninja-win7\llvm\lib\IR\LLVMContextImpl.cpp(137) :
error C2248: 'llvm::TrailingObjects<llvm::AttributeSetImpl,
llvm::IndexAttrPair>::operator delete' :
cannot access private member declared in class 'llvm::AttributeSetImpl'
TrailingObjects.h(298) : see declaration of
'llvm::TrailingObjects<llvm::AttributeSetImpl,
llvm::IndexAttrPair>::operator delete'
AttributeImpl.h(213) : see declaration of 'llvm::AttributeSetImpl'
llvm-svn: 260053
-fsized-deallocation. Disable sized deallocation for all objects derived from
TrailingObjects, as we expect the storage allocated for these objects to be
larger than the size of their dynamic type.
llvm-svn: 259942
Previously, the code enforced non-decreasing alignment of each trailing
type. However, it's easy enough to allow for realignment as needed, and
thus avoid the developer having to think about the possiblilities for
alignment requirements on all architectures.
(E.g. on Linux/x86, a struct with an int64 member is 4-byte aligned,
while on other 32-bit archs -- and even with other OSes on x86 -- it has
8-byte alignment. This sort of thing is irritating to have to manually
deal with.)
llvm-svn: 256533
- Automatic alignment of the base type for the alignment requirements
of the trailing types.
- Support for an arbitrary numbers of trailing types, instead of only
1 or 2, by using a variadic template implementation.
Upcoming commits to clang will take advantage of both of these features.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12439
llvm-svn: 256054
'llvm::TrailingObjects<`anonymous-namespace'::Class1,short,llvm::NoTrailingTypeArg>::additionalSizeToAlloc' :
cannot access protected member declared in class
'llvm::TrailingObjects<`anonymous-namespace'::Class1,short,llvm::NoTrailingTypeArg>'
I'm not sure how this compiles with gcc.
Aren't protecteded members accessible only with protected or public inheritance?
llvm-svn: 244199
This is intended to help support the idiom of a class that has some
other objects (or multiple arrays of different types of objects)
appended on the end, which is used quite heavily in clang.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11272
llvm-svn: 244164
Richard Smith