Summary: The PIC additions didn't update the prologue and epilogue code to save and restore r30 (PIC base register). This does that.
Test Plan: Tests updated.
Reviewers: hfinkel
Reviewed By: hfinkel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6876
llvm-svn: 225450
This partially fixes PR13007 (ARM CodeGen fails with large stack
alignment): for ARM and Thumb2 targets, but not for Thumb1, as it
seems stack alignment for Thumb1 targets hasn't been supported at
all.
Producing an aligned stack pointer is done by zero-ing out the lower
bits of the stack pointer. The BIC instruction was used for this.
However, the immediate field of the BIC instruction only allows to
encode an immediate that can zero out up to a maximum of the 8 lower
bits. When a larger alignment is requested, a BIC instruction cannot
be used; llvm was silently producing incorrect code in this case.
This commit fixes code generation for large stack aligments by
using the BFC instruction instead, when the BFC instruction is
available. When not, it uses 2 instructions: a right shift,
followed by a left shift to zero out the lower bits.
The lowering of ARM::Int_eh_sjlj_dispatchsetup still has code
that unconditionally uses BIC to realign the stack pointer, so it
very likely has the same problem. However, I wasn't able to
produce a test case for that. This commit adds an assert so that
the compiler will fail the assert instead of silently generating
wrong code if this is ever reached.
llvm-svn: 225446
Its functionality has been replaced by calling
SIInstrInfo::legalizeOperands() from
SIISelLowering::AdjstInstrPostInstrSelection() and running the
SIFoldOperands and SIShrinkInstructions passes.
llvm-svn: 225445
The call lowering assumes that if the callee is a global, we want to emit a direct call.
This is correct for regular globals, but not for TLS ones.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6862
llvm-svn: 225438
A broken hint is a copy where both ends are assigned different colors. When a
variable gets evicted in the neighborhood of such copies, it is likely we can
reconcile some of them.
** Context **
Copies are inserted during the register allocation via splitting. These split
points are required to relax the constraints on the allocation problem. When
such a point is inserted, both ends of the copy would not share the same color
with respect to the current allocation problem. When variables get evicted,
the allocation problem becomes different and some split point may not be
required anymore. However, the related variables may already have been colored.
This usually shows up in the assembly with pattern like this:
def A
...
save A to B
def A
use A
restore A from B
...
use B
Whereas we could simply have done:
def B
...
def A
use A
...
use B
** Proposed Solution **
A variable having a broken hint is marked for late recoloring if and only if
selecting a register for it evict another variable. Indeed, if no eviction
happens this is pointless to look for recoloring opportunities as it means the
situation was the same as the initial allocation problem where we had to break
the hint.
Finally, when everything has been allocated, we look for recoloring
opportunities for all the identified candidates.
The recoloring is performed very late to rely on accurate copy cost (all
involved variables are allocated).
The recoloring is simple unlike the last change recoloring. It propagates the
color of the broken hint to all its copy-related variables. If the color is
available for them, the recoloring uses it, otherwise it gives up on that hint
even if a more complex coloring would have worked.
The recoloring happens only if it is profitable. The profitability is evaluated
using the expected frequency of the copies of the currently recolored variable
with a) its current color and b) with the target color. If a) is greater or
equal than b), then it is profitable and the recoloring happen.
** Example **
Consider the following example:
BB1:
a =
b =
BB2:
...
= b
= a
Let us assume b gets split:
BB1:
a =
b =
BB2:
c = b
...
d = c
= d
= a
Because of how the allocation work, b, c, and d may be assigned different
colors. Now, if a gets evicted to make room for c, assuming b and d were
assigned to something different than a.
We end up with:
BB1:
a =
st a, SpillSlot
b =
BB2:
c = b
...
d = c
= d
e = ld SpillSlot
= e
This is likely that we can assign the same register for b, c, and d,
getting rid of 2 copies.
** Performances **
Both ARM64 and x86_64 show performance improvements of up to 3% for the
llvm-testsuite + externals with Os and O3. There are a few regressions too that
comes from the (in)accuracy of the block frequency estimate.
<rdar://problem/18312047>
llvm-svn: 225422
I got confused and assumed SrcIdx/DstIdx of the CoalescerPair is a
subregister index in SrcReg/DstReg, but they are actually subregister
indices of the coalesced register that get you back to SrcReg/DstReg
when applied.
Fixed the bug, improved comments and simplified code accordingly.
Testcase by Tom Stellard!
llvm-svn: 225415
Patch by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
"This patch started out as an exploration of gc.relocate, and an attempt
to write a simple test in call-lowering. I then noticed that the
arguments of gc.relocate were not checked fully, so I went in and fixed
a few things. Finally, the most important outcome of this patch is that
my new error handling code caught a bug in a callsite in
stackmap-format."
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6824
llvm-svn: 225412
This change includes the most basic possible GCStrategy for a GC which is using the statepoint lowering code. At the moment, this GCStrategy doesn't really do much - aside from actually generate correct stackmaps that is - but I went ahead and added a few extra correctness checks as proof of concept. It's mostly here to provide documentation on how to do one, and to provide a point for various optimization legality hooks I'd like to add going forward. (For context, see the TODOs in InstCombine around gc.relocate.)
Most of the validation logic added here as proof of concept will soon move in to the Verifier. That move is dependent on http://reviews.llvm.org/D6811
There was discussion in the review thread about addrspace(1) being reserved for something. I'm going to follow up on a seperate llvmdev thread. If needed, I'll update all the code at once.
Note that I am deliberately not making a GCStrategy required to use gc.statepoints with this change. I want to give folks out of tree - including myself - a chance to migrate. In a week or two, I'll make having a GCStrategy be required for gc.statepoints. To this end, I added the gc tag to one of the test cases but not others.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6808
llvm-svn: 225365
LLVM emits stack probes on Windows targets to ensure that the stack is
correctly accessed. However, the amount of stack allocated before
emitting such a probe is hardcoded to 4096.
It is desirable to have this be configurable so that a function might
opt-out of stack probes. Our level of granularity is at the function
level instead of, say, the module level to permit proper generation of
code after LTO.
Patch by Andrew H!
N.B. The inliner needs to be updated to properly consider what happens
after inlining a function with a specific stack-probe-size into another
function with a different stack-probe-size.
llvm-svn: 225360
Even thouh gcc produces simialr instructions as Owen pointed out the two patterns aren’t equivalent in the case
where the original subtraction could have caused an overflow.
Reverting the same.
llvm-svn: 225341
In order to make comdats always explicit in the IR, we decided to make
the syntax a bit more compact for the case of a GlobalObject in a
comdat with the same name.
Just dropping the $name causes problems for
@foo = globabl i32 0, comdat
$bar = comdat ...
and
declare void @foo() comdat
$bar = comdat ...
So the syntax is changed to
@g1 = globabl i32 0, comdat($c1)
@g2 = globabl i32 0, comdat
and
declare void @foo() comdat($c1)
declare void @foo() comdat
llvm-svn: 225302
int->fp conversions on PPC must be done through memory loads and stores. On a
modern core, this process begins by storing the int value to memory, then
loading it using a (sometimes special) FP load instruction. Unfortunately, we
would do this even when the value to be converted was itself a load, and we can
just use that same memory location instead of copying it to another first.
There is a slight complication when handling int_to_fp(fp_to_int(x)) pairs,
because the fp_to_int operand has not been lowered when the int_to_fp is being
lowered. We handle this specially by invoking fp_to_int's lowering logic
(partially) and getting the necessary memory location (some trivial refactoring
was done to make this possible).
This is all somewhat ugly, and it would be nice if some later CodeGen stage
could just clean this stuff up, but because doing so would involve modifying
target-specific nodes (or instructions), it is not immediately clear how that
would work.
Also, remove a related entry from the README.txt for which we now generate
reasonable code.
llvm-svn: 225301
This is equivalent to the AMDGPUTargetMachine now, but it is the
starting point for separating R600 and GCN functionality into separate
targets.
It is recommened that users start using the gcn triple for GCN-based
GPUs, because using the r600 triple for these GPUs will be deprecated in
the future.
llvm-svn: 225277
This patch improves the logic added at revision 224899 (see review D6728) that
teaches the backend when it is profitable to speculate calls to cttz/ctlz.
The original algorithm conservatively avoided speculating more than one
instruction from a basic block in a control flow grap modelling an if-statement.
In particular, the only allowed instruction (excluding the terminator) was a
call to cttz/ctlz. However, there are cases where we could be less conservative
and still be able to speculate a call to cttz/ctlz.
With this patch, CodeGenPrepare now tries to speculate a cttz/ctlz if the
result is zero extended/truncated in the same basic block, and the zext/trunc
instruction is "free" for the target.
Added new test cases to CodeGen/X86/cttz-ctlz.ll
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6853
llvm-svn: 225274
In r225251, I removed an old entry from the README.txt file. While there are
several contributing factors (including pieces in Clang's ABI code), upon
further reflection, the backend part deserves a regression test.
llvm-svn: 225268
"ELF Handling for Thread-Local Storage" specifies that R_X86_64_GOTTPOFF
relocation target a movq or addq instruction.
Prohibit the truncation of such loads to movl or addl.
This fixes PR22083.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6839
llvm-svn: 225250
The old target DAG combine that allowed for performing int_to_fp(fp_to_int(x))
without a load/store pair is updated here with support for unsigned integers,
and to support single-precision values without a third rounding step, on newer
cores with the appropriate instructions.
llvm-svn: 225248
We now produce the desired code as noted in the README.txt file (no spurious
or). Remove the README entry and improve the regression test.
llvm-svn: 225214
Consider this function from our README.txt file:
int foo(int a, int b) { return (a < b) << 4; }
We now explicitly track CR bits by default, so the comment in the README.txt
about not really having a SETCC is no longer accurate, but we did generate this
somewhat silly code:
cmpw 0, 3, 4
li 3, 0
li 12, 1
isel 3, 12, 3, 0
sldi 3, 3, 4
blr
which generates the zext as a select between 0 and 1, and then shifts the
result by a constant amount. Here we preprocess the DAG in order to fold the
results of operations on an extension of an i1 value into the SELECT_I[48]
pseudo instruction when the resulting constant can be materialized using one
instruction (just like the 0 and 1). This was not implemented as a DAGCombine
because the resulting code would have been anti-canonical and depends on
replacing chained user nodes, which does not fit well into the lowering
paradigm. Now we generate:
cmpw 0, 3, 4
li 3, 0
li 12, 16
isel 3, 12, 3, 0
blr
which is less silly.
llvm-svn: 225203
The 64-bit semantics of cntlzw are not special, the 32-bit population count is
stored as a 64-bit value in the range [0,32]. As a result, it is always zero
extended, and it can be added to the PPCISelDAGToDAG peephole optimization as a
frontier instruction for the removal of unnecessary zero extensions.
llvm-svn: 225192
lhbrx and lwbrx not only load their data with byte swapping, but also clear the
upper 32 bits (at least). As a result, they can be added to the PPCISelDAGToDAG
peephole optimization as frontier instructions for the removal of unnecessary
zero extensions.
llvm-svn: 225189
We used to generate code similar to:
umov.b w8, v0[2]
strb w8, [x0, x1]
because the STR*ro* patterns were preferred to ST1*.
Instead, we can avoid going through GPRs, and generate:
add x8, x0, x1
st1.b { v0 }[2], [x8]
This patch increases the ST1* AddedComplexity to achieve that.
rdar://16372710
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6202
llvm-svn: 225183
For 0-lane stores, we used to generate code similar to:
fmov w8, s0
str w8, [x0, x1, lsl #2]
instead of:
str s0, [x0, x1, lsl #2]
To correct that: for store lane 0 patterns, directly match to STR <subreg>0.
Byte-sized instructions don't have the special case for a 0 index,
because FPR8s are defined to have untyped content.
rdar://16372710
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6772
llvm-svn: 225181
Claim conformance to version 2.09 of the ARM ABI.
This build attribute must be emitted first amongst the build attributes when
written to an object file. This is to simplify conformance detection by
consumers.
Change-Id: If9eddcfc416bc9ad6e5cc8cdcb05d0031af7657e
llvm-svn: 225166
This patch lowers patterns such as-
sub v0.4s, v0.4s, v1.4s
abs v0.4s, v0.4s
to
sabd v0.4s, v0.4s, v1.4s
on AArch64.
Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6781
llvm-svn: 225165
PPC has an instruction for ctlz with defined zero behavior, and our lowering of
cttz (provided by DAGCombine) is also efficient and branchless, so speculating
these makes sense.
llvm-svn: 225150
r225135 added the ability to materialize i64 constants using rotations in order
to reduce the instruction count. Sometimes we can use a rotation only with some
extra masking, so that we take advantage of the fact that generating a bunch of
extra higher-order 1 bits is easy using li/lis.
llvm-svn: 225147
Materializing full 64-bit constants on PPC64 can be expensive, requiring up to
5 instructions depending on the locations of the non-zero bits. Sometimes
materializing a rotated constant, and then applying the inverse rotation, requires
fewer instructions than the direct method. If so, do that instead.
In r225132, I added support for forming constants using bit inversion. In
effect, this reverts that commit and replaces it with rotation support. The bit
inversion is useful for turning constants that are mostly ones into ones that
are mostly zeros (thus enabling a more-efficient shift-based materialization),
but the same effect can be obtained by using negative constants and a rotate,
and that is at least as efficient, if not more.
llvm-svn: 225135
Justin Hibbits