$URL$ is an SVN keyword substitution enabled via
`svn propset svn:keywords "URL" tools/clang/lib/Basic/Version.cpp`.
Now that we no longer use SVN, it's no longer being replaced by
anything, and we no longer offer svn exports. So remove the
$URL$-specific logic.
The "cfe" path prefix removal also no longer makes sense now that
we're on git: Both CLANG_REPOSITORY and LLVM_REPOSITORY are usually
set to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git
So remove that too, and remove the "llvm" prefix removal for symmetry.
With the github url, "llvm" _is_ found in the string, but not in
the place the function expected. Nobody noticed since the llvm
repository path is only used if CLANG_REVISION and LLVM_REVISION are
different, which in the git monorepo world they never should be.
(I might remove the "// Support LLVM in a separate repository"
block in a separate commit.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72848
Summary:
When downstream LLVM distributions (like AOSP) set the CLANG_VENDOR
cmake variable, the version string printed by the clang driver looks
like:
$ clang --version
[CLANG_VENDOR] clang version X.X.X ([CLANG_REPOSITORY_STRING] sha) (based on LLVM X.X.X)
Rather than the more standard:
$ clang --version
clang version X.X.X ([CLANG_REPOSITORY_STRING] sha)
Based on feedback the the version string is a little long, the trailing
"(based on LLVM X.X.X)" is redundant and makes less sense after moving
LLVM to the monorepo. And it is only added should vendors set the cmake
variable CLANG_VENDOR. Let's remove it.
Reviewers: jyknight, eli.friedman, rsmith, rjmccall, efriedma
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: arphaman, efriedma, cfe-commits, srhines
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69925
Some targets such as Python 2.7.16 still use VERSION in
their builds. Without VERSION defined, the source code
has syntax errors.
Reverting as it will probably break many other things.
Noticed by Sterling Augustine
llvm-svn: 365992
Summary:
It has been introduced in 2011 for gcc compat:
ad1a4c6e89
it is probably time to remove it
Reviewers: rnk, dexonsmith
Reviewed By: rnk
Subscribers: dschuff, aheejin, fedor.sergeev, arphaman, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64062
llvm-svn: 365962
Previously, there were two different scripts for generating VCS headers:
one used by LLVM and one used by Clang and lldb. They were both similar,
but different. They were both broken in their own ways, for example the
one used by Clang didn't properly handle monorepo resulting in an
incorrect version information reported by Clang.
This change unifies two the scripts by introducing a new script that's
used from both LLVM, Clang and lldb, ensures that the new script
supports both monorepo and standalone SVN and Git setups, and removes
the old scripts.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57063
llvm-svn: 353268
Previously, there were two different scripts for generating VCS headers:
one used by LLVM and one used by Clang. They were both similar, but
different. They were both broken in their own ways, for example the one
used by Clang didn't properly handle monorepo resulting in an incorrect
version information reported by Clang.
This change unifies two the scripts by introducing a new script that's
used from both LLVM and Clang, ensures that the new script supports both
monorepo and standalone SVN and Git setups, and removes the old scripts.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57063
llvm-svn: 352729
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
We probably just need to touch LLVM's configure this time to work around the
totally inadequate Makefile build server integration.
This reverts commit r210314.
llvm-svn: 210320
This will unbreak clang vendor builds as a follow-up to r210238, now that we
can't poke into LLVM's private config.h (nor should the string be exposed by
llvm-config.h).
This hopefully removes for good the last include of LLVM's config.h.
llvm-svn: 210313
This corrects long-standing misuses of LLVM's internal config.h.
In most cases the public llvm-config.h header was intended and we can now
remove the old hacks thanks to LLVM r210144.
The config.h header is private, won't be installed and should no longer be
included by clang or other modules.
llvm-svn: 210145
uncovered.
This required manually correcting all of the incorrect main-module
headers I could find, and running the new llvm/utils/sort_includes.py
script over the files.
I also manually added quite a few missing headers that were uncovered by
shuffling the order or moving headers up to be main-module-headers.
llvm-svn: 169237
If you're using git-svn, the clang and llvm repository will typically
map to a different revision.
Before we had:
clang version 3.1 (trunk 152167 trunk 152162)
After this change:
clang version 3.1 (trunk 152167) (llvm/trunk 152162)
So it's self-descriptive with an extra parens group. Which is more
compatible with version string parsers is probably debatable, but this
style was requested.
llvm-svn: 152183
- I don't like returning StringRef's ever, unless it is actually important for
performance, which it isn't here.
- Also, stop validating getClangRevision to be an integer, I don't see a good
reason to do this.
llvm-svn: 115071
(even if it is defined). This fixes the issue of this function
returning '0' when SVN_VERSION is defined to be "".
Fixes: <rdar://problem/7663667>
llvm-svn: 97620
have it return a StringRef instead of an integer (to be more VCS
agnostic).
(2) Add getClangFullRepositoryVersion(), which contains an
amalgamation of the repository name and the revision.
(3) Change PCH to only emit the string returned by
getClangFullRepositoryVersion() instead of also emitting the value
of getClangSubversionRevision() (which has been removed). This is
functionally equivalent.
More cleanup to version string generation pending...
llvm-svn: 94231
Nico Weber