Normal customer devices won't be able to run these tests, we're hoping to get
a public facing bot set up at some point. Both devices pass the testsuite without
any errors or failures.
I have seen some instability with the armv7 test runs, I may submit additional patches
to address this. arm64 looks good.
I'll be watching the bots for the rest of today; if any problems are introduced by
this patch I'll revert it - if anyone sees a problem with their bot that I don't
see, please do the same. I know it's a rather large patch.
One change I had to make specifically for iOS devices was that debugserver can't
create files. There were several tests that launch the inferior process redirecting
its output to a file, then they retrieve the file. They were not trying to test
file redirection in these tests, so I rewrote those to write their output to a file
directly.
llvm-svn: 314132
Normal customer devices won't be able to run these devices, we're hoping to get
a public facing bot set up at some point. Both devices pass the testsuite without
any errors or failures.
I have seen some instability with the armv7 test runs, I may submit additional patches
to address this. arm64 looks good.
I'll be watching the bots for the rest of today; if any problems are introduced by
this patch I'll revert it - if anyone sees a problem with their bot that I don't
see, please do the same. I know it's a rather large patch.
One change I had to make specifically for iOS devices was that debugserver can't
create files. There were several tests that launch the inferior process redirecting
its output to a file, then they retrieve the file. They were not trying to test
file redirection in these tests, so I rewrote those to write their output to a file
directly.
llvm-svn: 314038
Normal customer devices won't be able to run these devices, we're hoping to get
a public facing bot set up at some point.
There will be some smaller follow-on patches. The changes to tools/lldb-server are
verbose and I'm not thrilled with having to skip all of these tests manually.
There are a few places where I'm making the assumption that "armv7", "armv7k", "arm64"
means it's an ios device, and I need to review & clean these up with an OS check
as well. (Android will show up as "arm" and "aarch64" so by pure luck they shouldn't
cause problems, but it's not an assumption I want to rely on).
I'll be watching the bots for the rest of today; if any problems are introduced by
this patch I'll revert it - if anyone sees a problem with their bot that I don't
see, please do the same. I know it's a rather large patch.
One change I had to make specifically for iOS devices was that debugserver can't
create files. There were several tests that launch the inferior process redirecting
its output to a file, then they retrieve the file. They were not trying to test
file redirection in these tests, so I rewrote those to write their output to a file
directly.
llvm-svn: 313932
*** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has
*** two obvious implications:
Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge
effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit,
performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the
merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this
reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of
the repository):
find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} +
find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ;
The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4.
Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of
a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt
to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV.
llvm-svn: 280751
This module was originally intended to be imported by top-level
scripts to be able to find the LLDB packages and third party
libraries. Packages themselves shouldn't need to import it,
because by the time it gets into the package, the top-level
script should have already done this. Indeed, it was just
adding the same values to sys.path multiple times, so this
patch is essentially no functional change.
To make sure it doesn't get re-introduced, we also delete the
`use_lldb_suite` module from `lldbsuite/test`, although the
original copy still remains in `lldb/test`
llvm-svn: 251963
For convenience, we had added the folder that dotest.py was in
to sys.path, so that we could easily write things like
`import lldbutil` from anywhere and any test. This introduces
a subtle problem when using Python's package system, because when
unittest2 imports a particular test suite, the test suite is detached
from the package. Thus, writing "import lldbutil" from dotest imports
it as part of the package, and writing the same line from a test
does a fresh import since the importing module was not part of
the same package.
The real way to fix this is to use absolute imports everywhere. Instead
of writing "import lldbutil", we need to write "import
lldbsuite.test.util". This patch fixes up that and all other similar
cases, and additionally removes the script directory from sys.path
to ensure that this can't happen again.
llvm-svn: 251886
This is the conclusion of an effort to get LLDB's Python code
structured into a bona-fide Python package. This has a number
of benefits, but most notably the ability to more easily share
Python code between different but related pieces of LLDB's Python
infrastructure (for example, `scripts` can now share code with
`test`).
llvm-svn: 251532
Jason Molenda