This patch was temporarily reverted because it has exposed bug 37229 on
PowerPC platform. The bug is unrelated to the patch and was just a general
bug in the optimization done for PowerPC platform only. The bug was fixed
by the patch rL331410.
This patch returns the disabled commit since the bug was fixed.
llvm-svn: 331427
This changes some aspects of the build that are not relevant or useful
for Fuchsia like setting the RPATH/RUNPATH.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46361
llvm-svn: 331425
These are necessary changes to support building LLVM for Fuchsia.
While these are not sufficient to run on Fuchsia, they are still
useful when cross-compiling LLVM libraries and runtimes for Fuchsia.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46345
llvm-svn: 331423
the method declaration is unavailable for an app extension platform
Rationale:
Classes are often shared between an app extension code and
non-app extension code. There's no way to remove the implementation
using preprocessor when building the app extension, so we should not warn here.
rdar://38150617
llvm-svn: 331421
Summary:
Machine Instruction flags for fast math support and MIR print support
Reviewers: spatel, arsenm
Reviewed By: arsenm
Subscribers: wdng
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45781
llvm-svn: 331417
Sinking the and closer to a compare against zero is beneficial on PPC as it
allows us to emit record-form instructions. In the future, we may expand this
to a larger set of operations that feed compares against zero since PPC has
lots of record-form instructions.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46060
llvm-svn: 331416
This code previously existed only in MCMachOStreamer but is
useful for WebAssembly too. See: D46335
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46297
llvm-svn: 331412
instrumentation codegeneration strategy of using a data structure and
a loop. Required some finesse to get the critical things being tested to
surface in a nice way for FileCheck but I think this preserves the
original intent of the test.
llvm-svn: 331411
The CTR loops pass will insert the decrementing branch instruction in an exiting
block for the loop being transformed. However if that block is part of another
loop as well (whether a nested loop or with irreducible CFG), it is not valid
to use that exiting block. In fact, if the loop hass irreducible CFG, we don't
bother analyzing it and we just bail on the transformation. In practice, this
doesn't lead to a noticeable reduction in the number of loops transformed by
this pass.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37229
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46162
llvm-svn: 331410
Summary:
Prior to this change, LLVM would in some cases emit *massive* writeout
functions with many 10s of 1000s of function calls in straight-line
code. This is a very wasteful way to represent what are fundamentally
loops and creates a number of scalability issues. Among other things,
register allocating these calls is extremely expensive. While D46127 makes this
less severe, we'll still run into scaling issues with this eventually. If not
in the compile time, just from the code size.
Now the pass builds up global data structures modeling the inputs to
these functions, and simply loops over the data structures calling the
relevant functions with those values. This ensures that the code size is
a fixed and only data size grows with larger amounts of coverage data.
A trivial change to IRBuilder is included to make it easier to build
the constants that make up the global data.
Reviewers: wmi, echristo
Subscribers: sanjoy, mcrosier, llvm-commits, hiraditya
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46357
llvm-svn: 331407
The return values of the newly supported functions were not handled correctly:
strlcpy()/strlcat() return string sizes rather than pointers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45177
llvm-svn: 331401
I believe all of the x86 builtins should be considered nothrow.
I've left the incssp builtins alone because I think its current attributes are wrong and I'm following up with the contributor for that.
I plan to start adding const as well, but that requires more careful auditing.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46328
llvm-svn: 331399
to make sure that Testgen always has access to coverage info even if
the match table used by the selector itself is stripped off that
information for performance reasons.
Reviewers: dsanders, aemerson
Reviewed By: dsanders
Subscribers: rovka, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits, dsanders
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46098
llvm-svn: 331398
to share it between the Instruction Selector in optimized and
non-optimized modes both and the Testgen.
Reviewers: dsanders, aemerson
Reviewed By: dsanders
Subscribers: rovka, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits, dsanders
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46097
llvm-svn: 331396
The main goal is to share getMatchTable between the Instruction
Selector and the Testgen.
The commit also contains some NFC only loosely related to refactoring
out the getMatchTable, but strongly related to the initial Testgen
patch (see https://reviews.llvm.org/D43962)
Reviewers: dsanders, aemerson
Reviewed By: dsanders
Subscribers: rovka, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits, dsanders
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46096
llvm-svn: 331395
This change adds support for two types of Minidump CodeView records:
PDB70 (reference: https://crashpad.chromium.org/doxygen/structcrashpad_1_1CodeViewRecordPDB70.html)
This is by far the most common record type.
ELF BuildID (found in Breakpad/Crashpad generated minidumps)
This would set a proper UUID for placeholder modules, in turn enabling
an accurate match with local module images.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46292
llvm-svn: 331394
It reverts r331378 as it caused test failures
ThreadSanitizer-x86_64 :: Darwin/gcd-groups-destructor.mm
ThreadSanitizer-x86_64 :: Darwin/libcxx-shared-ptr-stress.mm
ThreadSanitizer-x86_64 :: Darwin/xpc-race.mm
Only clang part of the change is reverted, libc++ part remains as is because it
emits error less aggressively.
llvm-svn: 331392
Only support UTF-8 (since LLVM contains UTF-8 parsing support
already, and the code even does that already) and Windows-1252
(where most code points has the same value in unicode). Keep the
existing default as only allowing ASCII input.
Using the option type JoinedOrSeparate, since the real rc.exe
handles options in this form, even if llvm-rc uses Separate for
other similar existing options.
Rename the struct SearchParams to WriterParams since it's now used
for more than just include paths.
Add a missing getResourceTypeName method to the BundleResource class,
to fix error printing from within STRINGTABLE resources (used in
tests).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46238
llvm-svn: 331391
Summary:
Android toolchains include their headers and libraries in a
self-contained directory within the toolchain.
Reviewers: srhines
Reviewed By: srhines
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45291
llvm-svn: 331390
Summary:
A handful of targets will try some default paths if --sysroot is not provided.
If that is the case, it should be used for the libc++ header paths.
Reviewers: srhines, EricWF
Reviewed By: srhines
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45292
llvm-svn: 331389
If the sanitizer runtime is loaded in a binary that doesn't really
support it, then __sanitizer_startup_hook will never have been
called to initialize StoredArgv. This case can't be supported, but
its failure mode shouldn't be to crash in sanitizer_common internals.
Patch By: mcgrathr
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46344
llvm-svn: 331382
Summary:
Some of our internal testing detected a major compile time regression which I've
tracked down to:
r278938 - Revert "Reassociate: Reprocess RedoInsts after each inst".
It appears that processing long chains of reassociatable instructions causes
non-linear (potentially exponential) growth in the number of times an
instruction is revisited. For example, the included test revisits instructions
220 times in a 20-instruction test.
It appears that r278938 reversed the order instructions were visited and that
this is preventing scheduled revisits from being cancelled as a result of
visiting the instructions naturally during normal processing. However, simply
reversing the order also harmed the generated code. Upon closer inspection, it
was discovered that revisits occurred in the opposite order to the first pass
(Thanks to escha for spotting that).
This patch makes the revisit order consistent with the first pass which allows
more revisits to be cancelled. This does appear to have a small impact on the
generated code in few cases but it significantly reduces compile-time.
After this patch, our internal test that was most affected by the regression
dropped from ~2 million revisits to ~4k resulting in Reassociate having 0.46%
of the runtime it had before (99.54% improvement).
Here's the summaries reported by lnt for the LLVM test-suite with --benchmarking-only:
| metric | geomean before patch | geomean after patch | delta |
| ----- | ----- | ----- | ----- |
| compile time | 0.1956 | 0.1261 | -35.54% |
| execution time | 0.3240 | 0.3237 | - |
| code size | 7365.4459 | 7365.6079 | - |
The results have a few wins and losses on compile-time, mostly in the +/- 2.5% range. There was one outlier though:
| Performance Regressions - compile_time | Δ | Previous | Current |
| MultiSource/Benchmarks/ASC_Sequoia/CrystalMk/CrystalMk | 9.82% | 2.0473 | 2.2483 |
Reviewers: javed.absar, dberlin
Reviewed By: dberlin
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45734
llvm-svn: 331381
Atomics in C and C++ are incompatible at the moment and mixing the
headers can result in confusing error messages.
Emit an error explicitly telling about the incompatibility. Introduce
the macro `__ALLOW_STDC_ATOMICS_IN_CXX__` that allows to choose in C++
between C atomics and C++ atomics.
rdar://problem/27435938
Reviewers: rsmith, EricWF, mclow.lists
Reviewed By: mclow.lists
Subscribers: jkorous-apple, christof, bumblebritches57, JonChesterfield, smeenai, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45470
llvm-svn: 331379
Atomics in C and C++ are incompatible at the moment and mixing the
headers can result in confusing error messages.
Emit an error explicitly telling about the incompatibility. Introduce
the macro `__ALLOW_STDC_ATOMICS_IN_CXX__` that allows to choose in C++
between C atomics and C++ atomics.
rdar://problem/27435938
Reviewers: rsmith, EricWF, mclow.lists
Reviewed By: mclow.lists
Subscribers: jkorous-apple, christof, bumblebritches57, JonChesterfield, smeenai, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45470
llvm-svn: 331378
The size of an object cannot be less than the emitted size of all the
contained elements. This would cause an overflow in padding size
calculation. Add an assert to catch this.
Patch by Suyog Sarda.
llvm-svn: 331376
Max Kazantsev