X86 Supports Indirect Branch Tracking (IBT) as part of Control-Flow Enforcement Technology (CET).
IBT instruments ENDBR instructions used to specify valid targets of indirect call / jmp.
The `nocf_check` attribute has two roles in the context of X86 IBT technology:
1. Appertains to a function - do not add ENDBR instruction at the beginning of the function.
2. Appertains to a function pointer - do not track the target function of this pointer by adding nocf_check prefix to the indirect-call instruction.
This patch implements `nocf_check` context for Indirect Branch Tracking.
It also auto generates `nocf_check` prefixes before indirect branchs to jump tables that are guarded by range checks.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41879
llvm-svn: 327767
Summary:
These instructions zero the non-scalar part of the lower 128-bits which makes them different than the FMA3 instructions which pass through the non-scalar part of the lower 128-bits.
I've only added fmadd because we should be able to derive all other variants using operand negation in the intrinsic header like we do for AVX512.
I think there are still some missed negate folding opportunities with the FMA4 instructions in light of this behavior difference that I hadn't noticed before.
I've split the tests so that we can use different intrinsics for scalar testing between the two. I just copied the tests split the RUN lines and changed out the scalar intrinsics.
fma4-fneg-combine.ll is a new test to make sure we negate the fma4 intrinsics correctly though there are a couple TODOs in it.
Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39851
llvm-svn: 318984
No existing processor has both so it doesn't really matter what we do here. But we were previously just relying on pattern order which gave FMA4 priority.
llvm-svn: 317775
This attribute will be used in a tablegen backend that generated the X86 memory folding tables which will be added in a future pass.
Instructions with this attribute unset will be excluded from the full set of X86 instructions available for the pass.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38027
llvm-svn: 315171
Some register-register instructions can be encoded in 2 different ways, this happens when 2 register operands can be folded (separately).
For example if we look at the MOV8rr and MOV8rr_REV, both instructions perform exactly the same operation, but are encoded differently. Here is the relevant information about these instructions from Intel's 64-ia-32-architectures-software-developer-manual:
Opcode Instruction Op/En 64-Bit Mode Compat/Leg Mode Description
8A /r MOV r8,r/m8 RM Valid Valid Move r/m8 to r8.
88 /r MOV r/m8,r8 MR Valid Valid Move r8 to r/m8.
Here we can see that in order to enable the folding of the output and input registers, we had to define 2 "encodings", and as a result we got 2 move 8-bit register-register instructions.
In the X86 backend, we define both of these instructions, usually one has a regular name (MOV8rr) while the other has "_REV" suffix (MOV8rr_REV), must be marked with isCodeGenOnly flag and is not emitted from CodeGen.
Automatically generating the memory folding tables relies on matching encodings of instructions, but in these cases where we want to map both memory forms of the mov 8-bit (MOV8rm & MOV8mr) to MOV8rr (not to MOV8rr_REV) we have to somehow point from the MOV8rr_REV to the "regular" appropriate instruction which in this case is MOV8rr.
This field enable this "pointing" mechanism - which is used in the TableGen backend for generating memory folding tables.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32683
llvm-svn: 304087
This patch introduces new X86ISD::FMAXS and X86ISD::FMINS opcodes. The legacy intrinsics now lower to this node. As do the AVX-512 masked intrinsics when the rounding mode is CUR_DIRECTION.
I've merged a copy of the tablegen multiclass avx512_fp_scalar into avx512_fp_scalar_sae. avx512_fp_scalar still needs to support CUR_DIRECTION appearing as a rounding mode for X86ISD::FADD_ROUND and others.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30186
llvm-svn: 295810
Add WIG value to all of AVX instructions which ignore the W-bit in their encoding, instead of giving them the default value of 0.
This patch is needed for a follow up work on EVEX2VEX pass (replacing EVEX encoded instructions with their corresponding VEX version when possible).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29876
llvm-svn: 295643
This tries to keep all the ModRM memory and register forms in their own regions of the encodings. Hoping to make it simple on some of the switch statements that operate on these encodings.
llvm-svn: 279422
Predicate UseAVX depricates pattern selection on AVX-512.
This predicate is necessary for DAG selection to select EVEX form.
But mapping SSE intrinsics to AVX-512 instructions is not ready yet.
So I replaced UseAVX with HasAVX for intrinsics patterns.
llvm-svn: 237903
Added intrinsics for the instructions. CC parameter of the intrinsics was changed from i8 to i32 according to the spec.
By Igor Breger (igor.breger@intel.com)
llvm-svn: 236714
This associates movss and movsd with the packed single and packed double
execution domains (resp.). While this is largely cosmetic, as we now
don't have weird ping-pong-ing between single and double precision, it
is also useful because it avoids the domain fixing algorithm from seeing
domain breaks that don't actually exist. It will also be much more
important if we have an execution domain default other than packed
single, as that would cause us to mix movss and movsd with integer
vector code on a regular basis, a very bad mixture.
llvm-svn: 228135
This removes a hardcoded list of instructions in the CodeEmitter. Eventually I intend to remove the predicates on the affected instructions since in any given mode two of them are valid if we supported addr32/addr16 prefixes in the assembler.
llvm-svn: 224809
The new attributes are NumElts and the CD8TupleForm. This prepares the code
to enable x8 and x2 inserts.
NFC, no change in X86.td.expanded except for the new attributes.
llvm-svn: 219871
This change further evolves the base class AVX512_masking in order to make it
suitable for the masking variants of the FMA instructions.
Besides AVX512_masking there is now a new base class that instructions
including FMAs can use: AVX512_masking_3src. With three-source (destructive)
instructions one of the sources is already tied to the destination. This
difference from AVX512_masking is captured by this new class. The common bits
between _masking and _masking_3src are broken out into a new super class
called AVX512_masking_common.
As with valign, there is some corresponding restructuring of the underlying
format classes. The idea is the same we want to derive from two classes
essentially: one providing the format bits and another format-independent
multiclass supplying the various masking and non-masking instruction variants.
Existing fma tests in avx512-fma*.ll provide coverage here for the non-masking
variants. For masking, the next patches in the series will add intrinsics and
intrinsic tests.
For AVX512_masking_3src to work, the (ins ...) dag has to be passed *without*
the leading source operand that is tied to dst ($src1). This is necessary to
properly construct the (ins ...) for the different variants. For the record,
I did check that if $src is mistakenly included, you do get a fairly intuitive
error message from the tablegen backend.
Part of <rdar://problem/17688758>
llvm-svn: 215660
After adding the masking variants to several instructions, I have decided to
experiment with generating these from the non-masking/unconditional
variant. This will hopefully reduce the amount repetition that we currently
have in order to define an instruction with all its variants (for a reg/mem
instruction this would be 6 instruction defs and 2 Pat<> for the intrinsic).
The patch is the first cut that is currently only applied to valignd/q to make
the patch small.
A few notes on the approach:
* In order to stitch together the dag for both the conditional and the
unconditional patterns I pass the RHS of the set rather than the full
pattern (set dest, RHS).
* Rather than subclassing each instruction base class (e.g. AVX512AIi8),
with a masking variant which wouldn't scale, I derived the masking
instructions from a new base class AVX512 (this is just I<> with
Requires<HasAVX512>). The instructions derive from this now, plus a new set
of classes that add the format bits and everything else that instruction
base class provided (i.e. AVX512AIi8 vs. AVX512AIi8Base).
I hope we can go incrementally from here. I expect that:
* We will need different variants of the masking class. One example is
instructions requiring three vector sources. In this case we tie one of the
source operands to dest rather than a new implicit source operand ($src0)
* Add the zero-masking variant
* Add more AVX512*Base classes as new uses are added
I've looked at X86.td.expanded before and after to make sure that nothing got
lost for valignd/q.
llvm-svn: 215125
This allows assembling the two new instructions, encls and enclu for the
SKX processor model.
Note the diffs are a bigger than what might think, but to fit the new
MRM_CF and MRM_D7 in things in the right places things had to be
renumbered and shuffled down causing a bit more diffs.
rdar://16228228
llvm-svn: 214460
Passes the computed scaling factor in TSFlags rather than the old attributes.
Also removes the C++ version of computing the scaling factor (MemObjSize)
along with the asserts added by the previous patch.
No functional change.
llvm-svn: 213279
This does not actually move the logic yet but reimplements it in the Tablegen
language. Then asserts that the new implementation results in the same value.
The next patch will remove the assert and the temporary use of the TSFlags and
remove the C++ implementation.
The formula requires a limited form of the logical left and right operators.
I implemented these with the bit-extract/insert operator (i.e. blah{bits}).
No functional change.
llvm-svn: 213278
Original commits messages:
Add MRMXr/MRMXm form to X86 for use by instructions which treat the 'reg' field of modrm byte as a don't care value. Will allow for simplification of disassembler code.
Simplify a bunch of code by removing the need for the x86 disassembler table builder to know about extended opcodes. The modrm forms are sufficient to convey the information.
llvm-svn: 201065
r201059 appears to cause a crash in a bootstrapped build of clang. Craig
isn't available to look at it right now, so I'm reverting it while he
investigates.
llvm-svn: 201064
Oren Ben Simhon