Commit r298799 changed code that made the XFAIL on MachineBranchProb.ll
irrelevant, but some configurations still failed. I can't reproduce it
locally, so I'm hoping that enabling this will tell me if some
configurations will really fail or if they were just too slow.
llvm-svn: 299558
There are about 3 underlying bugs causing the tests to fail.
On top of that, some tests just we're 'generic' enough. i.e. 32-bit
registers.
llvm-svn: 294434
Minimum density for both optsize and non optsize are now options
-sparse-jump-table-density (default 10) for non optsize functions
-dense-jump-table-density (default 40) for optsize functions, which
matches the current default. This improves several benchmarks at google
at the cost of a small codesize increase. For code compiled with -Os,
the old behavior continues
llvm-svn: 264689
(This is the second attempt to submit this patch. The first caused two assertion
failures and was reverted. See https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25687)
The patch in http://reviews.llvm.org/D13745 is broken into four parts:
1. New interfaces without functional changes (http://reviews.llvm.org/D13908).
2. Use new interfaces in SelectionDAG, while in other passes treat probabilities
as weights (http://reviews.llvm.org/D14361).
3. Use new interfaces in all other passes.
4. Remove old interfaces.
This patch is 3+4 above. In this patch, MBB won't provide weight-based
interfaces any more, which are totally replaced by probability-based ones.
The interface addSuccessor() is redesigned so that the default probability is
unknown. We allow unknown probabilities but don't allow using it together
with known probabilities in successor list. That is to say, we either have a
list of successors with all known probabilities, or all unknown
probabilities. In the latter case, we assume each successor has 1/N
probability where N is the number of successors. An assertion checks if the
user is attempting to add a successor with the disallowed mixed use as stated
above. This can help us catch many misuses.
All uses of weight-based interfaces are now updated to use probability-based
ones.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14973
llvm-svn: 254377
and the follow-up r254356: "Fix a bug in MachineBlockPlacement that may cause assertion failure during BranchProbability construction."
Asserts were firing in Chromium builds. See PR25687.
llvm-svn: 254366
The patch in http://reviews.llvm.org/D13745 is broken into four parts:
1. New interfaces without functional changes (http://reviews.llvm.org/D13908).
2. Use new interfaces in SelectionDAG, while in other passes treat probabilities
as weights (http://reviews.llvm.org/D14361).
3. Use new interfaces in all other passes.
4. Remove old interfaces.
This patch is 3+4 above. In this patch, MBB won't provide weight-based
interfaces any more, which are totally replaced by probability-based ones.
The interface addSuccessor() is redesigned so that the default probability is
unknown. We allow unknown probabilities but don't allow using it together
with known probabilities in successor list. That is to say, we either have a
list of successors with all known probabilities, or all unknown
probabilities. In the latter case, we assume each successor has 1/N
probability where N is the number of successors. An assertion checks if the
user is attempting to add a successor with the disallowed mixed use as stated
above. This can help us catch many misuses.
All uses of weight-based interfaces are now updated to use probability-based
ones.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14973
llvm-svn: 254348
The patch in http://reviews.llvm.org/D13745 is broken into four parts:
1. New interfaces without functional changes.
2. Use new interfaces in SelectionDAG, while in other passes treat probabilities
as weights.
3. Use new interfaces in all other passes.
4. Remove old interfaces.
This the second patch above. In this patch SelectionDAG starts to use
probability-based interfaces in MBB to add successors but other MC passes are
still using weight-based interfaces. Therefore, we need to maintain correct
weight list in MBB even when probability-based interfaces are used. This is
done by updating weight list in probability-based interfaces by treating the
numerator of probabilities as weights. This change affects many test cases
that check successor weight values. I will update those test cases once this
patch looks good to you.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14361
llvm-svn: 253965
Summary:
This reverts commit 79c37e1a4ff1e634da8f95322f080601b4c815fc.
This test passes locally but fails on the community buildbot. So we will let it
XFAIL for now.
Patched by Mandeep Singh Grang (mgrang@codeaurora.org)
Reviewers: kparzysz, weimingz
Subscribers: aemerson, rengolin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14189
llvm-svn: 251664
Summary: Refer PR23377. This test was XFAIL'ed for Hexagon as well as ARM. But it has now started passing for ARM.
Reviewers: hans, rengolin, aemerson, kparzysz
Subscribers: aemerson, llvm-commits, rengolin
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14155
llvm-svn: 251652
Currently, when edge weights are assigned to edges that are created when lowering switch statement, the weight on the edge to default statement (let's call it "default weight" here) is not considered. We need to distribute this weight properly. However, without value profiling, we have no idea how to distribute it. In this patch, I applied the heuristic that this weight is evenly distributed to successors.
For example, given a switch statement with cases 1,2,3,5,10,11,20, and every edge from switch to each successor has weight 10. If there is a binary search tree built to test if n < 10, then its two out-edges will have weight 4x10+10/2 = 45 and 3x10 + 10/2 = 35 respectively (currently they are 40 and 30 without considering the default weight). Each distribution (which is 5 here) will be stored in each SwitchWorkListItem for further distribution.
There are some exceptions:
For a jump table header which doesn't have any edge to default statement, we don't distribute the default weight to it.
For a bit test header which covers a contiguous range and hence has no edges to default statement, we don't distribute the default weight to it.
When the branch checks a single value or a contiguous range with no edge to default statement, we don't distribute the default weight to it.
In other cases, the default weight is evenly distributed to successors.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12418
llvm-svn: 246522
This will cause hot nodes to appear closer to the root.
The literature says building the tree like this makes it a near-optimal (in
terms of search time given key frequencies) binary search tree. In LLVM's case,
we can do up to 3 comparisons in each leaf node, so it might be better to opt
for lower tree height in some cases; that's something to look into in the
future.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9318
llvm-svn: 236192
Previously, the code would try to put a fall-through case last,
even if that meant moving a case with much higher branch weight
further down the chain.
Ordering by branch weight is most important, putting a fall-through
block last is secondary.
llvm-svn: 235942
Third time's the charm. The previous commit was reverted as a
reverse for-loop in SelectionDAGBuilder::lowerWorkItem did 'I--'
on an iterator at the beginning of a vector, causing asserts
when using debugging iterators. This commit fixes that.
llvm-svn: 235608
This is a re-commit of r235101, which also fixes the problems with the previous patch:
- Switches with only a default case and non-fallthrough were handled incorrectly
- The previous patch tickled a bug in PowerPC Early-Return Creation which is fixed here.
> This is a major rewrite of the SelectionDAG switch lowering. The previous code
> would lower switches as a binary tre, discovering clusters of cases
> suitable for lowering by jump tables or bit tests as it went along. To increase
> the likelihood of finding jump tables, the binary tree pivot was selected to
> maximize case density on both sides of the pivot.
>
> By not selecting the pivot in the middle, the binary trees would not always
> be balanced, leading to performance problems in the generated code.
>
> This patch rewrites the lowering to search for clusters of cases
> suitable for jump tables or bit tests first, and then builds the binary
> tree around those clusters. This way, the binary tree will always be balanced.
>
> This has the added benefit of decoupling the different aspects of the lowering:
> tree building and jump table or bit tests finding are now easier to tweak
> separately.
>
> For example, this will enable us to balance the tree based on profile info
> in the future.
>
> The algorithm for finding jump tables is quadratic, whereas the previous algorithm
> was O(n log n) for common cases, and quadratic only in the worst-case. This
> doesn't seem to be major problem in practice, e.g. compiling a file consisting
> of a 10k-case switch was only 30% slower, and such large switches should be rare
> in practice. Compiling e.g. gcc.c showed no compile-time difference. If this
> does turn out to be a problem, we could limit the search space of the algorithm.
>
> This commit also disables all optimizations during switch lowering in -O0.
>
> Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8649
llvm-svn: 235560
This is a major rewrite of the SelectionDAG switch lowering. The previous code
would lower switches as a binary tre, discovering clusters of cases
suitable for lowering by jump tables or bit tests as it went along. To increase
the likelihood of finding jump tables, the binary tree pivot was selected to
maximize case density on both sides of the pivot.
By not selecting the pivot in the middle, the binary trees would not always
be balanced, leading to performance problems in the generated code.
This patch rewrites the lowering to search for clusters of cases
suitable for jump tables or bit tests first, and then builds the binary
tree around those clusters. This way, the binary tree will always be balanced.
This has the added benefit of decoupling the different aspects of the lowering:
tree building and jump table or bit tests finding are now easier to tweak
separately.
For example, this will enable us to balance the tree based on profile info
in the future.
The algorithm for finding jump tables is O(n^2), whereas the previous algorithm
was O(n log n) for common cases, and quadratic only in the worst-case. This
doesn't seem to be major problem in practice, e.g. compiling a file consisting
of a 10k-case switch was only 30% slower, and such large switches should be rare
in practice. Compiling e.g. gcc.c showed no compile-time difference. If this
does turn out to be a problem, we could limit the search space of the algorithm.
This commit also disables all optimizations during switch lowering in -O0.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8649
llvm-svn: 235101
Now that `Metadata` is typeless, reflect that in the assembly. These
are the matching assembly changes for the metadata/value split in
r223802.
- Only use the `metadata` type when referencing metadata from a call
intrinsic -- i.e., only when it's used as a `Value`.
- Stop pretending that `ValueAsMetadata` is wrapped in an `MDNode`
when referencing it from call intrinsics.
So, assembly like this:
define @foo(i32 %v) {
call void @llvm.foo(metadata !{i32 %v}, metadata !0)
call void @llvm.foo(metadata !{i32 7}, metadata !0)
call void @llvm.foo(metadata !1, metadata !0)
call void @llvm.foo(metadata !3, metadata !0)
call void @llvm.foo(metadata !{metadata !3}, metadata !0)
ret void, !bar !2
}
!0 = metadata !{metadata !2}
!1 = metadata !{i32* @global}
!2 = metadata !{metadata !3}
!3 = metadata !{}
turns into this:
define @foo(i32 %v) {
call void @llvm.foo(metadata i32 %v, metadata !0)
call void @llvm.foo(metadata i32 7, metadata !0)
call void @llvm.foo(metadata i32* @global, metadata !0)
call void @llvm.foo(metadata !3, metadata !0)
call void @llvm.foo(metadata !{!3}, metadata !0)
ret void, !bar !2
}
!0 = !{!2}
!1 = !{i32* @global}
!2 = !{!3}
!3 = !{}
I wrote an upgrade script that handled almost all of the tests in llvm
and many of the tests in cfe (even handling many `CHECK` lines). I've
attached it (or will attach it in a moment if you're speedy) to PR21532
to help everyone update their out-of-tree testcases.
This is part of PR21532.
llvm-svn: 224257
the case of multiple edges from one block to another.
A simple example is a switch statement with multiple values to the same
destination. The definition of an edge is modified from a pair of blocks to
a pair of PredBlock and an index into the successors.
Also set the weight correctly when building SelectionDAG from LLVM IR,
especially when converting a Switch.
IntegersSubsetMapping is updated to calculate the weight for each cluster.
llvm-svn: 162572
Renato Golin