We previously handled one-dimensional arrays but didn't consider the
general case. The fix is simple: keep going through subsequent
dimensions until we get to the base element.
llvm-svn: 191493
Functions declared as constexpr must have their parsing delayed in
-fdelayed-template-parsing mode so as not to upset later template
instantiation.
N.B. My reading of the standard makes it seem like delayed template
parsing is at odds with constexpr. We may want to make refinements in
other places in clang to make constexpr play nicer with this feature.
This fixes PR17334.
llvm-svn: 191484
Summary:
Parsing cast expressions during error recovery can put us in a bad
state. Check to see if the token for a simple-type-specifier makes
sense before further parsing.
Fixes PR17255.
Reviewers: rsmith, doug.gregor, CornedBee, eli.friedman
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1696
llvm-svn: 191159
fields in the class. This allows a better checking of member intiailizers and
in class initializers in regards to initialization ordering.
For instance, this code will now produce warnings:
class A {
int x;
int y;
A() : x(y) {} // y is initialized after x, warn here
A(int): y(x) {} // default initialization of leaves x uninitialized, warn here
};
Several test cases were updated with -Wno-uninitialized to silence this warning.
llvm-svn: 191068
When a comma occurs in a default argument or default initializer within a
class, disambiguate whether it is part of the initializer or whether it ends
the initializer.
The way this works (which I will be proposing for standardization) is to treat
the comma as ending the default argument or default initializer if the
following token sequence matches the syntactic constraints of a
parameter-declaration-clause or init-declarator-list (respectively).
This is both consistent with the disambiguation rules elsewhere (where entities
are treated as declarations if they can be), and should have no regressions
over our old behavior. I think it might also disambiguate all cases correctly,
but I don't have a proof of that.
There is an annoyance here: because we're performing a tentative parse in a
situation where we may not have seen declarations of all relevant entities (if
the comma is part of the initializer, lookup may find entites declared later in
the class), we need to turn off typo-correction and diagnostics during the
tentative parse, and in the rare case that we decide the comma is part of the
initializer, we need to revert all token annotations we performed while
disambiguating.
Any diagnostics that occur outside of the immediate context of the tentative
parse (for instance, if we trigger the implicit instantiation of a class
template) are *not* suppressed, mirroring the usual rules for a SFINAE context.
llvm-svn: 190639
Summary:
__uuidof on templated types should exmaine if any of its template
parameters have a uuid declspec. If exactly one does, then take it.
Otherwise, issue an appropriate error.
Reviewers: rsmith, thakis, rnk
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1419
llvm-svn: 190240
is at the end of the line, point to the location after the double colon instead
of at the next token. There is more context to be given this way. In addition,
the next token can be several lines later.
llvm-svn: 190029
Summary:
Transform the token sequence for:
typename typedef T U;
to:
typename T typedef U;
Raise a diagnostic when this happens but only if we succeeded handling
the typename.
Reviewers: rsmith, rnk
Reviewed By: rsmith
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1433
llvm-svn: 189867
Summary:
There were two things known to be wrong with our implementation of MSVC
mode template arguments:
- We didn't properly handle __uuidof/CXXUuidofExpr and skipped all type
checking completely.
- We didn't allow for MSVC's extension of allowing certain constant
"foldable" expressions from showing up in template arguments.
They allow various casts dereference and address-of operations.
We can make it more general as we find further peculiarities but this
is the known extent.
Reviewers: rsmith, doug.gregor, rjmccall
Reviewed By: doug.gregor
CC: cfe-commits, rnk
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1444
llvm-svn: 189087
It doesn't make any sense to accept "..." in the argument to a C-style cast,
so use a separate expression list parsing routine which rejects it. PR16874.
llvm-svn: 188330
ParseCXXClassMemberDeclaration was trying to use the result of
ActOnCXXMemberDeclarator to attach it to some late parsed attributes.
However when failures arise, we have no decl to attach to which
eventually leads us to a NULL pointer dereference.
While we are here, clean up the code a bit.
Fixes PR16765
llvm-svn: 187557
followed by an identifier, then diagnose an identifier as being a bogus part of
the declarator instead of tripping over it. Improves diagnostics for cases like
std::vector<const int *p> my_vec;
llvm-svn: 186061
Sema::MergeFunctionDecl attempts merging two decls even if the old decl
is invalid. This can lead to interesting circumstances where we
successfully merge the decls but the result makes no sense.
Take the following for example:
template <typename T>
int main(void);
int main(void);
Sema will not consider these to be overloads of the same name because
main can't be overloaded, which means that this must be a redeclaration.
In this case the templated decl is compatible with the non-templated
decl allowing the Sema::CheckFunctionDeclaration machinery to move on
and do bizarre things like setting the previous decl of a non-templated
decl to a templated decl!
The way I see it, we should just bail from MergeFunctionDecl if the old
decl is invalid.
This fixes PR16531.
llvm-svn: 185779
previously didn't work if a mem-initializer-id had a template argument which
contained parentheses or braces.
We now implement a simple rule: just look for a ') {' or '} {' that is not
nested. The '{' is assumed to start the function-body. There are still two
cases which we misparse, where the ') {' comes from a compound literal or
from a lambda. The former case is not valid C++, and the latter will probably
not be valid C++ once DR1607 is resolved, so these seem to be of low value,
and we do not regress on them with this change. EDG and g++ also misparse
both of these cases.
llvm-svn: 185598
PR16456 reported that Clang implements a hybrid between AltiVec's
"Keyword and Predefine Method" and its "Context Sensitive Keyword
Method," where "bool" is always a keyword, but "vector" and "pixel"
are context-sensitive keywords. This isn't permitted by the AltiVec
spec. For consistency with gcc, this patch implements the Context
Sensitive Keyword Method for bool, and stops treating true and false
as keywords in Altivec mode.
The patch removes KEYALTIVEC as a trigger for defining these keywords
in include/clang/Basic/TokenKinds.def, and adds logic for "vector
bool" that mirrors the existing logic for "vector pixel." The test
case is taken from the bug report.
llvm-svn: 185580
The removal is tried by retrying the failed lookup of a correction
candidate with either the MemberContext or SS (CXXScopeSpecifier) or
both set to NULL if they weren't already. If the candidate identifier
is then looked up successfully, make a note in the candidate that the
SourceRange should include any existing nested name specifier even if
the candidate isn't adding a different one (i.e. the candidate has a
NULL NestedNameSpecifier).
Also tweak the diagnostic messages to differentiate between a suggestion
that just replaces the identifer but leaves the existing nested name
specifier intact and one that replaces the entire qualified identifier,
in cases where the suggested replacement is unqualified.
llvm-svn: 185487
*that* easy...
Try a bit harder to disambiguate. This is mostly straightforward, but for
=-style initializers, we actually need to know where an expression ends:
[foo = bar baz]
is a message send, whereas
[foo = bar + baz]
is a lambda-introducer. Handle this by parsing the expression eagerly, and
replacing it with an annotation token. By chance, we use the *exact same*
parsing rules in both cases (except that we need to assume we're inside a
message send for the parse, to turn off various forms of inapplicable
error recovery).
llvm-svn: 182432
a FieldDecl from it, and propagate both into the closure type and the
LambdaExpr.
You can't do much useful with them yet -- you can't use them within the body
of the lambda, because we don't have a representation for "the this of the
lambda, not the this of the enclosing context". We also don't have support or a
representation for a nested capture of an init-capture yet, which was intended
to work despite not being allowed by the current standard wording.
llvm-svn: 181985
C++1y, so stop adding the 'const' there. Provide a compatibility warning for
code relying on this in C++11, with a fix-it hint. Update our lazily-written
tests to add the const, except for those ones which were testing our
implementation of this rule.
llvm-svn: 179969
Richard Smith