instruction to an add scev, it's not safe to blindly transfer the
inbounds flag from a gep instruction to an nsw on the scev for the
gep.
llvm-svn: 107117
There are 2 changes relative to the previous version of the patch:
1) For the "simple" if-conversion case, there's no need to worry about
RemoveExtraEdges not handling an unanalyzable branch. Predicated terminators
are ignored in this context, so RemoveExtraEdges does the right thing.
This might break someday if we ever treat indirect branches (BRIND) as
predicable, but for now, I just removed this part of the patch, because
in the case where we do not add an unconditional branch, we rely on keeping
the fall-through edge to CvtBBI (which is empty after this transformation).
The change relative to the previous patch is:
@@ -1036,10 +1036,6 @@
IterIfcvt = false;
}
- // RemoveExtraEdges won't work if the block has an unanalyzable branch,
- // which is typically the case for IfConvertSimple, so explicitly remove
- // CvtBBI as a successor.
- BBI.BB->removeSuccessor(CvtBBI->BB);
RemoveExtraEdges(BBI);
// Update block info. BB can be iteratively if-converted.
2) My patch exposed a bug in the code for merging the tail of a "diamond",
which had previously never been exercised. The code was simply checking that
the tail had a single predecessor, but there was a case in
MultiSource/Benchmarks/VersaBench/dbms where that single predecessor was
neither edge of the diamond. I added the following change to check for
that:
@@ -1276,7 +1276,18 @@
// tail, add a unconditional branch to it.
if (TailBB) {
BBInfo TailBBI = BBAnalysis[TailBB->getNumber()];
- if (TailBB->pred_size() == 1 && !TailBBI.HasFallThrough) {
+ bool CanMergeTail = !TailBBI.HasFallThrough;
+ // There may still be a fall-through edge from BBI1 or BBI2 to TailBB;
+ // check if there are any other predecessors besides those.
+ unsigned NumPreds = TailBB->pred_size();
+ if (NumPreds > 1)
+ CanMergeTail = false;
+ else if (NumPreds == 1 && CanMergeTail) {
+ MachineBasicBlock::pred_iterator PI = TailBB->pred_begin();
+ if (*PI != BBI1->BB && *PI != BBI2->BB)
+ CanMergeTail = false;
+ }
+ if (CanMergeTail) {
MergeBlocks(BBI, TailBBI);
TailBBI.IsDone = true;
} else {
With these fixes, I was able to run all the SingleSource and MultiSource
tests successfully.
llvm-svn: 107110
have to be registers, per gcc documentation. This affects
the logic for determining what "g" should lower to. PR 7393.
A couple of existing testcases are affected.
llvm-svn: 107079
When an instruction has tied operands and physreg defines, we must take extra
care that the tied operands conflict with neither physreg defs nor uses.
The special treatment is given to inline asm and instructions with tied operands
/ early clobbers and physreg defines.
This fixes PR7509.
llvm-svn: 107043
(in both CallInst and InvokeInst)
also add a (short-lived) constant to CallInst, that names
the operand index of the first call argument. This is
strictly transitional and should not be used for new code.
llvm-svn: 107001
large integers, the first inserted value would always create
an 'or X, 0'. Even though this is trivially zapped by
instcombine, don't bother creating this pointless instruction.
llvm-svn: 106979
the returned value after the tail call if it differs from other return
values. The optimal thing to do would be to introduce a phi node for
the return value, but for the moment just fix the miscompile.
llvm-svn: 106947
if-conversion. The RemoveExtraEdges function doesn't work for blocks that
end with unanalyzable branches, so in those cases, the "extra" edges must
be explicitly removed. The CopyAndPredicateBlock and MergeBlocks methods
can also avoid copying successor edges due to branches that have already
been removed. The latter case is especially helpful when MergeBlocks is
called for handling "diamond" if-conversions, where otherwise you can end
up with some weird intermediate states in the CFG. Unfortunately I've
been unable to find cases where this cleanup actually makes a significant
difference in the code. There is one test where we manage to remove an
empty block at the end of a function. Radar 6911268.
llvm-svn: 106939
CopyFromReg nodes for aliasing registers (AX and AL). This confuses the fast
register allocator.
Instead of CopyFromReg(AL), use ExtractSubReg(CopyFromReg(AX), sub_8bit).
This fixes PR7312.
llvm-svn: 106934
introduced in r106343, but only showed up recently (with a particular compiler &
linker combination) because of the particular check, and because we have no
builtin checking for dereferencing the end of an array, which is truly
unfortunate.
llvm-svn: 106908
The VNInfo.kills vector was almost unused except for all the code keeping it
updated. The few places using it were easily rewritten to check for interval
ends instead.
The two new methods LiveInterval::killedAt and killedInRange are replacements.
This brings us down to 3 independent data structures tracking kills.
llvm-svn: 106905
SCEVUnknown values which are loop-variant, as LSR can't do anything
interesting with these values in any case. This fixes very slow compile
times on loops which have large numbers of such values.
llvm-svn: 106897
for an "i" constraint should get lowered; PR 6309. While
this argument was passed around a lot, this is the only
place it was used, so it goes away from a lot of other
places.
llvm-svn: 106893
are dead, not just the def of this register. I.e., a register could be dead, but
it's subreg isn't.
Testcase to follow with a subsequent patch.
llvm-svn: 106878
with the following instructions. This is done via trickery by considering the
instruction preceding the IT to be the hazard. Care must be taken to ensure
it's the first non-debug instruction, or the presence of debug info will
affect codegen.
Part of the continuing work for rdar://7797940, making ARM code-gen unaffected
by the presence of debug information.
llvm-svn: 106871
Jim Grosbach