This is a new form of expression of the form:
(expr op ... op expr)
where one of the exprs is a parameter pack. It expands into
(expr1 op (expr2onwards op ... op expr))
(and likewise if the pack is on the right). The non-pack operand can be
omitted; in that case, an empty pack gives a fallback value or an error,
depending on the operator.
llvm-svn: 221573
(for an integer too large for any signed type) from Warning to ExtWarn -- it's
ill-formed in C++11 and C99 onwards, and UB during translation in C89 and
C++98. Add diagnostic groups for two relevant diagnostics.
llvm-svn: 203974
* Explicitly say that we conform to the two N/A bullets that required no
compiler changes.
* Remove a library feature from our features list.
llvm-svn: 203964
attribute syntax. There's nothing generalized about this; it's one of
several first-class attribute syntaxes we support, all of which are
more-or-less equally general.
As discussed on cfe-commits, we may want to revisit this if we start allowing
this syntax as an extension in C (or if C adopts the syntax), but hopefully
this diagnostic wording will be crystal clear to everyone in the mean time.
llvm-svn: 199443
Use internal links to provide easier access to recent and ongoing work.
Also shift up the order of standards in the page title in order to avoid web
search results focusing on C++98 in the summary.
This is done to highlight the modern standards support in clang that was
previously languishing at the bottom of the page.
"C++98/03 is sooooo yesterday" - dgregor
llvm-svn: 196565
deallocation function (and the corresponding unsized deallocation function has
been declared), emit a weak discardable definition of the function that
forwards to the corresponding unsized deallocation.
This allows a C++ standard library implementation to provide both a sized and
an unsized deallocation function, where the unsized one does not just call the
sized one, for instance by putting both in the same object file within an
archive.
llvm-svn: 194055
tomorrow is complete.
There is a missing warning due to a serious issue with template
instantiation in Clang (and potentially in the core language).
llvm-svn: 191577
optimize, to follow the permissions granted in N3664. Under those rules, only
calls generated by new-expressions and delete-expressions are permitted to be
optimized, and direct calls to ::operator new and ::operator delete must be
treated as normal calls.
llvm-svn: 186799
- fix paper links to point to isocpp.org, where most of the papers are already up
- update "SVN" features to "Clang 3.3" to distinguish them from features which we
complete after the branch
- document use of -std=c++1y to enable c++1y support
llvm-svn: 181283
and mark "clarifying memory allocation" as done, since it turns out that our
optimizations here (such as they are) already conform to the new rules.
llvm-svn: 181110
Add a CXXDefaultInitExpr, analogous to CXXDefaultArgExpr, and use it both in
CXXCtorInitializers and in InitListExprs to represent a default initializer.
There's an additional complication here: because the default initializer can
refer to the initialized object via its 'this' pointer, we need to make sure
that 'this' points to the right thing within the evaluation.
llvm-svn: 179958
constructor. This isn't quite perfect (as usual, we don't handle default
arguments correctly yet, and we don't deal with copy/move constructors for
arguments correctly either, but this will be fixed when we implement core issue
1351.
This completes our support for inheriting constructors.
llvm-svn: 179154
implement correct functionality, even if it's not optimal. On this basis, mark
"data dependency ordering" as done. Add footnotes for cases where our
implementation is known to be suboptimal.
llvm-svn: 176891
* Mark attributes as done in SVN.
* Downgrade alignment support from 'Clang 3.0' to 'SVN', now that we actually implement the rules.
* Upgrade 'Dynamic initialization with concurrency' from 'No' to 'Clang 2.9' -- all that is required here is the ABI-mandated locking for the initialization of static locals.
llvm-svn: 175882
* Mark 'sequence points' as done now we have a warning for unsequenced operations
* Mark 'memory model' as done now we correctly model bitfield operations
llvm-svn: 173771
libraries have an incorrect definition of std::common_type (inherited from a
bug in the standard -- see LWG issue 2141), whereby they produce reference
types when they should not.
If we instantiate a typedef named std::common_type<...>::type, which is defined
in a system header as decltype(... ? ... : ...), and the decltype produces a
reference type, convert it to the non-reference type. (This doesn't affect any
LWG2141-conforming implementation of common_type, such as libc++'s, because the
default implementation of common_type<...>::type isn't supposed to produce a
reference type.)
This is horrible. I'm really sorry. :( Better ideas appreciated!
llvm-svn: 166455
we generate correct code for both strong and weak atomic compare-exchanges, even
though we don't propagate to the IR enough information to generate optimal weak
compare-exchanges on architectures which support them.
llvm-svn: 155161
implementations, mark the atomics-related parts of the C++11 status page
as done. I've not marked 'Strong Compare and Exchange' done, since although
we implement supporting builtins, we don't yet produce different code for
the weak and strong forms.
llvm-svn: 154644
between unscoped enumerations and class template member specializations,
whose behavior is currently under discussion in CWG (and for which there
is a preference to not implement the currently-standardized wording).
llvm-svn: 153464
scoped enumeration members. Later uses of an enumeration temploid as a nested
name specifier should cause its instantiation. Plus some groundwork for
explicit specialization of member enumerations of class templates.
llvm-svn: 152750
basic source character set in C++98. Add -Wc++98-compat diagnostics for same in
literals in C++11. Extend such support to cover string literals as well as
character literals, and mark N2170 as done.
This seems too minor to warrant a release note to me. Let me know if you disagree.
llvm-svn: 152444
agreed on IRC, any remaining issues are best dealt with as bugs.
We have no __has_feature check for this; please shout if you'd like one. This
feature seems too small to be worth its own release notes bullet (again, please
shout if you disagree).
llvm-svn: 151380
As far as I know, this implementation is complete but might be missing a
few optimizations. Exceptions and virtual bases are handled correctly.
Because I'm an optimist, the web page has appropriately been updated. If
I'm wrong, feel free to downgrade its support categories.
llvm-svn: 130642
template<typename T> auto f(T a) -> decltype(a.foo());
Since this is the primary reason for the introduction of this feature, downgrade implementation status to "Some examples work".
llvm-svn: 129533
Turn on the __has_feature switch for variadic templates, document
their completion, and put the ExtWarn into the c++0x-extensions
warning group.
llvm-svn: 123854
explicit-instantiation-declaration-after-explicit-instantiation-definition
errors. This wraps up explicit template instantiation for now.
llvm-svn: 85347
Richard Smith