See r331124 for how I made a list of files missing the include.
I then ran this Python script:
for f in open('filelist.txt'):
f = f.strip()
fl = open(f).readlines()
found = False
for i in xrange(len(fl)):
p = '#include "llvm/'
if not fl[i].startswith(p):
continue
if fl[i][len(p):] > 'Config':
fl.insert(i, '#include "llvm/Config/llvm-config.h"\n')
found = True
break
if not found:
print 'not found', f
else:
open(f, 'w').write(''.join(fl))
and then looked through everything with `svn diff | diffstat -l | xargs -n 1000 gvim -p`
and tried to fix include ordering and whatnot.
No intended behavior change.
llvm-svn: 331184
Extend the ConstantRange implementation to compute the range of possible values resulting from an arithmetic right shift operation.
There will be a follow up patch to leverage this constant range infrastructure in LazyValueInfo.
Patch by Surya Kumari Jangala!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40881
llvm-svn: 320976
Previously ConstantRange::makeGuaranteedNoWrapRegion only handled addition. This adds support for subtraction.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40036
llvm-svn: 319806
Summary:
Add LLVM_FORCE_ENABLE_DUMP cmake option, and use it along with
LLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS to set LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP.
Remove NDEBUG and only use LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP to enable dump methods.
Move definition of LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP from config.h to llvm-config.h so
it'll be picked up by public headers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38406
llvm-svn: 315590
Summary: As far as I can tell we should be able to implement these almost the same way we do unsigned, but using signed comparisons and checks for min signed value instead of min unsigned value.
Reviewers: pete, davide, sanjoy
Reviewed By: davide
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33815
llvm-svn: 305607
I did this a long time ago with a janky python script, but now
clang-format has built-in support for this. I fed clang-format every
line with a #include and let it re-sort things according to the precise
LLVM rules for include ordering baked into clang-format these days.
I've reverted a number of files where the results of sorting includes
isn't healthy. Either places where we have legacy code relying on
particular include ordering (where possible, I'll fix these separately)
or where we have particular formatting around #include lines that
I didn't want to disturb in this patch.
This patch is *entirely* mechanical. If you get merge conflicts or
anything, just ignore the changes in this patch and run clang-format
over your #include lines in the files.
Sorry for any noise here, but it is important to keep these things
stable. I was seeing an increasing number of patches with irrelevant
re-ordering of #include lines because clang-format was used. This patch
at least isolates that churn, makes it easy to skip when resolving
conflicts, and gets us to a clean baseline (again).
llvm-svn: 304787
Truncate currently uses a udivrem call which is going to be slow particularly for larger than 64-bit widths.
As far as I can tell all we were trying to do was modulo LowerDiv by (MaxValue+1) and make sure whatever value was effectively subtracted from LowerDiv was also subtracted from UpperDiv.
This patch recognizes that MaxValue+1 is a power of 2 so we can just use a bitwise AND to accomplish a modulo operation or isolate the upper bits.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32672
llvm-svn: 304733
r271020 added an early out to skip the signed multiply portion of ConstantRange::multiply. The comment says we don't need to do signed multiply if the range is only positive numbers, but the implemented check only ensures that the start of the range is positive. It doesn't look at the end of the range.
This patch checks the end of the range instead. Because Upper is one more than the end we have to see if its positive or if its one past the last positive number.
llvm-svn: 302717
Previously SimplifyCFG used getSetSize which returns an APInt that is 1 bit wider than the ConstantRange's bit width. In the reasonably common case that the ConstantRange is 64-bits wide, this requires returning a 65-bit APInt. APInt's can only store 64-bits without a memory allocation so this is inefficient.
The new method takes the 8 as an input and tells if the range contains more than that many elements without requiring any wider math.
llvm-svn: 302385
We were default constructing the Lower/Upper APInts. Then creating min or max value, then doing a move assignment to Lower and copy assignment to upper. The copy assignment operator in particular has an out of line function call that has to examine whether or not a previous allocation exists that can be reused which of course it can't in this case.
The new code creates the min/max value first, move constructs Lower from it then copy constructs Upper from Lower.
This also seems to have convinced a self host build that this constructor can be inlined more readily into other methods in ConstantRange.
llvm-svn: 301736
We were creating an APInt at the top of these methods that isn't always returned. For ranges wider than 64-bits this results in an allocation and deallocation when its not used.
In getSignedMax we were creating Upper-1 to use in a compare and then creating it again for a return value. The compiler is unable to determine that these can be shared. So help it out and create the Upper-1 in a temporary that can be reused.
This provides a little compile time improvement.
llvm-svn: 300621
This typedef used to be conditional based on whether rvalue references were supported. Looks like it got left behind when we switched to always having rvalue references with c++11. I don't think it provides any value now.
llvm-svn: 300146
Summary:
ConstantRange class currently has a method getSetSize, which is mostly used to
compare set sizes of two constant ranges (there is only one spot where it's used
in a slightly different scenario). This patch introduces setSizeSmallerThanOf
method, which does such comparison in a more efficient way. In the original
method we have to extend our types to (BitWidth+1), which can result it using
slow case of APInt, extra memory allocations, etc.
The change is supposed to not change any functionality, but it slightly improves
compile time. Here is compile time improvements that I observed on CTMark:
* tramp3d-v4 -2.02%
* pairlocalalign -1.82%
* lencod -1.67%
Reviewers: sanjoy, atrick, pete
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31104
llvm-svn: 298236
We had various variants of defining dump() functions in LLVM. Normalize
them (this should just consistently implement the things discussed in
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2014-January/034323.html
For reference:
- Public headers should just declare the dump() method but not use
LLVM_DUMP_METHOD or #if !defined(NDEBUG) || defined(LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP)
- The definition of a dump method should look like this:
#if !defined(NDEBUG) || defined(LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP)
LLVM_DUMP_METHOD void MyClass::dump() {
// print stuff to dbgs()...
}
#endif
llvm-svn: 293359
This just extracts out the transfer rules for constant ranges into a single shared point. As it happens, neither bit of code actually overlaps in terms of the handled operators, but with this change that could easily be tweaked in the future.
I also want to have this separated out to make experimenting with a eager value info implementation and possibly a ValueTracking-like fixed depth recursion peephole version. There's no reason all four of these can't share a common implementation which reduces the chances of bugs.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27294
llvm-svn: 288413
This change teaches getEquivalentICmp to be smarter about generating
ICMP_NE and ICMP_EQ predicates.
An earlier version of this change was landed as rL283057 which had a
use-after-free bug. This new version has a fix for that bug, and a (C++
unittests/) test case that would have triggered it rL283057.
llvm-svn: 283078
They've broken the sanitizer-bootstrap bots. Reverting while I investigate.
Original commit messages:
r283057: "[ConstantRange] Make getEquivalentICmp smarter"
r283058: "[SCEV] Rely on ConstantRange instead of custom logic; NFCI"
llvm-svn: 283062
r231483 taught ConstantRange::multiply to be clever about signed vs unsigned ranges. For example, an unsigned range could be full-set while the signed range is more specific than that.
In looking at the allocations trace for LTO'ing verify-uselistorder (see r236629 for details), millions of allocations are from APInt, many of which come from ConstantRange's.
This change tries to avoid some (3.2 million) allocations by returning the unsigned range if its suitable. The checks here are that it should not be a wrapping range, and should be positive. That should be enough to check for ranges such as [1, 10) which the signed range will be equal to, if we were to calculate it.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20723
Reviewed by James Molloy
llvm-svn: 271020
This reapplies commit r268521, that was reverted in r268530 due to a test failure in select-implied.ll
Modified the test case to reflect the new change.
llvm-svn: 268557
Rename makeNoWrapRegion to a more obvious makeGuaranteedNoWrapRegion,
and add a comment about the counter-intuitive aspects of the function.
This is to help prevent cases like PR26628.
llvm-svn: 261532
Summary: This will be used in a future change to ScalarEvolution.
Reviewers: hfinkel, reames, nlewycky
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13612
llvm-svn: 250975
Summary:
This change splits `makeICmpRegion` into `makeAllowedICmpRegion` and
`makeSatisfyingICmpRegion` with slightly different contracts. The first
one is useful for determining what values some expression //may// take,
given that a certain `icmp` evaluates to true. The second one is useful
for determining what values are guaranteed to //satisfy// a given
`icmp`.
Reviewers: nlewycky
Reviewed By: nlewycky
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8345
llvm-svn: 232575
Multiplication is not dependent on signedness, so just treating
all input ranges as unsigned is not incorrect. However it will cause
overly pessimistic ranges (such as full-set) when used with signed
negative values.
Teach multiply to try to interpret its inputs as both signed and
unsigned, and then to take the most specific (smallest population)
as its result.
llvm-svn: 231483
Nico Weber