Currently adding attribute no_sanitize("bounds") isn't disabling
-fsanitize=local-bounds (also enabled in -fsanitize=bounds). The Clang
frontend handles fsanitize=array-bounds which can already be disabled by
no_sanitize("bounds"). However, instrumentation added by the
BoundsChecking pass in the middle-end cannot be disabled by the
attribute.
The fix is very similar to D102772 that added the ability to selectively
disable sanitizer pass on certain functions.
In this patch, if no_sanitize("bounds") is provided, an additional
function attribute (NoSanitizeBounds) is attached to IR to let the
BoundsChecking pass know we want to disable local-bounds checking. In
order to support this feature, the IR is extended (similar to D102772)
to make Clang able to preserve the information and let BoundsChecking
pass know bounds checking is disabled for certain function.
Reviewed By: melver
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119816
A significant number of our tests in C accidentally use functions
without prototypes. This patch converts the function signatures to have
a prototype for the situations where the test is not specific to K&R C
declarations. e.g.,
void func();
becomes
void func(void);
This is the tenth batch of tests being updated (there are a
significant number of other tests left to be updated).
Sometimes people get minimal crash reports after a UBSAN incident. This change
tags each trap with an integer representing the kind of failure encountered,
which can aid in tracking down the root cause of the problem.
Not much interesting here. Mostly wiring things together.
One thing worth noting is that the approach is substantially different
from the old PM. Here, the -O0 case works fundamentally differently in
that we just directly build the pipeline without any callbacks or other
cruft. In some ways, this is nice and clean. However, I don't like that
it causes the sanitizers to be enabled with different changes at
different times. =/ Suggestions for a better way to do this are welcome.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39085
llvm-svn: 318131
This flag controls whether a given sanitizer traps upon detecting
an error. It currently only supports UBSan. The existing flag
-fsanitize-undefined-trap-on-error has been made an alias of
-fsanitize-trap=undefined.
This change also cleans up some awkward behavior around the combination
of -fsanitize-trap=undefined and -fsanitize=undefined. Previously we
would reject command lines containing the combination of these two flags,
as -fsanitize=vptr is not compatible with trapping. This required the
creation of -fsanitize=undefined-trap, which excluded -fsanitize=vptr
(and -fsanitize=function, but this seems like an oversight).
Now, -fsanitize=undefined is an alias for -fsanitize=undefined-trap,
and if -fsanitize-trap=undefined is specified, we treat -fsanitize=vptr
as an "unsupported" flag, which means that we error out if the flag is
specified explicitly, but implicitly disable it if the flag was implied
by -fsanitize=undefined.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10464
llvm-svn: 240105
check using the ubsan runtime) and -fsanitize=local-bounds (for the middle-end
check which inserts traps).
Remove -fsanitize=local-bounds from -fsanitize=undefined. It does not produce
useful diagnostics and has false positives (PR17635), and is not a good
compromise position between UBSan's checks and ASan's checks.
Map -fbounds-checking to -fsanitize=local-bounds to restore Clang's historical
behavior for that flag.
llvm-svn: 193205
Tong Zhang