template arguments. I believe that this is the last place in the AST
where we were storing a source range for a nested-name-specifier
rather than a proper nested-name-specifier location structure. (Yay!)
There is still a lot of cleanup to do in the TreeTransform, which
doesn't take advantage of nested-name-specifiers with source-location
information everywhere it could.
llvm-svn: 126844
template specialization types. This also required some parser tweaks,
since we were losing track of the nested-name-specifier's source
location information in several places in the parser. Other notable
changes this required:
- Sema::ActOnTagTemplateIdType now type-checks and forms the
appropriate type nodes (+ source-location information) for an
elaborated-type-specifier ending in a template-id. Previously, we
used a combination of ActOnTemplateIdType and
ActOnTagTemplateIdType that resulted in an ElaboratedType wrapped
around a DependentTemplateSpecializationType, which duplicated the
keyword ("class", "struct", etc.) and nested-name-specifier
storage.
- Sema::ActOnTemplateIdType now gets a nested-name-specifier, which
it places into the returned type-source location information.
- Sema::ActOnDependentTag now creates types with source-location
information.
llvm-svn: 126808
template specialization types. There are still a few rough edges to
clean up with some of the parser actions dropping
nested-name-specifiers too early.
llvm-svn: 126776
nested-name-speciciers within elaborated type names, e.g.,
enum clang::NestedNameSpecifier::SpecifierKind
Fixes in this iteration include:
(1) Compute the type-source range properly for a dependent template
specialization type that starts with "template template-id ::", as
in a member access expression
dep->template f<T>::f()
This is a latent bug I triggered with this change (because now we're
checking the computed source ranges for dependent template
specialization types). But the real problem was...
(2) Make sure to set the qualifier range on a dependent template
specialization type appropriately. This will go away once we push
nested-name-specifier locations into dependent template
specialization types, but it was the source of the
valgrind errors on the buildbots.
llvm-svn: 126765
a dependent template name rather than (indirectly and incorrectly)
trying to determine whether we can compute a context for the
nested-name-specifier. Fixes a GCC testsuite regression,
<rdar://problem/9068589>.
llvm-svn: 126749
information for qualifier type names throughout the parser to address
several problems.
The commit message from r126737:
Push nested-name-specifier source location information into elaborated
name types, e.g., "enum clang::NestedNameSpecifier::SpecifierKind".
Aside from the normal changes, this also required some tweaks to the
parser. Essentially, when we're looking at a type name (via
getTypeName()) specifically for the purpose of creating an annotation
token, we pass down the flag that asks for full type-source location
information to be stored within the returned type. That way, we retain
source-location information involving nested-name-specifiers rather
than trying to reconstruct that information later, long after it's
been lost in the parser.
With this change, test/Index/recursive-cxx-member-calls.cpp is showing
much improved results again, since that code has lots of
nested-name-specifiers.
llvm-svn: 126748
name types, e.g., "enum clang::NestedNameSpecifier::SpecifierKind".
Aside from the normal changes, this also required some tweaks to the
parser. Essentially, when we're looking at a type name (via
getTypeName()) specifically for the purpose of creating an annotation
token, we pass down the flag that asks for full type-source location
information to be stored within the returned type. That way, we retain
source-location information involving nested-name-specifiers rather
than trying to reconstruct that information later, long after it's
been lost in the parser.
With this change, test/Index/recursive-cxx-member-calls.cpp is showing
much improved results again, since that code has lots of
nested-name-specifiers.
llvm-svn: 126737
DependentNameTypeLoc. Teach the recursive AST visitor and libclang how to
walk DependentNameTypeLoc nodes.
Also, teach libclang about TypedefDecl source ranges, so that we get
those. The massive churn in test/Index/recursive-cxx-member-calls.cpp
is a good thing: we're annotating a lot more of this test correctly
now.
llvm-svn: 126729
source-location information. We don't actually preserve this
information in any of the resulting TypeLocs (yet), so it doesn't
matter.
llvm-svn: 126693
UnresolvedLookupExpr and UnresolvedMemberExpr.
Also, improve the computation that checks whether the base of a member
expression (either unresolved or dependent-scoped) is implicit. The
previous check didn't cover all of the cases we use in our
representation, which threw off source-location information for these
expressions (which, in turn, caused some breakage in libclang's token
annotation).
llvm-svn: 126681
CXXDependentScopeMemberExpr, and clean up instantiation of
nested-name-specifiers with dependent template specialization types in
the process.
llvm-svn: 126663
dependent template names. There is still a lot of redundant code in
TreeTransform to cope with TemplateSpecializationTypes, which I'll
remove in stages.
llvm-svn: 126656
specifiers such as
typename T::template apply<U>
Previously, we would turn T::template apply<U> into a
TemplateSpecializationType. Then, we'd reprocess that
TemplateSpecializationType and turn it into either a
TemplateSpecializationType wrapped in an ElaboratedType (when we could
resolve "apply" to a template declaration) or a
DependentTemplateSpecializationType. We now produce the same ASTs but
without generating the intermediate TemplateSpecializationType.
The end goal here is to avoid generating TemplateSpecializationTypes
with dependent template-names, ever. We're not there yet.
llvm-svn: 126589
UnresolvedUsingValueDecl to use NestedNameSpecifierLoc rather than the
extremely-lossy NestedNameSpecifier/SourceRange pair it used to use,
improving source-location information.
Various infrastructure updates to support NestedNameSpecifierLoc:
- AST/PCH (de-)serialization
- Recursive AST visitor
- libclang traversal (including the first tests of this
functionality)
llvm-svn: 126459
nested-name-specifiers throughout the parser, and provide a new class
(NestedNameSpecifierLoc) that contains a nested-name-specifier along
with its type-source information.
Right now, this information is completely useless, because we don't
actually store the source-location information anywhere in the
AST. Call this Step 1/N.
llvm-svn: 126391
way it keeps track of namespaces. Previously, we would map from the
namespace alias to its underlying namespace when building a
nested-name-specifier, losing source information in the process.
llvm-svn: 126358
includes explicitly-specified template arguments) to a function
template specialization in cases where no deduction is performed or
deduction fails. Patch by Faisal Vali, fixes PR7505!
llvm-svn: 126048
enumeration type, we were generating an integer literal implicitly
casted to the appropriate enumeration type. However, later checks on
that expression would strip the implicit cast.
This commit tweaks the lame hack, by creating an explicit cast instead
of an implicit cast. The right answer is to introduce a
SubstNonTypeTemplateParmExpr expression that acts like the substituted
result. I'll investigate that soon.
llvm-svn: 125818
it's okay for the following template parameters to not have default
arguments (since those template parameters can still be
deduced). Also, downgrade the error about default template arguments
in function templates to an extension warning, since this is a
harmless C++0x extension.
llvm-svn: 124855
argument but doesn't (because previous template parameters had default
arguments), clear out all of the default arguments so that we maintain
the invariant that a template parameter has a default argument only if
subsequence template parameters also have default arguments.
Fixes a crash-on-invalid <rdar://problem/8913649>.
llvm-svn: 124345
derived-to-base cast that also casts away constness (one of the cases
for static_cast followed by const_cast) would be treated as a bit-cast
rather than a derived-to-base class, causing miscompiles and
heartburn.
Fixes <rdar://problem/8913298>.
llvm-svn: 124340
generate meaningful [*] template argument location information.
[*] Well, as meaningful as possible, given that this entire code path
is a hack for when we've lost type-source information.
llvm-svn: 124211
implementation used by overload resolution to support rvalue
references. The original commits caused PR9026 and some
hard-to-reproduce self-host breakage.
The only (crucial!) difference between this commit and the previous
commits is that we now properly check the SuppressUserConversions flag
before attempting to perform a second user-defined conversion in
reference binding, breaking the infinite recursion chain of
user-defined conversions.
Rvalue references should be working a bit better now.
llvm-svn: 124121
resolution to match the latest C++0x working paper's semantics. The
implementation now matching up with the reference-binding
implementation used for initialization.
llvm-svn: 123977
a pack expansion, e.g., the parameter pack Values in:
template<typename ...Types>
struct Outer {
template<Types ...Values>
struct Inner;
};
This new implementation approach introduces the notion of an
"expanded" non-type template parameter pack, for which we have already
expanded the types of the parameter pack (to, say, "int*, float*",
for Outer<int*, float*>) but have not yet expanded the values. Aside
from creating these expanded non-type template parameter packs, this
patch updates template argument checking and non-type template
parameter pack instantiation to make use of the appropriate types in
the parameter pack.
llvm-svn: 123845
involve template parameter packs at multiple template levels that
occur within the signatures members of class templates (and partial
specializations thereof). This is a work-in-progress that is deficient
in several ways, notably:
- It only works for template type parameter packs, but we need to
also support non-type template parameter packs and template template
parameter packs.
- It doesn't keep track of the lengths of the substituted argument
packs in the expansion, so it can't properly diagnose length
mismatches.
However, this is a concrete step in the right direction.
llvm-svn: 123425
when we're actually matching a template template argument to a
template template parameter. Otherwise, use strict matching.
Fixes <rdar://problem/8859985> clang++: variadics and out-of-line definitions.
llvm-svn: 123385
matching of variadic template template parameters to template
arguments. This paragraph was the subject of ISO C++ committee
document N2555: Extending Variadic Template Template Parameters.
llvm-svn: 123348
number of explicit call arguments. This actually fixes an erroneous
test for [temp.deduct.partial]p11, where we were considering
parameters corresponding to arguments beyond those that were
explicitly provided.
llvm-svn: 123244
allows an argument pack determines via explicit specification of
function template arguments to be extended by further, deduced
arguments. For example:
template<class ... Types> void f(Types ... values);
void g() {
f<int*, float*>(0, 0, 0); // Types is deduced to the sequence int*, float*, int
}
There are a number of FIXMEs in here that indicate places where we
need to implement + test retained expansions, plus a number of other
places in deduction where we need to correctly cope with the
explicitly-specified arguments when deducing an argument
pack. Furthermore, it appears that the RecursiveASTVisitor needs to be
auditied; it's missing some traversals (especially w.r.t. template
arguments) that cause it not to find unexpanded parameter packs when
it should.
The good news, however, is that the tr1::tuple implementation now
works fully, and the tr1::bind example (both from N2080) is actually
working now.
llvm-svn: 123163
expansions with something that is easier to use correctly: a new
template argment kind, rather than a bit on an existing kind. Update
all of the switch statements that deal with template arguments, fixing
a few latent bugs in the process. I"m happy with this representation,
now.
And, oh look! Template instantiation and deduction work for template
template argument pack expansions.
llvm-svn: 122896
Douglas Gregor