We may not have the mangling for static locals vs. enums completely figured out,
but at least for my simple test cases, enums should not increment the mangling
number.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4164
llvm-svn: 211078
Initializers of global data that can appear multiple TUs (static data
members of class templates or __declspec(selectany) data) are now in a
comdat group keyed on the global variable being initialized. On
non-Windows platforms, this is a code size and startup time
optimization. On Windows, this is necessary for ABI compatibility with
MSVC.
Fixes PR16959.
Reviewers: rsmith
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3811
llvm-svn: 209555
This makes it easier to see where a global ctor comes from, and it also makes
ASan's init order analyzer output easier to understand. gcc does this too,
but only in -fPIC mode for some reason. Don't do this for constructors with
explicit init priority.
Also prepend "sub_" before the 'I', that way regular constructors stay
lexicographically after symbols with init priority (because
ord('s') > ord('I')). gold seems to ignore the name of constructor symbols,
and ld only looks at the symbol if it includes an init priority, which this
patch doesn't change.
Before: __GLOBAL_I_a
Now: __GLOBAL_sub_I_myfile.cc
llvm-svn: 208128
We were using the same guard variable and failing to initialize the
second global.
Clang is still not MS ABI compatible in this area. Fixing that is
PR16959, which will require LLVM changes to @llvm.global_ctors.
llvm-svn: 207008
If a guard variable will be created for an entity at global scope,
then we cannot rely on the scope depth to disambiguate names for us.
Instead, mangle the entire variable into the guard to ensure it's uniqueness.
llvm-svn: 203151
Initializers and finalizers for static data members have the variable's
access-specifier, storage-class, type and CV-qualifiers mangled in.
llvm-svn: 203145
Summary:
The MSVC ABI appears to mangle the lexical scope into the names of
statics. Specifically, a counter is incremented whenever a scope is
entered where things can be declared in such a way that an ambiguity can
arise. For example, a class scope inside of a class scope doesn't do
anything interesting because the nested class cannot collide with
another nested class.
There are problems with this scheme:
- It is unreliable. The counter is only incremented when a previously
never encountered scope is entered. There are cases where this will
cause ambiguity amongst declarations that have the same name where one
was introduced in a deep scope while the other was introduced right
after in the previous lexical scope.
- It is wasteful. Statements like: {{{{{{{ static int foo = a; }}}}}}}
will make the mangling of "foo" larger than it need be because the
scope counter has been incremented many times.
Because of these problems, and practical implementation concerns. We
choose not to implement this scheme if the local static or local type
isn't visible. The mangling of these declarations will look very
similar but the numbering will make far more sense, this scheme is
lifted from the Itanium ABI implementation.
Reviewers: rsmith, doug.gregor, rnk, eli.friedman, cdavis5x
Reviewed By: rnk
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2953
llvm-svn: 202951
This makes the C++ ABI depend entirely on the target: MS ABI for -win32 triples,
Itanium otherwise. It's no longer possible to do weird combinations.
To be able to run a test with a specific ABI without constraining it to a
specific triple, new substitutions are added to lit: %itanium_abi_triple and
%ms_abi_triple can be used to get the current target triple adjusted to the
desired ABI. For example, if the test suite is running with the i686-pc-win32
target, %itanium_abi_triple will expand to i686-pc-mingw32.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2545
llvm-svn: 199250
clang-cl adds these, so this makes the tests a bit more realistic. These are the
tests where it would make a difference if the windows specific handling were
removed.
llvm-svn: 194336
Static locals requiring initialization are not thread safe on Windows.
Unfortunately, it's possible to create static locals that are actually
externally visible with inline functions and templates. As a result, we
have to implement an initialization guard scheme that is compatible with
TUs built by MSVC, which makes thread safety prohibitively difficult.
MSVC's scheme is that every function that requires a guard gets an i32
bitfield. Each static local is assigned a bit that indicates if it has
been initialized, up to 32 bits, at which point a new bitfield is
created. MSVC rejects inline functions with more than 32 static locals,
and the externally visible mangling (?_B) only allows for one guard
variable per function.
On Eli's recommendation, I used MangleNumberingContext to track which
bit each static corresponds to.
Implements PR16888.
Reviewers: rjmccall, eli.friedman
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1416
llvm-svn: 190427
Summary:
These typically come from static data members of class template
specializations. This accomplishes two things:
1. May expose GlobalOpt optimizations for Itanium C++ ABI code.
2. Works toward fixing double initialization in the Microsoft C++ ABI.
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1475
llvm-svn: 189051
and only consider using __cxa_atexit in the Itanium logic. The
default logic is to use atexit().
Emit "guarded" initializers in Microsoft mode unconditionally.
This is definitely not correct, but it's closer to correct than
just not emitting the initializer.
Based on a patch by Timur Iskhodzhanov!
llvm-svn: 155894
Hans Wennborg