This clarifies the difference between test for exception support in
libc++abi tests and support for exceptions built into libc++abi.
This also removes the rather confusing similarity between the
_LIBCXXABI_NO_EXCEPTIONS and LIBCXXABI_HAS_NO_EXCEPTIONS macros.
Finally, TEST_HAS_NO_EXCEPTIONS is also detected automatically based
on -fno-exceptions, so it doesn't have to be specified explicitly
through Lit's compile_flags.
C++98 and C++03 are effectively aliases as far as Clang is concerned.
As such, allowing both std=c++98 and std=c++03 as Lit parameters is
just slightly confusing, but provides no value. It's similar to allowing
both std=c++17 and std=c++1z, which we don't do.
This was discovered because we had an internal bot that ran the test
suite under both c++98 AND c++03 -- one of which is redundant.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80926
to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351648
Currently there is only support for a -fno-exceptions libc++ build. This is
problematic for functions such as std::terminate() which are defined in
libc++abi and using any of those functions throws away most of the benefits
of using -fno-exceptions (code-size). This patch introduces a -fno-exceptions
libc++abi build to address this issue.
This new variant of libc++abi cannot be linked against any with-exceptions
code as some symbols necessary for handling exceptions are missing in this
library.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20677
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists, bcraig
llvm-svn: 271267