Now that we've moved to C++14, we no longer need the llvm::make_unique
implementation from STLExtras.h. This patch is a mechanical replacement
of (hopefully) all the llvm::make_unique instances across the monorepo.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66259
llvm-svn: 368936
lld currently selects the relocation model automatically depending on
the link flags specified, but in some cases it'd be useful to allow
explicitly overriding the relocation model using a flag.
llvm-svn: 366644
This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote
using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the
source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual
post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against
lld's code base.
Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style:
https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html
In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable
naming scheme change, and this patch does that.
I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that
is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter.
Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld
repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts
because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But
there's a remedy.
clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your
downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to
a commit after the mass renaming:
1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming,
2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and
3. rebase again to the head.
Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and
for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and
disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by
hand, but that shouldn't be too many.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121
llvm-svn: 365595
Use -fsave-optimization-record=<format> to specify a different format
than the default, which is YAML.
For now, only YAML is supported.
llvm-svn: 363573
This is a mechanical rewrite of replaceSymbol(A, B) to A->replace(B).
I also added a comment to Symbol::replace().
Technically this change is not necessary, but this change makes code a
bit more concise.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62117
llvm-svn: 361123
This is the last patch of the series of patches to make it possible to
resolve symbols without asking SymbolTable to do so.
The main point of this patch is the introduction of
`elf::resolveSymbol(Symbol *Old, Symbol *New)`. That function resolves
or merges given symbols by examining symbol types and call
replaceSymbol (which memcpy's New to Old) if necessary.
With the new function, we have now separated symbol resolution from
symbol lookup. If you already have a Symbol pointer, you can directly
resolve the symbol without asking SymbolTable to do that.
Now that the nice abstraction become available, I can start working on
performance improvement of the linker. As a starter, I'm thinking of
making --{start,end}-lib faster.
--{start,end}-lib is currently unnecessarily slow because it looks up
the symbol table twice for each symbol.
- The first hash table lookup/insertion occurs when we instantiate a
LazyObject file to insert LazyObject symbols.
- The second hash table lookup/insertion occurs when we create an
ObjFile from LazyObject file. That overwrites LazyObject symbols
with Defined symbols.
I think it is not too hard to see how we can now eliminate the second
hash table lookup. We can keep LazyObject symbols in Step 1, and then
call elf::resolveSymbol() to do Step 2.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61898
llvm-svn: 360975
SymbolTable's add-family functions have lots of parameters because
when they have to create a new symbol, they forward given arguments
to Symbol's constructors. Therefore, the functions take at least as
many arguments as their corresponding constructors.
This patch simplifies the add-family functions. Now, the functions
take a symbol instead of arguments to construct a symbol. If there's
no existing symbol, a given symbol is memcpy'ed to the symbol table.
Otherwise, the functions attempt to merge the existing and a given
new symbol.
I also eliminated `CanOmitFromDynSym` parameter, so that the functions
take really one argument.
Symbol classes are trivially constructible, so looks like constructing
them to pass to add-family functions is as cheap as passing a lot of
arguments to the functions. A quick benchmark showed that this patch
seems performance-neutral.
This is a preparation for
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-April/131902.html
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61855
llvm-svn: 360838
It makes the --plugin-opt=obj-path= and --plugin-opt=thinlto-index-only=
behavior more consistent - the files will be created in the
BitcodeFiles.empty() case, but I assume whether it behaves this way is
not required by anyone.
LTOObj->run() cannot run with empty BitcodeFiles. There would be an error:
ld.lld: error: No available targets are compatible with triple ""
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61635
llvm-svn: 360129
Summary:
The gold plugin behavior (creating empty index files for lazy bitcode
files) was added in D46034, but it missed the case when there is no
non-lazy bitcode files, e.g.
ld.lld -shared crti.o crtbeginS.o --start-lib bitcode.o --end-lib ...
crti.o crtbeginS.o are not bitcode, but our distributed build system
wants bitcode.o.thinlto.bc to confirm all expected outputs are created
based on all of the modules provided to the linker.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61420
llvm-svn: 359788
Currently we have -Rpass for filtering the remarks that are displayed as
diagnostics, but when using -fsave-optimization-record, there is no way
to filter the remarks while generating them.
This adds support for filtering remarks by passes using a regex.
Ex: `clang -fsave-optimization-record -foptimization-record-passes=inline`
will only emit the remarks coming from the pass `inline`.
This adds:
* `-fsave-optimization-record` to the driver
* `-opt-record-passes` to cc1
* `-lto-pass-remarks-filter` to the LTOCodeGenerator
* `--opt-remarks-passes` to lld
* `-pass-remarks-filter` to llc, opt, llvm-lto, llvm-lto2
* `-opt-remarks-passes` to gold-plugin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59268
Original llvm-svn: 355964
llvm-svn: 355984
Currently we have -Rpass for filtering the remarks that are displayed as
diagnostics, but when using -fsave-optimization-record, there is no way
to filter the remarks while generating them.
This adds support for filtering remarks by passes using a regex.
Ex: `clang -fsave-optimization-record -foptimization-record-passes=inline`
will only emit the remarks coming from the pass `inline`.
This adds:
* `-fsave-optimization-record` to the driver
* `-opt-record-passes` to cc1
* `-lto-pass-remarks-filter` to the LTOCodeGenerator
* `--opt-remarks-passes` to lld
* `-pass-remarks-filter` to llc, opt, llvm-lto, llvm-lto2
* `-opt-remarks-passes` to gold-plugin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59268
llvm-svn: 355964
Summary:
The gold linker allowed you to output the ELF files after LTO was run. It did
it by using the 'obj-path' option. This replicates that behavior.
Reviewers: espindola, ruiu, MaskRay, pcc
Reviewed By: MaskRay, pcc
Subscribers: grimar, emaste, inglorion, arichardson, steven_wu, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56046
llvm-svn: 354917
Previously we were never setting this which means it was always being
set to Default (-O2/-Os).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57422
llvm-svn: 352667
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
`--plugin-opt=emit-llvm` is an option for LTO. It makes the linker to
combine all bitcode files and write the result to an output file without
doing codegen. Gold LTO plugin has this option.
This option is being used for some post-link code analysis tools that
have to see a whole program but don't need to see them in the native
machine code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55717
llvm-svn: 349198
Summary:
This adds support to option -plugin-opt=dwo_dir=${DIR}. This option is used to specify the directory to store the .dwo files when LTO and debug fission is used
at the same time.
Reviewers: ruiu, espindola, pcc
Reviewed By: pcc
Subscribers: eraman, dexonsmith, mehdi_amini, emaste, arichardson, steven_wu, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47904
llvm-svn: 337195
I think code is dead, because the only way to see
Path as empty seems would be if replaceThinLTOSuffix()
replaced some prefix with empty prefix (making the result
Path empty).
But it is impossible to pass the empty prefix,
we would file in driver:
https://github.com/llvm-mirror/lld/blob/master/ELF/Driver.cpp#L669
llvm-svn: 336338
- Move some common code into Common/rrorHandler.cpp and
Common/Strings.h.
- Don't use `fatal` when incompatible bitcode files are
encountered.
- Rename NameRef variable to just Name
See D47162
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47206
llvm-svn: 333021
Instead of writing empty index for file, this patch tracks the state of files in ObjectToIndexFileState. If the files are not indexed , only then we emit the empty files
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46480
llvm-svn: 331803
Previously, code to initialize Backend and code to initialize Conf are
intermingled in init(), though they don't depend on each other.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46554
llvm-svn: 331698
Our promise is that as long as there's no fatal error (i.e. broken
file is given to the linker), our main function returns to the caller.
So we can't use exit() in the regular code path.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46442
llvm-svn: 331690
Jonas Devlieghere